test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Let's talk AFK Players

1383941434462

Comments

  • satanailofhwbgsatanailofhwbg Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    aarons9 wrote: »
    i mind.. i am not going to sit out an hour because someone let a mission fail.

    i would say this would be considered griefing more by the GMs then being afk..

    Well then, please continue to encourage the AFK-ing, but don't whine about it here.
  • nakedcrooknakedcrook Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Really? Another leeching thread? Common boys and girls, this has been addressed before.

    Leeching is not against the TOS. How many times must this be said?

    As annoying as it is, nobody is breaking any rules by leeching. This seriously needs to stop popping up on the forums. In fact...these threads are now more annoying than leechers...more common too.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    If you oppose the Reputation nerf, feel free to use my signature
  • edited July 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • edited July 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • jumpingjsjumpingjs Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    A solution to leaching, is instead of Vote to Kick, would be to select the someone who is leeching, and then click a special button that places you in another map (and it would have 5 people in the map too :):D) so that person is on his own and cannot complete the STF to get marks.


    Thing is, it only needs a team of 3 or something to target someone
    Hopefully I'll come back from my break; this break is fun; I play intellectual games.

    I hope STO get's better ...
  • romeowhiskey4romeowhiskey4 Member Posts: 266 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    nakedcrook wrote: »
    Really? Another leeching thread? Common boys and girls, this has been addressed before.

    Leeching is not against the TOS. How many times must this be said?

    As annoying as it is, nobody is breaking any rules by leeching. This seriously needs to stop popping up on the forums. In fact...these threads are now more annoying than leechers...more common too.

    Yes but it is unsporting... I mean... kicking someone who donates a lot to a fleet isn't against the ToS but it's considered bad form, infact a whole host of things are considered bad form but not against the ToS. But using a system to gain an advantage over others IS against the ToS... Leeching could be construed that way, depends on your interpretation.

    This thread is for the community to do something about it. I'm not asking for Cryptic/PW to take a stance, not asking for any GM involvement. Not asking for a change in ToS, not asking for a brand new system to kick... I'm asking fleet leaders to be willing to agree being a contact for their fleets so people can feel confident enough to approach them with an issue about a member of their fleet.

    Problem with some folk on this site/game is that they are so damned hostile towards anyone. Keyboard warriors cooped up in their rooms but wouldn't say boo to a goose. So FL's band together and start tackling this problem from within. Eventually the fleets will weed out the leechers and, while they are not common now, they WILL come back, then we can be prepared for this eventuality. Hopefully kerb the vast majority of it.

    @nabreeki, thanks for your support! :)
  • rickeyredshirtrickeyredshirt Member Posts: 1,059 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I've been having a lot of trouble with this lately. In space someone will hide by an asteroid as if his teammates cannot see him. On the ground I've had players go as far as to run up to other players and just stand there and do nothing. :eek:
  • wraithmeisterwraithmeister Member Posts: 397 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Leeches are a real problem in pick-up group missions, especially elite STFs. There are players who zone in and then afk for rest of mission. On ground missions they may try to hide to be inconspicuous , and on space missions they fly 100km away from action and try to avoid notice, but on elite STFs it is often very noticeable when you are trying to get bonus objective while short a member.

    We just missed bonus on an elite STF due to such a leech. There must be some way to deal with them. One answer that comes to mind is to have STFs and possibly other group missions auto-boot a player who does not enter combat for 10 consecutive minutes (or less). If leeches start getting booted from STFs due to being afk, then perhaps they will stop taking up spot on team which can be filled by someone who wants to participate.

    I'm sure this has been kicked around before but nothign has happend. You can report player to GM but you get back canned response and as far as I know nobody has been banned from game for excessive leeching.
  • corvallecorvalle Member Posts: 254 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Leeches are a real problem in pick-up group missions, especially elite STFs. There are players who zone in and then afk for rest of mission. On ground missions they may try to hide to be inconspicuous , and on space missions they fly 100km away from action and try to avoid notice, but on elite STFs it is often very noticeable when you are trying to get bonus objective while short a member.

    We just missed bonus on an elite STF due to such a leech. There must be some way to deal with them. One answer that comes to mind is to have STFs and possibly other group missions auto-boot a player who does not enter combat for 10 consecutive minutes (or less). If leeches start getting booted from STFs due to being afk, then perhaps they will stop taking up spot on team which can be filled by someone who wants to participate.

    I'm sure this has been kicked around before but nothign has happend. You can report player to GM but you get back canned response and as far as I know nobody has been banned from game for excessive leeching.

    Oh my goodness, another one of these posts..

    Nothing to see here people, move on.

    PS..why would people get banned for something that is not against the game TOS/EULA? Want to avoid it? Go out and make a private group match. Problem solved.
  • jetwtfjetwtf Member Posts: 1,207
    edited August 2013
    I just really really want to see just one AFK or leecher! really I have not seen 1 single AFK player during any queue event and i am doing the grind on 2 toons so i am running them pretty much exclusivly. Is this really a problem or did some people see 1 and then jump on the forum bandwagon thinking it is in every single event?
    Join Date: Nobody cares.
    "I'm drunk, whats your excuse for being an idiot?" - Unknown drunk man. :eek:
  • oschwoschw Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    corvalle wrote: »
    Oh my goodness, another one of these posts..

    Nothing to see here people, move on.

    PS..why would people get banned for something that is not against the game TOS/EULA? Want to avoid it? Go out and make a private group match. Problem solved.

    So griefing is allowed by the EULA? I dont think so.

    its not griefing? How is, on purpose(!) joinin a Group of players, with the intention to make them loose, not griefing?

    They dont want to make the team lose, but only to leech?

    Well, joining a Game for FIVE players, and NOT playing, quite happily qualifies for "wanting to make your team loose on purpose"
  • nakedcrooknakedcrook Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Leeching is not against the TOS. Stop pugging if you want to avoid leechers. I dunno why you people don't understand this. Leeching is NOT against the TOS.

    Say it with me...

    Leeching is not against the TOS.

    One more time.

    Leeching is not against the TOS.

    Man oh man..I dunno what is wrong with this community. I dunno why it has to be said over and over and over.

    Leeching is not griefing. Just because someone is AFK, does not mean you instantly lose the match. If you cannot pick up the slack, then you are a bad player. I have had my fair share of run-ins with AFKers in EVERY game type going. What did I do? I gave it 120%...and I made up for the fact that someone was AFK.

    Reporting AFKers clogs up an already overburdened report system. Ignoring does nothing. Complaining on the forums does nothing.

    I hate to sound like a jerk...but this is getting old.

    Addendum:

    Unless a dev or mod comes in here, and corrects me on the fact that leeching is NOT against the TOS...I will stand by this statement till my dying breath.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    If you oppose the Reputation nerf, feel free to use my signature
  • stumpfgobsstumpfgobs Member Posts: 297 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    nakedcrook wrote: »
    Man oh man..I dunno what is wrong with this community.

    I do. Its people that literally say that leeching is okay. :rolleyes:
  • topsettopset Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    corvalle wrote: »
    Oh my goodness, another one of these posts..

    Nothing to see here people, move on.

    PS..why would people get banned for something that is not against the game TOS/EULA? Want to avoid it? Go out and make a private group match. Problem solved.

    Well, the fact that we get several posts like this a week (I'm also sick of reading them too, I nearly didn't even bother clicking on this one after reading the summary) - does clearly indicate that AFKers are a big problem in this game for the casual solo-gamer. Personally I don't run any public games (like plenty of the forum regs) so can't guage it - but lots of non-posting members are coming on the the forums to moan about this. It's probably about time something was done.

    Now, I know it's not currently against the TOS so there's nothing that the developers can do about them (except *fix the problem* ) but it's probably time that changed - but every solution that's been put forward by us seems a bit shakey at best. The Devs have said "we're discussing it" for months, but it's probably about time something was sorted.

    Telling people to stop using public queues to go and form private ones is only a short term solution, and one that works (so I recommend it) but long term having nobody in public queues would be a terrible thing for the game, so it's not really a solution - just a band aid.

    EDIT:
    oschw wrote: »
    So griefing is allowed by the EULA? I dont think so.
    its not griefing? How is, on purpose(!) joinin a Group of players, with the intention to make them loose, not griefing?

    Now, I don't AFK from STFs but I would imagine the whole point of doing it isn't to make people fail, but to get free rewards without actually doing anything. That's not against the rules, it doesn't say anywhere that *users must fire there weapons and help out their team mates* because that would be completely stupid. All you're doing is not contributing, which is annoying and jerk-ish but can't be made against the rules. Making these people get no rewards will stop AFKers! The problem is... how...
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Kirk's Protege.
  • deniedexistencedeniedexistence Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Just because it's not explicitly stated that AFK'ing/leeching is against TOS, doesn't mean that you still should either do it or condone it.

    Also, there is this thing called common courtesy. You are playing with a group of other people trying to accomplish a common goal. So don't be a d***

    If you can't arsed to, or are to lazy to actually play the game, then why the heck are you here in the first place?
  • cgta1967cgta1967 Member Posts: 86 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    if you rely on a pug to get something done...it's your own fault that you are upset with leechers.
    _______________________
    ---- FIRE EVERYTHING ! ----
  • cavewarkcavewark Member Posts: 131 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    well I give it 5 mins before the thread is merged into the 200 page the cryptic ignoring thread where they don't give a TRIBBLE.
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • topsettopset Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    valoreah wrote: »
    Being AFK may not necessarily be against the TOS. Getting full rewards for zero effort is another matter entirely. It's a form of griefing in addition to a broken game mechanic that allows events to grant full rewards to those who put forth no effort.

    Stop calling it greifing, that word doesn't mean what you think it means.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Kirk's Protege.
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    topset wrote: »
    Stop calling it greifing, that word doesn't mean what you think it means.

    When you leech you know that it is making things harder for other people. When you leech you know that it will annoy people. What would you call someone who knows that and does it anyways?
  • johnny111971johnny111971 Member Posts: 1,300 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    valoreah wrote: »
    I'll call it how I see it, thanks. ;)

    The problem is, that it is not your definition, nor anyone else's, outside of Cryptic/PWE's, definition that makes a difference. They don't see it as a terribly important issue tbh.

    If it makes you feel better, then by all means go ahead and report them. As others have suggested, the only way to avoid this problem is going to channel/private matches.

    If you dont belong to these channels, consider asking the other people in the mission with you if they want to team... you already know they aren't going to leech on you. If the next random player you pick up is decent, add him to the team when you reform... and you are all set.

    Star Trek Online, Now with out the Trek....
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    2 days in a row doing Mirror Universe Incursion to level up a Romulan character their was 1 person who kept leeching the mission. Something needs to be done to stop leeching.
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013

    If you dont belong to these channels, consider asking the other people in the mission with you if they want to team... you already know they aren't going to leech on you. If the next random player you pick up is decent, add him to the team when you reform... and you are all set.

    That is not reality I had played multiple games with someone they sent me a friend invite I accepted and at a later time that person leeched a entire match.
  • anothervisitoranothervisitor Member Posts: 414 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    jetwtf wrote: »
    I just really really want to see just one AFK or leecher! really I have not seen 1 single AFK player during any queue event and i am doing the grind on 2 toons so i am running them pretty much exclusivly.
    I started playing shortly after the game went F2P because I'm a Trekkie. I've seen about 4 leechers in STFs since then. It's unfair to get free rewards like that but fortunately it is not a frequent problem.
    Tyr shall give me strength!
    For the glory of Tempus!
    I am the hands of Shar!
    Flames of Kossuth, protect me!
    Oghma, grant me knowledge!
    Lolth commands, and I obey!
  • johnny111971johnny111971 Member Posts: 1,300 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    That is not reality I had played multiple games with someone they sent me a friend invite I accepted and at a later time that person leeched a entire match.

    u... then add them to your ignore list, and dont accept team invites from them in the future.

    Star Trek Online, Now with out the Trek....
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    u... then add them to your ignore list, and dont accept team invites from them in the future.

    When I see someone leech I add them to ignore but my point was even in private matches their is sometimes leeching going on.

    Things to help stop leeching.

    When something is kill/destroyed only people that attacked and damaged it will get experience/expertise points and will have a chance at getting any loot drops.

    Allow players to flag someone as a leecher and if the person who was flagged a leecher does not engage in combat after a few min they are booted from the mission.
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • jsck82jsck82 Member Posts: 119 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Regarding the TOS:


    Section 10, User Conduct.

    PWE may take any actions and impose any penalties we deem necessary to discourage and punish any violation of these terms or any other illegal or inappropriate conduct, all without prior notice or warning. The determination as to whether a violation has occurred and who is responsible for such act is solely within PWE's discretion, and is based on what we deem best for the community and the Website. By using the Website, you agree you will be bound by PWE's determination as to whether a violation has occurred and any penalty we choose to implement.

    Leeching doesn't HAVE to be against the TOS for PWE or Cryptic (as a subsidiary) to take action. As a prime example, look at the STF early leave penalty. Leaving early was not, and is not, a violation of the TOS, and yet, they took action.

    Arguing against action being taken simply because it is not covered in the EULA doesn't mean anything. They have proven that.

    I for one would like to see something done about people that are leeching. What exactly that may be, I'm not sure. Account banning is excessive for this offense. Loss of marks or other rewards, however, I feel would be appropriate. How it would be determined that someone is leeching (in the code, mind you, it isn't as easy to see as it is for you and I) is another issue.

    I would, for one, like to see what Cryptic has to say to the community regarding this issue. I have yet to see a response from even the community manager, and this, I fear, tells me everything I need to know about their stance on it.
  • cavewarkcavewark Member Posts: 131 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    well a few of us are frankly sick of afkers and leechers and we are choosing not to play it as much , its rather frustrating that Cryptic have totally buried their heads in the sand they don't care.

    THey say its "not against the spirit of the game" well if leeching isn't against the spirit of the game what they don't realise is that THESE players must be using automatic parsing programs to join missions then need on all drops then reflag for the next mission.

    BUt you cant prove it because they arnt moving,

    Like I say and have said a lot before Crytpic doenst care they only care that people are playing when the game is flooded with auto bot players then the players who still buy zen will depart.
This discussion has been closed.