test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The Intrepid-class is a warship with banned weapons!

oliviaclaireoliviaclaire Member Posts: 158 Arc User
[Original post title: The Intrepid-class is a warship, not a science vessel!]

Canonical reference

VOY: "The Thaw"

PARIS: This ship was built for combat performance, Harry, not musical performance. Nobody figured we'd be taking any long trips.

According to this line of dialogue, not only is the Intrepid-class a warship, but it also was not built for long-range missions. It's ironic that the ship was called Voyager.

By contrast, STO describes it as a long-range science vessel, while Memory Alpha: Intrepid-class describes it as a long-range explorer. The main reason for this conclusion seems to be a line of dialogue from VOY: "Someone to Watch Over Me":

NEELIX: Voyager's an Intrepid class starship with a crew of one hundred and forty six, designed for long-term exploration. I thought we'd start with a tour of our primary systems. First stop, Engineering.

However, the Intrepid-class background information is a much closer match to being built for combat performance:

In the first draft script of VOY: "Caretaker" (dated 8 June 1994), the Intrepid-class was referred to as "a sleek bullet of a ship, built for action, capable of holding a crew compliment of one hundred and twenty-five."

In fact, the very first mission that the USS Voyager is engaged in is a military-type operation, as seen in VOY: "Caretaker":

JANEWAY: I'm leaving on a mission to find a Maquis ship that disappeared in the Badlands a week ago.
PARIS: I wouldn't if I were you.
JANEWAY: Really?
PARIS: I've never seen a Federation starship that could manoeuvre through the plasma storms.
JANEWAY: You've never seen Voyager. We'd like you to come along.
PARIS: You'd like me to lead you to my former colleagues. I was only with the Maquis a few weeks before I was captured, Captain. I don't know where most of their hiding places are.
JANEWAY: You know the territory better than anyone we've got.
PARIS: What's so important about this particular Maquis ship?
JANEWAY: My Chief of Security was on board, undercover. He was supposed to report in twice during the last six days. He didn't.

That's definitely not a "long-term exploration" or a "long-range science" type of mission.

Starship classification

Memory Alpha: Warship

In starship classification, a warship, war vessel, or combat vessel was a generic term for any armed starship designed for combat. These vessels included battleships, battle cruisers, various sized cruisers, escorts, and destroyers.

This is a close [perfect] match to being built for combat performance.

Memory Alpha: Science vessel

In starship classification, a science vessel (or research vessel) was a limited-role starship. It was not well armed, but instead carried several laboratories, advanced sensors, and in some cases, advanced deflector shields. Ships of this class were used for scientific research missions, such as observing the collapse of a star, mapping newly discovered planets and nebulae, or simply being an isolated location for hazardous experiments. Most science vessels were not designed for long term missions.

The Intrepid-class is not listed as one of them.

If Star Trek insists that the Intrepid-class is a long-range explorer, then it could only mean one thing: Starfleet exploration vessels are warships.

Do you realize how ridiculous of an episode VOY: "Living Witness" is now?

EMH: Voyager wasn't a warship. We were explorers.

240x320.jpg

Explorers with a vessel built for combat performance, also known as a warship. :)

Update: A perfect match

Scratch the "close" match, it is a perfect match! The wording may be slightly different between "built for combat performance" and "designed for combat" but the meaning is exactly the same.

Update: Definition of a warship

Dictionary: Warship

[A] ship built or armed for combat purposes.

Update: Named after a real warship

Memory Alpha: USS Bellerophon (Intrepid-class) background information

"Inter Arma Enim Silent Leges" writer Ronald D. Moore named the Bellerophon after the HMS Bellerophon, a British warship which served as part of a fleet commanded by Lord Nelson in the early 19th century.

Retcon / Supersession

Conflicting statements do not necessarily equal supersession. They could simply mean that different writers or directors didn't conduct proper research or that they disagree. This is why the class' original description as "built for action", when combined with "built for combat performance" and being armed for combat purposes, makes the Intrepid-class a warship by definition. That, plus being named after a real warship in the case of the USS Bellerophon.

Update: The Intrepid-class is a light cruiser (warship)

Memory Alpha: Light cruiser

According to the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual, the Saber-class was also classified as a light cruiser, as was the Intrepid-class. During the Dominion War a variant type of light cruiser was built from an Intrepid-class primary hull.

Wikipedia: Light cruiser

A light cruiser is a type of small- or medium-sized warship. The term is a shortening of the phrase "light armored cruiser", describing a small ship that carried armor in the same way as an armored cruiser: a protective belt and deck.

Memory Alpha: Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Technical Manual is a reference book that contains technical information about the milieu of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Written from an entirely in-universe point of view. . . .

A reference book plus canon make the Intrepid-class a warship. :)

Update: The Intrepid-class armaments

Memory Alpha: Intrepid-class phaser systems

[A] total ship's complement of fourteen phaser arrays. [. . .] Additional phaser banks included at least four separate phaser emitters. . . .

The Intrepid-class model only has thirteen discernible phaser arrays, with the large array strips being the same type-10 phaser arrays used by Galaxy-class starships, according to Rick Sternbach. Other phaser emitter locations were seen in "Think Tank", "Unimatrix Zero", "Prophecy", "Resolutions", and "Dragon's Teeth".

Memory Alpha: Phaser array

A phaser array is a devastating weapon comprised of an arrangement of phaser emitters located in strategic areas of a starship, space station, or other vessel. In the 23rd century, phaser arrays had smaller numbers of emitters, and were commonly referred to as phaser banks. (TOS: "The Corbomite Maneuver", "Balance of Terror") By the 24th century, Starfleet began to fit its vessels and facilities with phaser arrays that contained much larger numbers of emitters. . . .

Memory Alpha: Intrepid-class torpedo systems

The Intrepid-class housed five standard torpedo launchers (two fore and two aft, and one on the ventral side of the ship). The USS Voyager was loaded with type-6 photon torpedoes in 2371. The ship also had class-9 and at least four class-10 photon torpedoes and two tricobalt devices in her torpedo arsenal. (VOY: "Caretaker", "Resolutions", "Scorpion, Part II", "In the Flesh", "Bliss")

In addition, the ship also carried spatial charges, that could also be used as subspatial charges to cause subspace disturbance. There were also photon charges and photon bursts. The ship also had gravimetric charges, that could be installed into photon torpedoes, turning them into extremely destructive gravimetric torpedoes. . . .

Banned weapons

The tricobalt devices and spatial charges can be used as subspace weapons, which were banned under the Khitomer Accord.

Star Trek: Insurrection

DANIELS: They've detonated an isolytic burst. A subspace tear is forming.
RIKER: On screen.
PERIM: I thought subspace weapons were banned by the Khitomer Accord.
RIKER: Remind me to lodge a protest.

[. . .]

LAFORGE: Detonating the warp core might neutralise the cascade, but then again it might not. Subspace weapons are unpredictable. That's why they were banned.

It's canon. :)

Update: They still cannot explain it!

VOY: "The Voyager Conspiracy"

SEVEN: The Captain ordered Commander Tuvok to destroy the array. He fired two tricobalt devices. Are those weapons normally carried on Federation Starships?
CHAKOTAY: No.
SEVEN: Yet they were part of Voyager's arsenal. Why?
CHAKOTAY: I can't explain that.

Even to this day, they failed to explain it. :)

Star+Trek+Into+Darkness+Crying.jpg
tumblr_mo6mrj5wwq1rcq1yuo1_500.gif
star-trek-into-darkness-teaser-trailer-bones-mccoy-close-up.jpg
crying.jpeg
tumblr_mnvs41yPIt1qe89guo1_500.gif
trek7_06.jpg
timeless_292.jpg?w=474&h=354
200_s.gif
TOS1x05i.png
data-spot-generations.jpg
Post edited by oliviaclaire on
«13456711

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • antonine3258antonine3258 Member Posts: 2,391 Arc User
    I'm not sure where the issue is here.

    Starfleet's ships are generally multi-role, the Constitution was usually considered on screen an even match for a Klingon D7, and it's was also an exploration vessel.

    The Defiant is so scary because it's a single-role warship versus Starfleet usually building to fill its defense and scientific obligations. The same features for long-range exploration (high endurance at high warp speed) also makes it a good fleet scout.
    Fate - protects fools, small children, and ships named Enterprise Will Riker

    Member Access Denied Armada!

    My forum single-issue of rage: Make the Proton Experimental Weapon go for subsystem targetting!
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • alexhurlbutalexhurlbut Member Posts: 292 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Well on one hand, the Intrepid Class is often seen as a light cruiser, going by the line in The Thaw. She's not heavily armed like the Defiant however.
    What you forgot, oliviaclaire, is that the STO is set in 2400s. USS Voyager's journey showed what the Intrepid was capable of beyond her original role. So in the years after (in the STO timeline), Starfleet started to tweak the Class toward that new role and re-designated it as a long range science vessel.
  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    But....but....how can the Intrepid be a warship, it only has two tac console slots!

    Seriously though, what does it mater what is said in the shows or on screen. The STO ships often bare little resemblance to what happened on screen, they are put in categories because the game needs the that way to function.
    I mean you mentioned the Defiant, yeah its a pure warship. So why does it need any science bridge officers? Why does it need sci consoles?
    The new Nebula is another example, it has temporal spec seating, why? The only thing we every really saw it do was be part of a detection grid for cloaked ships, so it's essentially an AWAC, why does it not have intel spec seating?
    BOP's in STO can be run as anything (sci, tac, eng) thanks to the mass uni seating, but that makes no sense as surely they are only ever shown to be warships onscreen?

    There's many other examples but trawling through pages of show scripts and websites to find evidence they made the ship wrong doesn't really help the situation.
    SulMatuul.png
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    Olivia, you should really send an application to The TruthSeeker, you seem to have all the requirements to become a top contributor.
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...

    [Edit to add] But as is the way with canon, new, surplants and supercedes old... ;)
  • alexhurlbutalexhurlbut Member Posts: 292 Arc User
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...

    [Edit to add] But as is the way with canon, new, surplants and supercedes old... ;)
    It isn't that unbelievable to have a Class repurposed for a different role. There have been real life examples of that.

  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...
    Saying Federation starships were equipped to kick TRIBBLE has as much relevance as saying "water makes you wet".

    Starfleet tried to send a ship for peaceful exploration with no shields, not many weapons and the idea that being prepared to fight was counter-productive and non-sense. It was in the 22nd century... and we all know how that went.

    "If you want peace, prepare for war". Especially after encountering Xindi, Temporal terrorists, Klingons, Romulans, Borg and Dominion.
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • worgausworgaus Member Posts: 91 Arc User
    Keep in mind that STO takes place after the Voyager series, and sometimes even in real life everything from common house hold items to vehicles sometimes end up in roles their designers didn't originally envision for them. The crew of Voyager and their experiences, (such as Seven's introduction of an Astrometrics Lab), most likely caused Star Fleet to reevaluate what the Intrepid Class was capable of and what role it should play.


  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...

    [Edit to add] But as is the way with canon, new, surplants and supercedes old... ;)
    It isn't that unbelievable to have a Class repurposed for a different role. There have been real life examples of that.
    Absolutely, hence my edit to acknowledge that the new canon, supercedes the old B)
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...
    Saying Federation starships were equipped to kick **** has as much relevance as saying "water makes you wet".

    Starfleet tried to send a ship for peaceful exploration with no shields, not many weapons and the idea that being prepared to fight was counter-productive and non-sense. It was in the 22nd century... and we all know how that went.

    "If you want peace, prepare for war". Especially after encountering Xindi, Temporal terrorists, Klingons, Romulans, Borg and Dominion.
    Sorry, but as per Paris' comment, the ship was designed for combat performance... That Starfleet since found a new use for the Intrepid Class is rather beside the point, that it was initially designed for a more combat-oriented mission profile...
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    So much stupid it hurts.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,472 Arc User
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...

    [Edit to add] But as is the way with canon, new, surplants and supercedes old... ;)

    No. The Intrepid was always designed as a Long Range Exploration vessel, just as was the Galaxy Class! In every game I have ever played that featured the Intrepid it has always been classed as a Long Range (Exploration) vessel. Also, Starfleet wouldn't equip a short range vessel with it's most advanced Warp Engine (9.975) and Bio-Neural Circuits. However, Starfleet's ethos on conflict is 'Our starships are not designed to start wars, but to finish them'. Starfleet ships are all designed to have defensive capability in mind, so as to allow time for other ships to arrive and assist in conflicts. In canon there are actually very few 'offensive minded' ships (Defiant, Sovereign, Norway, Akira etc.). Also, Starfleet's primary role IS exploration. Seeing the amount of unknown, on top of all the conflicts that have happened, it makes logical sense to equip ANY exploration vessel, travelling into the unknown, with the highest quality of equipment possible, with it being able to defend itself for an extended period, where it maybe out of contact with Starfleet, as highlighted so with Voyager!
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...
    Saying Federation starships were equipped to kick **** has as much relevance as saying "water makes you wet".

    Starfleet tried to send a ship for peaceful exploration with no shields, not many weapons and the idea that being prepared to fight was counter-productive and non-sense. It was in the 22nd century... and we all know how that went.

    "If you want peace, prepare for war". Especially after encountering Xindi, Temporal terrorists, Klingons, Romulans, Borg and Dominion.
    Sorry, but as per Paris' comment, the ship was designed for combat performance... That Starfleet since found a new use for the Intrepid Class is rather beside the point, that it was initially designed for a more combat-oriented mission profile...
    That doesn't necessarily mean the same thing as being a tac ship in STO. ALL ships in STO are either freighters or designed for combat, especially the science ships.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,460 Arc User
    Read the rest of Paris' line, Marcus.

    He says the ship was "designed for combat performance, not musical performance." He's not saying it's a "warship"; he's saying it's not a musical instrument. Context is important, especially when you want to contribute to one of olivia's paranoid rants.

    Antonine, the issue here is that olivia apparently has permission to start as many of these silly threads as she likes, in all the subforums where they don't belong, and never receive so much as a thread-closing or a slap on the wrist in response from the "moderators". (You should see the one where she claims the US is an Evil Empire, and thus the same must be true of its descendant the Federation, because of the shape of a building at the Coronado naval base in California.)​​
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    leemwatson wrote: »
    No. The Intrepid was always designed as a Long Range Exploration vessel, just as was the Galaxy Class! In every game I have ever played that featured the Intrepid it has always been classed as a Long Range (Exploration) vessel. Also, Starfleet wouldn't equip a short range vessel with it's most advanced Warp Engine (9.975) and Bio-Neural Circuits. However, Starfleet's ethos on conflict is 'Our starships are not designed to start wars, but to finish them'. Starfleet ships are all designed to have defensive capability in mind, so as to allow time for other ships to arrive and assist in conflicts. In canon there are actually very few 'offensive minded' ships (Defiant, Sovereign, Norway, Akira etc.). Also, Starfleet's primary role IS exploration. Seeing the amount of unknown, on top of all the conflicts that have happened, it makes logical sense to equip ANY exploration vessel, travelling into the unknown, with the highest quality of equipment possible, with it being able to defend itself for an extended period, where it maybe out of contact with Starfleet, as highlighted so with Voyager!

    I generally agree, but I like to point out that the Sovereign, Norway and Akira ships were not "designed for combat" any more than every other ship class. Just because they are featured in action scenes does not mean that is all they do - it wouldn't make sense to assume otherwise.​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...
    Saying Federation starships were equipped to kick **** has as much relevance as saying "water makes you wet".

    Starfleet tried to send a ship for peaceful exploration with no shields, not many weapons and the idea that being prepared to fight was counter-productive and non-sense. It was in the 22nd century... and we all know how that went.

    "If you want peace, prepare for war". Especially after encountering Xindi, Temporal terrorists, Klingons, Romulans, Borg and Dominion.
    Sorry, but as per Paris' comment, the ship was designed for combat performance...
    Of course, it was. It was a ship designed after the Borg encounter and during (or at least, right before) the Dominion War. If you don't equip a ship whose first major mission is to find and capture a Maquis ship by itself in a dangerous territory with enough firepower to hold its ground, then you're doing something wrong.

    Note how Paris merely says "designed for combat performance" not something like "exclusively designed to fight".

    From Memory Alpha:
    Ronald D. Moore commented (about warship classes): "This also is a legacy of Gene's. He felt very strongly that the Federation would not build warships per se, but rather a fleet of scientific exploration vessels with weapons designed for defense rather than offense. It was quite a fight just to get the Defiant designated as a pure warship around here, much less trying to go for an entire fleet of ships like it." (AOL chat, 1997)
    Emphasis on "per se".
    Handheld phasers are designed to be able to disintegrate things, but Starfleet officers are recommended to use them to stun, rather than kill, rather than disintegrate.

    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    leemwatson wrote: »
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...

    [Edit to add] But as is the way with canon, new, surplants and supercedes old... ;)

    No. The Intrepid was always designed as a Long Range Exploration vessel, just as was the Galaxy Class! In every game I have ever played that featured the Intrepid it has always been classed as a Long Range (Exploration) vessel. Also, Starfleet wouldn't equip a short range vessel with it's most advanced Warp Engine (9.975) and Bio-Neural Circuits. However, Starfleet's ethos on conflict is 'Our starships are not designed to start wars, but to finish them'. Starfleet ships are all designed to have defensive capability in mind, so as to allow time for other ships to arrive and assist in conflicts. In canon there are actually very few 'offensive minded' ships (Defiant, Sovereign, Norway, Akira etc.). Also, Starfleet's primary role IS exploration. Seeing the amount of unknown, on top of all the conflicts that have happened, it makes logical sense to equip ANY exploration vessel, travelling into the unknown, with the highest quality of equipment possible, with it being able to defend itself for an extended period, where it maybe out of contact with Starfleet, as highlighted so with Voyager!

    Not according to the canon... I don't really care what every game has said, because none of them are canon, merely licensed product. The canon references (the early canon references) were that the Intrepid Class was designed for combat performance... It can't be stated any more plainly, or from a more direct source, so if you're going to ignore canon, then there's not really any point in discussing it, because you're only then discussing opinions, rather than canon citations... As I said, the later canon does try and retcon the Intrepid as a science vessel, but what was originally said, although it has indeed been superceded, is still worth being aware of and bearing in mind B)
  • mkm1911#2674 mkm1911 Member Posts: 96 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    I'll be honest. I disagree with this. The Defiant is a combat ship.

    I'm not saying the Intrepid class is a pure science vessel, per se, but it ain't a pure combat vessel either. It has typical phasers and torpedos similar to the galaxy class, which is exploration. This is in contrast to two ships where a character literally said that this ship was meant for war or combat, The Vengeance and Defiant. And both of those sported improved defensive and offensive capabilities beyond that which is found on the majority of other ships.

    I can agree with the concept of exploration, though. This is just my opinion.

    Sorry, brother, but just look at the interior of Voyager. That ain't no combat vessel.

    As far as STO designating it a science vessel, I'm fine with that. I'm ok with looking at it as a science vessel that has some defensive qualities.

    For the scope of this game, there isn't enough of a difference between exploration vs science for me to care what it's label is. And since I needed a science vessel, I'm much happier having this fill my science slot than a most of the other ones.
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    Got to agree with Olivia on this, Voyager was clearly designed and refered to early on, as a short-range, short-term ship, with the capability of whooping some a**... It's only later that the writers (and now devs) tried to relabel it as a science vessel...
    Saying Federation starships were equipped to kick **** has as much relevance as saying "water makes you wet".

    Starfleet tried to send a ship for peaceful exploration with no shields, not many weapons and the idea that being prepared to fight was counter-productive and non-sense. It was in the 22nd century... and we all know how that went.

    "If you want peace, prepare for war". Especially after encountering Xindi, Temporal terrorists, Klingons, Romulans, Borg and Dominion.
    Sorry, but as per Paris' comment, the ship was designed for combat performance... That Starfleet since found a new use for the Intrepid Class is rather beside the point, that it was initially designed for a more combat-oriented mission profile...
    That doesn't necessarily mean the same thing as being a tac ship in STO. ALL ships in STO are either freighters or designed for combat, especially the science ships.
    Sure, but as I just mentioned, while the games do have an internal consistency which we like to call 'canon', they aren't capable of superceding the canon of the episodes...
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    Read the rest of Paris' line, Marcus.

    He says the ship was "designed for combat performance, not musical performance." He's not saying it's a "warship"; he's saying it's not a musical instrument. Context is important, especially when you want to contribute to one of olivia's paranoid rants.

    Antonine, the issue here is that olivia apparently has permission to start as many of these silly threads as she likes, in all the subforums where they don't belong, and never receive so much as a thread-closing or a slap on the wrist in response from the "moderators". (You should see the one where she claims the US is an Evil Empire, and thus the same must be true of its descendant the Federation, because of the shape of a building at the Coronado naval base in California.)​​

    Absolutely, he wasn't saying that it's a warship, but he did say 'designed for combat performance'... A ship which is designed for combat performance, is clearly intended to be used in combat roles, rather than pure research and diplomacy...

    And sure, I'm not totally drinking the Kool-Aid (That's for force-feeding Klingons Polaron-Style :tongue: ) but I can't deny Paris' line, which did refer to the Intrepid's original design intent...

    Given Olivia's apparent total lack of sanctions for the Conspiracy Threads, I'm coming to my own theory: She's a moderator's alt :tongue:
  • spacehermitspacehermit Member Posts: 358 Arc User
    Is it weekend already?
  • redeyedravenredeyedraven Member Posts: 1,297 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Is it weekend already?

    Only in the closed Station of psychiatry.
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    actually now that think about it is the Defiant actually as good of a warship as it is made out to be. I can't remember a time it destroyed a larger ship when it wasn't part of a large fleet battle were the ship was likely heavily damaged for fighting other ships. in fact most of the time it seemed to be running or ambushing someone. not saying it's a bad ship but is it seems older ship designed for very different roles do almost as well with fewer problems. granted it could be a writing problem.

    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • byozuma#0956 byozuma Member Posts: 502 Arc User
    The Defiant is glass cannon. Being as big as it is with it's particular armament it doesn't have the power output to take much of a beating. A trope continued in the mission "Facility 4028" where Captain Shon's is blasted to hell. Shame he didn't go down with it...
    oldracesbanner.jpg
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Absolutely, he wasn't saying that it's a warship, but he did say 'designed for combat performance'... A ship which is designed for combat performance, is clearly intended to be used in combat roles, rather than pure research and diplomacy...

    They aren't mutually exclusive and, having seen Star Trek before :tongue: , I can report that research/diplomacy vessels are often involved in combat. The name "Science Vessel" simply describes a ship that is capable of conducting research. That's it. Anything else may be involved as well, depending on the whim of whoever's building it, provided its capacity to do science is maintained. Not all science vessels need combat capability, but having combat capability doesn't change the core nature of a science vessel.

    /Thread
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    nightken wrote: »
    actually now that think about it is the Defiant actually as good of a warship as it is made out to be. I can't remember a time it destroyed a larger ship when it wasn't part of a large fleet battle were the ship was likely heavily damaged for fighting other ships. in fact most of the time it seemed to be running or ambushing someone. not saying it's a bad ship but is it seems older ship designed for very different roles do almost as well with fewer problems. granted it could be a writing problem.

    People have a highly skewed vision of ship classes in Star Trek. Whenever something is designated as a "warship" many people suddenly jump to the conlcusion it could end empires on it's own. A simple interceptor is also a "warship" of sorts, it doesn't say anything about it's performance, since "warship" isn't a classification.

    The intrepid, for all intends and purposes, is a interceptor/excort/destroyer - it is in function pretty much the equivalent of a Klingon Bird of Prey. On the battlefield it'd match those or the Jem'Hadar attack ships. She was designed to fight Borg - but that doesn't mean a Defiant tears through cubes. When fighting Borg, Starfleet lost cruisers with large crew compartiments while causing relatively little damage. Defiants came with less crew and packed more weapons for their size so a pack of them could evade and stay int he fight against a cube longer while minimizing losses. The Defiant, as @nightken pointed out, never took on anything in the cruiser weightclass on her own, safe the Mirror Negh'Var flagships and that was a kind of goofy moment. The Dfiant/Sao Paolo didn't fare to well in heavy combat against cruisers, one was destroyed and the Sao Paolo was heavily crippled when facing a cube as the only Defiant class on site.

    If we take the Technical Manual as a supplemental source, Defiants were cosnidered mobile weapon platforms (after the initial Borg design was canned) and were supposed to up a station's defensive arsenal over Runabouts. A Runabout also has quite the combat capability for it's size and could even hope to take at least a few hits before desintegrating, but tht doesn't make them ideal fighter swarms or something.

    Bottom line is, one can't throw "warship" on the table and expect to win. That doesn't say anything. A Galaxy class is a Explorer for Starfleet but also a prime "warship" if need be since she will bolster Starfleet's line-up in a state of war.​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    The Defiant is glass cannon. Being as big as it is with it's particular armament it doesn't have the power output to take much of a beating. A trope continued in the mission "Facility 4028" where Captain Shon's is blasted to hell. Shame he didn't go down with it...

    :open_mouth:

    I'd definitely rather have Shon watching my back (who, in-game, has always had Cara's back) than that useless fruit Kurland...
This discussion has been closed.