test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
jrdobbsjr#3264 Arc User
Reactions
Comments
-
> @metaliant said: > Bajorans are/were in an alliance with the Klingons and CArdassins, so it's odd that they would back the Terrans but you never know, things can change in 30 years I suppose. The Intendant, to me at least, seemed more of a vassal of the Klingon Emperor than an Allied leader. Once she and Worf were…
-
> @spiritborn said: > Where you got the TOS Type II? I've found Type I at K-13 but not Type II. Is your Fleets K13 maxed out? I’ve gotten Type IIs at ours and it’s maxed
-
There is the Reman and Breen BOFFs available through Mudd's...they are an account unlock if you buy it.
-
XBox doesn't either....people on the forum have been claiming for years it's because M$ won't allow it on XBox but the Fallout 1st stipend in Fallout 76 proves that isn't why. I suspect it's because they aren't making enough money off console players so they have to maximize costs. It's not. I have Fallout 1st on XBox, and…
-
TOS era bridges for the Warbird and D7 would be nice but sadly it will probably never happen.
-
Wish they had Klingon and Romulan AoY Temporal campaigns as well....that would be epic.
-
Most of my toons carry a Type II hand phaser, one of the Fleet weapons from K-13 if available. It warms my heart whenever I make someone turn blue and disappear with it.
-
I figured the Bajorans backed O'Brien and the other humans when they captured Terok Nor and began the war to retake the Empire...a period in time where the humans desperately needed all the help they could get. Those races astute enough to back the winning horse that early were deemed politically reliable and got rewarded…
-
> @somtaawkhar said: > Something Enterprise retconed long before Discovery. > > Actually, TOS explicitly mentions past conflicts with the Klingons. And the severity of said conflict explains why the Enterprise was always "the only ship in the quadrant" so many of the Federation's ships got destroyed in the war they didn't…
-
> @rattler2 said: > Except it didn't? > Nothing in DSC contradicts events in TOS. Hell... they even brought up the USS Defiant, which CONFIRMED an event in TOS still happens. > However that is a discussion for another time and another thread. Cloaking devices? The Federation nearly being destroyed by the Klingons in a war…
-
> @r24681012 said: > why do we continue to have star trek shows set in the past rather then set after nemisis or voyager for me star trek began with the original series i was never interested it what came before but thats me others may feel different and thats there right > > what kind of person are you a prequal or sequel…
-
> @"nye#8522" said: > With that in mind, don't be so quick to blame Cryptic. While they should say something I get the feeling it's Microsoft again, not Cryptic. Microsoft is the reason that lifetime subs for Xbox aren't worth buying like they are for pc and ps4. Microsoft doesn't allow the monthly dil (or is it zen)…
-
Sela is in Club Fed for her own protection, everyone wants her dead
-
> @warpangel said: > jrdobbsjr#3264 wrote: » > > I don’t see a problem with the cloaking device and Klingons. What I think was dumb is how everyone gets the vapors if Starfleet uses them. > > > > Not everyone. Just some klingon factionalists. That’s not what “Path to 2409” says.......one entry is about how everybody got…
-
> @seaofsorrows said: > coldnapalm wrote: » > > I'm sorry...but honorable warrior...either internal or external and cloaking ships just does not work...at all. > > > > > This has long been a huge inconsistency with the Klingons. They're supposed to be 'honorable' but they fight from the shadows, hiding and stabbing people…
-
Hardly ever messed with the ISC, Andromedans, and the post war X-ships. Groups I played in didn't like having to play in the fleet formations necessary to make the first two powerful and the X ships were considered too OP. Never even messed with the RPG stuff....don't recall even seeing it in stores.
-
More like already has been....SFB is almost forgotten now. The lore for it wasn't that bad...it was intended to create a strategic situation that made sense to the player within the limits set by the tenuous nature of their license (from Franz Josef of all people). I enjoyed playing it back in the 80s and early 90s before…
-
[quote] Well the reason why they only do cross faction stuff. Is because of their limited man power that is the biggest reason. I think they are starting to hire new people from what I gathered from the live stream so hopefully this is going to help them out. Hopefully they get enough new hires so they can do less cross…
-
> @"aboundedorc0#8479" said: > coldnapalm wrote: » > > RSE is dead in this game. The cast of characters that are involved in it are worthless for further story points. IF we were to get a RSE revival, we would need somebody new who isn't a bloody moron to take center stage. Maybe we can get a tie in character for that in…
-
Maybe D’Tan could cut a deal with the Klingons and > @sennahcherib said: > yes, RSE is dead for good, until maybe a new empress/emperor raises to take power by force. > > For now, you have 2 options: first, you use your imagination; second, you play as a federation pet by following the story. > I personally use my…
-
> @seaofsorrows said: > jrdobbsjr#3264 wrote: » > > How anyone can see a Traitor and the reincarnation of Kaiser Wilhelm II as worthy of following is beyond me. Sela nearly destroyed the galaxy with her epic stupidity. > > > > > I am inclined to agree, but far be it from me to tell anyone how to play their character.…
-
> @seaofsorrows said: > baddmoonrizin wrote: » > > Ah, this old chestnut again. :smile: > > Correct me if I'm wrong, @seaofsorrows , but isn't the IRW prefix unavailable for the newer, post-LOR Romulan ships? At least, I have been able to use it on most of mine. > > > > > Is it? I didn't know that. > > I have never…
-
(Trolling comments moderated out. - BMR)
-
Since According to canon the Federation exists on the sufferance of those “hood rats”, what does that make the Feddy bears? Lol
-
(Off topic derailing comments moderated out. - BMR)
-
> @smokebailey said: > jrdobbsjr#3264 wrote: » > > If I bought some R&D packs and they did strike paydirt I’d actually consider picking one only because they look quite OP. > > Problem is, I’m not all that interested in spending money on STO anymore.......though I’m mildly curious how/ why the Federation chose to refit…
-
If I bought some R&D packs and they did strike paydirt I’d actually consider picking one only because they look quite OP. Problem is, I’m not all that interested in spending money on STO anymore.......though I’m mildly curious how/ why the Federation chose to refit the Connie’s to be smaller and less powerful in the years…
-
> @huijian said: > How about giving Roms a real faction of their own. New Romulus is also a disaster, after having YEARS to get that place in order they haven't completed any infrastructure or development. The Romulan Republic is clearly the laziest bunch of Roms ever, what a disgrace. If Sela was still in charge I bet…
-
Siamek was brainwashed into working for Hakeev just like they try to do to a Romulan toon in the LoR storyline.......don’t get why people hate him so. I have to hand it to Cryptic, Ripsote was actually pretty good, and the concept behind it is far better than the drivel CBS came up with for the Klingon War.