test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

romulan dreadnought pack close to being ready? [It's out! Please use feedback thread]

1235715

Comments

  • ussweatherlightussweatherlight Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    No, you're not.
    However to be fair, he probably didn't do it all by himself without any design and validation phase or construction plans.

    True, he had collaborators. He was a commander in the Dominion War, and perhaps his people managed to gain the know how there, and perhaps Remans participate in ship construction.

    It seems clear though that the senate knew nothing of the Scimitar of his.
    _____________________________________________

    "Second star on the right, and straight on till morning."

    U.S.S. Weatherlight
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    True, he had collaborators. He was a commander in the Dominion War, and perhaps his people managed to gain the know how there, and perhaps Remans participate in ship construction.

    It seems clear though that the senate knew nothing of the Scimitar of his.

    I thought about that too and my best guess would be that while Donatra went off to stop Shinzon, the other Romulans might have tried to get their hands on those construction plans anay way they could before those Remans found out the alliance was broken and deleted those files.
  • zdfx19zdfx19 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I am not sure I care about the actual cannon truth. I will always think of it as a Reman ship simply because Romulan ships look like birds of prey where the scimitar looks like a giant bat (with which the Remans seem to have things in common.)

    Since we have time before the official announcement, I am curious if any of you have tried to speculate what the ship might actually look like on paper? Cryptic has been inconsistent with the carrier line of ships over the years and that makes it harder to see the ship?s niche than with other C Store releases . The Vesta was pretty easy to figure out for example.

    This is is an attempt at guessing the Science variant?s details based off of the pattern established by the other more pure carriers with a mark up to C-Store current quality. (The Atrox in retrospect was kind of a sucky release.)

    Science Variant

    Hull: 42,000
    Shields: 6270 (Mk 10)
    Shield Modifier: 1.2
    Hanger Bays: 2
    Crew: 3200
    Bridge officers: CMDR Science, LT CMDR Engineering, LT CMDR Tactical, LT Universal.
    Device Slots: 4
    Weapons: 4 Fore, 3 Aft (Can mount dual cannons.)
    Consoles: 3 Tactical, 3 Engineering. 4 Science
    Turn Rate: 6
    Impulse Modifier: 0.15
    Bonus Power: +10 Shields, +10 Auxiliary.
    Abilities: Battle Cloak, Launch Scorpion Fighters, Subsystem Targeting, Sensor Analysis, Carrier Commands.

    The special consoles are harder to guess for this ship. I predict the tactical version to pack a thayloron gun console, the engineering version to pack a separable ship console, and this science variant to have a console that allows the ship to fire while cloaked for a limited time with a three minute cool down. I have no idea regarding the set bonus.

    How do you figure the ship will pan out stat wise?
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,863 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    zdfx19 wrote: »
    I am not sure I care about the actual cannon truth. I will always think of it as a Reman ship simply because Romulan ships look like birds of prey where the scimitar looks like a giant bat (with which the Remans seem to have things in common.)

    Since we have time before the official announcement, I am curious if any of you have tried to speculate what the ship might actually look like on paper? Cryptic has been inconsistent with the carrier line of ships over the years and that makes it harder to see the ship?s niche than with other C Store releases . The Vesta was pretty easy to figure out for example.

    This is is an attempt at guessing the Science variant?s details based off of the pattern established by the other more pure carriers with a mark up to C-Store current quality. (The Atrox in retrospect was kind of a sucky release.)

    Science Variant

    Hull: 42,000
    Shields: 6270 (Mk 10)
    Shield Modifier: 1.2
    Hanger Bays: 2
    Crew: 3200
    Bridge officers: CMDR Science, LT CMDR Engineering, LT CMDR Tactical, LT Universal.
    Device Slots: 4
    Weapons: 4 Fore, 3 Aft (Can mount dual cannons.)
    Consoles: 3 Tactical, 3 Engineering. 4 Science
    Turn Rate: 6
    Impulse Modifier: 0.15
    Bonus Power: +10 Shields, +10 Auxiliary.
    Abilities: Battle Cloak, Launch Scorpion Fighters, Subsystem Targeting, Sensor Analysis, Carrier Commands.

    The special consoles are harder to guess for this ship. I predict the tactical version to pack a thayloron gun console, the engineering version to pack a separable ship console, and this science variant to have a console that allows the ship to fire while cloaked for a limited time with a three minute cool down. I have no idea regarding the set bonus.

    How do you figure the ship will pan out stat wise?

    As much as I would love that build I do think it would be OP, at the very least I don't think would get SA unless maybe the Sci version gets it and one less tac console (Like the Bort and Oddy.)
  • zdfx19zdfx19 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    If I were to quibble balance rather than be optimistic, I might lower the turn rate to 5.5 and change the hull to 40,500k as the Romulans seem weaker there. Every 3 pack C-Store ship is a 10 console ship so I will not slash off one. I tried to put the console layout right between the Bortas and Odyssey with some care given to the Atrox and Vo'quv to create a Romulan niche and not overlap so much. I would continue that to guess at each variant's layout (ie the TAC variant would have 4 tactical consoles and 3 for both science and engineering).

    You may be right in slashing off sensor analysis but the Romulans lack a real top end science ship so I made the call to include it for the Science variant as a sell feature. I kept to four officer stations to fit the other faction carriers (and since it will be a C-Store ship) but it is interesting to note that the lock box carriers have had five BOFF stations each. That makes it hard to guess as they are not consistent. If it were lock box I'd guess at a five BOFF layout. Its the only clue for guessing I have.

    OP? Maybe but look at the Vesta. There is and will be cash shop power creep in game over time pushing them to make ships people feel are worth the money to buy rather than just a reskin of a free or already existing option. To really sell us on the Scimitar and make money it needs to wow us a bit and I tried to show that without going totally nuts.

    But man, that?s just my "guess" at the science variant. Feel free to share yours. :)
  • newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
    edited June 2013
    From Tribble

    1)Falchion Drednought Warbird
    2)Scimitar Drednought Warbird
    3)Tulwar Drednought Warbird

    It's a carrier

    one drone hanger pet revealed:



    Disruptor beam array x3
    Plasma torpedoes or photon torpedoes
    Multi spectral emitters
    Tri-phasic emitters
    Beam array overlord 1
    FAW 1
    EPTS 1
  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    The third one could be Tulwar or Doa, the screen shot conflict.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    as long as these are Romulan ONLY
    Live long and Prosper
  • pyryckpyryck Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Dreadnought WARBIRD. So yes, it will be Romulan only. :D


    p.s. the Drones are considered frigates
  • elandarkskyelandarksky Member Posts: 1,013 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    This raises two questions in me

    -will there be a 'generic' scimitar like teh oddy/bort

    -will the kdf get any more 3packs? (still missing raider/raptor/carrier) where feds have cruiser/escort/sci-carrier hybrid
    [Combat (Self)] Your Bite deals 2378 (1475) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother.
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited June 2013
    -will there be a 'generic' scimitar like teh oddy/bort

    i very much doubt it , since they were originally designed and released for the event
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    The Scimatar isn't the Flag Ship.
  • nobscunobscu Member Posts: 136 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Screenshots or it doesn't exist.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ruminate00ruminate00 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    zdfx19 wrote: »
    OP? Maybe but look at the Vesta.

    I wish people would stop using Vesta as an example of "OP". The Vesta's supposed "OP" stems from the fact that people compare it to regular science vessels. Compared to non-science vessels, the Vesta is above average at best.

    Regardless, your guess is probably close to what the Scimitar will be. The Scimitar is a dreadnaught, and the only other playable dreadnaught in the game has similar stats. (the Vesta's stats don't even come close, fyi)
  • elandarkskyelandarksky Member Posts: 1,013 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    voporak wrote: »
    I've said it before in threads and in chat, I'll say it again.

    If that logic applies, every federation ship in the game with the exception of tiny escorts like the Defiant should have a wing of type-8 shuttles. Having small craft does NOT = carrier. The Romulans' small craft just happens to be the Scorpion fighter.

    The way i always saw it was fighters are designed to be used in combat, ships with a wing of FIGHTERS are carriers/flightdecks

    Shuttles are Auxillary craft for away missions where transporters are usless, not to be flown into a warzone, (how many danubes did you see in DS9's actual 'War' fights?[by war fight i mean planned, not the first occurance of a jemhadar vessel where the danubes just happened to be there])

    The best way i could think of comparing it would be a boat seeing a carrier vessel, and ordering the lifeboat be fitted with guns and deployed :p (very bad methaphor, but it made me giggle inside)
    [Combat (Self)] Your Bite deals 2378 (1475) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother.
  • bridgernbridgern Member Posts: 709 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Bridger.png
  • erraberrab Member Posts: 1,434 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    bridgern wrote: »

    This was posted in the Romulan Section a few days ago.

    If you go to Tribble now the Drone has been removed.

    It looks like it was leaked onto Tribble early and quickly removed.

    Still, I Can't wait to see what the Scimitar can do!

    I'm sure that we'll be seeing a lock box version of a Borg a Fided Scimitar that well be open to all factions has well, there's too much money to be made for Cryptic to pass that chance up ;)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • rezkingrezking Member Posts: 1,109 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    sollvax wrote: »
    as long as these are Romulan ONLY

    The Feds will get ship equivalents and the "exclusive" consoles that come with them.
    NO to ARC
    RIP KDF and PvP 2014-07-17 Season 9.5 - Death by Dev
  • starblade7starblade7 Member Posts: 169 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    So perhaps you missed this thread already:
    http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=746861

    Plenty of speculation already covered there.
    Forget the possibility of PvP, for so much has become pay-to-win, never to be balanced. Forget the promise of exploration and research, for in the grim dark future of Star Trek Online there is only war. There is no peace amongst the stars, only an eternity of carnage and slaughter, and the laughter of thirsting publishers.
  • newromulan1newromulan1 Member Posts: 2,229
    edited June 2013
    starblade7 wrote: »
    So perhaps you missed this thread already:
    http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=746861

    Plenty of speculation already covered there.

    Thanks for letting me know I did miss it. I am still not used to the forums with a Romulan Shipyard/flotilla section:)

    I was wondering why no-one had posted about it.

    Anyways I have my 5000 Zen ready and waiting - which makes me wonder- if all the other Romulan ships are only 2000 zen - will they have the 3-pack lower?

    2x3 = 6000 zen vs other ships @ 2500 x 3 = 7500 - so there is much more incentive to buy the 3 pack - but at 5000 there is only a possible 1000 saved if you don't want the 3 console bonus??
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,863 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    zdfx19 wrote: »
    If I were to quibble balance rather than be optimistic, I might lower the turn rate to 5.5 and change the hull to 40,500k as the Romulans seem weaker there. Every 3 pack C-Store ship is a 10 console ship so I will not slash off one. I tried to put the console layout right between the Bortas and Odyssey with some care given to the Atrox and Vo'quv to create a Romulan niche and not overlap so much. I would continue that to guess at each variant's layout (ie the TAC variant would have 4 tactical consoles and 3 for both science and engineering).

    You may be right in slashing off sensor analysis but the Romulans lack a real top end science ship so I made the call to include it for the Science variant as a sell feature. I kept to four officer stations to fit the other faction carriers (and since it will be a C-Store ship) but it is interesting to note that the lock box carriers have had five BOFF stations each. That makes it hard to guess as they are not consistent. If it were lock box I'd guess at a five BOFF layout. Its the only clue for guessing I have.

    OP? Maybe but look at the Vesta. There is and will be cash shop power creep in game over time pushing them to make ships people feel are worth the money to buy rather than just a reskin of a free or already existing option. To really sell us on the Scimitar and make money it needs to wow us a bit and I tried to show that without going totally nuts.

    But man, that?s just my "guess" at the science variant. Feel free to share yours. :)

    Like its been said, the Vesta isn't really that OP...maybe its OP by science ship standards...but there is only one other science ship that can equip dual cannons...and no others with a hanger bay. Not to mention no other science ship has the tac boff potential of the Vesta.

    The layout you propose is a lot different than the Vesta, basically if you want to compare you're giving up the turn rate and some shields for more hull, a 4th forward weapon, a extra hanger, and a better boff seating.

    I would say you're getting a lot for a little, now if you think the Vesta is OP then what does this make this Scimitar?
  • zdfx19zdfx19 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Well, if I can be honest (and forgive my language) I think it makes the ship a damn good buy on par with everything else they are releasing. Power creep via cash shop and lock box. What?s new?

    So it?s OP to you? Honestly, who cares? PVP is an after thought ignored by most of the player population. PVE is easy enough to be irrelevant. The game is a themepark more about the experience than the challenge. If they ever revamp PVP it will likely be to PWE standards and those familiar with their other games automatically understand that means pay to win... It is what it is.
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    All C-Store ships from this point onward will now be $50 bundles, hooray! :rolleyes:

    Those drone ships, like from Enterprise. Ha! I wonder if it'll mimic random ships and their energy types, or will they mimic the ships they encounter.
  • pyryckpyryck Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Three little words - dreadnought, warbird, carrier.

    First off it is a rather LARGE ship that packs a LOT of firepower itself with quite a bit of defense available without the addition of the hangars.

    Second, it's a warbird with all that entails in regards to Romulans and singularity cores.

    Thirdly, it will probably have 2 hangars from which to launch frigate-sized combat ships.

    I've seen a few ideas tossed around on the console abilities as well as the set bonus. I would think the Tac version to get the Thalaron blast probably on at least a 5-10 min timer. The set bonus will probably be the perfect battle cloak allowing it to fire all weapons from cloak instead of just projectiles like the Advanced battle cloak. The Perfect cloak set bonus could be the big draw for buying the 3-pack.

    As for the different career versions, each will have 4 console slots for the primary career of the version. The Sci version probably will have Sensor analysis.

    As for the Scimitar being "OP", I will just recite a mantra I've heard attributed to the USMC - adapt, improvise and overcome. ;)
  • pyryckpyryck Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Thanks for letting me know I did miss it. I am still not used to the forums with a Romulan Shipyard/flotilla section:)

    I was wondering why no-one had posted about it.

    Anyways I have my 5000 Zen ready and waiting - which makes me wonder- if all the other Romulan ships are only 2000 zen - will they have the 3-pack lower?

    2x3 = 6000 zen vs other ships @ 2500 x 3 = 7500 - so there is much more incentive to buy the 3 pack - but at 5000 there is only a possible 1000 saved if you don't want the 3 console bonus??

    The 3-console set bonus will most likely be the major selling point for the 3-pack to encourage what few Romulan players there are to actually purchase the ships. ;)
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    makes little sense bringing the drones; they only got disruptor banks and holographic generators in show and no signs of torpedoes. i doubt the drones can spin around very quickly to avoid getting shot at in a 1vs1 fight. if the drones were designed perfectly, they could be considered OP due to the massive maneuverability and the disruptor attack mode, due to this there couldnt be any possible moment to fire torpedoes. since the last bit is not likely to happen, it really wouldnt make sense bringing the drones in if they could be easily shot at.

    the other thing that doesnt make sense about the drones is the use of a required superior telepath, the remans are suspect number 1 on that list, however i dont believe their telepathic ability is enough to control the drones for long if at all. so where they get the superior pilot from to control the drones will need to be explained.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • daggermoondaggermoon Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    lol can just see it now donatra uncloaks and gets nailed by her own weapon.:eek:
    rofl
  • quiiliitiilaquiiliitiila Member Posts: 309 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Things I'm hoping to see:

    Second Shield: Some type of secondary shielding, perhaps with a 25%-50% capacity.

    Thalaron Pulse: Most likely with a 5 minute CD (with some explanation as to why ours requires so much longer a charge time).

    Perfect Cloak: Perhaps like the enhanced battle cloak, but allows energy weapons to be fired instead of torps. Some have suggested that it be a TRUELY perfect cloak but on a medium CD, I'm not sure how I feel about that, I'd rather have a passive ability.

    Thalaron Power: I'm hoping they do something with the Thalaron power on the ship; passive weapon bonus,Aux etc. Or perhaps adding a DoT to all weapon attacks.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,863 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Things I'm hoping to see:

    Second Shield: Some type of secondary shielding, perhaps with a 25%-50% capacity.

    Thalaron Pulse: Most likely with a 5 minute CD (with some explanation as to why ours requires so much longer a charge time).

    Perfect Cloak: Perhaps like the enhanced battle cloak, but allows energy weapons to be fired instead of torps. Some have suggested that it be a TRUELY perfect cloak but on a medium CD, I'm not sure how I feel about that, I'd rather have a passive ability.

    Thalaron Power: I'm hoping they do something with the Thalaron power on the ship; passive weapon bonus,Aux etc. Or perhaps adding a DoT to all weapon attacks.

    We probably won't see secondary shields, firing while cloaked, or perfect cloak. Besides have you ever played a T'varo or B'rel? When you fire your torps you are vulnerable to attack but not for long, firing energy weapons while cloaked would leave you so vulnerable it would hurt. Plus there would be no downside since most people these days fly around using nothing but energy weapons.
  • revan999revan999 Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    makes little sense bringing the drones; they only got disruptor banks and holographic generators in show and no signs of torpedoes. i doubt the drones can spin around very quickly to avoid getting shot at in a 1vs1 fight. if the drones were designed perfectly, they could be considered OP due to the massive maneuverability and the disruptor attack mode, due to this there couldnt be any possible moment to fire torpedoes. since the last bit is not likely to happen, it really wouldnt make sense bringing the drones in if they could be easily shot at.

    the other thing that doesnt make sense about the drones is the use of a required superior telepath, the remans are suspect number 1 on that list, however i dont believe their telepathic ability is enough to control the drones for long if at all. so where they get the superior pilot from to control the drones will need to be explained.

    It clearly shows they have plasma torpedoes, but for some reason the description says says photon. Either way it shows beams and torpedoes.
This discussion has been closed.