this game, its software, its engine, and mostly likely the hardware running this game...are ANCIENT, outdated and sub par. The fact that there are problems like this are completely as the should be tbh. This game is basically running on popsicle sticks and duct tape. Expecting the kind of performance people keep wanting…
I think all us mac users need to do two things: accept that this is what can happen when you pour money into a game. And 2, move on to better pastures. Lets face it, the engine and graphics of this game are ancient compared to today's standards. The player base is very very small. So small that it relies on players…
welp it was fun while it lasted. I knew this was coming when S11 had all the mac issues. This was inevitable. Sucks that I sunk as much money in this game as I did. but entertinment has never been free. But I'm actually not that sad, because keeping up with this game has felt like more of a chore than actual fun. I'll miss…
It's hilarious to watch the people in this thread pretend to be copyright and IP lawyers, when none of you are. I'm also going to assume that none of you have actually read the CBS complaint. The Axanar team is going to be represented by one of the top IP law firms in the country. And so far, its looking like Axanar has a…
Cryptic may very well release more ships with a 5/3 load out in the future. But thinking that they will completely scrap the 4/4 load out completely as well as reprogram all the current ships to 5/3 is a bit ridiculous, and probably a forlorn expectation. I don't think all ships should have the same load out, that just…
Just because broad siding isn't canon (and honestly, the canon argument for a GAME is weak strawman one at best), does not mean it can't be a dynamic within a game that is clearly, and does not have to be a slave to its source material. If you want a Trek game that IS a slave to the canon, then go to college, get a degree…
So just because you don't like broadsiding, you think the play style should be removed altogether. Yeah sorry, thats not how this kind of things works. But I would hate to take your self important delusion away from you. And no, a cruiser that has a horrible turn rate should not be built for front facing attacks, what kind…
Yup. And when BFAW is nerfed, something else will become as powerful as it once was, then that will be nerfed. Eventually, by this logic, everything will eventually have to be nerfed until everything is equally useless. But nahhh, salty entitled people will be salty.
all i hear is "I don't use beams, and they are so good, so I want them less good for the people that use and depend on them, and until then I'll just stomp my feet because ONE ability happens to be good, because nothing in this game should ever be good or desirable ever. We should all just be miserable!"
The ship is FANTASTIC. Mine is performing very well. Do not regret the purchase, and thank you cryptic for sticking to your guns. Some people will never be satisfied with anything. Their loss.
Its not. Its already been shown that its going to be available in the C-Store and there will be a fleet version. Or did you guys not read the jupiter blogs like at all?
for the sake of the satire in other answers: Any ship, any design but the power output is set to infinite of course. For the sake of a real answer: I'm not sure. I really like Jupiter because its an original design and not based on anything canon. I'd love to see more original ships that aren't based on canon designs. I…