The Crossfield is definitely the ugliest ST ship I've ever seen
Ugliest Canon ship maybe, but STO has several designs that are a lot worse, the Federation Dyson Destroyer being the absolute worst Trek design I have ever seen.
Dude, Romulans have toilet brush ships. Dyson ships got nothing on those.
I'd really like to see the Dyson Ship's return, even possibly another Event Dyson Ship.
Don't know if it will happen, others still largely holding out for a Nova as well.
Yes, next two probably, and the final two on Tuesday. We can't speculate, even though we know.
'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
Judge Dan Haywood
'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
The Crossfield is definitely the ugliest ST ship I've ever seen
Ugliest Canon ship maybe, but STO has several designs that are a lot worse, the Federation Dyson Destroyer being the absolute worst Trek design I have ever seen.
Dude, Romulans have toilet brush ships. Dyson ships got nothing on those.
I'd really like to see the Dyson Ship's return, even possibly another Event Dyson Ship.
Don't know if it will happen, others still largely holding out for a Nova as well.
I want a T6 Dyson Destroyer too; still holding out hope for that one, and ready to deploy my full Protonic set on it again. Not the kind of hope that can drive one into the arms of bitterness, but a slim hope nonetheless. (Which I suppose what hope always is. As a fave Captain of mine once said: "I've never known Hope when it wasn't on a diet.")
And no, I really liked how they looked. Built-in DHC needs to beome upgradeable, though. But I was into the whole hybrid roles. And since we're apparently doing whole hybrid ships now, why not?!
The Crossfield is definitely the ugliest ST ship I've ever seen
Ugliest Canon ship maybe, but STO has several designs that are a lot worse, the Federation Dyson Destroyer being the absolute worst Trek design I have ever seen.
Dude, Romulans have toilet brush ships. Dyson ships got nothing on those.
I'd really like to see the Dyson Ship's return, even possibly another Event Dyson Ship.
Don't know if it will happen, others still largely holding out for a Nova as well.
I like actually all 9 dyson variants(10 with the lobi one) so its a pity they didnt get "upgraded" to T6
Well, they need two more updates before next Thursday, if they're going to keep up with these cutsey reveals.
'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
Judge Dan Haywood
'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Today and Tuesday are still strong contenders. Yesterday, was a 'Honey, I blew up the Dyson Battlezone' day.
'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
Judge Dan Haywood
'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Somehow I find it morally questionable to add a ship to a lockbox, then a slightly different version to a promo pack... only to add another slightly different version with updated visuals and traits to the C-store.
Has the person who thought this to be a defendable idea come up with a new Rule of Acquisition yet?
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother
When I heard we would get warship voyager I imagined somehing a little bit more tactical oriented. A lieutenant tactical, 3/3 setup and pilot maneuvers? Seems a little odd.
The saucer looks nice btw. But that's about all the positive feedback that I can give to this move.
I don't particularly care about this specific ship, but I find it wrong that items are more and more advertised as rare or only obtainable through one expensive method, and then change it a bit later after its rareness has been milked.
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother
The last two reveals will probably include the Ambassador.
And perhaps the Enterprise J.
I'd love to see the Vesta included though. It is somewhat of a hero ship if the novels are included. Though that might also make the Luna a good candidate for the last slot.
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother
bah, intrepid still 3/3 weapons payload, they could up swapped it to 4/2. can use dual cannons thou... miracle worker multi-mission sci vessel... does it come with aux cannons?
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
Yes, but it only has 1 LTC and 1 Com sci at best which is also your miracle worker seating. That severely limits sci potential.
When I heard we would get warship voyager I imagined somehing a little bit more tactical oriented. A lieutenant tactical, 3/3 setup and pilot maneuvers? Seems a little odd.
With all those weapons emplacements I was expecting either a Science Destroyer or even an Escort. Generic Science vessel stats just do NOT do that design justice.
In general I'm not impressed with this whole bundle though.
I don't care about traits and consoles since I already have way too many options when it comes to those. So it's the visuals that will be decisive for me.
The Defiant only has some special painting.
The differences for the Sovereign are barely noticable.
Same with the Intrepid.
The Galaxy has so many different versions already that I doubt that a few more will add that much since every new addition has a lower marginal value. I'll check it out in the tailor if that will be possible but I doubt I'll be very impressed.
I never cared much about the Kelvin or TOS Constitutions.
The only ships that are noticably different from the original ones (and which didn't have too many options yet) and interesting to me anyway are the NX-01 and the Odyssey. So unless the final two yet-to-be-revealed ships are very, very interesting I think I'll pass on this.
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
Yes, but it only has 1 LTC and 1 Com sci at best which is also your miracle worker seating. That severely limits sci potential.
Well ltc Sci and cmd Sci isn't really bad.
To be honest, I only use miracle worker abilities on characters that use energy weapons because weapon system synergy is interesting for them.
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
Yes, but it only has 1 LTC and 1 Com sci at best which is also your miracle worker seating. That severely limits sci potential.
The Warship Intrepid doesn't have a LtC Sci seat, only the Commander and a Lt Sci seat:
Whil i liked all other ships so far i am honestly disappointed with these Sci ships. I expected a Tactical Spearhead from the Crossfield but get one less weapon instead and a more DPS oriented VOY but also only 3/3 weapons and 2 TAC consoles?
And is it really the case that i will be able to use ALL the skins even if i do not own certain ships (i don't own the mirror crossfield or the pathfinder)
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
Yes, but it only has 1 LTC and 1 Com sci at best which is also your miracle worker seating. That severely limits sci potential.
The Warship Intrepid doesn't have a LtC Sci seat, only the Commander and a Lt Sci seat:
Yes, that was my point. I could have been more specific, but yes the issue is it can only run 2 top tier sci abilities one LTC power and one Com power, and here those are also MW slots. Most sci ships get 2 LTC and one Com powers either static sci seats or the second LTC seat is a universal seat.
FYI, while that may seem like an intentional hint we are apparently not allowed to discuss it and your post will almost certainly be deleted. I say this because every one of my own posts on that topic have vanished.
So the Crossfield doesn't seem to have the destroyer transformation of the mirror Crossfield. It does offer the 2 existing traits for the other versions. The Glenn version does look slightly better than the basic Crossfield though by thinning that wing and bending up the nacelle pylons, but the nacelles are still way too big.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
Yes, but it only has 1 LTC and 1 Com sci at best which is also your miracle worker seating. That severely limits sci potential.
The Warship Intrepid doesn't have a LtC Sci seat, only the Commander and a Lt Sci seat:
Yes, that was my point. I could have been more specific, but yes the issue is it can only run 2 top tier sci abilities one LTC power and one Com power, and here those are also MW slots. Most sci ships get 2 LTC and one Com powers either static sci seats or the second LTC seat is a universal seat.
Ah ok, I misunderstood, I thought you were saying it had both a LtC Sci and a Commander Sci seat, lol.
Comments
I'd really like to see the Dyson Ship's return, even possibly another Event Dyson Ship.
Don't know if it will happen, others still largely holding out for a Nova as well.
Yeah, last reveal was around 1pm EST on Monday, so I'd expect it to be around the same time today.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
I want a T6 Dyson Destroyer too; still holding out hope for that one, and ready to deploy my full Protonic set on it again. Not the kind of hope that can drive one into the arms of bitterness, but a slim hope nonetheless. (Which I suppose what hope always is. As a fave Captain of mine once said: "I've never known Hope when it wasn't on a diet.")
And no, I really liked how they looked. Built-in DHC needs to beome upgradeable, though. But I was into the whole hybrid roles. And since we're apparently doing whole hybrid ships now, why not?!
I like actually all 9 dyson variants(10 with the lobi one) so its a pity they didnt get "upgraded" to T6
I'm more surprised because blogs don't get posted on Fridays. At least I can't remember the last time that was the case.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
I believe there was a reveal last friday as well.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Mycelial shenanigans
Link to the Page from Reddit: https://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/11364733
Has the person who thought this to be a defendable idea come up with a new Rule of Acquisition yet?
[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
I don't particularly care about this specific ship, but I find it wrong that items are more and more advertised as rare or only obtainable through one expensive method, and then change it a bit later after its rareness has been milked.
[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
And perhaps the Enterprise J.
I'd love to see the Vesta included though. It is somewhat of a hero ship if the novels are included. Though that might also make the Luna a good candidate for the last slot.
[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
The Intrepid is a miracle worker science ship? Definitely was not expecting that. I would have imagined a temporal ship with 4/2 layout for Warship Voyager. The new trait looks like absolute garbage though, what a waste.
It can use 6 Sci console slots though. That's very special. And makes it potentially even more lethal than most other Sci ships.
[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
Yes, but it only has 1 LTC and 1 Com sci at best which is also your miracle worker seating. That severely limits sci potential.
With all those weapons emplacements I was expecting either a Science Destroyer or even an Escort. Generic Science vessel stats just do NOT do that design justice.
I don't care about traits and consoles since I already have way too many options when it comes to those. So it's the visuals that will be decisive for me.
The Defiant only has some special painting.
The differences for the Sovereign are barely noticable.
Same with the Intrepid.
The Galaxy has so many different versions already that I doubt that a few more will add that much since every new addition has a lower marginal value. I'll check it out in the tailor if that will be possible but I doubt I'll be very impressed.
I never cared much about the Kelvin or TOS Constitutions.
The only ships that are noticably different from the original ones (and which didn't have too many options yet) and interesting to me anyway are the NX-01 and the Odyssey. So unless the final two yet-to-be-revealed ships are very, very interesting I think I'll pass on this.
[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
Well ltc Sci and cmd Sci isn't really bad.
To be honest, I only use miracle worker abilities on characters that use energy weapons because weapon system synergy is interesting for them.
[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
The Warship Intrepid doesn't have a LtC Sci seat, only the Commander and a Lt Sci seat:
And is it really the case that i will be able to use ALL the skins even if i do not own certain ships (i don't own the mirror crossfield or the pathfinder)
Yes, that was my point. I could have been more specific, but yes the issue is it can only run 2 top tier sci abilities one LTC power and one Com power, and here those are also MW slots. Most sci ships get 2 LTC and one Com powers either static sci seats or the second LTC seat is a universal seat.
FYI, while that may seem like an intentional hint we are apparently not allowed to discuss it and your post will almost certainly be deleted. I say this because every one of my own posts on that topic have vanished.
Edit:
Ah ok, I misunderstood, I thought you were saying it had both a LtC Sci and a Commander Sci seat, lol.