test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Legacy of Romulus Dev Blog #47

12467

Comments

  • suraknarsuraknar Member Posts: 19 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    lan451 wrote: »
    Not a battle cloak. It seems that it won't actually come with the cloak at all. Instead, you have to use the cloak console from the Gal X/Defiant on it.

    So... not really on Par then eh, I mean versus Klingon and Romulan Designs...
    ~ Surak'nar ~

    Order of the Silver Star, -OSS-

    *Everyone dies, not everyone really fights*
  • furlong359furlong359 Member Posts: 145 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Gratz Cyptic, you got a JJ-ship without anyone noticing it. Good job, I for one, will not be getting this...thing. Its an ugly, ugly, ugly ship. It looks like one of the old starship designs from the old company that was going to do STO.


    I will, however be looking forward to the new crusier love. thanks for that.
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    lianthelia wrote: »
    Going by that shot the thing has the highest shield modifier out of any Cruiser?

    The Fleet version looks like it has better shields than most other Cruisers, other than the Cardassian Galor and Tal Shiar Adapted Battlecruiser. A heck of a lot easier to acquire, too, and with dual cannons and a 5/3 weapons payload. Of course, they could adjust the specs before it hits the live server... we'll see.
    suraknar wrote: »
    So... not really on Par then eh, I mean versus Klingon and Romulan Designs...

    Klingon battle cruisers don't have access to a battle cloak, despite both items having battle in their name... nor the hull, shields, payload distribution, etc. Now on the Romulan end, the Fleet version looks like a decent match for one of the Scimitar variants. No battle cloak, but better shields, hull, base turn, and power levels.
    With what? It's not like the KDF has gotten anything comparable. :D

    Nope, not really. We can hope the next ship to come out rebalances things a tad, once the Voth are sorted out...
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    wyndblade wrote: »
    the KDF will take that ship apart on principle!

    Well I guess without their loud-mouthed egos, the KDF really wouldn't have anything else would they?
  • linyivelinyive Member Posts: 1,086 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    A xena fan, are we? I just finished rewatching that series on netflix, so good. <3
    *hides and pokes her head up to see who is watching*

    I am currently watching "Xena" on Netflix. During the past two to three weeks, I have been steadily watching the series.

    rofl...

    I think the Avenger class will go nicely with my Armitage.

    I was not expecting this ship to be appealing.

    :)
  • wrathofachilleswrathofachilles Member Posts: 937 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    furlong359 wrote: »
    Gratz Cyptic, you got a JJ-ship without anyone noticing it. Good job, I for one, will not be getting this...thing. Its an ugly, ugly, ugly ship. It looks like one of the old starship designs from the old company that was going to do STO.


    I will, however be looking forward to the new crusier love. thanks for that.

    I really don't know where people are drawing comparisons between this ship and the vengeance, aside from a bit of boxiness here and there, the ships really are nothing alike. It's much more like a regent aesthetic married with a voyager saucer/hull with regent pylons and eh, they remind me of a sort of modernized excelsior type of nacelles.
  • captainkeatzcaptainkeatz Member Posts: 92 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I really don't know where people are drawing comparisons between this ship and the vengeance, aside from a bit of boxiness here and there, the ships really are nothing alike. It's much more like a regent aesthetic married with a voyager saucer/hull with regent pylons and eh, they remind me of a sort of modernized excelsior type of nacelles.

    There's a lot to be set about the design - for instance how Starfleet managed to create the Sovereign as a battle ship without making it look boxy - but the Avenger has no common features with the Vengeance, other than the rough edges and the classic flying spoon idea. No clue where people getting that impression from, honestly.
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Say, you have any clue what this Console Synergy thingi is with the Cloaking Device from the Defiant/Gal-x?
    The Avenger doesn't come with a Cloak of its own, but you can equip the Defiant's or Galaxy Dreadnought's Cloak on the Avenger if you have one of them.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Well I guess without their loud-mouthed egos, the KDF really wouldn't have anything else would they?

    Better to have a loud-mouthed ego than a lifelong trauma from Klingon players. :D
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • wrathofachilleswrathofachilles Member Posts: 937 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    There's a lot to be set about the design - for instance how Starfleet managed to create the Sovereign as a battle ship without making it look boxy - but the Avenger has no common features with the Vengeance, other than the rough edges and the classic flying spoon idea. No clue where people getting that impression from, honestly.

    The voyager was a touch on the boxy/chunky side, so I imagine they made it even more chunky/boxy as inspired by the "rough" look of the defiant type ships, i.e. "This is war, ladies and gentlemen, lets slap this together and get it out there pronto, it doesn't have to be pretty, it just has to work!"
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,865 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    There's a lot to be set about the design - for instance how Starfleet managed to create the Sovereign as a battle ship without making it look boxy - but the Avenger has no common features with the Vengeance, other than the rough edges and the classic flying spoon idea. No clue where people getting that impression from, honestly.

    This ^

    The thing really looks nothing like that piece of JJ trash other than it has a Saucer, Deflector, Nacelles, and Hull
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • wrathofachilleswrathofachilles Member Posts: 937 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    A side note... I've never liked the regent's, or now this ship's, peeping tom windows. The windows in the split upper hull where the only view is into other people's rooms on the other side. And if people close their shutters, then all you've got is a lovely view of the pristine... alley... great.
  • suraknarsuraknar Member Posts: 19 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The Fleet version looks like it has better shields than most other Cruisers, other than the Cardassian Galor and Tal Shiar Adapted Battlecruiser. A heck of a lot easier to acquire, too, and with dual cannons and a 5/3 weapons payload. Of course, they could adjust the specs before it hits the live server... we'll see.

    Klingon battle cruisers don't have access to a battle cloak, despite both items having battle in their name... nor the hull, shields, payload distribution, etc. Now on the Romulan end, the Fleet version looks like a decent match for one of the Scimitar variants. No battle cloak, but better shields, hull, base turn, and power levels.

    Well... I hope it works out... At least it is an effort for a Fed Battle Cruiser, and descent attempt to have an offering for TAC Captains commanding Cruisers or ENG Captains wanting a bit more of a Punch.

    I just feel that the Chimera has a very good balance all around in that regard...now, sacrificing some maneuverability for a bit more punch and sturdiness might be worth it..but it will feel sluggish going from 14 to 9...

    The Negh'var has 9...is the Avenger as big as it?
    ~ Surak'nar ~

    Order of the Silver Star, -OSS-

    *Everyone dies, not everyone really fights*
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    shpoks wrote: »
    Better to have a loud-mouthed ego than a lifelong trauma from Klingon players. :D

    Yeah,but they're the ones who behave like jerks then wonder why nobody will play with them, so really who's the ultimate loser there?
  • wrathofachilleswrathofachilles Member Posts: 937 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    suraknar wrote: »

    The Negh'var has 9...is the Avenger as big as it?

    I imagine it won't be as big as the negh'var, but the klingons have always had the upper hand on maneuverability in this game when comparing ships of equivalent size.
  • khayuungkhayuung Member Posts: 1,876 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    At 14 decks (estimating from window size) I think the Avenger is TINY.

    Which of course is really cool. Star Trek has nothing to compensate for, and this shows it. :D


    "Last Engage! Magical Girl Origami-san" is in print! Now with three times more rainbows.

    Support the "Armored Unicorn" vehicle initiative today!

    Thanks for Harajuku. Now let's get a real "Magical Girl" costume!
  • mvp333mvp333 Member Posts: 509 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    longasc wrote: »
    The ideas are nice, but the resulting ship doesn't look good. :(

    Completely correct. I love the amount of detail on the ship, and all of the ideas, but the end result just looks ugly, not to mention not very "Starfleet" in appearance... :|
  • wraithshadow13wraithshadow13 Member Posts: 1,728 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    With the new weapon hardpoints being a modeled thing, how will that effect cannons vs beams? Will each different weapon style be it's own visual or will they all just unrealistically shoot from the forward facing cannons?
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Hmm looks like a Ambassador-Voyager hybrid. Not sure if I like it though. Will have to take a closer look once it's available.
  • raptorus22raptorus22 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The Avenger class looks like the Dreadnought Class from Star Trek: Into Darkness.
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Really cool looking ship after seeing the other views. I will add it to the ship list. However my next ship purchase is already decided (Romulan). So this could be the one following or in the near future. In the meantime I will check out the 3D views in the Ship Yard once its available.

    The only bummer part is. I think I won't have a Tac Officers to make use of it. So I may have to get more Officer slots for my Fed Eng Captain to make use of it. I will have that figured out by the time I buy it. Since my Tac Officers are equipped for the regular Cruisers I have. Something I will have figured out by the time I get the ship. Once I see the stations on the regular C-store version. I will start planning that out. Plus I see some new gear I will have to get as well. Which that is not a problem.

    Looking forward to blasting my opponents into dust with it. Thanks for making a killer cruiser.

    Hope we can get some variations? I love to have a round deflector dish, and swept back nacelle plyons.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    khayuung wrote: »
    At 14 decks (estimating from window size) I think the Avenger is TINY.

    Which of course is really cool. Star Trek has nothing to compensate for, and this shows it. :D
    It has a Crew of 700, so it's not too small. About the same size as an Excelsior, maybe just a tad smaller then the Sovereign - which has 800 Crew.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • suraknarsuraknar Member Posts: 19 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I imagine it won't be as big as the negh'var, but the klingons have always had the upper hand on maneuverability in this game when comparing ships of equivalent size.

    Yes indeed.

    Upon closer inspection, I think there is another weakness ... not enough Tactical Abilities...TAC BO is Lieut. Commander... no no no...

    That makes two sore points for me... I think I'll just keep commanding the Chimera.. and forget about getting any new ships...

    I quit this game twice because of frustrating limits in Ships... I do not want to go down that road again...

    I am happy with Chimera...I do not need the headache of switching to this ship...

    Thanks all for input, appreciate.

    See you out there in the Final Frontier!
    ~ Surak'nar ~

    Order of the Silver Star, -OSS-

    *Everyone dies, not everyone really fights*
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    suraknar wrote: »
    Yes indeed.

    Upon closer inspection, I think there is another weakness ... not enough Tactical Abilities...TAC BO is Lieut. Commander... no no no...

    That makes two sore points for me... I think I'll just keep commanding the Chimera.. and forget about getting any new ships...

    I quit this game twice because of frustrating limits in Ships... I do not want to go down that road again...

    I am happy with Chimera...I do not need the headache of switching to this ship...

    Thanks all for input, appreciate.

    See you out there in the Final Frontier!
    It's not an Escort or a Destroyer. :) If it's not your thing, great! It's not your thing. No one's trying to convince you to fly the ship. We're simply stating that as far as Cruisers go, it's about the best one ever made for the Federation. For the people who like flying Cruisers this ship is quite a boon. :)
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • sirokksirokk Member Posts: 990 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I'm not a huge fan of the look myself but I would say she doesn't look as bad as the Vengeance and would consider it a insult to compare them!

    Would be nice if it could fire on ships while at warp! :eek:
    Star Trek Battles Channel - Play Star Trek like they did in the series!Avatar: pinterest-com/pin/14003448816884219Are you sure it isn't time for a "colorful metaphor"? --Spock in 'The Voyage Home'
    SCE ADVISORY NOTICE: Improper Impulse Engine maintenance can result in REAR THRUSTER LEAKAGE. ALWAYS have your work inspected by another qualified officer.
  • ruminate00ruminate00 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Double neck hull, spoon saucer, black reinforced plating.... looks like the Aventine's larger cousin.
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    It's not an Escort or a Destroyer. :) If it's not your thing, great! It's not your thing. No one's trying to convince you to fly the ship. We're simply stating that as far as Cruisers go, it's about the best one ever made for the Federation. For the people who like flying Cruisers this ship is quite a boon. :)
    I agree with you, everyone's got a different taste.

    It's a great ship for ppl want to fly Cruisers, EXCEPT it is the most hideous cruiser ever made.

    No matter how good this ship performs i won't buy such a ugly thing, ever.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • usscapitalusscapital Member Posts: 985 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    is the pylons not to thick ? , sorry cryptic but it just does not look right

    http://images-cdn.perfectworld.com/www/24/da/24dae44abf038aa464afd91da03b05fe1381258408.jpg
    NERF NERF NERF ONLINE

    DELTA PRICE RISING
  • linyivelinyive Member Posts: 1,086 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    suraknar wrote: »
    Yes indeed.

    Upon closer inspection, I think there is another weakness ... not enough Tactical Abilities...TAC BO is Lieut. Commander... no no no...
    Its a cruiser.

    Most cruisers focus on engineering.

    *points at the turn base as evidence*
  • suraknarsuraknar Member Posts: 19 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    linyive wrote: »
    Its a cruiser.

    Most cruisers focus on engineering.

    *points at the turn base as evidence*
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    It's not an Escort or a Destroyer. :) If it's not your thing, great! It's not your thing. No one's trying to convince you to fly the ship. We're simply stating that as far as Cruisers go, it's about the best one ever made for the Federation. For the people who like flying Cruisers this ship is quite a boon. :)

    Yes I understand now.

    I was misled by the Article's background Story...

    I thought it could be another better Hybrid, between Escort and Cruiser...but a bit heavier... than the Chimera, which is actually a Hybrid.

    But it is a Cruiser...its just called a Battle Cruiser and Made to Look meaner..for kicks and giggles....and sales of course at the store...

    So my bad..I disappointed myself by being over enthusiastic based on the Article. ;)

    I sure would like to see a Heavier ships based on the Chimera design philosophy... at one point...and it would be logical that a heavier ship than a heavy Destroyer would be called a Battle Cruiser...but anyways :P

    ...maybe it could be a Fast Dreadnought ...

    Thank you again.
    ~ Surak'nar ~

    Order of the Silver Star, -OSS-

    *Everyone dies, not everyone really fights*
Sign In or Register to comment.