test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Would your STO ship have marines?

135678

Comments

  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    gradii wrote: »
    sharpie65 wrote: »
    If Starfleet was PURELY about peaceful exploration, then none of their ships would have weapons or even a military rank structure. I believe Archer was rather vocal about not wanting to have weapons installed on his ship, although he later changed his mind when the Elachi showed up.

    The XINDI. not the Elachi..

    Actually he ran into the Elachi before he even was aware of the Xindi.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    gradii wrote: »
    sharpie65 wrote: »
    If Starfleet was PURELY about peaceful exploration, then none of their ships would have weapons or even a military rank structure. I believe Archer was rather vocal about not wanting to have weapons installed on his ship, although he later changed his mind when the Elachi showed up.

    The XINDI. not the Elachi..

    Actually, he had Trip install the phase cannons because they were under attack by the Elachi. They had not been installed previously because they had launched earlier than scheduled due to the events of the pilot episode.

    The Xindi incident resulted in additional weapons being installed, and Maco's were not stationed on board until then either, so you are partially correct.
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    talonxv wrote: »
    ioneon wrote: »
    No. Starfleet is an organization based on exploration and peace, There would be no "marines" or otherwise dedicated military combatants with the exception of shipboard security. Use ENT as an example all you like, MACOs are earth military, and those were the days before the Federation existed. No single television show or movie has ever, repeat EVER, shown a dedicated military combat force serving on board a Federation vessel.

    Where were the marines when Voyager got sucked into the Delta quadrant? Where was SEAL team 6 when the BORG boarded the Enterprise D? I hate to break it to you, they didn't exist.

    Starfleet holds to it's ideals on being peaceful, and as such does not carry a contingent of warriors on board, sorry to break it to you.


    But what about those forces Sisko found on DS9, you know the mission Nog lost his legs? Those are what we called GROUND FORCES, MILITARY FORCES.
    and both Dr Bashir and Lieutenant Larkin explicitly stated that their health had sufferred as a result of the situation they were in.

    I agree with everything else you said, but any ground force, from the National Guard to MARSOC (USMC Special Operations Command), is vulnerable to the mental and physical effects of the battlefield. The argument can be made that Marines receive better training (I firmly believe this, but I'm also biased and I don't want to turn this into a "this branch is better" debate), but better training just helps to keep you and your fellow marines/soldiers alive, it does not make you immune to mental and physical illness.
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    talonxv wrote: »
    ioneon wrote: »
    No. Starfleet is an organization based on exploration and peace, There would be no "marines" or otherwise dedicated military combatants with the exception of shipboard security. Use ENT as an example all you like, MACOs are earth military, and those were the days before the Federation existed. No single television show or movie has ever, repeat EVER, shown a dedicated military combat force serving on board a Federation vessel.

    Where were the marines when Voyager got sucked into the Delta quadrant? Where was SEAL team 6 when the BORG boarded the Enterprise D? I hate to break it to you, they didn't exist.

    Starfleet holds to it's ideals on being peaceful, and as such does not carry a contingent of warriors on board, sorry to break it to you.


    But what about those forces Sisko found on DS9, you know the mission Nog lost his legs? Those are what we called GROUND FORCES, MILITARY FORCES.

    Again, I don't agree that the AR-558 personel were Marines. They had no special equipment, no special clothing (heck, they were wearing vests!), had Starfleet ranks and both Dr Bashir and Lieutenant Larkin explicitly stated that their health had sufferred as a result of the situation they were in. And they were NEVER referred to as 'Marines'.

    Here's the problem. Most base the term Marine off of the US Marines. I'm going to let you in on a little secret since I AM a US Marine. Know the only real difference between a US Soldier and a US Marine. A uniform and esprit de corps. THAT'S IT.

    My drill instructor even told me this once ad it's true. Only reason the US Marine Corps exists as a separate branch, is because the US people want it so. The US Army is capable of doing our job. Infact a few times the Corps almost got absorbed by the Army. Hell Like I stated only difference between a French soldier and a French marine, is the fact a marine is stationed on a ship and part of a specific unit that is designated to be marines. Other than that, same uniform, rank structure, answer to the same chains of command.

    Marine when boiled down is a FUNCTION. Fighting from a ship to some other place. That's it. So those soldiers on the grounds, were indeed serving the functions as marines.

    Hell the Army divisions assaulting Omaha and Utah beach, serving in the Marine function.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • tessaravejgantessaravejgan Member Posts: 276
    reyan01 wrote: »
    talonxv wrote: »
    ioneon wrote: »
    No. Starfleet is an organization based on exploration and peace, There would be no "marines" or otherwise dedicated military combatants with the exception of shipboard security. Use ENT as an example all you like, MACOs are earth military, and those were the days before the Federation existed. No single television show or movie has ever, repeat EVER, shown a dedicated military combat force serving on board a Federation vessel.

    Where were the marines when Voyager got sucked into the Delta quadrant? Where was SEAL team 6 when the BORG boarded the Enterprise D? I hate to break it to you, they didn't exist.

    Starfleet holds to it's ideals on being peaceful, and as such does not carry a contingent of warriors on board, sorry to break it to you.


    But what about those forces Sisko found on DS9, you know the mission Nog lost his legs? Those are what we called GROUND FORCES, MILITARY FORCES.

    Again, I don't agree that the AR-558 personel were Marines. They had no special equipment, no special clothing (heck, they were wearing vests!), had Starfleet ranks and both Dr Bashir and Lieutenant Larkin explicitly stated that their health had sufferred as a result of the situation they were in. And they were NEVER referred to as 'Marines'.

    And why would they need to be called marines specifically? Its a human term. They obviously knew how to fight and were trained for combat situations making them trained soldiers. I do find it funny that they aren't wearing any sort of combat armor in the shows/movies. The shear idea of fighting a war or boarding enemy ships or going to an unknown planet/place, etc and not providing your people with armor or some protection like that is ridiculous just as the idea that an organization such as federation wouldn't have soldiers and warships.
  • This content has been removed.
  • talasivaritalasivari Member Posts: 59 Arc User
    IIRC, Gene Roddenberry looked to the US Coast Guard as the analog for Star Fleet. That doen't mean he lifted the entirety of the Coasties and grafted it onto the Federation, just that he wanted a less-military military.

    A quick read about the Coast Guard on wikipedia illustrates how they operate apart from the rest of the military, until time of war, when they can be placed under the authority of the Department of Defence/Navy.

    While the Coast Guard doesn't have marines, they have personell who perform the same function. Just so in Star Fleet. What they are called is probably not as important as what they do.
    Urtlolev of the Andorian Imperial Fleet
  • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    gradii wrote: »
    sharpie65 wrote: »
    If Starfleet was PURELY about peaceful exploration, then none of their ships would have weapons or even a military rank structure. I believe Archer was rather vocal about not wanting to have weapons installed on his ship, although he later changed his mind when the Elachi showed up.

    The XINDI. not the Elachi..

    Actually, he had Trip install the phase cannons because they were under attack by the Elachi. They had not been installed previously because they had launched earlier than scheduled due to the events of the pilot episode.

    The Xindi incident resulted in additional weapons being installed, and Maco's were not stationed on board until then either, so you are partially correct.

    Oh you mean that ship which looked like a S'lgoth.

    "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
    Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
    he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
    In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
    He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
    He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
    He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
    He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
  • trennantrennan Member Posts: 2,839 Arc User
    edited June 2016
    I need to let this argument play through the intercom on my qin heavy raptor. I'm sure my warriors would get a good laugh out of this. Ah the Federation, arguing over a job title and whether or not anyone does it for them.

    The answer is yes, I have Imperial Marines aboard my vessel. The Empire and the Republic are doing this for the Federation now, due to the alliance. You Feds are always to busy with your red tape and arguing to get anything done.

    And before you say we the Federation has more in terms of numbers. As players, yes. But, for the story line, it doesn't matter if there are 10 million fed players, they all count as 1 ship and 1 Captain. So just sit back, hide behind us and argue over shirt color, you seem to be good at it. The Empire with kill these big, bad monsters for you.

    Qoy qeylIs puqloD.
    Qoy puqbe’pu’.
    yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI’
    Say’moHchu’ may’ ’Iw.
    maSuv manong ’ej maHoHchu’.
    nI’be’ yInmaj ’ach wovqu’.
    batlh maHeghbej ’ej yo’ qIjDaq vavpu’ma’
    DImuv. pa’ reH maSuvtaHqu’.
    mamevQo’. maSuvtaH. ma’ov.

    GLORY TO THE EMPIRE!
    Mm5NeXy.gif
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    trennan wrote: »
    I need to let this argument play through the intercom on my qin heavy raptor. I'm sure my warriors would get a good laugh out of this. Ah the Federation, arguing over a job title and whether or not anyone does it for them.

    The answer is yes, I have Imperial Marines aboard my vessel. The Empire and the Republic are doing this for the Federation now, due to the alliance. You Feds are always to busy with your red tape and arguing to get anything done.

    And before you say we the Federation has more in terms of numbers. As players, yes. But, for the story line, it doesn't matter if there are 10 million fed players, they all count as 1 ship and 1 Captain. So just sit back, hide behind us and argue over shirt color, you seem to be good at it. The Empire with kill these big, bad monsters for you.

    Qoy qeylIs puqloD.
    Qoy puqbe’pu’.
    yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI’
    Say’moHchu’ may’ ’Iw.
    maSuv manong ’ej maHoHchu’.
    nI’be’ yInmaj ’ach wovqu’.
    batlh maHeghbej ’ej yo’ qIjDaq vavpu’ma’
    DImuv. pa’ reH maSuvtaHqu’.
    mamevQo’. maSuvtaH. ma’ov.

    GLORY TO THE EMPIRE!

    I have 3 mains, My Fed main merely shakes his head and orders his marines to combat. My KDF orion is laughing hysterically and my Rom Main is merely shaking his head and sighing going "freaking pacifists".
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    No Marines / MACOs here.

    Here's a quick thought: Look at Tasha Yar, and especially Worf. Their ground combat focuses, elite level combat skills, supreme loyalties to the Service and by extension the UFP, willingness to give up their lives in an instant for their comrades, etc. etc. would have made "classic" Marines - if Starfleet felt that the distinction was still necessary.

    Instead, it seems that all the "classic" Marine traits are ingrained into all "Tactical Branch" Officers - from the lowly TOS "redshirts" that never made it home from their first away team with the senior staff to those who hold "high rank" on Starships (Early Riker and his "Captains don't go planetside anymore, let me risk my life in your place, I know what I'm doing more than you do" attitude).

    And it saves on "rank structure confusion". :tongue: Captain Worf, SFMC from season 3 (when he made O3) till Generations (when he was promoted to "Major" Worf, O4)?
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    edited June 2016
    dareau wrote: »
    No Marines / MACOs here.

    Here's a quick thought: Look at Tasha Yar, and especially Worf. Their ground combat focuses, elite level combat skills, supreme loyalties to the Service and by extension the UFP, willingness to give up their lives in an instant for their comrades, etc. etc. would have made "classic" Marines - if Starfleet felt that the distinction was still necessary.

    Instead, it seems that all the "classic" Marine traits are ingrained into all "Tactical Branch" Officers - from the lowly TOS "redshirts" that never made it home from their first away team with the senior staff to those who hold "high rank" on Starships (Early Riker and his "Captains don't go planetside anymore, let me risk my life in your place, I know what I'm doing more than you do" attitude).

    And it saves on "rank structure confusion". :tongue: Captain Worf, SFMC from season 3 (when he made O3) till Generations (when he was promoted to "Major" Worf, O4)?

    This is a pretty good explaination but I would say it extends to -All- officers to varying degrees.

    Every starfleet officer is trained with the same moral code and is given courses on self defense.

    I know all of my characters regardless of career are more than capable of handling themselves in combat situations, with the same distinction as a marine if need be.

    "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
    Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
    he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
    In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
    He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
    He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
    He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
    He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
  • bloodyrizbloodyriz Member Posts: 1,756 Arc User
    My main as a tactical officer has the defense of the Federation and her ship as her primary goals, and therefore her ships are all geared towards warfare. Thus she has Marines, and other types of specialized combatants on board.​​
    signature.png
    We come in peace, SHOOT TO KILL!
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    trennan wrote: »
    I need to let this argument play through the intercom on my qin heavy raptor. I'm sure my warriors would get a good laugh out of this. Ah the Federation, arguing over a job title and whether or not anyone does it for them.

    The answer is yes, I have Imperial Marines aboard my vessel. The Empire and the Republic are doing this for the Federation now, due to the alliance. You Feds are always to busy with your red tape and arguing to get anything done.

    And before you say we the Federation has more in terms of numbers. As players, yes. But, for the story line, it doesn't matter if there are 10 million fed players, they all count as 1 ship and 1 Captain. So just sit back, hide behind us and argue over shirt color, you seem to be good at it. The Empire with kill these big, bad monsters for you.

    Qoy qeylIs puqloD.
    Qoy puqbe’pu’.
    yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI’
    Say’moHchu’ may’ ’Iw.
    maSuv manong ’ej maHoHchu’.
    nI’be’ yInmaj ’ach wovqu’.
    batlh maHeghbej ’ej yo’ qIjDaq vavpu’ma’
    DImuv. pa’ reH maSuvtaHqu’.
    mamevQo’. maSuvtaH. ma’ov.

    GLORY TO THE EMPIRE!

    Imperial Marines huh? Seems to me there's a HUGE difference between Marines and undisciplined, warmongering, ridge-headed barbarians, so idk how KDF could have anything that would be considered a Marine Corps.

    :)
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • antonine3258antonine3258 Member Posts: 2,391 Arc User
    Marine in the sense of troops defined for 'amphibious' (in this case, orbit-to-ground) assault to secure positions? I'm sure I have some security officers specialized for those operations, and at least some equipment for larger-scale operations on even the more science-based ships, but honestly, it always seems the bridge crew seems to handle these on their own :)
    Fate - protects fools, small children, and ships named Enterprise Will Riker

    Member Access Denied Armada!

    My forum single-issue of rage: Make the Proton Experimental Weapon go for subsystem targetting!
  • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    All starfleet officers are trained to be able to defend themselves, and can fight when/if need be. This is not something unique to tactical or security careers.

    "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
    Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
    he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
    In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
    He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
    He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
    He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
    He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,284 Arc User
    i have imperial marines aboard my ship as well...but none of them is a klingon​​
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,015 Arc User
    talonxv wrote: »
    I don't have marines aboard my ships, I have specially trained assault teams picked from the best and most intelligent officers under my personal command

    Actually technially the term marine is a person who fights from the sea(or in this case space) and fights on either another ship or ashore on hostile territory. Example French Marines. They are not their own separate branch. They are simply French Soldiers who serve in Marine Regiments and go aboard ship.

    So you can call them specially trained assault teams, but they still serve the same function as Marines. Marine is a function as much as a title.

    Mine are more like special forces
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • saedeithsaedeith Member Posts: 628 Arc User
      ioneon wrote: »
      No. Starfleet is an organization based on exploration and peace, There would be no "marines" or otherwise dedicated military combatants with the exception of shipboard security. Use ENT as an example all you like, MACOs are earth military, and those were the days before the Federation existed. No single television show or movie has ever, repeat EVER, shown a dedicated military combat force serving on board a Federation vessel.

      Where were the marines when Voyager got sucked into the Delta quadrant? Where was SEAL team 6 when the BORG boarded the Enterprise D? I hate to break it to you, they didn't exist.

      Starfleet holds to it's ideals on being peaceful, and as such does not carry a contingent of warriors on board, sorry to break it to you.

      Ideally yes. But as we have learned that isn't always possible. Hell, Archer was hell bent on abandoning his mission and going home to get cannons installed on his ship after a few run ins. Having some soldiers on board seems like the safe move.

    • alcyoneserenealcyoneserene Member Posts: 2,414 Arc User
      I think of the whole concept of having Archer struggle with having to house both regular starfleet security officers and MACO is a political brainwashing attempt in case martial law would be enacted to have fewer people resist it, as with greater inclusion of military alongside law enforcement officers, and no doubt a successful one as the majority of people will believe anything that's fed through them by some puppet in office and what's said on TV.

      That aside, yes I would definitely have MACO or Marines or whatever on my exploration vessel in addition to regular security officers since any initial exploration and survey missions by definition will encounter not only environmental dangers and other tricky situations requiring the discernment of trained officers, but also armed conflict.

      As to what ship class these MACO would be on for some deep space exploration mission, I'm not sure yet since any choice would have its advantages and disadvantages, including dreadnoughts.
      Y945Yzx.jpg
    • burstorionburstorion Member Posts: 1,750 Arc User
      Marines on my ships? No need, my guys are one man armies - heck, they near single handedly defeated the vaadwaur armies on foot!​​
    • trennantrennan Member Posts: 2,839 Arc User
      talonxv wrote: »
      trennan wrote: »
      I need to let this argument play through the intercom on my qin heavy raptor. I'm sure my warriors would get a good laugh out of this. Ah the Federation, arguing over a job title and whether or not anyone does it for them.

      The answer is yes, I have Imperial Marines aboard my vessel. The Empire and the Republic are doing this for the Federation now, due to the alliance. You Feds are always to busy with your red tape and arguing to get anything done.

      And before you say we the Federation has more in terms of numbers. As players, yes. But, for the story line, it doesn't matter if there are 10 million fed players, they all count as 1 ship and 1 Captain. So just sit back, hide behind us and argue over shirt color, you seem to be good at it. The Empire with kill these big, bad monsters for you.

      Qoy qeylIs puqloD.
      Qoy puqbe’pu’.
      yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI’
      Say’moHchu’ may’ ’Iw.
      maSuv manong ’ej maHoHchu’.
      nI’be’ yInmaj ’ach wovqu’.
      batlh maHeghbej ’ej yo’ qIjDaq vavpu’ma’
      DImuv. pa’ reH maSuvtaHqu’.
      mamevQo’. maSuvtaH. ma’ov.

      GLORY TO THE EMPIRE!

      I have 3 mains, My Fed main merely shakes his head and orders his marines to combat. My KDF orion is laughing hysterically and my Rom Main is merely shaking his head and sighing going "freaking pacifists".

      16blew.jpgvia Imgflip Meme Generator
      Mm5NeXy.gif
    • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
      I don't always feel the need to call the marines, but when I do, I show them who to kill personally.
      screenshot_2014_11_09_13_32_37_by_marhawkman-d861qod.jpg
      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      My character Tsin'xing
      Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
    • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
      gradii wrote: »
      This is a pretty good explaination but I would say it extends to -All- officers to varying degrees.

      Every starfleet officer is trained with the same moral code and is given courses on self defense.

      I know all of my characters regardless of career are more than capable of handling themselves in combat situations, with the same distinction as a marine if need be.

      Exactly. Every Starfleet personnel, from starship Captain to Maintenance Engineers or Botanists join Starfleet not only because of their explorative drive and passion for what they do but also to help to serve and protect the UFP. There are departments naturally more focused on combat (Tactical, Security) but everyone wearing a Starfleet Uniform has varying degrees of combat and crisis training, some more and some less just like there are Detectives in the police that aren't that firm in shooting a gun but excellent in their detective work and SWATs on the other end of the spectrum.

      The security branch is more than capable of supplementing people with different specializations and medical, engineers or command crew can very well be trained to be part of Hazard Teams if need be.

      Starfleet is also the military arm of the UFP. But they're not soldiers nor militaries (both canonically citable in these very words). The only one considering himself a soldier was Kirk and I am at this point believing he meant that metaphorically.​​
      lFC4bt2.gif
      ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
      "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
      "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
      "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    • This content has been removed.
    • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
      Of course the Federation is Military based! If there is anything that JJ-Trek got right is that, that one Admiral dude wanted a more Militarized Starfleet.

      Also, guys we actually do have MACOS on our ships, or in other words Marines. This is STO Cannon, I'm pretty sure anyway. Go play Viscus Cycle again, an Undine PvE.

      So yeah...

      MACOs were on board our ships for that mission yes. the question is not DO we have MACOs on our ships, it is rather, when do we have MACOs on our ships.

      "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
      Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
      he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
      In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
      He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
      He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
      He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
      He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
    • galattgalatt Member Posts: 708 Arc User
      My ship has three different MACO units;
      Alpha-The standard ground forces
      Bravo- The Federation equivalent of Seabees
      Echo- Electronic warfare
      sig_picture_resize_by_gx_9901-db9d1v1.png
    • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
      Oh one other thing, the Marines on my ship have been trained to use the PROPER position of attention in all appropriate situations, not that sloppy half attention/half parade rest thing starfleet officers use in STO.
      Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
      eaY7Xxu.png
    • ktonof1aqktonof1aq Member Posts: 210 Arc User
      Oh one other thing, the Marines on my ship have been trained to use the PROPER position of attention in all appropriate situations, not that sloppy half attention/half parade rest thing starfleet officers use in STO.

      Or in the tv and movies too LOL.
    • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
      edited June 2016
      angrytarg wrote: »
      starfleet had a starfleet marine service. you need a dedicated ground force when the time comes in urban warfare seperate from starship security and personnel. siege of ar-558 was not the only case now i think of it.

      http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/The_Siege_of_AR-558_(episode)

      nor the battle of the strong was another case when the klingons were attacking a federation world.

      http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Nor_the_Battle_to_the_Strong_(episode)

      But there's no hint that is anything other than Starfleet officer just doing their thing. Why do you need a special branch for that? In TOS: Arena Redshirts beamed down in ana ctive combat zone where heavy weapons were used, likewise heavy weapons are operated by Security in the AR.

      Not disregarding that there are specialised teams within Starfleet Tactical as that was never explored, but there's no indication of any specialised combat branch.​​

      and yet you can not explain the uniforms or what their purpose is.
      T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
      Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
    Sign In or Register to comment.