test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Update on Fleet Marks and Dilithium

15152545657101

Comments

  • olivia211olivia211 Member Posts: 675 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    gr4v1t4r wrote: »
    Regardless of wheter it is allowed or not, opening a dialog with him would be far more productive. I see a lot of the people here reaching out, I hope that Stahl will see this as an opportunity to get back in touch with the community again.

    People do not respond well to threats, much less the threat of getting fired. There are better ways to go about bringing up such a topic. Besides, if he wanted to open up a real dialog, he would have done more than give us a wall of text that basically says "too bad, so sad."
    No, I am not who you think I am. I am someone different. I am instead a banana.
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    olivia211 wrote: »
    People do not respond well to threats, much less the threat of getting fired. There are better ways to go about bringing up such a topic. Besides, if he wanted to open up a real dialog, he would have done more than give us a wall of text that basically says "too bad, so sad."

    Yup. We need to talk or at least be listened to. What if we elected a rep or a council of reps on our side?
    Another alternative is to form up as a mob outside Cryptic HQ and/or PWE HQ.

    By the way Olivia, the "my video antics" in your sig raises a smirk. Lol :)

    Edited to fix some "spellong" errors.
    I need a beer.

  • snakeswar2snakeswar2 Member Posts: 245 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    this is getting the kind of backlash that the dilithium and drop removal of the stfs did back when season 7 started and they never learned from that. i havent read much of this thread but much of the options i did see can work if cryptic is open to try them out and we try them out and cryptic keeps a list of all the options mentioned in this thread
  • rinksterrinkster Member Posts: 3,549 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Yup, the thread is slowing down a little.

    The deafening silence from dStahl means there is very little point in rehashing whats already been said.

    A lot of us are giving the benefit of the doubt to Cryptic over the long US holiday weekend.

    However, by tuesday, expect the rate to pick up again.

    Another day of silence on the matter from the devs on tuesday will not be acceptable.
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    snakeswar2 wrote: »
    this is getting the kind of backlash that the dilithium and drop removal of the stfs did back when season 7 started and they never learned from that. i havent read much of this thread but much of the options i did see can work if cryptic is open to try them out and we try them out and cryptic keeps a list of all the options mentioned in this thread

    Oh, this is rather bigger my friend.
    I need a beer.

  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    So we're 160 pages in and yet still no response? I would have figured Brandon or Dan would have jumped in by now to say something.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • gpgtxgpgtx Member Posts: 1,579 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    There is no way in heck that anyone could be that inept as to repeat that mistake again.

    i work at a public school you would be surprised just how inept people can be lol
    victoriasig_zps23c45368.jpg
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    knuhteb5 wrote: »
    So we're 160 pages in and yet still no response? I would have figured Brandon or Dan would have jumped in by now to say something.

    There has been a response, but it contained so little in the way of meaningful words that it can be safely discounted for now.
    gpgtx wrote: »
    i work at a public school you would be surprised just how inept people can be lol

    I was a soldier once and yes, I believe that people really can be that inept.
    I need a beer.

  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    There is no way in heck that anyone could be that inept as to repeat that mistake again.

    To paraphrase one of my favorite one episode wonder villains: "Always bet on stupidity".
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    To paraphrase one of my favorite one episode wonder villains: "Always bet on stupidity".

    Or alternatively, "never underestimate the odds of a foolish move".
    I need a beer.

  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    There has been a response, but it contained so little in the way of meaningful words that it can be safely discounted for now.

    Bran's done effectively all he can in this thread without input from his higher ups. I don't, and nor should anyone else, fault him for not making promises, statements or any kind of "wink wink, nudge nudge" actions that he can't back up.
  • lordagamemnonb5lordagamemnonb5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I was a soldier once and yes, I believe that people really can be that inept.

    I am a soldier, and I know exactly what you are talking about.

    To paraphrase one of my favorite one episode wonder villains: "Always bet on stupidity".
    Or alternatively, "never underestimate the odds of a foolish move".

    You are both correct. I forgot one of Einstein's pieces of wisdom:

    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    How the Devs see Star Trek, apparently:
    Star Trek: The Original Grind
    Star Trek: The Next Grind
    Star Trek: Deep Space Grind
    Star Trek: Voyage to the Grind
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Bran's done effectively all he can in this thread without input from his higher ups. I don't, and nor should anyone else, fault him for not making promises, statements or any kind of "wink wink, nudge nudge" actions that he can't back up.

    Surely with this sort of momentum behind this thread (and the others before it) an urgent response from the higher ups is warranted?

    We are the customers after all.

    EDIT

    200th post yay.
    I need a beer.

  • weylandjuarezweylandjuarez Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Oh, this is rather bigger my friend.

    Yes indeed! This is the 9th most commented thread in the news section since 2010 - the 8 archived threads above it deal with the closed beta prior to the launch of STO in February of that year.

    This is bigger than the Dilithium nerfs of Season 7 and bigger still than the announcement of STO going F2P.

    But as myself and many others have stated - the outrage felt over this is a symptom of a greater issue - the lack of transparency between the Devs and the player-base over far-reaching and arbitrary decisions that are being made by Cryptic without any consideration of the impact on their customers.

    This has to change otherwise these threads will only grow more frequent and even more bitter.
    Please join our peaceful protest to help make STO a better game
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Proudly not contributing to PWE's bottom-line since October 2012
  • gr4v1t4rgr4v1t4r Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Surely with this sort of momentum behind this thread (and the others before it) an urgent response from the higher ups is warranted?

    We are the customers after all.

    EDIT

    200th post yay.

    Actually, I disagree. Sure, a quick fix to the IOR situation would calm things down again, for now anyway. However, I hope they are in fact considering the bigger picture here. I would much rather receive a well-considered response to the entire situation, adressing not just the IOR but the general unrest within the community. Otherwise we are just fighting symptons here, and not the disease that is killing this game. I hope the dev's are using this time to addres the issues pointed out in this thread and the previous one. If they don't, we can look forward to a repeat of this situation sooner rather then later.
    Lost and Delirious... and Disenchanted too
    Apparently some forum posters have diplomatic immunity nowadays, where can I get mine?
    askray wrote: »
    Expressing my opinion isn't trolling but nice try. Besides, if I was you wouldn't know it ;P
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • puykonigpuykonig Member Posts: 52 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    best way is just stop playing STO till they fix it.
  • pwecangetlostpwecangetlost Member Posts: 538 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Well, this escalated quickly.
  • bones1970bones1970 Member Posts: 953 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    puykonig wrote: »
    best way is just stop playing STO till they fix it.

    I'm not stopping, but went from 12 hours to 1 (fleet daily's) so i get some fleetmarks/dilitium.
    And the solution is so easy, fleet-, romulan-, omega-marks change them all to just marks, this way we can get our marks with the mission we want to play.
  • husserehussere Member Posts: 30 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    puykonig wrote: »
    best way is just stop playing STO till they fix it.

    Then you might want to stop play STO at all since most of the main issues from playerbase side view wont be fixed.

    I am this close here to leave and never come back on game
    A Disenchanted player
  • imperialmirrorimperialmirror Member Posts: 147 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    puykonig wrote: »
    best way is just stop playing STO till they fix it.

    The problem is that I don't want myself and others to stop playing for them to fix mission and bugs in the game.

    Its looking to me that they dont want us to play STO anymore and move to there new game that coming out soon. I know I not giving up on STO but Im also not make any purchases until some major bugs are fixed in this game.
    1Wv2pWK.gif
  • brucebleobrucebleo Member Posts: 24 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Morning campers!!

    just posting here to show my continued support of the need for some serious rethinking of cryptics complete lack of foresight regarding players that actually DON'T want to join somebody elses mega fleet and that are quite happy with not wanting to recruit mass loads of players JUST to access parts of the game that would otherwise be off limits.

    THIS is my main 'bone of contention' when me and my fleet mate created our fleet during the closed beta and then again during the early access period....we did NOT expect to be faced with the simply sucky no win situation of having to decide upon opening up Indigo Fleet to random unknown people OR leaving our beloved fleet simply because the devs show their preferences to LARGE mega fleets.

    Again I say this....if it were not for STO being F2P both me and my fleet mate without a DOUBT would currently be playing Diablo 3 or dare I say it...EVE yarrrr o/

    Fix this issue and Cryptic/PWE would certainly recieve Gold subs and/or zen purchases now and then. As it stands......no more money will be passing from my account into Cryptics/PWE's coffers.

    PLEASE drop this Bill Roper style money grubbing mentality........if you WANT my money....don't try to FORCE me to part with it via insane grinds....ENTICE me to part with it.
  • bizzarquestionbizzarquestion Member Posts: 36 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    puykonig wrote: »
    best way is just stop playing STO till they fix it.

    I have done little playing these last few days. Except for the other day playing a few STF I only sign on to do my one VIP dilithium claim. Have like 3 months worth of those no sense in creating a further backlog.

    The cynical part of my believes Stahl took an extended weekend as soon as he posted his last 'follow up' post. But the optimistic part feels that they are truly having meetings this weekend to resolve our issues. You can tell that what I listed first as being the most prominent in my mind.

    Anyway...Power to the People! Keep up The Good Fight!
  • thisisoverlordthisisoverlord Member Posts: 949 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Also popping in to post my continued support of this thread and my fellow players everywhere,

    This weekend I played 0:00 STO
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    #2311#2700#2316#2500
  • clannmacclannmac Member Posts: 279 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Same here - group solidarity, mates!

    I am, sadly, not of the mind that folks are meeting to discuss any part of this over the weekend at all - in fact, Dan and "The Powers That Be" have probably turned off their comps, phones, pagers (does anyone still have pagers? Ha!), and so on and are looking for cheap tix to Mexico - but I'll admit it's a good hope! :)

    Was tempted a couple of times to get in-game meself, but I've such a bitter taste in my mouth the now, that, nope: have logged exactly 0:00 hours of STO as well.

    Stay standing strong on this one, chaps!
    366400.jpg

    Fleet Commander
    Caprica's Revenge
    (...actually active since November 2010, which may one day be important to archaeologists, but not to anyone else...)
  • born2bwild1born2bwild1 Member Posts: 1,329 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Also popping in to post my continued support of this thread and my fellow players everywhere,

    This weekend I played 0:00 STO

    sorry your not here - the game is jam pack tonight - new Romulus zones were full - at DS9 right now and there are like 40 ships in orbit
  • puykonigpuykonig Member Posts: 52 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    i love this game, since i found it on steam. i have play like 16hrs per/day. i know that is a lot of time of playing. I just hope they fix it. as i have stop playing this for the last 2 days now. Been on other game.
  • gr4v1t4rgr4v1t4r Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    sorry your not here - the game is jam pack tonight - new Romulus zones were full - at DS9 right now and there are like 40 ships in orbit

    Zones where full? 40 ships in orbit? You realize that zones get filled by design right? An actual number of zones would tell us more about players being online. Aside from that, I am confused as to why you keep posting here telling us everything is "A-Okay!!!"....What's your agenda?
    Lost and Delirious... and Disenchanted too
    Apparently some forum posters have diplomatic immunity nowadays, where can I get mine?
    askray wrote: »
    Expressing my opinion isn't trolling but nice try. Besides, if I was you wouldn't know it ;P
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kyuui13kyuui13 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    gr4v1t4r wrote: »
    Zones where full? 40 ships in orbit? You realize that zones get filled by design right? An actual number of zones would tell us more about players being online. Aside from that, I am confused as to why you keep posting here telling us everything is "A-Okay!!!"....What's your agenda?

    I bet he also thinks they pop in numerical order too
    Cryptic has on more than one occasion altered Zone sizes for a multitude of reasons. and if you think 40 ships around ds9, is "busy' well trust me, its no where near that.
    Next time you log in, ask yourself this.
    dastahl wrote: »
    If you can't have fun, then what is the point?
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    This will probably never be seen by dstahl or anyone else... and if it is, it will likely be disregarded as coming from the "Stupid Customer, Doesn't Know Anything" mentality. (Yes, I know what that is myself, I used to apply the same mental classification to customers too).

    Here's an idea.

    The problem is that small fleets are struggling - but the only reason why they haven't left their existing fleet to join a "super-fleet" is because they are tied to their RP or language/country fleet.

    Someone else said "Why don't we be able to merge fleets". This is a good idea, but the problem is that there will be too many fleets. However, this provides the basis for my proposal.

    How about this.

    Have the ability for a player to be able to join a maximum of three fleets; however, only one fleet can be set to "primary" fleet.


    A person's primary fleet is simply that - the primary. No changes to the fleet system for that person's primary fleet will occur.

    Secondary/tertiary fleets will be different. A player CANNOT buy equipment or supplies from secondary or tertiary fleets, but are still able to contribute resources to fleet projects and be able to visit fleet starbases and embassies.

    It's not a perfect solution, but it works.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • husserehussere Member Posts: 30 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    This will probably never be seen by dstahl or anyone else... and if it is, it will likely be disregarded as coming from the "Stupid Customer, Doesn't Know Anything" mentality. (Yes, I know what that is myself, I used to apply the same mental classification to customers too).

    Here's an idea.

    The problem is that small fleets are struggling - but the only reason why they haven't left their existing fleet to join a "super-fleet" is because they are tied to their RP or language/country fleet.

    Someone else said "Why don't we be able to merge fleets". This is a good idea, but the problem is that there will be too many fleets. However, this provides the basis for my proposal.

    How about this.

    Have the ability for a player to be able to join a maximum of three fleets; however, only one fleet can be set to "primary" fleet.


    A person's primary fleet is simply that - the primary. No changes to the fleet system for that person's primary fleet will occur.

    Secondary/tertiary fleets will be different. A player CANNOT buy equipment or supplies from secondary or tertiary fleets, but are still able to contribute resources to fleet projects and be able to visit fleet starbases and embassies.

    It's not a perfect solution, but it works.


    Take no offense but I think you are missing the whole thread line here.

    so basicaly what you are suggesting is to multiply the amount of items grinding by a X factor, depending on how many X fleets you join and contribute to? xD

    How to say ... Thanks but no thanks
    It totally goes against the whole thread wich is :

    Too much grind; not enough FUN

    Beeing able to join more fleets will result in even more grind and won't solve anything :D
    A Disenchanted player
This discussion has been closed.