test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Re: 4-year annviersary ships - The Dyson Science Destroyers

145791016

Comments

  • kyuzos7kyuzos7 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
  • lucho80lucho80 Member Posts: 6,600 Bug Hunter
    edited January 2014
    All my captains, must.... have.... that.... ship.....
  • captainrevo1captainrevo1 Member Posts: 3,948 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    So it's official they are real.
  • kyuzos7kyuzos7 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    tier 5 dyson voyager? thats what the fed one looks like.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kantazo1kantazo1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    Love those ship designs.
    Seek and ye shall find. Yeshua
  • kyuzos7kyuzos7 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    im slightly sad.

    they're 9 slot ships?

    the romulan one is a 4/3 with 9 consoles...
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • valenn1valenn1 Member Posts: 842 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    kyuzos7 wrote: »
    im slightly sad.

    they're 9 slot ships?

    the romulan one is a 4/3 with 9 consoles...

    Don't forget the 15 day of grind to get them.
    Beta, LTA, CE, Multiple preorder Versions, all Addon Packs except AoY, nearly all KDF/Rom and ~50% of all Fedships, over 25 LockboxShips, Endurer of Atari's "Year of Hell", but...
    unfortunately:

    NOT LOYAL ENOUGH!!!
  • paspinallpaspinall Member Posts: 296 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    oh no a 5 minute quest 15 times, WHAT a grind to get a ship !
  • kyuzos7kyuzos7 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    oh wait...

    theres a secondary deflector... i guess that makes up for 1 console?

    but i want it to be a 4/4 not a 4/3.

    unless this is it's science mode?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • norobladnoroblad Member Posts: 2,624 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    kyuzos7 wrote: »
    oh wait...

    theres a secondary deflector... i guess that makes up for 1 console?

    but i want it to be a 4/4 not a 4/3.

    unless this is it's science mode?

    It says its a 3/3 sci ship and it gains a cannon (built in, dps = ??? vs XII purple cannon??) and swaps the cmdr seat when in escort mode. It was unclear if the swapping is a console (haakona style) or a power (gurumba style).
  • kyuzos7kyuzos7 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    noroblad wrote: »
    It says its a 3/3 sci ship and it gains a cannon (built in, dps = ??? vs XII purple cannon??) and swaps the cmdr seat when in escort mode. It was unclear if the swapping is a console (haakona style) or a power (gurumba style).

    but they said they wanted to make it kinda like the Breen Warship...

    the warship has 4/4 with 10 consoles.

    Tactical Mode also enables powerful Dual Heavy Proton Cannons i guess this would go with the dyson weapon set?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • norobladnoroblad Member Posts: 2,624 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    kyuzos7 wrote: »
    but they said they wanted to make it kinda like the Breen Warship...

    the warship has 4/4 with 10 consoles.

    Tactical Mode also enables powerful Dual Heavy Proton Cannons i guess this would go with the dyson weapon set?

    Looks like, yes. Eh, well now we know. Go get it if you want it :)
  • blassreiterusblassreiterus Member Posts: 1,294 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    kyuzos7 wrote: »
    oh wait...

    theres a secondary deflector... i guess that makes up for 1 console?

    but i want it to be a 4/4 not a 4/3.

    unless this is it's science mode?
    The 4/3 is the tactical mode due to the cannons on it, in its science mode, it's 3/3.
    Star Trek Online LTS player.
  • kyuzos7kyuzos7 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    The 4/3 is the tactical mode due to the cannons on it, in its science mode, it's 3/3.

    i don't see much of any using the science mode alot... depending if you can transform at will people will just pop off a Gravity well and switch to tactical mode.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    From what I'm seeing, all of these look ugly as hell, and none of them look worth flying.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • hanoverhanover Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    Could someone host and hotlink those images? I'm tired of clearing cache and restarting my browser several times for each blog update.
    Does Arc install a root kit? Ask a Dev today!
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    So much for fake...

    Anyone who still - falsely - believes that the screenshots are fake, should read the most recent dev-blog.

    http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=1085061
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    noroblad wrote: »
    It says its a 3/3 sci ship and it gains a cannon (built in, dps = ??? vs XII purple cannon??) and swaps the cmdr seat when in escort mode. It was unclear if the swapping is a console (haakona style) or a power (gurumba style).
    Not all tactical ships are escorts.
  • throkithroki Member Posts: 36 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    Now all we're missing are some more protonic weapons to go along with that 'tactical mode' cannon on the ship. And some Tac Consoles to boost Protonic Damage.
    I sure do like the look of that cannon. :)
  • hanoverhanover Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    So, is it BORKEN, or is it SUPPER BOSTED?

    Surveyyyyyyyy SAYS...
    Does Arc install a root kit? Ask a Dev today!
  • undyingzeroundyingzero Member Posts: 313 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    I, for one, can't wait to get my hands on the Fed version of it, being a Sci captain that flies Sci vessels. I love how it looks, considering I've been wanting the fleet Intrepid for ages now, and this is the next best thing for me. Love how all three variants look, too.
  • alonaralonar Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    So those pic were fake, their color was wrong and the base ships, except the ar'kif, were wrong. It looks like they are, Fed = hybrid Avenger, Rom = hybrid Ar'kif, and KDF hybrid vet destroyer (sorry I forgot the name of it).
  • undyingzeroundyingzero Member Posts: 313 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    alonar wrote: »
    So those pic were fake, their color was wrong and the base ships, except the ar'kif, were wrong. It looks like they are, Fed = hybrid Avenger, Rom = hybrid Ar'kif, and KDF hybrid vet destroyer (sorry I forgot the name of it).
    They weren't fake at all, man. Where do you come off with saying they're fake?
  • alonaralonar Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    The ships in the pics are the wrong color, dark purple, the ships in the blog are the dyson white with blue and purple highlights, also the fed and KDF ships in the pics clearly are not the ones shown in the blog.
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    alonar wrote: »
    The ships in the pics are the wrong color, dark purple, the ships in the blog are the dyson white with blue and purple highlights, also the fed and KDF ships in the pics clearly are not the ones shown in the blog.

    It's more than likely that they were leaked pics of the ships at an earlier stage of their development.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • blassreiterusblassreiterus Member Posts: 1,294 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    From what I'm seeing, all of these look ugly as hell, and none of them look worth flying.
    Oh well, the ship's not for everyone for various reasons. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that.
    Star Trek Online LTS player.
  • dongemaharudongemaharu Member Posts: 544 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    Man, the Rom ship looks nice. The fed, on the other hand... looks like they went out of their way to choose the worst configuration on that chart. Cryptic can't design fed ships.
  • generalmocogeneralmoco Member Posts: 1,634
    edited January 2014
    Fakes created by a troll. That's my take, anyway.

    But if they are not fake, I will be very disappointed.



    well the Dev Blog from today confirmed that the link that I found was indeed a real link to the real ships coming out on the 4th Year anniversary!!!!


    Here it is again!! :D

    http://imgur.com/a/Iosic


    and here is the link to the dev blog

    http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=1085061
  • defalusdefalus Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    defalus wrote: »
    Dyson stuff so far has kinda han an emphasis on tankiness looking at the sets and the Obelisk. If I were to make a bet I'd wager that the hybrid is maybe some kind of destroyer like the Veteran ships that will later have an upgraded c-store version.

    Transforming destroyers? Looks like I was close, do I get an imaginary cookie?:D
    __________________________________________________
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    defalus wrote: »
    Transforming destroyers? Looks like I was close, do I get an imaginary cookie?:D

    No. You only get half an imaginary cookie.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
Sign In or Register to comment.