test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Best and Worst ST Characters

2456721

Comments

  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,966 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    twg042370 wrote: »
    Best: O'Brien

    Worst: Not O'Brien.

    I'm having a great time reading those in Colm Meaney's voice. :D
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    worst?

    mix betwen a number of star trek "characters" in no specific order.

    1. wesley crusher. shut up wesley!
    2. jj abrams. no comment!
    3. janeway. reckless beyond reason.

    best?

    1. Lwaxana Troi. especially when hunting picard as a boyfriend :D.
    2. Garak. just because.
    3. Jeffery Combs. such a cool recurring feature of trek.
    4. Charles Tucker. by far the best actor on trek, he showed a lot of flair and skill with his acting the best he could make it, better then any of the wooden acting trek has had the last 50 years.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • iikkajarviiikkajarvi Member Posts: 36 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Best: Spock, Scotty, Riker, Picard, Data, LaForge, Q, O'Brien

    Worst: Neelix, Dax, Janeway.

    Disclaimer: I dimly remember latter DS9/Voyager episodes, and I have not seen Enterprise.
    Current Server: Mindflayer
    History Class in the Realms: "Elves did it better first. Also, magic was probably involved somehow and maybe gods. Or godly magic. Now go outside so the orcs and bandits have someone to menace."
  • daqheghdaqhegh Member Posts: 1,490 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Best: Damar

    Worst: every one-off female character in TOS, particularly those that Kirk...courted. Remember Turnabout Intruder? *facepalm*
    My Old Blog about things that could and should have been added when I wrote it. Not sure what I want to do with it now. I'll just keep it available now that most of it is outdated.
  • grandnaguszek1grandnaguszek1 Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I finally figured out what they use nelix for, he just runs his butt around the ship doing chores for the senior officers.

    Trio was annoying, as Q put it she was doing a continuous physicobabble. When she went to talk to the other officers about their feelings it was only because Dr. Phil wasn't on. I really like Quark, Sisko, Data, Picard, Jadzia, Worf, and of course Morn because he's Morn.

    I don't like Janeway because she helped the Borg fight the Undine.
    say-star-wars-is-better.jpg
  • mrbelemrbele Member Posts: 24 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Hmmm...

    My best list has to be

    Spock: Leonard Nimoy pretty much invented playing a regularly recurring alien on television. He invented all things Vulcan. When you think of the first Klingons you can see the actors did very little work inventing a species. Director's have ONE WEEK to get an episode from nothing to "in the can", so you can hardly blame them.

    Shran. Again, I'm pretty much picking at actor's portrayals here, but the guy should teach an master class on acting while wearing prosthetics.

    Khan: Ricardo, that is. Everything about his charater was over the top...it had to be.

    Commissioner Bele: Frank Gorshin had a masterful way of bringing Tony-like performances to the screen without overdoing the theatricality. He was even like that in Batman.

    Worst List:

    Mayweather: there are a couple episodes (especially the last season, when everyone knew the show was over) where you can actually see his lips moving to the other charater's lines and he has this blank stare like "who cares, I'm just waiting for my queue".

    Q. John de Lancie is a good actor...I just couldn't get into the whole Q character. There was just something about the contiuum paying so much attention to Picard without (what I would call) sufficently valid reason.

    The Doctor. What kind of Doctor would get away with so continusously infringing upon patient confidentiality. "Oh, that Lt. Barkley has a variety of ailments, such as holo-addiction..." etc. etc. Why did Robert Picardo never say anything about this during production meetings???

    Tores. Only because she has an AMAZING singing voice (watch "A Chorus Line"). It would have been a nice nod to TOS episodes gione by that featured music. They could have invented a female Klingon ritual that involved singing.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Best: Reginald Barclay

    Worst: The entire cast of Enterprise.
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,769 Arc User
    edited February 2014
  • edited February 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • worffan101worffan101 Member Posts: 9,518 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    patrickngo wrote: »
    Your television would melt from the sheer awesomeness that would entail.

    Point, that. :D
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    reyan01 wrote: »
    Well, at least some/most of them had character. NOT Rom though - no; he was literally a walking clich?. The 'geek who gets the girl' thing was just ridiculous - it felt forced. It felt unnatural. It was, in my opinion, the most uninteresting and pointless relationship in Trek. And aside from occasionally spouting 'I love my brother' clich?s, what did he do?

    Sorry - I know some may have liked him, but I never found anything interesting about him and his character was, to me, nothing more than a dumping ground for clich?s that unimaginative writers threw around because they didn't know what else to do with him.

    Totally agree, Rom did nothing but irritate me... It's not like the writers couldn't write Ferengis well, Brunt, Nog, Quark, all awesome... Rom going from idiot minion to qualified engineer was ludicrous. Now if he could have been assigned to fix that faulty airlock on the docking ring, and be seen floating past Ops sans EVA suit, that would have been his best scene, and about all his character deserved...
  • revandarklighterrevandarklighter Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    worffan101 wrote: »

    I agree. To write a strong woman, take Picard and switch Dame Judi Dench for Sir Patrick Stewart. Easy.

    I disagree. To write a strong women write an interesting and strong character, let this character be played by any good actress and let her act like a human being.

    Kate Mulgrew was actually a more then capable enough actress and could have been awesome, if they hadn't over stressed her.
    She always had to be right (in the writers opinion), because "the strong female lead" could not make mistakes, that wo be a bad female cliche. She always had to be filmed in a way standing higher then every one else.
    Sisko, Picard and Kirk never needed that kind of treatment. Even Archer didn't.

    The reason why Sisko as "the black captain" worked and Janeway as "the female Captain" didn't is the fact that (most times) Sisko was "just" a Captain that happened to be black, which is something that doesn't matter in the 24th century.

    Janeway always needed that special treatment, she was not a Captain that happened to be female, that fact had to be stressed again and again, in almost every scene in some way.


    For best and worst.
    The Probably best is Picard, although my favorite is clearly (and will ever be) Worf.
    the worst is clearly Neelix. not even Wesley was that annoying.
  • thay8472thay8472 Member Posts: 6,165 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    iconians wrote: »
    Best: Reginald Barclay

    Worst: The entire cast of Enterprise.

    What do you have against porthos?! :mad:
    zx2t8tuj4i10.png
    Thank you for the Typhoon!
  • worffan101worffan101 Member Posts: 9,518 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I disagree. To write a strong women write an interesting and strong character, let this character be played by any good actress and let her act like a human being.

    Which is exactly what I'm suggesting.
    Kate Mulgrew was actually a more then capable enough actress and could have been awesome, if they hadn't over stressed her.
    She always had to be right (in the writers opinion), because "the strong female lead" could not make mistakes, that wo be a bad female cliche. She always had to be filmed in a way standing higher then every one else.

    Exactly. Picard makes mistakes; hell, he had to beg Q for help once. Even the Sisko makes mistakes, and the Sisko is literally a god. Janeway is a Mary Sue writers' pet who does things that IRL would be classified as utterly insane.
    Sisko, Picard and Kirk never needed that kind of treatment. Even Archer didn't.

    The reason why Sisko as "the black captain" worked and Janeway as "the female Captain" didn't is the fact that (most times) Sisko was "just" a Captain that happened to be black, which is something that doesn't matter in the 24th century.

    Janeway always needed that special treatment, she was not a Captain that happened to be female, that fact had to be stressed again and again, in almost every scene in some way.

    This exactly. The obvious repressed homosexuality was icing on the cake, but the shoddy writing and "Janeway-is-perfect" mentality among the writers caused the bulk of the problems.
    For best and worst.
    The Probably best is Picard, although my favorite is clearly (and will ever be) Worf.
    the worst is clearly Neelix. not even Wesley was that annoying.

    Agreed. Picard is best, maybe Data. Worf is my fave, too, though.

    Wesley gets a reprieve in my book because he was only on for one season and a few episodes after that, and because I'm a huge Wil Wheaton fanboy. Neelix, though...he was on for all seven interminable seasons. My friends call him the "spotty ******". Why they keep him on board, when his cooking is actively hazardous to the ship, is a mystery.
  • revandarklighterrevandarklighter Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    worffan101 wrote: »

    Wesley gets a reprieve in my book because he was only on for one season and a few episodes after that, and because I'm a huge Wil Wheaton fanboy. Neelix, though...he was on for all seven interminable seasons. My friends call him the "spotty ******". Why they keep him on board, when his cooking is actively hazardous to the ship, is a mystery.

    I'm kind of disappointed that will Wheaton doesn't want to make Wesley cameo/VoiceOver in sto. I agree that he's an awesome guy and could redeem the weseley character a bit more.

    And after all, I actually liked Wesley in prety much all cameos he made after he left the series as a regular.

    Even as a regular I didn't have that much of an issue with him after he got a real uniform and I was able to ignore the incredibly dump backstory of him beeing a honor caused officer with no real academy education outranking more experienced and trained people and ultimately beeing a senior officer on the flagship (a post lots of more qualified people would gladly give their hand for...)
    And after all he left the series early, and even without him early tng would not have been gold.

    Neelix the pedophile hedgehog on the other hand.... We had to suffer through seeing him being insufferable in general, commanding arround superiors, claiming to be an expert at everything while failing at everything and even getting people killed with his false expertise while still everyone cosidered him... Expert at everything.

    And neither back then nor now I ever met a person liking him. He was just as hated as jar jar binks. The only difference: after episode 1 George Lucas understood that fans did not like jar jar, despite it beeing Lucas favorite. So he at least kept jar jars appearances to a minimum in episode 2 and 3.
    But Neelix was not tone down or anything. He stood arround for almost 7 seasons...
  • grandnaguszek1grandnaguszek1 Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Like I said, sometimes when the other officers need their TRIBBLE done they always tell neelix to do it for them and he couldn't care less. He is the perfect way to not keep the crew tired from doing chores. Plus that's about all he was good for anyways.
    say-star-wars-is-better.jpg
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,966 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I disagree. To write a strong women write an interesting and strong character, let this character be played by any good actress and let her act like a human being.

    Something they talked about in episode 32 of The Foundry Roundtable when they asked Terilynn about writing strong female characters. In a military setting like Starfleet, a "strong female character" is just a strong character that incidentally happens to have TRIBBLE. If you could switch the character's gender without affecting the script outside of romance plots (and with homosexuality becoming less and less taboo, even that's starting to change), you've hit the sweet spot.

    Take Samantha Carter from Stargate SG-1. With the exception of her being half in love with Jack O'Neill, she could've been Samuel Carter and the scripts would have needed no changes (apart from that cringeworthy "reproductive organs" bit in the pilot). Heck, they even joke about that once, with an alien asking what "Sam" means and her wisecracking that it means "that my dad wanted a boy."
    worffan101 wrote: »
    Exactly. Picard makes mistakes; hell, he had to beg Q for help once. Even the Sisko makes mistakes, and the Sisko is literally a god. Janeway is a Mary Sue writers' pet who does things that IRL would be classified as utterly insane.

    Not to mention things that are capital crimes in real-life militaries, like aiding the enemy in "Scorpion" as I've been arguing in the General Discussion forum. But no, since she's our wonderful protagonist who can do no wrong, she gets away scot free when Chakotay, or frankly anyone else on the command crew, should have relieved her of command right then and there and thrown her into the brig for the rest of the trip.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • worffan101worffan101 Member Posts: 9,518 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    starswordc is right; to write a strong female character, write a strong character who happens to be female.

    If I were to retcon all of my stories with Three and make her male, the only thing that would change is that she'd be dating someone other than her first officer. She'd act the same way, grow her hair stupidly long the same way, flip off important people the same way...

    In the same vein, you could make Jean-Luc Picard into Jeanne Picard, and it wouldn't change a thing. Just switch Sir Patrick Stewart out for Dame Judi Dench, and you have a powerfully epic female character.

    Janeway is...well, not the most stable person. She's addicted to a mind-altering substance, makes phenomenally bad decisions, allies with known enemies of the Federation--the f*cking BORG, no less--and trades Federation technology to random species in flagrant violation of the Prime Directive. She's outright unfit for command, at best.

    Voyager needs a maaaaaaaaaaaajor rewrite. I could write a better plot in my sleep, TBH.
  • edited February 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    daqhegh wrote: »
    Best: Damar

    Worst: every one-off female character in TOS, particularly those that Kirk...courted. Remember Turnabout Intruder? *facepalm*

    Damar had some great lines.

    Weyoun: The Founder, she wishes to see me. She has to be told about this.
    Damar: Oh, I'm sure she'll understand. But if she doesn't, I look forward to meeting Weyoun 9.
  • suavekssuaveks Member Posts: 1,736 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Best: Sisko, Garak, Quark

    Worst: Archer, Neelix, Janeway
    PyKDqad.jpg
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    2. jj abrams. no comment!

    You're going to have to comment. Elaborate on what it was in Abrams' performance that caused you to rate him the worst. I mean all he did was provide the voice over for a stuntman's scene. What made that "the worst" ?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    iconians wrote: »
    Worst: The entire cast of Enterprise.

    Hold up. How can the Enterprise cast be the worst in all of Trek if it includes this man?

    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Thy'lek_Shran
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    variant37 wrote: »
    Hold up. How can the Enterprise cast be the worst in all of Trek if it includes this man?

    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Thy'lek_Shran

    I really really REALLY wish the next time they do a Shon scene in STO, they have him call Admiral Quinn pink skin. Just as a nod to Shran.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited February 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    worffan101 wrote: »
    starswordc is right; to write a strong female character, write a strong character who happens to be female.

    Janeway is...well, not the most stable person.

    I think the only other weaker female character in the same theme, is Lt.Commander Joanne Galloway in A Few Good Men... Her need for Kaffee's approval was embarrassing and painful, not to mention the numerous times he displayed disrespect toward her as a superior officer, yet she never called him on it... Janeway's almost a mirror of that personality, but just as flawed...
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    valoreah wrote: »
    Starfleet and the Federation seem to agree with that since she was promoted to Admiral.

    She was made Admiral, because it was a way of giving her a desk job and off active service, so she couldn't inflict herself on the galaxy anymore... They might have increased her rank, but I certainly wouldn't consider it as a promotion ;)
  • edited February 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    She was made Admiral, because it was a way of giving her a desk job and off active service, so she couldn't inflict herself on the galaxy anymore... They might have increased her rank, but I certainly wouldn't consider it as a promotion ;)

    If they thought she was such a threat, they wouldn't have promoted her to Vice Admiral. They'd have let her rot at Rear Admiral or have discharged her.
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I really really REALLY wish the next time they do a Shon scene in STO, they have him call Admiral Quinn pink skin. Just as a nod to Shran.

    Shran is made of 100% awesome. He's the reason I have an Andorian character in STO and I'm positive he's the reason Captain Shon even exists.
Sign In or Register to comment.