test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

New Constellation Class!

1246

Comments

  • iggygreeniggygreen Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Personally i use a Fleet heavy cruiser (cheyanne type sue me i like the 4 nacelle design) and even I cant see any reason the Constellation should be a useable outfit at T5 or T5U or whatever the new ones are, it is a VERY old ship that the series itself labeled as being underpowered and overworked, sure its appearance appeals to some i dont mind its appearance but its like having an T5 Oberth :rolleyes:
  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    So, CBS said yes to this 4 Nacelle kitbash monstrosity (hey, they needed a quick old ship for the TNG Season one episode "The Battle") getting a T5 and Fleet variant (which we saw in two episodes, total); the STO lore states it's a 125 year old design too...

    yet CBS still won't okay the STAR TREK 'hero ship' design that started it all (IE the Starship Class/Constitution Class) -- the original 1701 U.S.S. Enterprise as a T5 (or T6) variant to this day.

    Somebody at the CBS 'Star Trek' licensing department really needs to pull their head out of their posterior.
    I think it's one of the more attractive kitbashes. They obviously put some more effort into it than some of the other kitbashes.

    my only complaint is that Cryptic just made it another version of the Cheyenne class instead of giving it some sort of hanger capacity like it quite visably displays on the ship model.
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    knuhteb5 wrote: »
    Um, so basically you're selling it as a a new ship even though it's just a reskin of the heavy cruiser retrofit with a new console? That's it?

    Edit: The new skin looks really nice but it should probably be at the most 500 zen.

    Just imagine if they did something like this for the KDF it would actually be worthwhile to have consoles for our iconic canon ships which right now we don't have. Yeah I could see the cost being 500 zen for a skin and console upgrade only heh. Although if it was KDF I woulda paid the 1000 zen out the door but I'm not sure I want to bother with this since its going to be worthless as of X2 launch.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Nice. Another classic, iconic design that will make the game better for it. Good work on the ship model, what I've seen so far looks excellent.

    That got me thinking.....exploring the unknowns of the Delta Quadrant with an overworked, underpowered vessel that was always on the verge of flying apart could be fun in a sense. :D
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • iamynaughtiamynaught Member Posts: 1,285 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I have to say, I kinda like the ship. I have an alt that is flying the Mirror Heavy Cruiser Retrofit. I'm not sure I'd use the exact model, but I like to make my own kitbashes and tend to stay clear of using just one of the preset looks. So I might end up using a piece here or there.

    With that said, I won't be getting this ship for 2 reasons.

    Number one is that my character flying the Mirror T5 version will have to be switching ships since Mirror ships aren't available to be upgraded to T5-U. I fly the Mirror ships because I like the look, and while that will still be possible after the expansion I would like to be able to upgrade them. Since I can't, well, what's the point. I have loads of other C-Store ships that can be upgraded.

    The second reason is very closely related to the first. I can't even consider buying it since I now need to hold on to what Zen I have in order to upgrade my T5 ships to T5-U.

    I didn't expect the upgrade process to be free. However, I didn't expect it to be Zen. I figured a good chunk of Dilithium, EC and Expertise and maybe having to run some missions to 'unlock' the ability to upgrade in the first place.

    I'm not upset that they went the Zen route since it makes a sort of sense. After all, it basically seems like the Fleet Module system to me. Buy the C-Store ship, upgrade it to fleet status for a $5 module. While I'm not mad, it has put a stop on any further Zen purchases, either buying Zen itself or spending it for C-Store items, at least until pricing for the upgrade is locked in* and T6 ship details are released.

    Maybe even until the (inevitable) Delta Rising bundle is announced and pricing for that is known as well.


    *Word is going around saying that the $5-$10 is per ship, and apparently that doesn't include the 3 ship bundles. So each of the 3 Kumari, Odyssey, Vesta and others will cost between $15-$30, IF the price point stands as it currently is. After all, sometimes a Tac Captain may want to fly the Tac Vesta, while a Sci Captain may want to fly the Sci Vesta.
    Hello. My name is iamynaught and I am an altaholic.

    Losing faith in humanity, one person at a time.
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    yreodred wrote: »
    Mirror version has better BOFF layout.

    Yeah, though the Fleet version will be able to be upgraded to T5-FU (because they don't have a separate identifier for Fleet Upgrade as opposed to standard Upgrade, I made up my own :P). The Mirror Universe ships will become the equivalent of T4 ships... good for leveling that chunk of the game, then left in the Shipyard for item storage. Fleet versions of a lot of the Mirror Universe ships would be great, but that's a no-go for now.

    Of course, if it had something at T5-U/T5-FU/T6 that didn't require four Fleet Ship Modules per character and a further upgrade to T5-FU shortly thereafter I'd be much more interested; this falls into the same category as many of the KDF Fleet ships without an available FSM discount. The ship costume is awfully nice, though.
    If it jumps you a "good distance forward" and grants you ambush damage bonus......isn't that counter productive if warps you out of targeting range?

    I was thinking this too, especially with a cruiser. Stealing the console for use on an Escort or Destroyer that can actually come about after jumping past its target would probably be more useful than keeping it on its original ship. Then again, that's mostly the point of T1-4 (possibly T1-5 soon).
    it came out exactly like i predicted, glad to see it finally available. only thing i was surprised by was the universal ENS on the fleet heavy, what a nice little surprise.

    but then i think, again, to the galaxy R. with its inferior console line up to this, inferior turn rate to this, with its NEED of a universal ENS more then any other ship in the entire game. but once again, like the galaxy X, another ship with a connection to the galaxy class gets a universal ENS that wile nice, it doesn't need. wile the galaxy R goes on intentionally being terrible.

    in the cruelest irony of all, picard's old dilapidated hunk of junk is twice the ship in game that his second command, the flagship of the federation, is. the ship class that was most powerful and flexible until the end of canon in the entire federation, remains the most broken and flawed ship in game. all the wile barring the cross of the galaxy X, forcing it into such a position because the X just HAS to be better, wile barley being any good it self.

    if you could just give a fleet ship a universal ENS this WHOLE FREAKING TIME, why the hell haven't you given the galaxy R one? if you haven't noticed, we have been pleading for you to takes the tiniest action for years to make this ships actually playable. wile it deserves more, we will take this small thing gladly.

    Well, yeah...
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • sunseahlsunseahl Member Posts: 827 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Don't Feddies already have this console? And if you don't why are people buying the ship for the console? The cross-faction KDF subspace jump does the same thing, doesn't it?
    Member of the "Disenchanted"
    We don't want what the Feds have. We want the equivalent. We want fairer treatment. Concern, desire, greed to some extent, and passionate belief that the enough people would buy KDF items to make it worth Cryptic's while.
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    sunseahl wrote: »
    Don't Feddies already have this console? And if you don't why are people buying the ship for the console? The cross-faction KDF subspace jump does the same thing, doesn't it?

    Not quite. The Subspace Jumper has the advantage of always placing you behind and facing your target, but lacks the ambush bonus the Warp Burst Capacitor provides.

    [EDIT] Has anyone tested the Warp Burst Capacitor with a Reman to see if the ambush duration is increased? I know from my own testing that the Romulan/Reman traits don't help with Mask Energy Signature, which is too bad, but what about this actual ambush bonus?
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I'd be interested in buying the T3 version just for the console, sooner or later, depending on how it actually performs.

    Probably won't bother until it's on sale in a few months.
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    So, CBS said yes to this 4 Nacelle kitbash monstrosity (hey, they needed a quick old ship for the TNG Season one episode "The Battle") getting a T5 and Fleet variant (which we saw in two episodes, total); the STO lore states it's a 125 year old design too...

    yet CBS still won't okay the STAR TREK 'hero ship' design that started it all (IE the Starship Class/Constitution Class) -- the original 1701 U.S.S. Enterprise as a T5 (or T6) variant to this day.

    Somebody at the CBS 'Star Trek' licensing department really needs to pull their head out of their posterior.

    the constellation actually has much more cause to be tier 5 useable. first of all, its 3 times the size of the constitution, actually operated in the mid 24th century, and is probably just 100 years old, not 125. it was probably built out of decommissioned constitution parts after they began phasing them out in 2393, to explain why the constellation looks like 3 connie saucers stacked on each other, attached to 4 connie nacelles.
  • willamsheridanwillamsheridan Member Posts: 1,189 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    So i have the Constellation together with the Fleet Cruiser (4 Fleet modules is quite a lot). And i think it is a great ship with great looks and also great performance. Not T5.5 but rathr normal T5 but it can be used in STFs. The phaser banks look great (wish they would put those canon ones on the Connie and the Excelsior)

    But 2 minor flaws:

    1. I have no idea where the Aft Beam emitters are. i see where the beam is coming from but there is nothing

    2. THe impulse Engines do not glow.

    But other than that i am happy i bought the Stargazer
  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    A bit disappointed that there were no hanger slots on it. Would have been a great opportunity to introduce the Galileo refit shuttles.

    Looks beautiful as always though, I'll probably grab one as soon as the Zen market stabilizes (whenever that might be)

    I hope at some point they dome out with that 'space away team' thing that has been mentioned on occasion. I'd love to be flying around an Ambassador class leading a constellation and excelsior for some TOS-movie era goodness.
  • riccardo171riccardo171 Member Posts: 1,802 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    bluegeek wrote: »
    I'd be interested in buying the T3 version just for the console, sooner or later, depending on how it actually performs.

    Probably won't bother until it's on sale in a few months.

    You read my mind. Honestly, I'd hold on and stockpile for something better for now.
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I personally do not have strong feelings one way or the other on the Constellation (Excelsior fan here) but I do know a lot of people were looking forward to having it in the game, so I'm happy for them.
  • gpgtxgpgtx Member Posts: 1,579 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    yeah i got it as well for my fleet heavy cruiser i bought back when fleets first started. love the little ship

    and the uni ensign that was added was a nice bonus
    victoriasig_zps23c45368.jpg
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    blitzy4 wrote: »
    Actually, on mine it was... but it's not really that useful. I'd have rather had another LTC station.
    my fleet heavy got a universal ENS, you sure you don't just have a retrofit?

    I'm pretty sure.
    ya with those nacelles, not sure i care for all the red added to them. wile the red was added were it didn't belong, the 4 connie refit style impulse engines are just grayed out. reminds me of the steamrunner, that eventually got at the corrected option added to it, this just oght to be fixed.

    with the addition of the nice material 6 to the heavy, i was hoping that the big hole when you pair up the cheyenne 'hull' and stargazer 'top pylon' would have been closed, but thats still there. and the dakota and star gazer nacelles still aren't mirrored like the nacelles on the Prometheus are. would love to see these things fixed on the heavy

    Yeah, noticed that too. I guess they decided to go with the Hathaway, where it didn't show impulse glow.

    And surprised there is no blue force field on the front as well.
  • xariamaxariama Member Posts: 161 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    So my question is this, then... what exactly are the Klingons and Romulans getting with this? Go ahead, I'll wait.
    Lane Bjorn Jorgensson, Captain, ISS Voltaire

    Here's a map to show how much they've screwed up the game map.
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Im not so excited abot the Constellation itself, but i like the Heavy Cruiser very much.
    The Constellations nacelles are a wonderful addition to my main characters Flagship.

    Link

    Although i have the fleet version of the Heavy Cruiser, i prefer to fly the Mirror HC, because of its BOFF layout. That uni ensign it got today isn't worth the time they may have spend on changing it IMO.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • adwynythadwynyth Member Posts: 369 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    A T3 ship? For only one faction? Seriously? That was hype-worthy?
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    xariama wrote: »
    So my question is this, then... what exactly are the Klingons and Romulans getting with this? Go ahead, I'll wait.

    Fed Romulans get to fly it too! Klingon and KDF-Romulans can shoot at it. :P
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    it came out exactly like i predicted, glad to see it finally available. only thing i was surprised by was the universal ENS on the fleet heavy, what a nice little surprise.


    but then i think, again, to the galaxy R. with its inferior console line up to this, inferior turn rate to this, with its NEED of a universal ENS more then any other ship in the entire game. but once again, like the galaxy X, another ship with a connection to the galaxy class gets a universal ENS that wile nice, it doesn't need. wile the galaxy R goes on intentionally being terrible.

    in the cruelest irony of all, picard's old dilapidated hunk of junk is twice the ship in game that his second command, the flagship of the federation, is. the ship class that was most powerful and flexible until the end of canon in the entire federation, remains the most broken and flawed ship in game. all the wile barring the cross of the galaxy X, forcing it into such a position because the X just HAS to be better, wile barley being any good it self.

    if you could just give a fleet ship a universal ENS this WHOLE FREAKING TIME, why the hell haven't you given the galaxy R one? if you haven't noticed, we have been pleading for you to takes the tiniest action for years to make this ships actually playable. wile it deserves more, we will take this small thing gladly.
    +1

    /10char ten ten ten
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Thanks for the Constellation class. And making it a version at T3 so its a cheap way to get the look.

    I have the Mirror version instead investing in a huge amount for a ship. So know I should able to make one at T5. Or use some of the parts to make my ship look interesting.

    The warp burst move will be very nice. And I can use it as well. Well time to farm up Dil for purchase.

    For the ones who saying they won't buy it. Thanks as it will make my ship stand out from the rest.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • rodentmasterrodentmaster Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    The Constellation?


    Ugly as heck in TNG, and ugly as heck here. Faithfully recreated, but I wouldn't use it over other visual options. I might spend zen on lesser ships here or there, if they have visuals or a feature I like, or even a console. This has nothing. No special weapons, no good console, and really poor looks. I won't bother with it.

    That said, others might like it. I always found it ugly as sin. To each their own.
  • pwefailpwefail Member Posts: 197 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    It has arrived too late in the day to be viable for most people.
    If they had of released it along with starbases it would've sold like hotcakes.
    The player formerly known as Chunter.
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I plan on buying it once I get the zen for it. I can make use of it. I love the price for it as well.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    the constellation actually has much more cause to be tier 5 useable. first of all, its 3 times the size of the constitution, actually operated in the mid 24th century, and is probably just 100 years old, not 125. it was probably built out of decommissioned constitution parts after they began phasing them out in 2393, to explain why the constellation looks like 3 connie saucers stacked on each other, attached to 4 connie nacelles.

    With STO technology there is no question that both are eligible for top tiers, but for funs sake I will say that the two were more or less equal in eligibility if the technology did have limits.

    The refit connies performance was respected by it's crew, unlike the constellation. The refit connie set speed records during its time. The refit connie had a prolific existence filled with achievement, proven by the movies. The only notable achievement of the Constellation was a maneuver any ship could pull off, and only worked because the Ferengi sensors were junk, combat at warp speed was already happening in TOS. And most importantly, the connie refit has a frame more similar to the best ships of the fleet in almost any period.

    Plus you have no conclusive evidence the connie refit was ever pushed out of service.
  • albertwesker45albertwesker45 Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    personally i don't like the red in the nacelles but that's My Opinion.
  • szerontzurszerontzur Member Posts: 2,724 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Did I miss something, or is this the first paid retrofit that doesn't have a gimmick of some sort?

    Everything from the Galaxy(saucer sep) to the Romulan retros have all had.. something.


    Edit:
    Nevermind, I mistook the fleet retrofit bit in the blog as the release of a c-store retrofit. Clearly not awake yet..
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I think it's pretty. I think the console has the coolest name of all time. Heh.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Pointless. The skin wont work on any known T6 ships. T5 Heavy Cruiser is awful and a dead-end now as well, so it would be dumb to spend money on it. Mirror T5 is the only interesting hull for the skin, but Cryptic wont take your money for a half-T6 upgrade on it. Most of the 3-min consoles are gimmicks and not worth $10 (some exceptions, dont know if this is one of them). Pointless.
Sign In or Register to comment.