test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Poll: Should the Galaxy-X remain exclusive to the referral program?

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
One of the main points Cryptic has emphasized in various interviews is that they listen to their players. And TBH, they've done a pretty good job so far. For example, the game launched without PvE for Klingons, the community requested it, and they have started to deliver and have more in the works. The game launched with a pretty lame crafting system, but people expressed their desires and Cryptic is reworking it. The list goes on and on from the DP to the difficulty slider to end game content.

However, a new issue has arisen that people are voicing their concerns about; namely the Galaxy-X ship introduced through the referral program. Cryptic has made a pattern thus far of listening to the players, and thats a good thing. So lets have an unofficial poll to show how the community feels about this issue, so Cryptic can have another opportunity to prove they are listening:

Should the Galaxy-X remain exclusive to the referral program?

After you vote, please share your thoughts.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13456715

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    no,but honestly. they're not gonna listen to you.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    If Cryptic have any regard for their players at all, they will change their decision on this.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    no it should never have been made "exclusive" to the program.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Can we not start another thread about this? There are already 3 of them going two of the riot threads. Hasn't even been 72 hours since the announcement was made and this subject is already starting to get on my nerves.

    This thread isn't going to end well.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    No, it shouldn't remain exclusive, it should be purchasable at a shipyard with any other T5 ship. Save Cryptics non canon ubercruisers for referral rewards and whatnot.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Can we not start another thread about this? There are already 3 of them going two of the riot threads. Hasn't even been 72 hours since the announcement was made and this subject is already starting to get on my nerves.

    Too bad. This is the kind of thing that needs to be nipped in the bud NOW.
    More topics means more people at Cryptic are aware that we, the players, are upset about this.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    No, it just means that the same people are posting their same complaints in several different topics about it, espiceally since at least one of the previous 3 hasn't left page 1.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Can we not start another thread about this? There are already 3 of them going two of the riot threads. Hasn't even been 72 hours since the announcement was made and this subject is already starting to get on my nerves.

    This thread isn't going to end well.

    Sorry its getting on your nerves, but at least with a poll you can see exact numbers with one click instead of reading every page of a thread. If it really does bother you though, I would recommend exercising your free will and not clicking on a thread related to a subject you dont want to read about.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    No, it just means that the same people are posting their same complaints in several different topics about it, espiceally since at least one of the previous 3 hasn't left page 1.

    I've counted at least 10 different people posting their thoughts against this in the last 20 minutes.
    I'm really sick of some people trotting out the "eeeh it's just teh same people over and over!" misinformation.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Unfortunately there are also sometimes dev posts in those threads and there is no way I'm missing that information. XD
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Unfortunately there are also sometimes dev posts in those threads and there is no way I'm missing that information. XD

    Which are easily found by clicking on the "dev post" button which is currently NOT next to this topic.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Unfortunately there are also sometimes dev posts in those threads and there is no way I'm missing that information. XD

    Well, you can easily see the Dev posts without reading anything else in the thread using the Dev tracker.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    I've counted at least 10 different people posting their thoughts against this in the last 20 minutes.
    I'm really sick of some people trotting out the "eeeh it's just teh same people over and over!" misinformation.

    So 10 people on the forums are complaining about this?

    Seriously, complain about something worthwhile and go find five friends, it's not that hard. I don't mean any ill-will towards you guys, but this is ridiculous.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Malicia wrote:
    So 10 people on the forums are complaining about this?

    Seriously, complain about something worthwhile and go find five friends, it's not that hard. I don't mean any ill-will towards you guys, but this is ridiculous.

    Yes, 10 people I counted in 20 minutes = only 10 people complaining about this.
    ¬_¬
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    It's more like 50 repeating posters who are raging to their hearts content, but I digress.

    Anywho I don't think Cryptic is going to change their mind about this one. It's too good a marketing strategy and that is one very tempting carrot at the end.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    It's more like 50 repeating posters who are raging to their hearts content, but I digress.

    Yes yes keep telling yourself it's just a few malcontents. That's what they said in SWG too as it burned around them.
    Anywho I don't think Cryptic is going to change their mind about this one. It's too good a marketing strategy and that is one very tempting carrot at the end.

    At the end of a nigh-impossible task, a marketing gimmick made in bad faith that will anger fans.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    It's more like 50 repeating posters who are raging to their hearts content, but I digress.

    Anywho I don't think Cryptic is going to change their mind about this one. It's too good a marketing strategy and that is one very tempting carrot at the end.

    Maybe your right. But I never would have believed they would have changed their mind and made what was planned to be a paid expansion for CO free either. And the only reason they did was because of community feedback. That was a much bigger issue than this by far.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Yes yes keep telling yourself it's just a few malcontents. That's what they said in SWG too as it burned around them.

    I did not rule out the one time posters who post their complaint and then move on, I just stated that it was a decent number of players who keep posting their rage about it. And I'm well aware of what happened in SWG.
    At the end of a nigh-impossible task, a marketing gimmick made in bad faith that will anger fans.

    Then this challenge should be right up the ally of us Trekkies. :cool:

    Seriously though, I understand the frustration. I share in it to an extent, but I'm still going to try my hardest to get that ship in a calm, collected, mature manner, and rise to the challenge or fail. Nothing more and nothing less.
    Maybe your right. But I never would have believed they would have changed their mind and made what was planned to be a paid expansion for CO free either. And the only reason they did was because of community feedback. That was a much bigger issue than this by far.

    I was not aware of that. Interesting.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    I was not aware of that. Interesting.

    Yeah, I was pretty surprised myself. Here is the info if your interested:

    http://www.champions-online.com/node/594840
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    I have no problem to them making an exclusive ship available for the master recruiters, and honestly, I bet you wouldn't have a problem with it either if it wasn't THAT SPECIFIC ship.

    Seriously, it's the coolest ship of all designs, IMO. Yes, I want it too. Am I ever going to get it? Probably not. Does it bother me? Not at all. Did you also complain about the Constitution class pre-order Enterprise 1701? That's exclusive as well. The difference, you can go and get this one.. Just recruit 5 people to the game.

    Edited to remove my errors about the "costume" It will have unique cannon. It will also possibly have a non-combat cloak (even though it contradicts their older pre-release posts)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    AtomicNewt wrote: »
    I have no problem to them making an exclusive ship costume (which is all it is btw. It will NOT cloak. They have already made it clear Feds will not get that technology) available for the master recruiters, and honestly, I bet you wouldn't have a problem with it either if it wasn't THAT SPECIFIC ship.

    Seriously, it's the coolest ship of all designs, IMO. Yes, I want it too. Am I ever going to get it? Probably not. Does it bother me? Not at all. Did you also complain about the Constitution class pre-order Enterprise 1701? That's exclusive as well. The difference, you can go and get this one.. Just recruit 5 people to the game.

    Please do your research before commenting, you're wrong on multiple counts.
    dstahl as hinted that it will have a cloak, and a unique cannon making it more than just a skin.
    And you not only have to recruit 5 people, a task in itself, you must also get them all to buy a one-month sub.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Please do your research before commenting, you're wrong on multiple counts.
    dstahl as hinted that it will have a cloak, and a unique cannon making it more than just a skin.
    And you not only have to recruit 5 people, a task in itself, you must also get them all to buy a one-month sub.

    Where did he hint that it will have a cloak? Link or it did not happen.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    I am going with no on that poll. If the Galaxy-X is going to be in the referral program, then Cryptic should reward it to the Veterans of Star Trek Online as well.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    i haven't posted in any of the other threads, but feel if i were to shoot for the All Good Things Galaxy, would have to sign up more than 5, because i doubt most would last the full month and be considered "subscribed".
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    No, and neither should the holo-tribble or the holo-BOff. Cryptic swore long ago (CoH Valentine's Day Event 2005) they would never tie in game rewards to referral programs again. They should not have done this in the first place. I am terribly disappointed in them. I want all of those things and I will never get them (assuming they're left like this) because all of my friends already play the game.

    For shame Jackalope! For shame!


    :(
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Where did he hint that it will have a cloak? Link or it did not happen.
    dstahl wrote: »
    The Galaxy X was a specific ship created specifically for the Referral program. The goal with the other end game ships is that they would be unlockable by reaching the next tier level but the specifics of that are still be discussed.



    Here's what I know about it so far - The cannon is specific to this ship, and takes the place of a weapon's slot, but is not an item that can be removed and placed on another ship. It shows up as a captain's power on your weapon tray. The beam is intendend to be a very narrow front cylinder beam that can pass through objects and hit multiple targets if you are lined up properly (out to a set distance).

    There are no details yet on recharge timers or how it impacts cooldowns of other powers/weapons.

    I've also heard rumor that it may have a non-battle cloak - which means that it might be able to cloak - but only out of combat.

    Once the designer is finished with the ship - I'll see if I can get the full details.

    The ship will be available by the time that your referals hit their first 30 day billing cycle.

    also...

    Management is aware of this thread ...

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?p=2637012
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    i haven't posted in any of the other threads, but feel if i were to shoot for the All Good Things Galaxy, would have to sign up more than 5, because i doubt most would last the full month and be considered "subscribed".

    Technically they would have to stay for two months. First they would have to play through the free month that comes with the game, then they would have to subscribe for another before you would get any credit.

    :(
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    :( double whammy :(
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010

    Oh goody! So, it's an even better item that many of us will never get unless we buy five accounts ourselves. Aaaaargh!!!

    :(
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    If Cryptic have any regard for their players at all, they will change their decision on this.

    I agree, there should be another way to get it...perhaps with the accolade system or something?
Sign In or Register to comment.