test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Borg Set Change

2456789

Comments

  • darkenzedddarkenzedd Member Posts: 881
    edited October 2012
    anazonda wrote: »
    Wait? Are we discussing Escort vs. Cruiser vs. Sci ships, or are we discussing ninja-changes to the borg set?

    Just need to figure this one out... thanks.


    It was meant to be about the set, but someone bragged about escorts being nerfed down to cruiser level now, hence what started the off topic. :rolleyes:
  • artfulmerkageartfulmerkage Member Posts: 294 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Oh well, I'll just redo next to every ship I have!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Valdus | Charn | Costello | Typhus | Thyran
  • edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • verlaine11verlaine11 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Wow im just speachless, i drop 3,200 shields (from 14.5 to 11.2) and gain a useless Tractor beam with a HUGE cooldown - unless that gets changed
  • darkenzedddarkenzedd Member Posts: 881
    edited October 2012
    I guess the tankiest set now would be the full MACO, but the set bonuses are next to useless.

    Going to make it difficult to mix and match sets when you can only get one set bonus.

    Well apart from mixing the new Omega Adapted Borg console with the beam or torp and another set...
  • timelord79timelord79 Member Posts: 1,852 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    verlaine11 wrote: »
    Wow im just speachless, i drop 3,200 shields (from 14.5 to 11.2) and gain a useless Tractor beam with a HUGE cooldown - unless that gets changed

    There is no more Borg tractor beam, because there is no more 4 piece set... so don't worry. ;)

    How far your shield strength drops depends on how powerful the Mk XII version is of teh Borg shield.. I don't think anyone has seen those numbers yet.
    Can someone math that?
    11750640_1051211588222593_450219911807924697_n.jpg
  • verlaine11verlaine11 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    timelord79 wrote: »
    There is no more Borg tractor beam, because there is no more 4 piece set... so don't worry. ;)

    Ohh thats true, well whoop de doo i lose huge amount of shields for nothing then, i think im going to a darkened room and cry

    Shield had better be better /grumble /grumble


    EDIT - looking at the pics you do get a free Tractor beam for a 3 piece........with a HUGE cooldown
  • corsair114corsair114 Member Posts: 276
    edited October 2012
    verlaine11 wrote: »
    Ohh thats true, well whoop de doo i lose huge amount of shields for nothing then, i think im going to a darkened room and cry

    Shield had better be better /grumble /grumble

    The Borg Tractor Beam is now part of the 3-piece bonus.
  • darkenzedddarkenzedd Member Posts: 881
    edited October 2012
    You can't be oblivious to your own bias here. You're already saying cruisers are weak. And you think that's good? That escorts are objectively superior to the other ship types?

    Judging by the picture, you get the tractor beam as part of the 3 piece bonus, but I may be wrong...
  • timelord79timelord79 Member Posts: 1,852 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I stand corrected then...

    Well, i guess no one is complaining getting that power with one less set piece I guess.
    11750640_1051211588222593_450219911807924697_n.jpg
  • captainrevo1captainrevo1 Member Posts: 3,948 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    So the shield, engine and deflector become a 3 piece and the console now becomes a new 3 pieces when you get a new borg torpdeo and cutting beam when ever they are added.

    now i have not looked at all the stats so they may require adjustment but i dont mind the theory behind the change, as its now in keeping with the other sets.
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    STFs aren't the issue. Players skills are, in these instances. You can easily complete a STF with a full team of RA ships with green Mk XI gear equiped. Some people even completed a normal one with mirandas.

    I'm only concerned because the borg set was the best science set and because it looks like we have no other sci set to compensate this loss. The borg shield is a real issue, it's not a shield it's a colander, and since there's no hull tanking in this game, this shield is a complete disaster. I'm really worried about the +5 aux power bonus given by the deflector, and the graviton build we could do with the current set.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Meh. It was bound to happen.

    and don't get comfortable, more changes are incomming........
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • weylandjuarezweylandjuarez Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I think the biggest disappointment here is that a lot of us were asking for more of the sets (Aegis for example) to be extended by adding a fourth item (console) - it would have added a lot of diversity to the game - and lots of full set/2-2/3-1 options.

    Doing this nerfs the existing Borg set because that shield heal's going away for the majority of players (who won't use the Borg shield). The console becomes largely redundant (it's got good stats but I don't use them on their own any more).

    Also - look at the cutting beam - [Dmg]x3? Yeah.

    I can't see many people taking the full 6-part Borg set (weapons adds to the sets have largely been too fussy to get any use out of) so really, what was the point? I guess just to standardise on the 3-part sets.

    Oh, and also to rank it so we'll have to grind for a new one when XIII becomes available...
    Please join our peaceful protest to help make STO a better game
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Proudly not contributing to PWE's bottom-line since October 2012
  • timelord79timelord79 Member Posts: 1,852 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    What do you mean with rank them? They where always ranked. they just didn't say Mk X even though they were. the procs were the only reason people used them anymore.
    11750640_1051211588222593_450219911807924697_n.jpg
  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    If this is truly an "escort nerf", then I'd like to welcome escort pilots to where many people believe the science players have been... nerfed because of the "unintended effects" of power combinations after multiple repeated whines from the "escort" crowd...

    Before: "Wah, gravity well with all sorts of Tac boosts from an MVAE = one hit kill". Bye Bye GW damage.
    Before: "Wah, CPB strips way too much of my MACO XII shield when ran with Tac boosts." Bye Bye CPB damage.
    Now: "Wah, we can't kill an escort without 5 escorts doing a perfectly coordinated Alpha Strike on all four shields at once." Bye Bye Borg shield proc reinforcing MACO/KHG XII shields.

    On that (semi-sarcastic) note, remember that the whole purpose of these various sets is to actually have players make choices, instead of encouraging "cookie cutter" builds, such as the nigh-universally recommended 3 Piece Borg / MACO/KHG MK XII shield, or 2 piece Borg / 2 piece Omega/JH/Breen builds for weapon proc & hull regen.

    Granted, regenerative shields are "lame" in the high-burst world of PvP, and massive damage world of late-game PvE. However, I'm wondering if a (logically postulated) Mk XII Borg Regenerative shield will hold up against a cruiser's "pressure DPS"?

    Especially in light of the fact that, if escorts do become somewhat more squishy because of this change, the need to actively resist the heal-cruiser's pressure DPS may "return". Then you really start up the PvP chess match (I'm the anti-pressure escort, let me deal with the heal-boat, while the anti-burst escort deals with the other escorts that are trying to wipe me off the map).
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • weylandjuarezweylandjuarez Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    timelord79 wrote: »
    What do you mean with rank them? They where always ranked. they just didn't say Mk X even though they were. the procs were the only reason people used them anymore.

    I was never sure whether the Borg set was one that levels with you or not - I always assumed it did. Irrespective, there was only one version before - now there's Mk XI and XII - sure to be followed at some point by Mk XIII - yay for new content /sarcasm
    Please join our peaceful protest to help make STO a better game
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Proudly not contributing to PWE's bottom-line since October 2012
  • hippiejonhippiejon Member Posts: 1,581 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    bitemepwe wrote: »
    Meh. It was bound to happen.

    and don't get comfortable, more changes are incomming........

    Exactly what roach just said.

    Oh no, we're going to have to adjust our tactics, and builds.
    Keeps the game interesting.
  • grylakgrylak Member Posts: 1,594 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Ok, before season 7 the Borg set has 4 pieces:

    2 pieces give you a bonus chance for hull repair which will give you up to 30% of your hull back.

    3 pieces gives you a chance for a shield heal bonus which happens when your shields go below 20%.

    4 pieces gives you a lame tractor beam.

    Up until now, everyone has been using the borg engines, deflector, assimilated module (for the hull and shield healing set bonuses) and the MACO shield (which is the best shield in the game).

    After season 7, they're removing the assimilated module as a set piece and making it a part of its own set. So, to get the 3rd set bonus shield heal I described above, you have to use the lame Borg shield.

    Everyone is now QQing because of this.


    I do not know QQing, but thank you for explaining. Is there a link to a dev post where this is talked about?
    *******************************************

    A Romulan Strike Team, Missing Farmers and an ancient base on a Klingon Border world. But what connects them? Find out in my First Foundary mission: 'The Jeroan Farmer Escapade'
  • thedoctorblueboxthedoctorbluebox Member Posts: 749 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I'm mad again, no words, no words... i can't even speak or type right now, get back to me later after I punch a hole in my wall.
  • weylandjuarezweylandjuarez Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    dareau wrote: »
    Especially in light of the fact that, if escorts do become somewhat more squishy because of this change, the need to actively resist the heal-cruiser's pressure DPS may "return". Then you really start up the PvP chess match

    Any incidental benefits to PvP are entirely by accident though (but I hope you're right) - this is about padding out the reputation system with reworked old content across multiple levels (XI/XII). I've a sneaking suspicion that you may not be able to choose whether you want that MkXI Borg cutting beam or not - you may have to grind it anyway to say unlock the Borg Mk XII Engines later on...

    Just speculation, but yeah - Cryptic really are that dumb.
    Please join our peaceful protest to help make STO a better game
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Proudly not contributing to PWE's bottom-line since October 2012
  • thedoctorblueboxthedoctorbluebox Member Posts: 749 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    New catch phrase:

    "Cryptic, ruining Star Trek Online one season at a time..."
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,882 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    It sucks that they are nerfing, I can live with it...its not the end of the world. But lets hope this will lead to re-evaluation and perhaps buffing of M.A.C.O. , Omega, and KHG sets.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • orondisorondis Member Posts: 1,447 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    It's about time.

    Still it doesn't go far enough, the 2-piece Borg set will still be a must have set for most, simply for the hull heals. What needs to be done is to rip out the borg hull heal proc, or make it so that it's part of the 3-piece set, with the tractor beam becoming part of the two piece.

    As it is though, it's still overpowered. The set was a mistake from it's introduction and needs to be brought in line with the other sets.

    So basically, it's a good start but doesn't go far enough.

    As for those raging, try to see it from a balance perspective. It is overpowered, so overpowered in fact that even after the first nerf it's STILL overpowered. I use it myself and I'll be more then happy to see it get nerfed further, because that's exactly what it needs.
    Previously Alendiak
    Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
    Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
  • havamhavam Member Posts: 1,735 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    orondis wrote: »
    It's about time.

    Still it doesn't go far enough, the 2-piece Borg set will still be a must have set for most, simply for the hull heals. What needs to be done is to rip out the borg hull heal proc, or make it so that it's part of the 3-piece set, with the tractor beam becoming part of the two piece.

    As it is though, it's still overpowered. The set was a mistake from it's introduction and needs to be brought in line with the other sets.

    Agreed, nerf it good baby
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    diogene0 wrote: »
    It was the best science set for graviton generators, but now if we want any set bonus, we'll have to use the terrible borg shield or the not up to par maco space set (the 2 piece power is stupid and utterly useless). So I'll have to loose a lot of resilience or sci power efficiency.

    I understand the need to nerf tanking, especially for escorts, but once again it looks like a science nerf, even if it wasn't the original purpose. I do hope that the new omega adapted borg tech won't force us to make a lot of sacrifices and have goot other set parts, because I really need the console on my science ship. :cool:

    I'm not opposed to change but I hope the new omega adapted borg tech isn't a cheap set with terrible set parts, because I'll feat I have to loose the GREAT borg deflector with +5 to aux. That's already a huge nerf for scis.

    I don't see it as about that.

    The Borg set is supposed to be a starter set that MACO/Omega Force replace.

    Making it the only 4 piece set in the game made it something too tempting, especially when the console required no STFs.

    I'll still use the console because it's a way to pump damage out of a non-Tac console. But that Mk XII MACO engine can come back out of the bank.
  • weylandjuarezweylandjuarez Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Seriously?? You guys really think it's that OP? I haven't used the Borg set in over a year now - after the last run of nerfs it just seemed really - meh. I hardly ever even use the console now.

    It's bland, it's ugly (the ship mods and the VFX are hideous) and the only people that use it religiously are min/maxxers who'll stick with a given setup irrespectively if they think they get 0.5% more mojo from it.

    TRIBBLE around with the Borg set is just wasted development effort in my opinion. They're monkeying around with existing content only to repackage it and present it as 'new' content.

    And to put it another way - all of the development effort that's gone into futzing with the Borg set could've resulted in a) a completely new set or b) a revamp of Aegis (which could really use some love) - unfortunately the Aegis set doesn't fit neatly into their new Omega grind so they've left it to rot.
    Please join our peaceful protest to help make STO a better game
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Proudly not contributing to PWE's bottom-line since October 2012
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    dareau wrote: »

    Especially in light of the fact that, if escorts do become somewhat more squishy because of this change, the need to actively resist the heal-cruiser's pressure DPS may "return".

    After this change, a possible change to tactical Team and possibly adjusting the BFI DOffs, Escorts may become squishy enough that none of the proposed changes will be needed for Cruisers or Engineers that have been given in other threads.

    Though I would still like to see them come about anyways just to enhance gameplay choices.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • orondisorondis Member Posts: 1,447 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    reyan01 wrote: »
    So, knowing that the Borg set is getting nerfed, I'll probably go for a full set MACO or OMEGA. I've got one MkXII piece of each and will therefore have to work to obtain the rest. Should I be going for full OMEGA or full MACO?

    2-piece borg set plus Maco shield appears to be the best by the looks of it.
    Previously Alendiak
    Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
    Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
  • weylandjuarezweylandjuarez Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    You don't need a full set of either (now anyway - bear in mind they may change too) - the 3 part bonus for each is pretty weak (Heavy Graviton Beam for the MACO and Gravitic Anchor for the Omega) - out of the two, the Gravitic Anchor is the more useful toy but it's still a toy.

    If you're only interested in functionality get the MACO shields and then whatever combination of Engine and Deflector works for you. MACO engines are faster in sector space (at the price of the wibbly-wobbly warp bubble - some like it, some hate it), Omega engines have a faster cooldown on Quantum Slipstream etc.

    MACO is more defensive, Omega is more offensive.
    Please join our peaceful protest to help make STO a better game
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Proudly not contributing to PWE's bottom-line since October 2012
Sign In or Register to comment.