test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

One of the COOLEST ship designs Cryptic ever made...wasted =(

1252628303133

Comments

  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY OFF TOPIC PEOPLE
    TAKE YOUR TRIBBLE WAR OVER SIZE QUEENS ELSEWHERE

    :P Hell my own response a few minutes ago was off topic...

    THIS IS NOT A T6 CONNIE THREAD.

    Well, my initial post there was intended to discuss the possibility of a hypothetical JJ-prise inclusion being our avenue to obtaining a T6 Excalibur :)

    But everyone seems to want to discuss the size difference between TOS and JJ constitutions instead :(
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY OFF TOPIC PEOPLE
    TAKE YOUR TRIBBLE WAR OVER SIZE QUEENS ELSEWHERE

    :P Hell my own response a few minutes ago was off topic...

    THIS IS NOT A T6 CONNIE THREAD.

    Well, my initial post there was intended to discuss the possibility of a hypothetical JJ-prise inclusion being our avenue to obtaining a T6 Excalibur :)

    But everyone seems to want to discuss the size difference between TOS and JJ constitutions instead :(

    Everyone's favorite hobby, whip it out and measure it.... ugh :P
    daveyny wrote: »
    But it should be.

    nah I wanna go for 30 pages and not locked thanks :P
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    nikeix wrote: »
    captaind3 wrote: »
    It's so weird, since it's obviously scaled from the exterior to be the same basic size.

    Yes, it is, because the model maker MADE A MISTAKE in assuming it would be the same size as the prime universe version and then was told otherwise too late to completely re-skin it.
    And a boneheaded creator decision it was.

    Call it what you like. The people that rule canon put the decision into the author's hands.

    Irrelevant. The VFX guy produced a canon on-screen size for the ship. The writers intent is immaterial. It's not canon if its not onscreen.
    You'll also note that the same smaller size is born out in ID as well. So clearly the writers couldn't have been that insistent about it.

    So as it stands, the AR Constitution Class is around 350 metres and the Dreadnought Class around 750 metres. With one scene blown up by 200 or so % for dramatic effect. That's canon, the onscreen picture you see with your eyes, that's canon.

    Lines in a script, on on a drawing, or in the head of a writer, that's not canon.​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    artan42 wrote: »
    nikeix wrote: »
    captaind3 wrote: »
    It's so weird, since it's obviously scaled from the exterior to be the same basic size.

    Yes, it is, because the model maker MADE A MISTAKE in assuming it would be the same size as the prime universe version and then was told otherwise too late to completely re-skin it.
    And a boneheaded creator decision it was.

    Call it what you like. The people that rule canon put the decision into the author's hands.

    Irrelevant. The VFX guy produced a canon on-screen size for the ship. The writers intent is immaterial. It's not canon if its not onscreen.
    You'll also note that the same smaller size is born out in ID as well. So clearly the writers couldn't have been that insistent about it.

    So as it stands, the AR Constitution Class is around 350 metres and the Dreadnought Class around 750 metres. With one scene blown up by 200 or so % for dramatic effect. That's canon, the onscreen picture you see with your eyes, that's canon.

    Lines in a script, on on a drawing, or in the head of a writer, that's not canon.​​

    OFFTOPIC QUIT
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    This Thread has run its course and is a rerun mode already.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    cbrjwrr wrote: »

    You think this can be kitbashed? I know we are actually talking about the Excalibur/Exeter here, but they aren't that much larger than the TOS Connie, which means that a kitbash with JJprise parts will look... I'll be tactful and say odd.

    Pym Particles can make it happen.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    ltminns wrote: »
    This Thread has run its course and is a rerun mode already.

    Possibly true, but there's still no t6 Excalibur, nor statement from a developer on why it cannot be done... So the thread is not finished. Given things, I doubt we'll ever see one now but until we have one or the other of the listed criteria this thread isn't dead.
    And its not about connies, their size, or their alternate dimensional skins
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited May 2016
    Ummm...

    Budweiser Engineering, Water Pipes from Hell, a Central "Radisson Inn" Elevator Core/Passageway that wouldn't fit in most modern day Extra-Large Cruise Ships and a WARP Core that would fill half to three-quarters of the Secondary Hull on the TOS Movie Enterprise ...

    What was it you were saying about on screen?
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    daveyny wrote: »
    Ummm...

    Budweiser Engineering, Water Pipes from Hell and a Central Radisson Inn Elevator Core/Passage that wouldn't fit in most modern day Cruise Ships ...

    What was it you were saying about on screen?

    not relevant to getting a t6 excalibur
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    daveyny wrote: »
    Ummm...

    Budweiser Engineering, Water Pipes from Hell and a Central Radisson Inn Elevator Core/Passage that wouldn't fit in most modern day Cruise Ships ...

    What was it you were saying about on screen?

    not relevant to getting a t6 excalibur

    Interiors, while downplayed a lot lately by Cryptic are still slightly relevant.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    And the shuttlebay doesn't for in the Defiant either. You saying that the Defiant's doubled in size because of an interior set? Or do you think the AR Conni only has windows every two decks? And the bleeding transparent window at the top. Is Spock 4 metres tall?
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • nikeixnikeix Member Posts: 3,972 Arc User
    While I've speculated that the Connie-family of skins is locked up because of non-compete clauses with the movies, the best sign that the glacier may be cracking is the inclusion of the T1 connie in the new expansion companion pack. Cryptic is deliberately putting all eyes on the iconic TOS ship and they have to know that'll only increase interest in being able to experience the fantasy of flying her with endgame/T6 stats.
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    edited May 2016
    artan42 wrote: »
    And the shuttlebay doesn't for in the Defiant either. You saying that the Defiant's doubled in size because of an interior set? Or do you think the AR Conni only has windows every two decks? And the bleeding transparent window at the top. Is Spock 4 metres tall?

    quit with the off topic cr ap will ya? Take it to its own thread.
    nikeix wrote: »
    While I've speculated that the Connie-family of skins is locked up because of non-compete clauses with the movies, the best sign that the glacier may be cracking is the inclusion of the T1 connie in the new expansion companion pack. Cryptic is deliberately putting all eyes on the iconic TOS ship and they have to know that'll only increase interest in being able to experience the fantasy of flying her with endgame/T6 stats.

    I think the glacier is missing at this point... ATM I think its more of a question/need to yell loud enough to get the Excalibur added to the allowed skins when it does happen.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    I'm discussing the size of a potential variant of a T6 Exeter. Fully on topic.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    artan42 wrote: »
    I'm discussing the size of a potential variant of a T6 Exeter. Fully on topic.

    except this is about Excaliburs :P and you're going on and on about a connie
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    Well, since the T-1 Connie practically got rebuilt from the ground up, perhaps the Excalibur will get the same treatment.
    B)
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    daveyny wrote: »
    Well, since the T-1 Connie practically got rebuilt from the ground up, perhaps the Excalibur will get the same treatment.
    B)

    twould be nice, tho that skin was a lot cleaner than many of the older ships they did, Im sure it needs a good dust n polish to compare to the shinys they've done lately
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    daveyny wrote: »
    Well, since the T-1 Connie practically got rebuilt from the ground up, perhaps the Excalibur will get the same treatment.
    B)

    twould be nice, tho that skin was a lot cleaner than many of the older ships they did, Im sure it needs a good dust n polish to compare to the shinys they've done lately

    When they redid the intrepid, did they redo the old variants as well? I'm not sure myself
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    No. The Monarch Venture Bellaraphon Cochrane Celestial Envoy and the other Intrepid hull were untouched.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    I haven't seen the OP weigh in on this recently.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,284 Arc User
    because the OP was banned last week - hopefully permanently - for being an TRIBBLE​​
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • This content has been removed.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    I'm discussing the size of a potential variant of a T6 Exeter. Fully on topic.

    except this is about Excaliburs :P and you're going on and on about a connie

    In fairness to everyone here, this discussion has included a lot about the Exeter and the Vesper as well. Neither of which are Consitution class vessels. They both fit the same criteria the OP pushed forward and even the OP has weighed in quite a bit on the potential for the Exeter to be an end-game variant of a T2 cruiser in both this topic and many others over the years.

    Discussing the Exeter is on-topic.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    See, that is what I don't get with these 'Naming and Shaming' Avatar changes. What is the difference between the 'Jail Bars' moniker over your Avatar and the 'User Banned Please Carry On' Avatar as far as what the effects are.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • thekodanarmada#7342 thekodanarmada Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    Why is no one asking why a science fiction image is using a measurement in feet instead of meters?
    DInb0Vo.gif[/url][/center]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    ltminns wrote: »
    See, that is what I don't get with these 'Naming and Shaming' Avatar changes. What is the difference between the 'Jail Bars' moniker over your Avatar and the 'User Banned Please Carry On' Avatar as far as what the effects are.

    I know why I don't mention it. These forums still use BBCode and are kind of dated even after all of the upgrading and integrating with Arc. So I mean, we're just one more upgrade/reboot/fiddle away from that breaking too, so it's not a functionality I put much stock in.

    ;)

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    Because Metric sucks :p

    Also, it's not as cool as the ancient pod ship:
    latest?cb=20061122043414&path-prefix=en
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • captaind3captaind3 Member Posts: 2,449 Arc User
    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY OFF TOPIC PEOPLE
    TAKE YOUR TRIBBLE WAR OVER SIZE QUEENS ELSEWHERE

    :P Hell my own response a few minutes ago was off topic...

    THIS IS NOT A T6 CONNIE THREAD.

    Well, my initial post there was intended to discuss the possibility of a hypothetical JJ-prise inclusion being our avenue to obtaining a T6 Excalibur :)

    But everyone seems to want to discuss the size difference between TOS and JJ constitutions instead :(

    Well it was brought up in regards to kit bashing possibilities.
    daveyny wrote: »
    Ummm...

    Budweiser Engineering, Water Pipes from Hell, a Central "Radisson Inn" Elevator Core/Passageway that wouldn't fit in most modern day Extra-Large Cruise Ships and a WARP Core that would fill half to three-quarters of the Secondary Hull on the TOS Movie Enterprise ...

    What was it you were saying about on screen?

    For the record the warp core of the TMP Enterprise took up a substantial amount of the secondary hull's interior anyway.
    daveyny wrote: »
    Well, since the T-1 Connie practically got rebuilt from the ground up, perhaps the Excalibur will get the same treatment.
    B)

    Especially since it has to stand up to Eight Generation console visual fidelity. The improvement of the lightning engine may also require improvements to ship hulls.
    daveyny wrote: »
    Well, since the T-1 Connie practically got rebuilt from the ground up, perhaps the Excalibur will get the same treatment.
    B)

    twould be nice, tho that skin was a lot cleaner than many of the older ships they did, Im sure it needs a good dust n polish to compare to the shinys they've done lately

    When they redid the intrepid, did they redo the old variants as well? I'm not sure myself

    I know when they updated the Galaxy, they updated the other skins as well so they could still be effectively kitbashed and not look like TRIBBLE.

    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo9_r1_400.gif
    "Rise like Lions after slumber, In unvanquishable number, Shake your chains to earth like dew, Which in sleep had fallen on you-Ye are many — they are few"
  • thekodanarmada#7342 thekodanarmada Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    Because Metric sucks :p

    Also, it's not as cool as the ancient pod ship:
    latest?cb=20061122043414&path-prefix=en

    Metric is the way and the light, heathen. The only people who use feet crash probes into Mars.
    DInb0Vo.gif[/url][/center]
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    -.- seriously people cant even keep it on topic for 3 posts let alone 12...
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
This discussion has been closed.