test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Tier 6 Iconic Ships!

18911131418

Comments

  • Options
    tuskin67tuskin67 Member Posts: 1,097 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    I am a little confuse on the uniform part, as it lists 3 different vessels besides these 3 new ones.

    Where do the other 3 exactly come from? Intel? Command? Regular C-store? Temporal Lockbox? Veteran?

    Each of these new ships has their own new costume, but can also use parts from ships within the same family. The Andromeda Class Exploration Cruiser gains access to parts from the Galaxy and Monarch costumes and can also use parts from the Venture Class if you own that starship. The Negh’Tev Heavy Battlecruiser has access to both the Negh’Var and the Qu’Daj costumes. The D’Khellra Warbird Battlecruiser can use the D’Deridex costume, and if you own the D’ridthau costume you can also use its interchangeable costume parts.

    In addition to all this, all Negh’Var variants (including the Negh’Tev) will have access to the new voDleH costume for free


    Didn't realize the D'Deridex even had a costume? Nor, did I realize that a bunch of these are supposed to have uniforms available with the ship(s)!

    Needing clarification please.

    :confused:

    Costume means ship model.
  • Options
    sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    So basically so are saying that its ok that we have to choose a style of game we dont enjoy playing?

    if you like broadsiding and being like a pebble in space go ahead,i dont have nothing against that,there lies the liberty and having the right to decide which way i want to play.

    Now it just seems that Cryptic wants us all to fly slow,chunky cruisers.../yawn
    Blame it in Cryptic,why were people using the Tactical/escort combo? maybe because they were at fault when they released the game,if you get higher dps and if you're smart and you can survive why fly a slower much less op vessel?

    Blame them,they are the ones that forgot the holy trinity in this game,seems like its there but in the end there isnt one...yeah cruisers=tanks? nah escort will do fine,science=heals? nah escort will do fine.

    So again,apart from the fact that i get bigger numbers with my escorts i love the way i need to keep on my toes and move around,not just be at 1/4 impulse and broadside and broadside until i just log out from pure boredom...

    Are they saying that you MUST buy a new cruiser ship to play the game? The answer to that is NO, however the devs are answering the many players who wanted a higher number of cruisers that are playable at endgame. More escorts will come, but they aren't going to give them overnight.

    Once again, I say that you do NOT HAVE TO BUY THE ICONIC CRUISER PACK TO PLAY THE DAMNED GAME! *facepalm*

    Also, where does it say that you need to be at 1/4 impulse to broadside? I can quite effectively use any one of my cruisers outfitted with beams and torpedoes at full throttle. As well as this, you seem to think that an escort can hull tank quite perfectly (which is where cruisers excel), and an escort group can heal themselves much better than having a dedicated science vessel shield/hull healer. Apart from the "slower, much less op vessel", beams are far better than cannons ever were unless you have a hit-and-run escort built with a full set of cannons.

    So excuse me for being the argubly-smarter player and sticking with what should have been the better off choice in terms of survivability.
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • Options
    chipg7chipg7 Member Posts: 1,577 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    And my T5U Ody just became obsolete. Thanks for nothing.

    ... How?

    Nothing they're doing is making T5 / T5-U obsolete. It's just not the newest shiny thing in the playground anymore. That doesn't make it obsolete in any way.

    But if you were awesome in the Oddy before, you'll still be just as awesome now. The ship itself is still great, and will still perform fantastic at end-game. T6 just has all the extra bells and whistles - fun gimmicks and such. They're great, but they haven't killed T5 / T5-U.
    flash525 wrote: »
    Your Oddy is not obsolete. T5U ships are more than comparable to T6. One extra console slot or bridge officer ability is not going to make or break the game where end content is concerned. If you truly think that these ships make your Oddy obsolete, then you're not playing very well. :P

    All T5U ships are still prime. People don't need T6 ships to be victorious.

    Quoting 'cause yes :D
    sqwished wrote: »
    A well built scimitar will still obliterate pretty much anything in it's path and is capable of out performing any current T6 ship. My old ship was retired in favour of revamping my old Odyssey both of which are T5-U. Now if I'm going to part with my Ody, then these new ships have at least got to be on par with it. And a flashy console thats more likely to be a gimmick than practically useful ain't going to cut it. Despite my love for Galaxy class design, I look at it from a purely performance point of view now.

    Also quoting 'cause yes :D

    The ships that you were kingmaker with before, you'll still wipe the floor with now. T5 / T5-U is not obsolete, and a lot of players need to realize that. I love my Aelahl, but my Ar'kif is still great. Heaven forbid I have a fleet of ships at my disposal - 'cause I'm a Fleet Admiral now :cool:

    But I do love watching players in T6 ships think they're flying win-boats... then explode because that's the only thing they thought they needed to win.
  • Options
    carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    chipg7 wrote: »
    Love how the moment that a handful of ships get the T6 treatment that so many are asking for, the complainers come out in full force :cool:

    Yes. I mean, the Galaxy being made viable (and I don't think you get anymore viable in STO at present than T6) had to be one of the hottest and never ending requests on this forum. So people finally got it. Not quite as you wanted I know but at this stage, I'd just be thankful it happened.
  • Options
    shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited March 2015

    *droooooooooooooool* :o

    Trendy, I have a problem with STO - I keep throwing money at the screen and nothing happens. :D :P :D
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • Options
    rgzarcherrgzarcher Member Posts: 320 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    awesome....now I can count the minutes until D’Deridex owners start whining about how they should be getting a free upgrade to the T6 version :rolleyes:

    ..you mean there are actually people who own that ship? All this time I thought it was an NPC only ship o.O
    "Why all the sales"?

    And a merry freaking Christmas to you too, Ebenezer.
    -jonsills, 'Cryptic Why the sales..instead of Fixing XP leveling and this game?'
  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    rgzarcher wrote: »
    ..you mean there are actually people who own that ship? All this time I thought it was an NPC only ship o.O

    You must play with your eyes closed. The D'D is flown everywhere :D
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    carlosbflycarlosbfly Member Posts: 682 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    nadiezja wrote: »
    Hm. For an iconic ship set? Yeah, this one was a good choice. We probably should get escorts and raiders next, though... the tiny ships. Defiant, B'rel, T'varo.

    I'd prefer Prommie over Defiant myself, but that's just me. Defiant's the better choice overall.

    I'd love to see the Advanced Escort as well. The Promethous is a great design and in STO, one of those ships you can adapt into so many different looks it can look like a totally different class with a creative player on the ship builder. A 2410 skin would be interesting as well, particularly with some of the Pathfinder design themes.

    Alas, I have a feeling the Defiant will get the next T6. Which is a bit daft imo as the Phantom is out there and pretty much a jacked up Defiant anyway.
  • Options
    hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    Odyssey will still be superior even if the Andromeda got a Pathfinder Layout in Eng and with Command.

    For one, the Odyssey still has a LtCmdr Universal seat, rather than the Eng LtCmdr seat the Andromeda will likely have. And for two, the Odyssey's console set has more use and benefits than the Galaxy's ever did (not that saucer separation on either were all that great, given the stupidity of the pet AI, much less the Aquarius separation). Whether or not the Andromeda's console is ship-bound or unbound is the other thing. If it's unbound (the initial blog implies it is), then it can be used on the Odyssey just as well. If it's not, then it just means the Andromeda can eke out a bit more power from higher subsystem cap and from temporarily boosted defense.

    If whining that an Lt Hybrid seat instantly busts T5Us to worthlessness, then clearly you're just wanting the new shiny, even if it won't have a notable impact on your gameplay.

    In fact, Cryptic is doing the hesitant adopters and stubborn holdouts a favor; invariably something at the LtCmdr or Cmdr level is going to bust, and get nerfed. See SS, Kinetic Magnet, and Ionic Turbulence. At least the late adopters or holdouts can look and say "hah, you early adopters got screwed, so I saved $$$".

    Also, as a reminder, do be aware that Pilot Specialization is going Primary once S10 hits, and with it, the inevitable Pilot-spec capable ships. Which is roughly 8 weeks from Thursday. So if you're not in a rush to collect this trio, start saving, and wait and see what comes out and how well it performs at some point.
  • Options
    rgzarcherrgzarcher Member Posts: 320 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    You must play with your eyes closed. The D'D is flown everywhere :D

    Honestly, I dont see it, period. Unless its a PVP ship? I avoid that whole section of the game so if its prolific there I wouldnt see it. :(
    "Why all the sales"?

    And a merry freaking Christmas to you too, Ebenezer.
    -jonsills, 'Cryptic Why the sales..instead of Fixing XP leveling and this game?'
  • Options
    bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    Game has officially changed its name from STO to Turtle Race in Space,come aboard folks while you broadisde on your cruiser you can make a PB&J sandwich,reinstall windows,clip your nails,make a pi
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • Options
    sfc#5932 sfc Member Posts: 992 Bug Hunter
    edited March 2015
    Of course i do not have to,i would buy an escort but guess what there isnt one apart from the flat chested prom date called "the Phantom"....so,where does that leave me and several other players?

    P.S: TNG overrated,still cant believe people is into those ships,ugly ugly ugly...
    Well, I think Voyager and the Intrepid are overrated, and that the Intrepid looks like a garden spade with a pituitary problem...

    but you don't see me complaining.

    P.S. :o
  • Options
    antonine3258antonine3258 Member Posts: 2,391 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    I like the look of that Rom particularly, very much a Republic-update for the Empire's most iconic craft.
    Fate - protects fools, small children, and ships named Enterprise Will Riker

    Member Access Denied Armada!

    My forum single-issue of rage: Make the Proton Experimental Weapon go for subsystem targetting!
  • Options
    tuskin67tuskin67 Member Posts: 1,097 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    Game has officially changed its name from STO to Turtle Race in Space,come aboard folks while you broadisde on your cruiser you can make a PB&J sandwich,reinstall windows,clip your nails,make a pi
  • Options
    sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    Of course i do not have to,i would buy an escort but guess what there isnt one apart from the flat chested prom date called "the Phantom"....so,where does that leave me and several other players?

    P.S: TNG overrated,still cant believe people is into those ships,ugly ugly ugly...

    Whoever said that you needed a T6 ship to do anything endgame? Yes, it is more effective and more efficient but you have never been made to pick the "flat chested prom date" which other people may like the look of.
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • Options
    flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    @Trendy, might we get a rear shot of the KDF beast please?
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • Options
    sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    All i wanted to hear,that they do know that there is a crowd out there that wants a choice of escorts.


    The way i see it all those people in the galaxy thread were also spamming and & or trolling,but yeah point taken,seems some people cant voice their opinion,ill shut up now and just hope the "eventually" isnt 2 years done the road...

    Plasmanugget out!!

    They weren't spamming it, as the Galaxy was well and truly underpowered as opposed to the Defiant and Intrepid due to the poor choice of engineering skills available at Ensign level by the time the game was released. It wasn't multiple threads either (to my knowledge), just one thread that had a lot of momentum (well over 1000 pages last I checked). And that was the most recent iteration of that thread, which had been closed and reopened several times by devs and/or community moderators.
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • Options
    tehbubbalootehbubbaloo Member Posts: 2,003 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    im not very happy for another cruiser, nor the continuance of the trait disparity. im definitely not happy about this system of upgrading ships either.
    i am happy to see another kdf ship, although it doesnt even begin to tempt me to open my wallet.. too bad its not a sci ship, or better yet a BoP...
  • Options
    captaind3captaind3 Member Posts: 2,449 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    lnblade wrote: »
    Yeah, but was that meant to be taken 100% literally or was it just flavor text for the write up of the pilot specialization? If you think about it, they're introducing a new BOff specialization (that has quite a few appealing abilities), but they don't have any ships that can actually take advantage of it yet. It makes much more sense that the recently announced ships will make use of piloting than Command or Intel.

    Well the Samsar came out shortly before the Command Specialization and we got access to a Command BOFF in the mission so we'd have one before the grind.

    It's possible that they'd pre release a ship with the slot.

    On the other hand, these big cruisers just scream "we are the Command flagships that fleet commanders fly around in"
    jaguarskx wrote: »
    Nice, but I am still waiting for a T6 BoP.
    The key words there are "at this time" lol. Qualifiers for the win, right? I wouldn't be surprised if they released T6 versions of all the previous ships as time passes. It's easier than coming up with wholly new ships, since the assets are already in place. Just needs some slight tweaking to the stats and maybe some new costume parts.

    Indeed this bodes well for my dreams about a Nemesis accurate Sovereign.

    And a tier 6 Bird of Prey is one of my dreams.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo9_r1_400.gif
    "Rise like Lions after slumber, In unvanquishable number, Shake your chains to earth like dew, Which in sleep had fallen on you-Ye are many — they are few"
  • Options
    timelord79timelord79 Member Posts: 1,852 Arc User
    edited March 2015

    Awesome. Thank you. She looks beautiful. Only thing missing now is the original atzec hull pattern on it.
    11750640_1051211588222593_450219911807924697_n.jpg
  • Options
    sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    @plasmanugget

    In answer to your post just then, there are more cruisers at T6 because of the same reason there were more escorts at T5 and below.
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • Options
    hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    lnblade wrote: »
    The key words there are "at this time" lol. Qualifiers for the win, right? I wouldn't be surprised if they released T6 versions of all the previous ships as time passes. It's easier than coming up with wholly new ships, since the assets are already in place. Just needs some slight tweaking to the stats and maybe some new costume parts.
    Indeed. Those very words are the reason why I didn't have issue with Cryptic not releasing a T6 Galaxy or Defiant when Intel was the only thing. Especially since they already have sufficiently close analogues in the Guardian and Phantom "at that time". Except some people were straight up anal about needing a T6 Galaxy and Defiant right then and there, moreso with the Pathfinder's release.

    Now with 2 Primary Specializations going on 3, they can safely release those ships "at this time" without them overshadowing or being overshadowed by similar ships in that lineup.

    Because honestly, if they did release an Intel Galaxy and Defiant back when Intel was the only thing, there would be whining and complaining over how they're both inferior to the Guardian and Phantom, and delusional conspiracy theories over Cryptic "deliberately making them worse" to sell their new originals.

    I do hope they continue to follow through the other bit of their statement and pad out their Intel and Command Specialist ship lines with more original ships though. At least a Command Escort and Carrier for all factions and an Intel Sci vessel for both KDF and Rom. As well as an Intel Cruiser for Romulans, and an Intel Destroyer for KDF.
  • Options
    aelfwin1aelfwin1 Member Posts: 2,896 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    aurigas7 wrote: »
    Exciting news. Hope they get a good boff/console layout.

    Yup ... , that's the Achilles Heel of this deal for me .



    ... purty can only get you so far ...
  • Options
    hartzillahartzilla Member Posts: 1,177 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    Sigh, I was hoping they would wait until Geko's get the galaxy interior in the game idea panned out.

    Now I'm starting to suspect we aren't getting a galaxy interior :(
  • Options
    jhighfilljhighfill Member Posts: 59 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    So far they have released cruisers and science. Pilot ships will probily be the escort type
  • Options
    neos472neos472 Member Posts: 580 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    @Trendy can we have a look at the new Galaxy skin with its saucer off i wanna see if we have the battle bridge there finally
    manipulator of time and long time space traveler
  • Options
    jellico1jellico1 Member Posts: 2,719
    edited March 2015
    Reread my post,never said i needed a T6 ship,either for endgame or anything else?

    Just saying i want the choice of an T6 escort ship,why should cruisers have 9 or 10 different ones to choose from? why should science have 3 T6 ships to choose from? and final question why should escort users have only ONE T6 escort to choose from?


    probably because escorts are so strong it might be harder for the Devs to make new ones without pumping them up even more

    I see the Defiant getting a T-6 upgrade next

    And then the Nebula science ship in the same type of bundle simple because they will sell the best

    Being TNG ships of course :P
    Jellico....Engineer ground.....Da'val Romulan space Sci
    Saphire.. Science ground......Ko'el Romulan space Tac
    Leva........Tactical ground.....Koj Romulan space Eng

    JJ-Verse will never be Canon or considered Lore...It will always be JJ-Verse
  • Options
    sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    @jellico he hates the TNG-era ships anyway :P
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • Options
    umaekoumaeko Member Posts: 748 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    I would chime in that more dorsal views of the T6 Andromeda would be welcome. All we got so far are underside shots.
Sign In or Register to comment.