test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
Badges
Comments
-
The one phase was done prior to removing the smoke bomb/ AoC interaction. Just as an FYI, @"gromovnipljesak#8234". After that, we lost an additional 25% of our damage. Conservatively.
-
@"noworries#8859" Exposed Weakness: this Sabo feat does not work. As far as I can tell it does literally nothing Lurkers Assault: has an AP gain block that needs to be removed. Please, and thank you.
-
@"mikal#9243" this is from the CW feedback thread.
-
Sadly, you are incorrect about the TR damage. But, we will probably be able to out damage OPs! Or, maybe, your TR knowledge far out paces our own... can you share your reasoning? TR buffers? Oh, man, I am on the edge of my seat to know which TR powers buff the party. Please share!
-
Please understand that I am not advocating for a GWF nerf. I’m arguing that the basis that the dev is using to justify the further nerfs to TRs beyond fixing power Looping and the AoC smokebomb, are ridiculous because literally every other DPS will qualify for a nerf on that basis. Also, I hoped the various videos will…
-
@"noworries#8859" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOXN9t_3cU
-
@"noworries#8859" @seveninchblade 1 billion damage in 3 seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olZeKV3vsCY
-
For what, 2 weeks? Go troll the GWF feedback thread for a while, okay?
-
That ability has already been changed. And, to compare that as a single hit is disingenuous as it took a long time (when every DPS can one phase bosses) and many hits to pull off. And, very very few TRs were ever able to do it. Maybe 2that I am aware of. This is a non issue as powerlooping is gone and AoC Bomb is gone.…
-
First of all, thank you for communicating with us! Thank you for explaining your reasoning for your changes to Smoke Bomb. Please understand that, for most of your TR players, the nerfs that affect us most and give the most concern, are the nerfs to powers that affect all feat paths. Bringing Sabo and Scoundrel more into…
-
Please disregard the question about AP gain. The test may have been in error.
-
@"noworries#8859" I’d like to sum up, in a constructive, non snarky way, the frustration our community has had regarding the mod 15 changes. 1) Communication. This is the single biggest problem when it comes to these changes. You asked for feedback, responded once, and never addressed any of the concerns brought up by the…
-
This. This right here. Please consider this. It would solve “powerloop” problem, and not take TRs completely out of the game in PVE, while WWoB only has limited usefulness in PVP. If the AP block for Lurkers Assault is lifted, then we could compete, maybe, with the other DPSers and still be seen as a decent pick for…
-
I know it should be imminent not eminent. I don’t want to edit and get the comment ganked. 🤷♂️
-
Why can’t we get the same consideration given to other class feedback threads? For example @"noworries#8859" wrote yesterday on the DC feedback thread: I was involved in the original TR suggestion threads years ago when we were told balancing TRs was eminent, and it was like pulling teeth to get a response. Why is that?…
-
The difference amounts to a 50% drop or more in dps for end game TRs. It’s not that we are opposed to figuring new things out. Please understand that some of the TRs on here have been figuring things out on TRs for years and years. The changes we object to are changes that affect the endgame playability (dps) in all feat…
-
@"jaime4312#3760" I was talking about the 50% SoD described above, not the way SoD is working mod 14. SWs are certainly not in a good place right now and you were right to correct me. Thank you.
-
-
-
You’ve seen a single TR one phase the baby in cradle? It is important to distinguish something that is a true bug, vs something they change that might not be too wise. This is clearly the latter.
-
This right here. And, the devs were contacted directly with exactly why this was probably too much, and the solution. Since they were notified and all, I can only assume this was WAI. But, I'd expect it to get toned down to what Blur suggests here. Anyway, as for vitriol, @c1k4ml3kc3, you seem to be the most vitriolic…
-
TRs do good damage? Must be "buggy exploit thing". This was thoroughly tested in preview and confirmed with devs that it was WAI.
-
I redid my executioner loadout for bosses on my tr-including companions, mounts (with insignias), etc. swapped to my Sabo loadout. Redid the sabo, and when I tried to swap back to the executioner, it makes the sound but it won’t swap. I don’t have anything on cooldown, and no error appears. I don’t know if It has anything…
-
I suppose “huge” is a relative term... ;)
-
“Supposedly” in mod 13.
-
You mean the one with the Shadows not filling up if you get hit? That’s the big sabo benefit? How else do Sabos benefit from this mod, for PVE play?
-
Not for pve they aren’t. To even take that feat, you have to give up back alley tactics or Ambusher Haste. Both of which are way better for pve play than the new shadowy opportunity...
-
Hi @zebular ! Could you pin this link to the top of the page? Also, please remove The Lilia Drakon and Noto builds as they are now out of date. Thank you! https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Dwtx9Or-UOhrZOKwOWz8_O_Yzu_mX3Q5xE-QX6OkGA/edit?usp=sharing @zebular, I know you all have been slammed with the new mod. Just wanted…
-
The TR power Path of the Blades shows no animation, and doesn’t follow the character around. You drop it, like smoke bomb. It also is not critting sometimes from stealth. The TR power Sly Flourish did not change at all from previous mods. It still gives 10% debuff. Is this intended as a tooltip rewrite, because it doesn’t…
-
But, @magnusg15 does have a point about the scoundrel tree. When the top feat won’t proc on a boss, there is a problem.