test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The best/awful looking ship in STO

13

Comments

  • asuran14asuran14 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    Best would be a mixture of the gal-x class parts, (monarch saucer, third necelle. Venture hull, and normal necelles. Andromida neck an pylons). Though as a whole any of the patrol escort classes look amazing, and i am so hoping to see them redone in a T-6 varient. Also what about the two assimulated Tal'shiar ships those look so aggressive an yet mask thier borg orgin developement well.

    Worst would be Undine ships outside of Vila heavy bio-ship which is the only one i like of thier line up. Ferangi, also never liked thier design along with the Cardassian designs but that is alot of personal factors no liking how flow or rater don't flow well.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    I find it difficult to give a real list, but here's an example of how the same ship can be awesome and unawesome to the same person! (We already see that some people hate what others love and vice versa):

    Kolasi Siege Destroyer: Ugly
    Kolasi Siege Destroyer in Siege Mode: Awesome. I only fly it this way. TRIBBLE turn rate.
    Battlecruiser with Avenger engineering section: Terrible
    Battlecruiser with Arbiter engineering section. Awesome.


    If I try to give a good list:

    Awesome:
    Federation without kitbashing: Hestia Advanced Escort
    Federation with kitbashing: Pathfinder with Intrepid pylons and nacelles
    Klingons without kitbashing: Bortasque. I really like the look of the ships. Too bad it handles so terrible.
    Klingons with kitbashing: Tie between Vor'Cha and Neg'Var, really.
    Romulans without kitbashing: Aehlahl (literally without kitbashing - no options. That makes me sad.)
    Romulans with kitbashing: Kara Advanced Warbird.

    Terrible:
    Federation: Olympus. I really don't like the golfball ships.
    Klingons: Anquat.
    Romulans: Mogai and Scimitar. I just can't get to like their looks.​​
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • xyquarzexyquarze Member Posts: 2,120 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    Considering it's such an unusual style i expected the Gurumba to be mentioned here a couple of times by now.​​
    kyrrok wrote: »
    KDF: (...) For last place, it's the Guramba/Kolasi.

    Ask and ye shall receive

    My mother was an epohh and my father smelled of tulaberries
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,489 Arc User
    xyquarze wrote: »
    questerius wrote: »
    Considering it's such an unusual style i expected the Gurumba to be mentioned here a couple of times by now.
    kyrrok wrote: »
    KDF: (...) For last place, it's the Guramba/Kolasi.

    Ask and ye shall receive

    I knew it was a self fulfilling prophecy.

    The Gurumba has a unique style, one that takes a bit of getting used to. I like both the Gurumba and its mk 2 version.
    It may be an acquired taste, but it looks quite nice.​​
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    Best ships?
    Fed: Regent
    KDF: Mah'Ta
    Rom: Ar'Kif

    Worst?
    Fed: Dauntless
    KDF: Qib
    Rom: Scimitar
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • tinyfistedtinyfisted Member Posts: 193 Arc User
    I just want to come to the defense of the Scryer. A little. Yeah, the saucer could be a little better. Yeah, the nacelles could stand some adjusting, too. But Mmmmmm, Dat Dorsal Deflector. With a little tweaking, it would be my _second_ choice behind the Aventine, I think, for best fed looker.
    86B6EC45459D17DB8AE6CD5F51C13A90CDC00A85
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    Best
    • Fed
      • Sovereign/Regent
    • KDF
      • B'Rel/B'Rotlh
    • Rom
      • DSD's (Rom, with faction skin)
    • Cross-Faction
      • Breen Chel Grett

    Honorable Mentions
    • Fed
      • Akira, Ambassador, Battle Cruiser (with Avenger Saucer/Arbiter Hull), Fleet Star Cruiser, Nebula, Nova/Rhode Island, Prometheus/Hestia (despite using the name for a T6 MMSV on it), Tempest
    • KDF
      • Birok, DSD's (KDF, with faction skin), Guramba/Kolasi, Kamarang, K'Tanco (maybe just because the 13 Turn Rate made if fun to fly?), Mat'Ha, Peghqu', Qaw'Dun, Varanus, Vor'Cha/Tor'Kaht
    • Rom
      • Ar'kif/Jhu'ael, Command Warbirds (Rom), D'Deridex, Daeinos/Dinaes, Mogai/Morrigu
    • Cross-Faction
      • Nihydron Destroyer, Risian Corvette and Luxury Cruiser
    • Non-Playable
      • Nausicaan Syphon Frigate, Typhoon

    Worst
    • Fed
      • DSD's (Fed)
    • KDF
      • Command Battlecruisers (KDF, though I do have them, and they're really nice ships... *sigh* I don't want to offend the designer, but they simply look as if all the creative energy was spent on the Rom and Fed versions.)
    • Rom
      • Pilot Warbirds (Rom)
    • Cross-Faction
      • Ferengi Nandi

    Dishonorable Mentions
    • Fed
      • Battle Cruiser (with Arbiter Saucer/Avenger Hull), Cochrane/Discovery, DSSV's, Fleet Advanced Escort, Fleet Assault Cruiser
    • KDF
      • Qib (It looks... flattened; most of the KDF aesthetics work in their various ways, but that thing just doesn't. Still, I like it more than the Command Battlecruisers (KDF))
    • Rom
      • Dhael (looks like it's aft is raised and ready for flanking...), D'Khellra, Haakona/Kara
    • Cross-Faction
      • Benthan Assault Cruiser (I'd always wondered why it looked backwards, then I saw video that reminded me that it was.), Voth Bulwark Dreadnought Cruiser (reminds me of an IKEA commercial... I don't actually dislike it so much as find it incredibly funny.)
    Post edited by breadandcircuses on
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • tick0tick0 Member Posts: 243 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    Best: Odyssey Star Cruiser
    Odyssey_class_6.jpg

    Worst: An'quat Command Battlecruiser
    bcbca466b9926fc42eceb3b3e0be6ad01423525373.png
    Edit: The longer I look at the An'quat, the uglier it gets. :|
    star_trek_razzle_dazzle_by_schematization-d37701m.gif
    @f4tamy | Sad Pandas
  • highlord83highlord83 Member Posts: 229 Arc User
    nikephorus wrote: »
    Avenger for me. Awesome ship, but ugly as sin.

    Thats part of why I love mine. There's all these beautiful, sculpted and sleek science and exploration vessels in Starfleet, then you see this squat, short brick that's bristling with guns. the Avenger is the A-10 of Starfleet.

    For my choices though, I have to say that I hold the Aventine as one of the most beautiful ships in STO.

    On the opposite end, I utterly loathe all forms of the bloated, bulbous whale that is the Galaxy and it's variants.
    "So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again."
    -Dedication plaque of the Federation Starship U.S.S. Merkava
  • bones1970bones1970 Member Posts: 953 Arc User
    Worst: Fed veteran ship, Chimera Heavy Destroyer
  • schloopdooschloopdoo Member Posts: 373 Arc User
    Best: Klingon Veteran Destroyer in Regenerative Mode

    Worst: Klingon Veteran Destroyer in Tactical Mode
  • fovrelfovrel Member Posts: 1,448 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    A better name for this thread would be the bad looking ship and the very bad looking ship, because I think starship design is at it best mediocre. Cryptic is not to blame for this, but the ones that came up with the original Enterprise. From that point one we have to deal with a saucer, hull and nacelles configuration. We have to live with it.

    The defiant is a good design. It is a warship, Small, nimble, just what is needed, a simple gun platform. The orginal constellation is wrong. Saucer and hull make sense, a crew and passenger compartment and a separate hull with the enginering. Though the hull is tubular as is the warp core, but the warpcore is placed vertical in the hull. It doesn't make sense. Two nacelles outside the hull. That may have a reason, but they are connected with the hull with in comparison tinny struts. This whole configuration, think also about the neck, is screaming for stress problems when it comes to fast and abrubt manoeuvring. Voyager does it better. No neck and the nacelles are connected to the hull by short wings. However they can fold, anybody has a clue why?

    The famous B'rel is a warship and it looks as such. I don't now if one has to deal with recoil when you fire those guns. I suppose they can fire and are not just for cosmetic reasons. If there is recoil, you don't want your heavy guns that far outside the fuselage. You will have align problems when not firing simultanously or just firing with one side.

    And that is the other problem with ship design in the game. It is coming from designs from a tv show and/or movie. On screen we only see the ships for a short moment. I am not so much interested in the design. I am interested in a good story, good acting. The ship, also the outside, is not much more as decor. In the game that is totally different. I really have to like the ship. It is my ship, a spend hours with it.
  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    Fed side worst - probably the Imperial class assault cruiser. No idea what it's supposed to be and it just looks ridiculous, nothing like the sleek Regent or Sovereign classes.

    Best fed side - I'd say either the Regent, Pathfinder or Guardian.
    SulMatuul.png
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited October 2015
    Worst
    • KDF
      • Command Battlecruisers (KDF, though I do have them, and they're really nice ships... *sigh* I don't want to offend the designer, but they simply look as if all the creative energy was spent on the Rom and Fed

    @breadandcircuses I'd disagree. The Fed versions look awful. Like Excelsiors somebody said "let's pretend they're the replacement for the Typhoon", so they stuck a extra set of nacelles on them and hoped that people would be fooled enough by that single similarity to think they were a revamped Typhoon.

    I made a kitbash of the Klingon CC's I call the Klin'Gokor and I think it's a very nice looking ship, so much so, that if I bought the KDF CC's I'd buy the three pack to use the parts from two of the ships (but TRIBBLE the An'quat, it's bloody disgusting).
    22086698919_41b49e4f42_o.png

    The Romulan ones, however, are all nice.​​
    Post edited by artan42 on
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • hyefatherhyefather Member Posts: 1,286 Arc User
    This is the best looking ship in STO.

    800px-Federation_Research_Science_Vessel_%28Horizon%29.png?version=5eb8a049b981e40b3b096965c931081b

    It's obviously the most practical as well. Why waste space with deck plating when you can have all your crew and all your consoles floating around inside a giant empty force field?

    Since all the consoles will need to be wireless, there are fewer deaths from console explosions during battle since there are no high-voltage EPS lines powering them. There is also no plating falling on you during a structural integrity failure. The forcefield protects your crew from enemy fire as long as the warp core remains online. This type of design is so superior to existing ships it should be made the standard for all future vessels from this point foward. Anything less is a death trap.

    latest?cb=20110408160423&path-prefix=en

    No more of this! Use Horizon standard architecture for all future Starfleet vessels!
    '

    For some odd reason when I look at that ship I see 1 torpedo shooting from a cloaked BOP and well...the rest is history.

  • tmassxtmassx Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    Starfleet
    best: Regent, Interpid, Armitage
    worst: Eclipse, Imperial class, Arbiter

    KDF
    best: Bortasqu, Ning'tao, Krenn (temporal d.)
    worst: Qib, Orion Marauder, An'quat

    Romulan Navy
    best: Aelahl, R'Mor (sci temporal), Dinaes (vet)
    worst: Ha'nom, Ha'feh, Ha'apax, pilot warbirds

    Alien
    best: all Jem'hadar's, Xindi insectoid, Elachi escort
    worst: Risian cruiser, Nandi, all Herald's
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,015 Arc User
    Starfleet
    best: Sovereign, Eclipse, Defiant, Intrepid and Excelsior
    worst: Fed Dyson and the olympic type science ships

    KDF
    best: Kamarag, Vor'cha and Negh'var with the B'rel and Qin raptor
    worst: the orion marauder,

    RR
    best: Aves class warbird, D'deridex and Mogai
    worst: Scimitar, it's too big and ugly
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • tinyfistedtinyfisted Member Posts: 193 Arc User
      Dishonorable Mentions
      • Fed
        • Battle Cruiser (with Arbiter Saucer/Avenger Hull), Cochrane/Discovery, DSSV's, Fleet Advanced Escort, Fleet Assault Cruiser

      Emphasis mine. If we're including kitbashes, the avenger saucer+nacelles goes very nicely on the arbiter hull+pylons. The arbiter's deflector is sexaaaay. It works in the same way the Aventine does, sleek lines with a little boxy in the right places.

      Although it's not really a looker, I'm also fond of a kitbash I invariably make out of the Tier 2 escorts, combining the Gladius and Ushaan classes.

      86B6EC45459D17DB8AE6CD5F51C13A90CDC00A85
    • azurealli4nceazurealli4nce Member Posts: 80 Arc User
      Worst: Connie. Ugly TOS holdout that looks as ancient as it is.

      Best: Star Cruiser. Just the Tier 5 Star Cruiser- not the Odyssey. No neck, and a sleek layout- a beautiful ship. I wish Cryptic would come out with a T6 version of it.
      DPS-Bronze, DPS-Silver, DPS-Gold, etc. are FAKE! They were created by an outvoted minority who destroyed the original DPS channels!

      Tactical Team sucked, once upon a time. I got it buffed. Don't think for a minute that Cryptic ignores forum feedback.
    • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
      Worst looking is easy ... All of the T6 Klingon Command ships.
      Best looking Evreything else
    • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
      nikephorus wrote: »
      Avenger for me. Awesome ship, but ugly as sin.

      I think the opposite, one of the best designs, as long as it's the fleet version which has the flat warp nacelles. Its shape suggests pocket-battlecruiser, something that has almost everything of a full size tank, but handles better and isn't such a big target (visually, as it doesn't have any +defense as escorts). Combined with Arbiter skin, it's essentially a battle version of the regent assault cruiser from a visual point of view.
      laferrari1 wrote: »
      Worst looking is the Scryer. Flying pizza slicer/donut, with weird hull material, incomprehensible design with two awkward nacelles slapped on top of it. Ugh.

      Took me a while to come to terms with it, until someone pointed out to look at it like a mobile mini-DS9 or a science laboratory, which is what it is. The holes in the center could be viewed as spaces for the drone swarmers to enter or exit (despite coming out the back) and as a serious recon-science observatory while cloaked behind enemy lines or in deep space. I have to agree about the nacelles however, but they can be switched to the Eclipse ones and it meshes well with the only drawback that there's no more bussard collectors at all which did look good on the original nacelles. Also, the hull space inner circle can be closed off completely, but possibly only in the fleet variant.

      About the other Fed intel ships, the Eclipse (battle)Cruiser I understand is one of those you either really like it (I do) or really dislike it, but the Phantom is real nice all round, especially with the fleet nacelles, and as close as it gets to a flying saucer. But then again, I'm not a Defiant fan, and find the visual concept of it in DS9 is very poorly done to depict a full size ship scaled down for battle (and if I understood correctly not to require much crew or take up precious room on the space station), which Cryptic's Arbiter pulled off really well.

      Like seaofsorrows mentioned I think its the deflector on the avernger that does it for me. I don't mind the rest of it, but the deflector looks TRIBBLE, and the arbiter didn't do anything for me either. We must have opposite tastes, because I hate the Eclipse as well haha.
      Tza0PEl.png
    • starke1701starke1701 Member Posts: 127 Arc User
      rattler2 wrote: »
      Out of all the funky designs, you have to pick on Captain Crusher's ship? Also, that was a paramount/CBS design before STO even launched...

      Well... I can't find an updated pic of the Olympic from STO... but I found an older pic of her.
      Federation_Research_Science_Vessel_%28Olympic%29.png
      Canon version:
      latest?cb=20150928135351&path-prefix=en

      I'm pretty sure they changed the model to be more canon but like I said, I can't find a pic

      Nope. Taken a few minutes ago in game:

      B1DC0F1743D89C3749AF1F43CEB61D40890DA878
    • svindal777svindal777 Member Posts: 856 Arc User
      bones1970 wrote: »
      Worst: Fed veteran ship, Chimera Pregnant Destroyer

      Fixed
      Well excuse me for having enormous flaws that I don't work on.
    • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
      Pregnant hah that's funny, but I'm sad cause I like that ship. You think it will have an abortion for me?
      Tza0PEl.png
    • starke1701starke1701 Member Posts: 127 Arc User
      svindal777 wrote: »
      bones1970 wrote: »
      Worst: Fed veteran ship, Chimera Pregnant Destroyer

      Fixed

      Strange, the Chimera's design has actually grown on me over time.
    • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,963 Arc User
      Best-looking:
      C2D5CC59928F55D5EE3F227201CFCBF2FFC9D492

      I also like some combinations of parts for the command cruisers, and the Hestia looks wicked.

      Worst-looking: The Envoy-class T4 skin for the Galaxy.
      Federation_Exploration_Cruiser_%28Envoy%29.png
      "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
      — Sabaton, "Great War"
      VZ9ASdg.png

      Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
    • groomofweirdgroomofweird Member Posts: 1,045 Arc User
      There are some ships I think are very pretty ingame.
      For fed ships I do love the Sovereign and the Intrepid classes.
      By god do I ever hate the Gladius, it hurts me lol! I do have the intel toilet seat Phantom which I'm warming to over time. I always enjoyed the look of my Kumari too.
      For the roms I do love the new intel ships, and even the pilot ships (or some of the custom skin variants). I especially love the Mogai.
      I do own a Scimitar and I wholey agree it is not pretty.
      Klinkside I love the Somraw raptor and of course the classic B'rel.
      Currently I do own a fleet Mat'ha raptor, but even though I absolutely love the ship its appearance drives me batty. The nacelles just seem...wrong, I dont know, its probably just me lol!
      There are some special ships lockbox and alike that I both love and loathe.
      I find the Zhal vessel to be ugly as a box of nails, but I think the Nihydron Destroyer is a beautiful design.
      The Narcine is a pretty vessel, and I look at my Astika everyday and think how full of badassery it looks.
      The Benthan ship hurts my brain, especially when I see it moving, as does the APU sandcastle class.
      Ok this is turning into my giving my opinion on many ships rather than just a couple so I will leave it there lol!
      Nimoysig1_zpsr79joxz3.jpg
      "If this will be our end, then I will have them make SUCH an end as to be worthy of rememberance! Out of torpedos you say?! Find me the ferengi!".
    • kamiyama317kamiyama317 Member Posts: 1,295 Arc User
      hyefather wrote: »
      This is the best looking ship in STO.

      800px-Federation_Research_Science_Vessel_%28Horizon%29.png?version=5eb8a049b981e40b3b096965c931081b

      It's obviously the most practical as well. Why waste space with deck plating when you can have all your crew and all your consoles floating around inside a giant empty force field?

      Since all the consoles will need to be wireless, there are fewer deaths from console explosions during battle since there are no high-voltage EPS lines powering them. There is also no plating falling on you during a structural integrity failure. The forcefield protects your crew from enemy fire as long as the warp core remains online. This type of design is so superior to existing ships it should be made the standard for all future vessels from this point foward. Anything less is a death trap.

      latest?cb=20110408160423&path-prefix=en

      No more of this! Use Horizon standard architecture for all future Starfleet vessels!
      '

      For some odd reason when I look at that ship I see 1 torpedo shooting from a cloaked BOP and well...the rest is history.

      Well that's simple. We just briefly turn the force field dome off and the torpedo flies harmlessly through the ship. Then we turn it back on and we can all start breathing again.

      Geez that should have been obvious!
    • huntor2huntor2 Member Posts: 46 Arc User
      edited October 2015
      Best: Most of the canon ships and the Oddy too

      Worst: Obelisk Carrier
    • zigadeiczigadeic Member Posts: 113 Arc User
      Best looking ship has to be the phantom I mean look at those lines and curves it just screams elegence and power.

      Worst has to be the Chimera I mean it looks like a spoon every time I see it in my roster i have to go make a cup of tea
      tumblr_m9xiz26mwj1rdabsoo1_r1_400.gif
    This discussion has been closed.