test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Poll: Should the Galaxy-X be added to the C-store?

135678

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    But... But... Golden Tribble!!!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    I believe it should be, but it should be rather high priced (such as a bit above the Constitution), as it is a rather nice reward and they shouldn't be too common, methinks. This would make them able to be had, for that Captain who really wants to drive one, but not necessarily to be seen every match; which, in turn, keeps the referral program a nice way to get one.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Thlaylie wrote: »
    Guess I'm just going on principle and Honor.

    I'm asking what that has to do with this situation. What does Cryptic releasing a ship they never claimed was "exclusive" have to do with their honor?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Two questions...

    First comment....Being at war with Klingons all Treaties would no longer be valid, that is assuming the Federation as declared war and not just acting like they are in war.


    Questions:

    1) Being at war and you are wanting to win said war, would you not have the wepons and ships to win such war?

    2) If being at war with the Klingons who uses cloaking then would it not make sense to either have a wepon that makes said cloak useless or have cloaking on your ships.

    Observation: I may be wrong on this but isn't only the Escorts that have it or is it all the ships for the Klingons and Romulans in STO that have it. Please let me know, I am thinking I am wrong on this one. :)

    Last comment....As far as the Romulans are concerned the same goes for them. Also please respond respectively as I am asking this to both sides of the argument in a very respectful way. :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Riight, and then the incentive to refeer a friend is what again? Except those lousy 400 C-points....

    You mean other than playing the game with your friend? Your argument sounds alot like "why should I invite my friend over to do something unless I get something for it?" :o
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    It sounds like you are trying to get something for nothing so.....

    Used Car salesman tactics do not a Happy experience make.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Expired comment
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Thlaylie wrote: »
    It sounds like you are trying to get something for nothing so.....

    If the items in the C-store were in fact FREE, then you might have a point. However, they are not, so you dont :o
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    danfiveten wrote: »
    im sorry but NO. what did cryptic say about not ading things that would affect game play ? adding the gx to the c store is a game changing element, so sorry cryptic if you do you lie about even more things. Putting the borg bo was pushing the envelope a lil bit.

    I dont mind it being added some way. Either accolades, or vet reward. but c store, come on. Honestly guys stop encourging this bull TRIBBLE. Im tired of all you lil wino's. Like the kids crying to mommy and daddy that the neigbor kid got a new bike.

    Yay, I'm not the only one who isn't begging to be double-charged for gameplay!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    I voted yes....

    Since they have done what they did with the C Store, I don't think ANYTHING in this game should be immune... No one should get anything special... Not Borg tribbles, not Liberated Borg, nothin'...

    Put it ALL in the C Store...
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Dyonas wrote: »
    If anyone complains about it I'd be so glad to point them to thate statement. If people get upset then perhaps it suggests the methods they used to get referrals are not how it was intended to be. I'm sure Cryptic would prefer people joining that have an interest in the game as opposed to a few extra keys and a one month subscription.

    Unfortunately Stormy's statement is undermined by the desperate shower of rewards included in STO's referral program as opposed to CO's nice but relatively low-key one. I've tried referring people to the game for free since closed beta, and I've yet to have a single outside friend or acquaintance join me. It makes me wonder just how much spam the people who've actually gotten 5 instead of buying it themselves have polluted the internet with...
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    THing is cryptic said game changing elements would be kept out. I dont really view the borg bo as a game changing element, since via ka you can get a borg bo as well, so not rally any difference there which is how i bet cryptic views it. I dont agree with putting new races via c store, they should be free, but they are not unfortunatly. Adding anything but a **** COSTUME would be against what cyrptic said the c store would be fore. The constitution doesnt count, yes its phasers lvl with you, but truthfully there is no difference with that ship from the others. She has no special powers, while the galaxy x has the phaser lance and cloak, that is a game changing element, WHICH IS AGAINST THE C STORE as per what cryptic said before sto went live. Grand nagus u can say yes no where did they say it would be exclusive, but its implied by it being part of the program. As in when you buy a bag of popcorn at the theater, you excpect somethign to be in the bag, just because they dotn have the words exclusive in the menu, does that mean im not going to get popcorn in the bag? no. Yet it is still implied that its exclusive, or not even that word supposed to be in there.

    Main thing is, i can see it as a accolade, or for finishing something. But the c store is against the c store rules.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    danfiveten wrote: »
    The constitution doesnt count, yes its phasers lvl with you, but truthfully there is no difference with that ship from the others.

    False. The TOS connie has an extra engineering slot that other T1 ships do not have.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Cryptic Studios Forum Usage Guidelines ~GM Tiyshen"
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    danfiveten wrote: »
    And you sir is all thats wrong with the world.

    The irony of that statement is it is usually the people who say it who it applies to :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    False. The TOS connie has an extra engineering slot that other T1 ships do not have.

    Yah but its not a phaser lance or cloak. its a extra engineering.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    danfiveten wrote: »
    Yah but its not a phaser lance or cloak. its a extra engineering.

    Perhaps your not aware of this, but the things you put in your ships slots actually have a statistical effect on the game. They directly effect your ship's performance.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    False. The TOS connie has an extra engineering slot that other T1 ships do not have.

    Correct, which is why I place the TOS Connie in the 'inching over the line' category.

    Now wouldn't it be awesome if at level 6 they added ships that are intermediate upgrades to the Light Cruiser (represented just by doodads slapped on like the dozen Miranda variants seen onscreen), with an extra console slot and handling capabilities closer to sci ship, escort, or cruiser? Then the TOS Connie would just be a skin for the cruiser variant that you could whip out earlier.

    On the other hand, it's not like the extra mk 1/2 console really does much useful. Personally I'd prefer the TOS Connie didn't have it (speaking as one of the preorder purchasers), then sticking it in the C-Store wouldn't violate the oft-repeated blandishments about not putting anything gameplay-affecting in the C-Store that you can't get through gameplay.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Perhaps your not aware of this, but the things you put in your ships slots actually have a statistical effect on the game. They directly effect your ship's performance.

    With my pvp record, trust me i know, dont talk to me like your talking to a freaking idiot buddy.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    No, I do not think that the Galaxy X should be in the C-Store. It is better suited to be a veteran's reward. That way, it won't unbalance the game as much and it would still be a relatively rare item
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    If the items in the C-store were in fact FREE, then you might have a point. However, they are not, so you dont :o

    A LOT less money than 5 copies of STO plus subs.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    danfiveten wrote: »
    With my pvp record, trust me i know, dont talk to me like your talking to a freaking idiot buddy. Otherwise i will make sure this thread does get closed.

    If you really know, then that would mean your previous statement is wrong:

    "but truthfully there is no difference with that ship from the others."

    Also, the great thing about a poll is that even if this thread is closed, the poll is not, and the very same link can be used in another thread ;)

    That said, feel free to behave however you would like. If you break the rules, you are much more likely to receive a personal punishment than anything happening to the thread itself.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Thlaylie wrote: »
    A LOT less money than 5 copies of STO plus subs.

    I agree, yet your earlier statement was "nothing", not "less" ;)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Two questions...

    First comment....Being at war with Klingons all Treaties would no longer be valid, that is assuming the Federation as declared war and not just acting like they are in war.

    The problem is: The treaty that disallows cloaking devices is with the Romulans, and believe it or not we're not officially at war with them. :D
    1) Being at war and you are wanting to win said war, would you not have the wepons and ships to win such war?

    Usually yes, however the Federation often puts peace over victory. They fight only as long until the enemy is ready for peace talks and they always play by the rules. To the point of trying to help enemy ships in distress even though they are often traps. And they would never break a treaty....
    2) If being at war with the Klingons who uses cloaking then would it not make sense to either have a wepon that makes said cloak useless or have cloaking on your ships.

    Unfortunately that treaty is with the Romulans, and they don't want Romulan deep space encounters in Sirius. :D
    Observation: I may be wrong on this but isn't only the Escorts that have it or is it all the ships for the Klingons and Romulans in STO that have it. Please let me know, I am thinking I am wrong on this one. :)

    All Klingon and Romulan ships except carriers have cloaking devices.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    K-Tar wrote:
    The problem is: The treaty that disallows cloaking devices is with the Romulans, and believe it or not we're not officially at war with them. :D
    That's going to change quick once they find out what I did with those subcommanders' bodies.
    Usually yes, however the Federation often puts peace over victory. They fight only as long until the enemy is ready for peace talks and they always play by the rules. To the point of trying to help enemy ships in distress even though they are often traps. And they would never break a treaty....
    Aside from the whole Cardassian Genocide....
    Unfortunately that treaty is with the Romulans, and they don't want Romulan deep space encounters in Sirius. :D
    Oh, game on!
    All Klingon and Romulan ships except carriers have cloaking devices.
    ?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    I agree, yet your earlier statement was "nothing", not "less" ;)

    Very well I stand corrected:

    You are trying to get something for a LOT less than other's have had to pay for it.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Thlaylie wrote: »
    Very well I stand corrected:

    You are trying to get something for a LOT less than other's have had to pay for it.

    Pay? You dont have to pay anything, you just have to get 5 people to sub. That costs you nothing.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    I say NO... personally I hate that ship, and second we have enough game changing items. ( at least what we have now is not that bad ) we don't need any more items like that, and we need to let cryptic know to knock it off, and work on cosmetic stuff only.

    in fact better Idea forget the C-store, tie the galaxy-x in to a really hard accolade, or something that is hard to do in game, so you have to earn it, and it will be available to everyone, but only to those who can do the accolade.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Zodi-emish wrote:
    I say NO... personally I hate that ship, and second we have enough game changing items. ( at least what we have now is not that bad ) we don't need any more items like that, and we need to let cryptic know to knock it off, and work on cosmetic stuff only.

    in fact better Idea forget the C-store, tie the galaxy-x in to a really hard accolade, or something that is hard to do in game, so you have to earn it, and it will be available to everyone, but only to those who can do the accolade.

    Preach it, brother!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited June 2010
    Pay? You dont have to pay anything, you just have to get 5 people to sub. That costs you nothing.

    That I disagree with,

    If you have to ask the cost......
Sign In or Register to comment.