test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Fed Phasing Cloaking Device

cyraxredcyraxred Member Posts: 40 Arc User
edited September 2014 in Federation Discussion
Hello all

Not sure if this has been brought up before...
For us Feds, with the new X2 coming soon, how about introducing the Phasing Cloaking Device...Starfleet created it in the 2350's, so almost 60 yrs ago with the current timeline, and since the Romulans are allowing Feds to use cloak on certain ships, and the new peace with the Klinks (Feel like barfing :P), and new threats, I say let us Feds use a Federation Made Cloaking device.
Any thoughts??

http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Phasing_cloaking_device
Post edited by cyraxred on
«13456716

Comments

  • torad1torad1 Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I think fed dont needs cloaking device - we have so much consoles already, let the cloak be unique to a few ships.
    Also why should we now use cloaks while we did not before?
    If it would be because of the iconians, then why not use romulan battle cloaks for everyone because we fight them together (ironie!)
    Also it would rip apart a major stand alone of the klingons that got already hurted by the romlans.
  • edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • pwecaptainsmirkpwecaptainsmirk Member Posts: 1,167 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    What an interesting suggestion :D

    Should we call it the Pegasus Cloak?

    ~CaptainSmirk
  • thegreendragoon1thegreendragoon1 Member Posts: 1,872 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Don't the Voth ships use a phased cloaking device?
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    *facepalm*

    Shouldn't this be in the F.C.T.?
    The dead horse section??
    The gimme' a break section???
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    A 'Fed cloak' thread? Is it really that time of the month again? Goodness, time does fly.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Yeah....

    But sooner rather than later your ship is going to end up fused inside an asteroid...
  • elandarkskyelandarksky Member Posts: 1,013 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    This is already in game (essentially) the T4 D'derix cstore ship gets a phase console, mix it with battle cloak and et'voila

    'The D'ridthau Warbird Battle Cruiser comes with a [Console - Universal - Molecular Phase Inverter], which when active significantly increases Defense and Damage Resistance, allows the ship to pass through other ships, and adds a bonus to the ship's speed and turn rate. The ship's cloaking device can still be used while the console is active.'

    ^(from star trek online's wiki)
    [Combat (Self)] Your Bite deals 2378 (1475) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother.
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,485 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    What an interesting suggestion :D

    Should we call it the Pegasus Cloak?

    ~CaptainSmirk

    Indeed. BTW, This (phase cloak Oberth) has been proposed before.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • torad1torad1 Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    hey, this is just a fed that does think he can not play without a cloack so he wants one - as if we would need a cloak to beat the evul klingons that talk about honor while hiding and always flee if its getting though :D
  • kapla1755kapla1755 Member Posts: 1,249
    edited August 2014
    OP maybe you missed the important parts in that wiki link
    In response to the illegal use of this device, the crew of the Pegasus mutinied against Pressman, forcing Pressman and a small group of officers who sided with him, including a young Ensign Will Riker, to flee the ship. Afterwards, the Pegasus drifted into an asteroid field in the Devolin system while still in a phased state. The cloak blew out the plasma relays aboard the ship, and when it passed through a particularly large asteroid, the cloak failed, causing the Pegasus to partially materialize inside solid rock. The crew dead, the Pegasus remained entombed in the asteroid for the next twelve years. A Judge Advocate General's investigation into the mutiny was initiated, but, in order to conceal the illegal test, Starfleet Intelligence classified the file. In 2370 Pressman, now an admiral at Starfleet Intelligence, boarded the USS Enterprise-D and mounted a mission to retrieve the phasing cloak. It had been determined that the Romulans had learned about the cloaking device and were attempting to retrieve it themselves, and Pressman was determined not to let it fall into their hands. The Pegasus was eventually located and the device retrieved, but not before a Romulan Warbird sealed the Enterprise inside the asteroid. Deciding not to continue to aid Pressman in the illegal activity, Riker, by this point the Enterprise's first officer, revealed the existence of the cloaking device to Captain Picard, and suggested using it to phase the Enterprise and pass through the surface of the asteroid. The plan worked, and Picard ordered the Enterprise to decloak in front of the Warbird, thereby revealing the existence of the phasing cloak to the Romulans. Both Admiral Pressman and Commander Riker were subsequently taken into custody for their respective roles in the illegal experiment. (ENT: "These Are the Voyages..."; TNG: "The Pegasus")
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    edalgo wrote: »
    It's only illegal if Starfleet deems it to be.

    Laws can be changed

    Yes, because the Federation is a military dictatorship and not a democracy. So Starfleet decides which laws apply and which don't.:rolleyes:
  • artemisa0kartemisa0k Member Posts: 142 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    the thing that I've always wondered is tho technically the treaty (which I believe would currently be invalid) banned cloak's however it doesn't inherently seem to ban Phasing tech.

    So realistically the Federation could remove the cloaking component and instead go with straight up phasing instead now granted after a proper scan or a few shots the opponent would probably start finding a way to compensate but at the same time you could theoretically setup a system that shifted the ships phase variance every few seconds for the duration to negate their attempts.

    I mean really does it matter if they can see you if they are unable to actually damage you ?

    also I remember some of the temporal tech allowing phasing or something similar in the series
  • cyraxredcyraxred Member Posts: 40 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    One of the idea i was thinking to replace the Standard Cloak available to Feds, and only selected ships can use it, and a/all tier 6 ships, so it would a upgrade...well if done right...well maybe.:rolleyes:

    As for Illegal, Feds only were being gracious to the Roms due to the original Treaty of Algeron, and with Rom Home Destroyed, technically so is the treaty, due to new reformation of the Romulan Empire.
  • ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited August 2014
    What an interesting suggestion :D

    Should we call it the Pegasus Cloak?

    ~CaptainSmirk


    Hmmm.. OK. This has been discussed before. So many reasons why, but it's a violation of the treaty with the Romulans. But a lot has happened in 60 years, including a genocidal human clone using remans to attack... wait... that wasn't the Romulans attacking us... so that excuse won't work.

    Hmmm... I would like one though. Maybe for Oberth class science vessels only AND it comes with a 15% chance of blowing up your ship each time it's used.
    edalgo wrote: »
    It's only illegal if Starfleet deems it to be.

    Laws can be changed


    Only if you're Putin or George Bush. 'Nuff said.
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    kapla1755 wrote: »
    OP maybe you missed the important parts in that wiki link

    Or maybe you should go watch the episode instead of relying on a ****ty wiki:


    The pegasus cloak got damaged in the fighting the crew put up, and when they attempted to deactivate it, they blew out some plasma conduits. The ship then drifted, while still cloaked, into the asteroid field where at some point the cascading system failures reached the cloak related systems, and it shut down, materializing the ship in the asteroid - fusing the matter together.



    The cloak worked perfectly until someone shot it, basically.

    As was demonstrated by the Enterprise using it without issue. Sure, as a prototype device it was a bit finnicky, but the first phaser cannon also blew up a little moon mountain so... your point is invalid.


    The Treaty of algeron is why the federation has to this date no phase cloaks. Its not a technical issue: Its one of diplomatic tact.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Oh boy this thread again.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • illcadiaillcadia Member Posts: 1,412 Bug Hunter
    edited August 2014
    What an interesting suggestion :D

    Should we call it the Pegasus Cloak?

    ~CaptainSmirk

    Yes. And it should come on a T5 Oberth retrofit.
  • pweistheworstpweistheworst Member Posts: 986 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I think this would be a good idea, but I know it will just add to the anti-FED rage from hardcoire KDF players.

    Frankly, if the KDF and ROM factions get some serious love in terms of new ships and consoles then I think they "might" be willing to put up with a Pegasus Cloak console for the FEDs.
    In the immortal words of Captain Sisko: "It may not be what you believe, but that doesn't make it wrong."

    Don't believe the lies in this forum. I am NOT an ARC user. I play STO on Steam or not at all.
  • sqwishedsqwished Member Posts: 1,475 Bug Hunter
    edited August 2014
    If they did choose to implant the federation phasing cloak they could limit it to the two ships that according to TNG actually had equipped. Being an Oberth and Galaxy class starships. But to be fair given how the game is at present would there be any real advantage of having said device?
    Oh, it's not broken? We can soon fix that!

  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    sqwished wrote: »
    If they did choose to implant the federation phasing cloak they could limit it to the two ships that according to TNG actually had equipped. Being an Oberth and Galaxy class starships. But to be fair given how the game is at present would there be any real advantage of having said device?

    Well, if they stuck to canon, yes. A phasing cloak renders you invulnerable to all forms of weaponry while it's active. If implemented as the "battle" variety cloak, would be the most epic escape ability ever. If implemented as the "regular" variety cloak, not so much, since you'd have to be out of combat to use it.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • ltdata96ltdata96 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    misterde3 wrote: »
    Yes, because the Federation is a military dictatorship and not a democracy. So Starfleet decides which laws apply and which don't.:rolleyes:

    (Text from Memory Alpha) The Treaty of Algeron was a peace treaty signed between the United Federation of Planets and the Romulan Star Empire in 2311, following the events of the Tomed Incident. The Treaty of Algeron was signed approximately 160 years after the conclusion of the Earth-Romulan War. (TNG: "The Pegasus")

    The treaty reinforced and redefined the Romulan Neutral Zone, and made clear that any violations of the Zone without adequate notification, by either side, would be considered an act of war. (TNG: "The Defector"; ENT: "These Are the Voyages...") The treaty also expressly prohibited the development or use of cloaking device technology by the Federation.


    The Romulan Star Empire is not in existance anymore in STO lore, so the whole thing is invalid, and the Federation is allowed to use any sort of cloaking devices. That's how i see it.

    And i think a "real" phase cloak would be cool (the Kar Fi's phasing device is only temporary, so "meh")
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    yreodred wrote: »
    Sounds nice.
    I like that idea, it would add some useful ship parts for the Odyssey, like another saucer or different looking nacelles.

    It's a shame they don't release more alternative ship models for already existing ships, but sadly cryptics 12 year old main audience rather goes for the next ROXXOR ship...
    ltdata96 wrote: »
    (Text from Memory Alpha) The Treaty of Algeron was a peace treaty signed between the United Federation of Planets and the Romulan Star Empire in 2311, following the events of the Tomed Incident. The Treaty of Algeron was signed approximately 160 years after the conclusion of the Earth-Romulan War. (TNG: "The Pegasus")

    The treaty reinforced and redefined the Romulan Neutral Zone, and made clear that any violations of the Zone without adequate notification, by either side, would be considered an act of war. (TNG: "The Defector"; ENT: "These Are the Voyages...") The treaty also expressly prohibited the development or use of cloaking device technology by the Federation.


    The Romulan Star Empire is not in existance anymore in STO lore, so the whole thing is invalid, and the Federation is allowed to use any sort of cloaking devices. That's how i see it.

    And i think a "real" phase cloak would be cool (the Kar Fi's phasing device is only temporary, so "meh")


    This has been already addressed:

    The Federation, in an act of APPLIED FCKN DIPLOMATIC TACT has decided to carry over the Treaty of algeron to the newly "founded" Romulan republic and the remnants of the star empire (the tal shiar and cohorts basically) because: how about we do not start yet another war.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    This has been already addressed:

    The Federation, in an act of APPLIED FCKN DIPLOMATIC TACT has decided to carry over the Treaty of algeron to the newly "founded" Romulan republic and the remnants of the star empire (the tal shiar and cohorts basically) because: how about we do not start yet another war.

    Already breaking the treaty anyways since the zen Defiant and the Zen Gal-X both have cloaking devices which can be applied to just about any ship.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    This has been already addressed:

    The Federation, in an act of APPLIED FCKN DIPLOMATIC TACT has decided to carry over the Treaty of algeron to the newly "founded" Romulan republic and the remnants of the star empire (the tal shiar and cohorts basically) because: how about we do not start yet another war.
    Doesn't make much sense when:

    1) Both the Tal Shiar and Starfleet are repeatedly and blatantly violating the neutral zone.

    2) Starfleet is using cloaking devices on some ships (in violation of the treaty)

    3) The Republic is getting significant aid from the Federation, including Starfleet personnel and ships, yet somehow can't negotiate the use of cloaking devices?

    4) This is the same Republic which was until very recently fielding ships and soldiers to both the KDF and Starfleet to assist in the war effort against the other. They were hardly staying aloof of the conflict and logically, if it was not for the Undine and Voth, we'd probably be in a three way war right now.

    The Federation is in no way obliged to follow the treaty, since it's been violated numerous times in numerous ways by all parties involved, including the usage of cloaking ships by the federation.
  • pwecaptainsmirkpwecaptainsmirk Member Posts: 1,167 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I have to agree that the Romulan Empire no longer exists, so treaties with them are now null and void.

    There is no such treaty with the Romulan Republic (as far as we know?) so it would not violate any treaty to actively pursue a Fed Cloaking Device, phased or not.

    I doubt D'Tan would tell the Feds they can't research cloaking technology.

    ~CaptainSmirk
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    reynoldsxd wrote: »
    Or maybe you should go watch the episode instead of relying on a ****ty wiki:


    The pegasus cloak got damaged in the fighting the crew put up, and when they attempted to deactivate it, they blew out some plasma conduits. The ship then drifted, while still cloaked, into the asteroid field where at some point the cascading system failures reached the cloak related systems, and it shut down, materializing the ship in the asteroid - fusing the matter together.



    The cloak worked perfectly until someone shot it, basically.

    As was demonstrated by the Enterprise using it without issue. Sure, as a prototype device it was a bit finnicky, but the first phaser cannon also blew up a little moon mountain so... your point is invalid.


    The Treaty of algeron is why the federation has to this date no phase cloaks. Its not a technical issue: Its one of diplomatic tact.

    The "****ty wiki" was the source cited in the OP; it is therefore perfectly reasonable to actually cite the rest of the "****ty wiki" in response.
    I have to agree that the Romulan Empire no longer exists, so treaties with them are now null and void.

    There is no such treaty with the Romulan Republic (as far as we know?) so it would not violate any treaty to actively pursue a Fed Cloaking Device, phased or not.

    I doubt D'Tan would tell the Feds they can't research cloaking technology.

    ~CaptainSmirk

    As for the reliability of Federation developed cloaking technology, in-game lore also provides an example of the general incompatibility of Starfleet technology with cloaking devices...
    Tragedy struck for Starfleet on Stardate 72487.91, when the U.S.S. Kelso was lost with all hands.

    The Kelso was supposed to be on a routine mission to study the long-term effects of the Hobus supernova on star systems in the Devron Sector when it was destroyed. Initial reports indicated that the Kelso could have come under attack. However, when the remains of the vessel were recovered by the U.S.S. April, it was found that a coolant leak caused by an experimental cloaking device onboard the Kelso caused plasma to vent from the ship. The plasma reacted with ionizing radiation present in the area, causing the explosion which destroyed the Kelso.
    ...which may be a perfectly logical reason for cloaking devices being in limited use by Starfleet. The political ramifications...
    After careful consideration, Captain Barax Wenn of the April revealed the cause of the Kelso's destruction to the captains of the Romulan ships assisting in the search for the vessel. In response, Praetor Taris lodged an immediate complaint with the Federation Council, and, as a "gesture of good faith," informed the Klingon Empire of the details of the Kelso's destruction as well.

    Starfleet Security admitted that the U.S.S. Kelso was testing a Federation cloaking device. The Romulans then ejected all Federation diplomats and ships from their space in protest, and Chancellor J'mpok recalled the Klingon ambassador to the Federation back to Qo'noS for "strategic discussions."

    After the revelation that Starfleet was testing a cloaking device, tensions between the Federation, Romulans and Klingons were at their highest point since the destruction of the Romulan homeworld in 2387. After a full inquiry, six members of Starfleet Security were court-martialed.

    It took three months for Federation President Aennik Okeg to convince the Romulans and the Klingons to send representatives to a summit to discuss the situation.
    ...also argue against widespread use of cloaking technology by the Federation. The continued use of cloaking on a limited number of ships (specifically designed to be compatible with the cloaking device console) may very well have been negotiated with the Romulan Republic, most recently on the Avenger-class battlecruiser, but the official policy...
    When the meeting finally began, Okeg made the Federation's position clear. He apologized for the experiments into cloaking technology, and said that he had signed an executive order banning all research into or creation of Federation cloaking technology.

    "The narrow legal view may be that the Treaty of Algeron ended when Romulus was destroyed," Okeg said. "The Romulan Star Empire we knew is gone, and you are a new people. What has not changed is the Federation's commitment to peace."
    ...appears to follow the statements made by Federation President Aennik Okeg.

    Naturally, lore would have to reflect negotiations for the Federation expanding the use of cloaking technology, otherwise the whole thing is jumping the Sharknado. It just seems silly to do something to provoke the Klingon Empire after successfully making peace, especially with the Romulan Republic being placed in between the two and also having the promise of the continued validity of the Treaty of Algeron.

    Then again, all that is just lore, without getting into the whole discussion of faction distinctiveness and gameplay balance.

    As far a Phasing Cloak console, though... it is actually an interesting idea, assuming it has the same cooldown as the Phase Shift Generator, is ship-restricted to a T5 or T6 Oberth-class, and has a chance of catastrophic failure; I'd suggest a 2-piece set bonus for using both the Pegasus Cloak and Enhanced Plasma Manifold that negates the failure chance. I'd also enable collision a la Ramming Speed (though without any speed/maneuverability boost or a doff to negate it) for one second upon leaving the Phasing Cloak to mimic the possibility of phasing into or around a foreign object with negative results for both.
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • artemisa0kartemisa0k Member Posts: 142 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I have to agree that the Romulan Empire no longer exists, so treaties with them are now null and void.

    There is no such treaty with the Romulan Republic (as far as we know?) so it would not violate any treaty to actively pursue a Fed Cloaking Device, phased or not.

    I doubt D'Tan would tell the Feds they can't research cloaking technology.

    ~CaptainSmirk

    wouldn't really surprise me if he offered to help, I don't think the Romulans managed to successfully create a working phasic cloaking system and the fed's would be more useful allies strategically if they were able to cloak both vs the Iconian's and Tal'shiar remnants
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I have to agree that the Romulan Empire no longer exists, so treaties with them are now null and void.

    There is no such treaty with the Romulan Republic (as far as we know?) so it would not violate any treaty to actively pursue a Fed Cloaking Device, phased or not.

    I doubt D'Tan would tell the Feds they can't research cloaking technology.

    ~CaptainSmirk

    Oh god...Smirk, you don't realize what you just did, do you?

    You just gave the pro-Fed cloak argument SO much ammunition by saying that. They'll never let this go, never now, and will gladly use that quote over and over and over again to justify it.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
Sign In or Register to comment.