test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Kumari Line of Andorian Escorts

1356711

Comments

  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Dan talks about breaking the 4/4.
    Al talks about no broadside.
    Logical step is...?
  • webdeathwebdeath Member Posts: 1,570 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    :mad:

    Klingons won't gets new stuffs? Yeesh.....

    Oh well that's a different subject for another day..

    I still suspect the ship will have the same turn rate and inertia as the KDF Raptor. It just has the appearance that is nearly identical to the Raptor. Probably increased hull and shields that the Raptor doesn't have because of it's innate Cloaking device.
    You think that your beta test was bad?
    Think about this:
    American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • illcadiaillcadia Member Posts: 1,412 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2013
    webdeath wrote: »
    :mad:

    Klingons won't gets new stuffs? Yeesh.....

    Oh well that's a different subject for another day..

    I still suspect the ship will have the same turn rate and inertia as the KDF Raptor. It just has the appearance that is nearly identical to the Raptor. Probably increased hull and shields that the Raptor doesn't have because of it's innate Cloaking device.

    Yeah, but they'll probably move the pivot point forward so it actually turns decently. You know, like that *unintentional bug* the raptor has that they were *totally* going to fix last year in short order, but I guess decided it was working as preferred.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Al reiterated that it's a Heavy Escort... so yeah, that 15 turn is likely, eh?
  • webdeathwebdeath Member Posts: 1,570 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Al reiterated that it's a Heavy Escort... so yeah, that 15 turn is likely, eh?

    Heavy Escort? Uh oh.. I smell another word not mentioned... Carrier.. :D
    You think that your beta test was bad?
    Think about this:
    American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    webdeath wrote: »
    Heavy Escort? Uh oh.. I smell another word not mentioned... Carrier.. :D

    Nah, they wanted to recreate the Kumari from ENT... they want Particle Cannon QBB badassery...

    Picture DHC damage.
    Picture quad beams.
    Picture BO.
    Picture having to buy the 3pack to get three of them.
    Picture there being a 3pc set bonus that allows your BO to work for all three Particle Cannon QBBs...
  • webdeathwebdeath Member Posts: 1,570 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Nah, they wanted to recreate the Kumari from ENT... they want Particle Cannon QBB badassery...

    Picture DHC damage.
    Picture quad beams.
    Picture BO.
    Picture having to buy the 3pack to get three of them.
    Picture there being a 3pc set bonus that allows your BO to work for all three Particle Cannon QBBs...

    Picture the QBB having no [Acc] and missing... ALOT. :P
    You think that your beta test was bad?
    Think about this:
    American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • leoll2leoll2 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    IMO the ship will have 5 fore weapons
    P2W means Play To Win

    Archimede - Leader and Founder of "Raiders of Starfleet"
    ...and 21 other characters!
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    webdeath wrote: »
    Picture the QBB having no [Acc] and missing... ALOT. :P

    Picture one of the variants having both a LCdr Eng and Sci BOFF... so you can MAS the EWP and TB them... so you don't need any [Acc] to light up their hull with pretty particle FX...

    I still find it funny - because for the most part - didn't the Kumari just serve as a ship to get blown up a lot - pretty fast at that, no?
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Kind of do not understand why an escort must get 5 forward slots, when pretty much its already escort online :rolleyes: Why couldn't they try something less game-breaking...like giving those 5 slots to Galaxy :P
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • twamtwam Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I still find it funny - because for the most part - didn't the Kumari just serve as a ship to get blown up a lot - pretty fast at that, no?

    Oh, but that they will, my friend, that they will...

    *silently powers up disruptors while approaching under cloak*
  • gorgothedreadful#6260 gorgothedreadful Member Posts: 23 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Based on a comparison of how the Odyssey and Vesta are laid out...

    Boff layout of all three:

    Cm Tac
    Lt Eng
    Lt Sci
    Ens Uni
    LtCm Uni
    Tactical version consoles:

    5 Tac
    3 Eng
    2 Sci

    +15 weapons power
    Engineering version consoles:

    4 Tac
    4 Eng
    2 Sci

    +10 weapons power
    +5 shield power
    Science version consoles:

    4 Tac
    3 Eng
    3 Sci

    +10 weapons power
    +5 auxiliary power
    Other stats (based on size and title):

    Weapons 5 fore and 2 aft, or the standard 4 fore and 3 aft
    Around 32000-35000 hull
    x1.1 or x1 shield modifier
    Crew 200
    Turn 15
    Impulse 2.0

    Price 2500 for one, or 5000 for all three
  • edited February 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • naz4naz4 Member Posts: 1,373 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Instead of all of them being escorts, could it be 1 escort, 1 sci and 1 cruiser?
  • havamhavam Member Posts: 1,735 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    naz4 wrote: »
    Instead of all of them being escorts, could it be 1 escort, 1 sci and 1 cruiser?

    doesn't matter it ll be the escort to rule them all. We knew it was coming, and we knew that it was going to be a fed thing, while kdf scorts are left in the dust once more.

  • naz4naz4 Member Posts: 1,373 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    People said that about the armitage before it got released.
  • havamhavam Member Posts: 1,735 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    not sure, i said it about the 3pc escort pack that was going to come sooner or later. Oddy>>all fed cruisers, Vesta> all sci ships, Kumari>all escorts

    The armitage is one annoying piece of ....
  • lordmanzelotlordmanzelot Member Posts: 468 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I think this features are reasonable :D

    - Dual Tripple Quad Beam Banks
    - Quad Dual Double Heavy Heavy Cannons
    - Dual Rapid Fire Quad Torpedo Launchers

    and ...

    - Double Tripple Spiral Quad Beam Arrays
    Subscribed For: 2300+ Days
  • chorkswaldchorkswald Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Personally dont care what its layout is as long as its pvp/ESTF viable
    "But it ain't all buttons and charts, little albatross. You know what the first rule of flyin' is? Love. You can know all the math in the 'Verse, but take a boat in the air you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of worlds. Love keeps her in the air when she oughta fall down, tells ya she's hurtin' 'fore she keens. Makes her home."
  • edited February 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • darkfader1988darkfader1988 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I can assure you, 5 Weapon slots in front, worse turn rate then bug though.
    6 Tactical weapon slots.

    In compensation, they will remove 1 aft weaponslot to make it less OP :P
    MT - Sad Pandas
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Don't forget this from the Ask Cryptic December 2012...

    Q: (cousteau1701e) Anything you can say about the upcoming Andorian ship?

    Dstahl: It is an escort, has massive guns, is a new model based on an older design, it has a custom bridge, and is not coming out in January as I had originally thought. It will be in the first half of 2013, though.

    Massive Guns, eh? QBBs? QDHCs?

    Or are we looking at the possibility of a SHC?

    Wish I could find a still of the Kumari firing from In a Mirror, Darkly (Part 2)...meh.
  • deusemperordeusemperor Member Posts: 136 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    well looking at the picture of it. We do see two large cannons like things on its wings. So dual phaser lance anyone?
    "Nobody can say "no" to a ship with two huge wing-mounted cannons, especially three of them."

    http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=821691
  • maicake716maicake716 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    annnnnd this will be bad for pvp.

    last thing we need is a ship to (obviously) have 5 forward weapon slots.

    -sighs-

    look at ff14, when it released it was pretty ****ty.

    not to long after they fired everyone who had anything to do with it and redid/relaunched the game, now i see theyre already beta testing open world random event encounters.


    why cant sto show a turnaround like ff14 did?
    mancom wrote: »
    Frankly, I think the only sound advice that one can give new players at this time is to stay away from PVP in STO.
    Science pvp at its best-http://www.youtube.com/user/matteo716
    Do you even Science Bro?
  • illcadiaillcadia Member Posts: 1,412 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2013
    I'm going to laugh and laugh and laugh at y'all when it doesn't have five forward weapon slots.
  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I seriously hope that this statement is a sales pitch and not an assessment:

    "They say a picture can say a thousand words, but seeing these ships in action is something that not even a million words can describe. I hope to see all of you out in space soon, hopefully sporting one of these fantastic escorts, letting those cannons spit out destruction upon anything in your firing arc."

    You know what the most frustrating thing is. I want to express my true feelings, and I can't.
  • gorgothedreadful#6260 gorgothedreadful Member Posts: 23 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Judging by the three side ports the Kumari has while the other two have only two side ports it seems maybe those are broadside weapons. Maybe the Andorian Escorts will have two weapons on each side and two or four on the fore, leaving none for the aft.
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    illcadia wrote: »
    I'm going to laugh and laugh and laugh at y'all when it doesn't have five forward weapon slots.

    your laughter will be drowned out by how releaved i will be
  • shookyangshookyang Member Posts: 1,122
    edited February 2013
    Anyone else think of the Miraj/Mirage from SilverHawks?

    I wasn't going to get this ship, but now I'm thinking I may.

    I'll have to buy a rename token so I can call my Captain Bluegrass or Quicksilver...
  • devorasxdevorasx Member Posts: 693
    edited February 2013
    And why the heck is it called the Kumari line of ships? The Kumari was just the name of an Andorian Battlecruiser. Some people really cant name ships properly -.-
    Co-founder of The Spanish Inquisition TSI - Cause no one expects it!

    PaxOttomana: gawd mirror event is like fighting a tsi premade, they keep comin and comin!
Sign In or Register to comment.