test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Where is the love for Science ships?

lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,884 Arc User
Ever since you nerfed Science to hell because of Tac officers Science ships have been hurting. Since I've been playing the game which was before f2p there has only been 3 Science ships added to the game...2 of them through lock boxes.

I look at the list of lockbox/special ships...plenty of cruisers, escorts, and cruisers that want to be escorts but absolutely no love for Science. Carriers used to be full of Science abilities including a Sci Cmdr. Now all the carriers these days have a Tac Cmdr and generally very little Science to them.

Since LoR Cruisers have gotten a nice boost and they already had A2B which gave them a whole ton...but Sci are left completely in the dark. The last Sci ship you introduced in the Vesta is basically a Armitage wanna-be...
Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
Post edited by lianthelia on
«1345678

Comments

  • qweeble#7491 qweeble Member Posts: 164 Cryptic Developer
    edited August 2013
    There have been a lot more than 3 science ships since free to play launch... here's a list of T5 ships with commander-level science BOFF stations that have come out since F2P...

    Rademaker
    Vesta
    Aventine
    Fleet Nova
    Fleet Nova Retrofit
    Atrox
    Fleet Varanus
    Fleet Trident
    Fleet Luna
    Mirror Trident
    Mirror Luna
    Korath
    Wells
    Fleet Nebula
    Ha'nom
    Mirror Ha'nom
    Fleet Ha'nom
    R'mor
    Fleet Olympic
    Fleet Olympic Retrofit
    Tholian Orb Weaver
    Fleet Intrepid
    Mirror Vo'Quv
    Fleet Vo'Quv



    Commander Universal station ships:

    Fleet Norgh
    Fleet B'Rel
    Fleet Hoh'SuS
    Fleet Hoh'SuS Retrofit
    Tal Shiar Adapted Battlecruiser
    Tholian Recluse



    May have missed a couple.
    I make space ships!
    Twitter! STO_JamJamz
  • naldorannaldoran Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Here's a better question: where's the love for science abilities? With so many consoles granting what have traditionally been science powers' effects, borked resists making many abilities ineffective, and the lack of group content that really *needs* science ships on the team, there's precious little reason to fly those many wonderful ships you just listed. :(
    12th Fleet | Sad Pandas | Starfleet M.A.C.O.
  • starschildren1starschildren1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    There have been a lot more than 3 science ships since free to play launch... here's a list of T5 ships with commander-level science BOFF stations that have come out since F2P...

    Rademaker
    Vesta
    Aventine
    Fleet Nova
    Fleet Nova Retrofit
    Atrox
    Fleet Varanus
    Fleet Trident
    Fleet Luna
    Mirror Trident
    Mirror Luna
    Korath
    Wells
    Fleet Nebula
    Ha'nom
    Mirror Ha'nom
    Fleet Ha'nom
    R'mor
    Fleet Olympic
    Fleet Olympic Retrofit
    Tholian Orb Weaver
    Fleet Intrepid
    Mirror Vo'Quv
    Fleet Vo'Quv



    Commander Universal station ships:

    Fleet Norgh
    Fleet B'Rel
    Fleet Hoh'SuS
    Fleet Hoh'SuS Retrofit
    Tal Shiar Adapted Battlecruiser
    Tholian Recluse



    May have missed a couple.

    Still didnt get the jist of what he is saying... Sci is TRIBBLE compared to what it used to be..ok if it was a little overpowered at 1st but look where its at now!?? Tacs are all about weapons, Engi are all about passives and sci are all about our Bof abilities which are TRIBBLE and half of them dont work as good compared to most Tac bof abilities...

    And its not just one or two things that break and ruin a profession its a multitude of things big and small that really pushes something to the verge of useless!.

    There are a few builds that actually work on the ordinary sci ship and thats because we have to reallllly make our ship a self healing ship more than a disabling ship (which is basically what we are SUPOSSED to do)

    Cryptic we really appreciate all the new content and grind but we would really appreciate if you would review the logic in alot of abilities and bugs and stuff before any more grind fest comes out.

    Please and thank you!
    Fleet Guardian of Nova Core

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I love science ships! :)
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • brish01brish01 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Asking a dev in here, is like asking the same person to feed your dog, that gets it wrong every time.

    Scis is about boff abilities, problem is most that are popular and used (cookie-cutter builds) get nerfed batted in the pvp scene. See a connection to this? So its gotten to the point the only why I can be effective at sci is to almost roll in a nebula or similar type setup and depend on tankiness or go for limited sci and burst.
    18.jpg
  • tangolighttangolight Member Posts: 777 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Still didnt get the jist of what he is saying... Sci is TRIBBLE compared to what it used to be..ok if it was a little overpowered at 1st but look where its at now!?? Tacs are all about weapons, Engi are all about passives and sci are all about our Bof abilities which are TRIBBLE and half of them dont work as good compared to most Tac bof abilities...

    Ops said only 3 science ships have been released since F2P. Dev proved them wrong. How is that hard to get?

    JamJamz didn't address science abilities. JamJamz does design, modelling (and textures?) for ships, he has nothing to do with the effectiveness of science abiltiies, so he didn't talk about that.
  • cgta1967cgta1967 Member Posts: 86 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    SCI seems fine to me....but then again I'm not very creative when it comes to a topic to rage about.....
    _______________________
    ---- FIRE EVERYTHING ! ----
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I wish they would take a look at all abilities. Like the red headed stepchild of Cryptic that is pvp, boff abilities have remained unchanged since time began :(
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    Missing the point arent you?

    Science Abilities are pretty weak, worst consoles have replaced certain abilities like the latest Subnuke AoE to the point I can only say Sci characters are only good for one thing ground, they have the toughest skill selection since its all over tha place (unlike Tacts that are easy mode) and the only thing they still have a place is ground tanks.

    Sure we have Ships but whats the point when the only thing that still have use is TR?

    I could have a All Cmdr Sci stations ship and it would be ... nothing.

    What does the ship guy have to do with BO abilities???
    GwaoHAD.png
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I don't use them since I don't have a Sci Captain to use them on. My Eng or Tacs are filled as it is with ships. Either Cruisers or Escorts. I do have plans on a Sci in the future, but this is a far off goal. Specially when the Romulans became playable. That threw it on the back burner for now.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • thlaylierahthlaylierah Member Posts: 2,987 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    The latest lockbox ships are science ships.
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    The latest lockbox ships are science ships.

    The escort is sciencey but the not the cruiser.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,884 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    First off I don't consider Fleet ships *new* and they're not new...they're just existing ships with a extra console and more hull and shields same with the mirror vessels and I count the temporal vessel only once since its just a skin difference between the three factions.

    I didn't count the Romulan vessel so that's four Sci Vessels...I don't even need the split second it would take me to blink to think of four Cruisers or four Escorts.

    I was also talking about Sci abilities for those who missed it...you know...all that about being nerfed to death thanks to Tac captains and never got anything to make up for the huge losses.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • theroyalfamilytheroyalfamily Member Posts: 300 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    There have been a lot more than 3 science ships since free to play launch... here's a list of T5 ships with commander-level science BOFF stations that have come out since F2P...

    Well, let's take out the ones that are actually old ships, just with a new skin or new stats - the fleet ships and the mirror ships - and the ones that merely just can have a cdr sci boff:
    Rademaker
    Vesta
    Aventine
    Atrox
    Korath
    Wells
    Ha'nom
    R'mor
    Tholian Orb Weaver

    Of those, three are the Vesta line, so that doesn't count. The Korath, Wells, and R'mor are all identical stats, but are different ships (and one came at a different time), so I'll give you them - but they are lockbox, as is the Orb Weaver. The Atrox is technically a sci ship, but functions far differently from other sci ships - because it's a carrier!

    So we have, really, in new non-lock-box ships:
    Vesta line
    Ha'nom
  • reximuzreximuz Member Posts: 1,172 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    Nothing but this is kinda of a misdirect,

    The OP said their have only been 3 science ships in over a year, the ship guy posted a list of science ships added to the game proving him wrong.

    Calling it a misdirect is a pretty big misdirect.
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    lianthelia wrote: »
    First off I don't consider Fleet ships *new* and they're not new...they're just existing ships with a extra console and more hull and shields same with the mirror vessels and I count the temporal vessel only once since its just a skin difference between the three factions.

    I didn't count the Romulan vessel so that's four Sci Vessels...I don't even need the split second it would take me to blink to think of four Cruisers or four Escorts.

    I was also talking about Sci abilities for those who missed it...you know...all that about being nerfed to death thanks to Tac captains and never got anything to make up for the huge losses.

    Fleet ships are new. Look at how much of a difference they make in combat nowadays. The difference between a Sovereign and Fleet Sovereign are humongous.

    About science abilities. To be frank, and this may be biased, but in truth Engineering abilities are the ones who are at a disadvantage. Consider this:

    Engineering abilities:
    Debuffs: 1
    DoT powers: 2
    Self heals: 2
    Self/Team heals: 2
    Team heals: 1
    Offensive buffs: 2
    Aux buffs: 1
    Speed buffs: 2
    Other: 2

    Science abilities:
    Heals: 2
    Disables: 3
    Placates: 2
    Offensive buffs: 2
    Movement control: 2
    DoT: 2
    Other: 5

    Science abilities have a very diverse range of capabilities. They may not be what you want them to be, and in that case I recommend switching ships. Science powers are for weakening targets or using attack/defense methods that are outside of the traditional tank/damage roles.

    Sure, those eager damage-spitting Tacscorts are a problem. But you could use Feedback Pulse to reflect damage back at them; Tractor beam to hold them down and move out of the firing arc; Energy siphon to reduce their weapons power; Jam Sensors so they can't target you; Photonic shockwave to knock them around for a second or two.

    It's all about how you use the various tools to your advantage.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • reximuzreximuz Member Posts: 1,172 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Well, let's take out the ones that are actually old ships, just with a new skin or new stats - the fleet ships and the mirror ships - and the ones that merely just can have a cdr sci boff:



    Of those, three are the Vesta line, so that doesn't count. The Korath, Wells, and R'mor are all identical stats, but are different ships (and one came at a different time), so I'll give you them - but they are lockbox, as is the Orb Weaver. The Atrox is technically a sci ship, but functions far differently from other sci ships - because it's a carrier!

    So we have, really, in new non-lock-box ships:
    Vesta line
    Ha'nom

    This is the most BS post I have ever seen on these forums. If you can't delete the ship from the game without having an impact then its an unique ship.

    If we can take ships off the list for nonsensical reasons, I'm going to add every ship with a Sci Boff seat on as a Sci ship. Universal seats count too, so each BOP counts as 4 Sci ships. And now my post is almost as terrible as yours. Almost.
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Jamjamz made a valid point there are tons of science ships but I think the problem is there is only really one type of science build that hangs on the verge of being nerfed into unusable at any time so its the science abilities and not the science ships.

    Pretty much energy drains are only viable the disable and shield stripping ones are pretty much the unreliable since most players and npcs have such high resistances even at max auxillary which it requires on most of these you don't even put a dent into the enemy target.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,884 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Fleet ships are new. Look at how much of a difference they make in combat nowadays. The difference between a Sovereign and Fleet Sovereign are humongous.

    About science abilities. To be frank, and this may be biased, but in truth Engineering abilities are the ones who are at a disadvantage. Consider this:

    Engineering abilities:
    Debuffs: 1
    DoT powers: 2
    Self heals: 2
    Self/Team heals: 2
    Team heals: 1
    Offensive buffs: 2
    Aux buffs: 1
    Speed buffs: 2
    Other: 2

    Science abilities:
    Heals: 2
    Disables: 3
    Placates: 2
    Offensive buffs: 2
    Movement control: 2
    DoT: 2
    Other: 5

    Science abilities have a very diverse range of capabilities. They may not be what you want them to be, and in that case I recommend switching ships. Science powers are for weakening targets or using attack/defense methods that are outside of the traditional tank/damage roles.

    Sure, those eager damage-spitting Tacscorts are a problem. But you could use Feedback Pulse to reflect damage back at them; Tractor beam to hold them down and move out of the firing arc; Energy siphon to reduce their weapons power; Jam Sensors so they can't target you; Photonic shockwave to knock them around for a second or two.

    It's all about how you use the various tools to your advantage.

    Who cares about diversity when most of those *diverse* abilities do squat? Most of them are ineffective or easily avoidable.

    I didn't really argue that escorts are better than Sci or anything, mostly mentioned escorts because of how many more of them we get than Sci...
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • burstdragon323burstdragon323 Member Posts: 853 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Last time a dev posted to me, I was told that Gravity Well's -Repel can't be improved.

    Basically, we got screwed by evolution.

    Tachyon beam: useless against ships with 20-200K shields.
    How to fix: make Tachyon Beam remove a percentage of shields.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    The latest lockbox ships are science ships.

    I think you need to read the very first post.

    Matter of fact, alot of people in this thread need to read the initial post, to include the Cryptic rep.

    Also, Science BOFF abilities were nerfed hard, long long ago and have never recovered. People complained about energy drains, so energy drains were made easy to resist with minimal points. This affected a whole swath of Science Debuff abilities (Energy Siphon, Tachyon Beam, Tykien's Rift, etc.). That's just one example.

    Hell, even in PVE this is now an issue. Not surprising to see NPCs walk away from a Grav Well 3 made by full Grav Well skill with 4-5 associated sci consoles to boost it.

    Also, I want to say that I find it ridiculous that TAC Captain BUFFs greatly improve Science ability damage more than Science Captain BUFFs ever will.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • arcademasterarcademaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    The reason they don't make more science ships is that almost no one would buy them. Why would almost no one buy them? Because Science skills in space are friggin useless. This has been the case since I play this game (F2P Launch) and in that time it only got WORSE, not better even once.

    If in dev interviews someone asks Gecko or DStahl about science being useless, they always evade with TRIBBLE about they'd rather make new missions that require science than making over the abilities themselves. Well if you love science ships I'd take that as a big reminder to simply quit the game honestly.

    The only thing space science abilities are good for is making the air look colorful. Woohoo. Damage is beyond useless (I get that, tac territory and all) but the disable capabilities are utterly useless too. It's not just that no missions profit from that type of ability at all, if they would, the abilities we have would STILL suck. GWs that have zero effect on ships that pass through. Energy drains that make a ship that barely hurts us hurt us a tiny bit less for 10 seconds. Random chance to disable a subsystem for 2 seconds with 90 seconds cooldowns, the list goes on and on. It's hard to fathom how the devs can't even see what the issue is.

    Yes, in a coordinated team environment, 2 seconds are all that is needed for a pro team to dismantle a player completely. But with effects like this Science will NEVER have a place in PvE. As long as you try to balance both at once Science will stay useless until the end of time. Balance PvP and PvE seperately or remove Science ships from the game, currently they are just traps for new players and bad players to waste money on because they don't know better.

    This situation is so frustrating. And over and over the devs show us they don't give a TRIBBLE.
  • decroniadecronia Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    There have been a lot more than 3 science ships since free to play launch... here's a list of T5 ships with commander-level science BOFF stations that have come out since F2P...

    Rademaker Really 1/3 of a ship as it is part of a set
    Vesta Really 1/3 of a ship as it is part of a set
    Aventine Again 1/3 of a ship as it is part of a set
    Fleet Nova Not realy new just a rehsah of a current ship
    Fleet Nova Retrofit Rehash number two
    Atrox Yep so that's one full ship so far
    Fleet Varanus Rehash not new
    Fleet Trident Rehash not new
    Fleet Luna Rehash not new
    Mirror Trident Rehash not new and lock box
    Mirror Luna Rehash not new and lock box
    Korath Lock box doesn't count
    Wells Lock box so doesn't count
    Fleet Nebula Rehash not new
    Ha'nom Yep so full ship number 2
    Mirror Ha'nom Rehash not new and lock box
    Fleet Ha'nom Rehash not new
    R'mor Lock box doesn't count
    Fleet Olympic Rehash not new
    Fleet Olympic Retrofit Rehash not new
    Tholian Orb Weaver Lock box doesn't count
    Fleet Intrepid Rehash not new
    Mirror Vo'Quv Rehash and lock box doesn't count
    Fleet Vo'Quv Rehash not new

    Basically 3 full new ships so far, the rest are either rehashes or lock box so not being counted by me. Though the ship thing is not that important in all honest, to me anyway.

    It is sci skills, and the BOFF skills that are SNAFUed and this is really the problem not the ships themselves. These need looking at and rebuilding. I know this isn't your area JamJamz so maybe you would be kind enough to get someone whoes area it is to dare to pop their head above the parapet and come here and let us discuss that with them.
  • havamhavam Member Posts: 1,735 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    If only i could find a post by cryptic representative, explaining that lockbox ship do not take time away from the development of regular ships. Since they are extras that wouldn't have made it into the game otherwise...something about CBS....mah who am i kiddin
  • stumpfgobsstumpfgobs Member Posts: 297 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    About science abilities. To be frank, and this may be biased, but in truth Engineering abilities are the ones who are at a disadvantage.

    Its less about the amount. In that department science is quite glorious. There are plenty of different abilities around. No, its not about the amount, but you can make it about it.
    How many of the science abilities actually do something worthwhile/work compared to the eng abilities?

    The truth is, if i want working science stuff, i don't check the science abilities, i check the exotic consoles of lock boxes and the lobi store. They actually work and even without wasting lots of skill points and precious bridge officer slots. :cool:
  • tali9999tali9999 Member Posts: 173 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    To be honest, science ships are not really the problem, science skills and the way they work are.

    There is one thing thought that makes science ships by themselve less interesting than other ships: they can most of the time only equip 3 fore, 3 aft weapons and that is a problem imho.

    With all the goodies and special weapons that can nowadays be acquired in game, having many weapon slots is a most for any ship.

    For instance, many people like to equip a kinetic cutting beam, a transphasic cluster torp, a romulan torpedo and other stuff like 180 degree quantum or trico mine.... That leaves you with like only 3 slots to equip beam or cannon weapons which simply is not good enough.

    Sci ships are most of time already poor on tactical options and having a TT skill already takes 1 slot... So you end with a ship with not only few weapons but also few tactical capabilities....

    Even the Vesta, the only sci ship i still use sometimes, it is only not bad when i go all phasers and max Aux with it using its special weapons... Not much room for torpedoes, mines or special weapons, it is still only a 6 slot ship..

    Sorry for my rambling, just a few thoughts on sci ships i had. If sci ships had 8 weapons slots like cruisers, i might be interested in them again even with their weaker hull they have.
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    havam wrote: »
    If only i could find a post by cryptic representative, explaining that lockbox ship do not take time away from the development of regular ships. Since they are extras that wouldn't have made it into the game otherwise...something about CBS....mah who am i kiddin

    Heh, I remember that ;)
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





Sign In or Register to comment.