Perfect World International Alumni
Closed Beta 2008 - Present
Monoftalmus - Heavens Tear wrote: »This means that TheEmpire/Enrage leaderships from HT are getting banned I think. TheEmpire have had 15-35 Enrage alts as main TW force, and have been exchanging them during the last several months. Having Enrage officers as members in TE, and Enrage members alts as officers in TE, is a violation from what I can read in the 1st post. And yes they have been bidding against other factions only, until 1 got land locked and had no more choice.
kk good luck all b:bye
Monoftalmus - Heavens Tear wrote: »
This means that TheEmpire/Enrage leaderships from HT are getting banned I think. TheEmpire have had 15-35 Enrage alts as main TW force, and have been exchanging them during the last several months. Having Enrage officers as members in TE, and Enrage members alts as officers in TE, is a violation from what I can read in the 1st post. And yes they have been bidding against other factions only, until 1 got land locked and had no more choice.
All bids must have a legitimate chance to win.
Alaxan - Dreamweaver wrote: »On the record, I will bid again against Calamity or Tempest. I will bring my faction into the fight with full intetion of winning. I will also take any punishment delt to me for doing so.
RedsRose - Lost City wrote: »I think we can lay down more then a few facts here from this entire thread:
- Fake bids have and continue to happen. The new system just took away the "refund" with which you could immediately tell if the guild was "fake"...10k return? ijs
- "Practice TW's" have always taken place between two guilds to whom were friendly and just wanted some fun. I have been in more then a few TW's in which we wore our starter town gear and even one in which we used NPC weapons that were not for our class (this one was an amazing war and one of the funniest I have ever been in).
- TW's have for the most part always been "timed" in terms of bidding for specific slot times to 2/3 way attack on one faction. Look at CQ on Lost City, the 3 way attacks were endless once they held most of the land.
- Factions that bid have often bid for the reason of 2/3 way attacks and MOST of the guilds involved knew going in they had no chance to win, even if one of the larger guilds sent in one party of 6 to defend.
- There have been more then a few cases of "Alliances" bidding on land and being "given" land in order to hold for another faction. This is/was often done to block in the potential for other guilds to attack.
These rules posted have always been here. However, to post them now after 2 years, after never having really never enforced them or enforced them extremely poorly is very much a downer to the already "broken" TW system.
All I can think of for now but the fact is MANY of the things outlined have been done and continue to be done. How the heck can you even prove or disprove some of these thing?
magyarwarlord wrote: »Alaxan where do i start. This guy deserves to be banned. He has been mixed up with cala ganking and fake bidding for a long time now. Finally the gm's cought up with you on your ganking and fake bidding alaxan you deserve it.
LeirtA - Lost City wrote: »LOLz Alliances can be made and broken. Treachery and deceit are part of wars in the past, present and in the future. It happened in real life so why can't it happen in a role playing game? Go read up on the history of World Wars 1 and 2 where allies became enemies and enemies became allies.
In the history of the warring states in China (Romance of the three kingdoms), Shu and Wu allied to defeat Wei and in the end, Shu and Wu still turned against one another. I would think Kanto you being a Chinese, (朱建诚 would have read or at least know of the history of the warring states.)
So what are GMs trying to imply? Alliances made must be forever and can't be broken? Where's the RP in this MMORPG?
In all of my game play experience in PWI, never have I seen a single GM on during weekends much less policing the TWs and I think a lot of players agree with this. When there was a faction TheClick (with only one member) making a bid on ThaClick in one of LC's past wars and there wasn't any repercussion, what policing are you all talking about?
Weren't you all the ones who confidently stated that the changes to the TW system will eliminate fake bidding and help fight inflation? Gold's still at 400+k per in LC and fake bidding is more rampant than ever. Congratulations! Now you guys have really stuck your feet into your mouths.
As for players asking for clarification on the TW rules, I'm surprised that you think of it as nitpicking. These are your customers and if these same customers who are helping to pay your salary can't nitpick on you then tell me, WHO CAN?
LeirtA - Lost City wrote: »
In all of my game play experience in PWI, never have I seen a single GM on during weekends much less policing the TWs and I think a lot of players agree with this .
magyarwarlord wrote: »Alaxan where do i start. This guy deserves to be banned. He has been mixed up with cala ganking and fake bidding for a long time now. When i was in calamity he even paied Tyranny to get free land then the entire faction revolted against the decision to give him the free land and went ahead and defeated inversion Against the officers decision. Finally the gm's cought up with you on your ganking and fake bidding alaxan you deserve it.
Firesong - Dreamweaver wrote: »Because many of the 'leet' high levels are cash players? Just sayin'.
Knownase - Heavens Tear wrote: »Monof, for the freakin last time, TE and Enrage DO NOT have such a connection, they have independent leaderships. Also, Rad has alts in TE or did not that long ago, don't forget to ban some Rad members too based on your logic. b:bye
Drakon is Rad's new little puppy now?
Can we ban Drakon on the grounds of this rule?
magyarwarlord wrote: »Alaxan i dont need proof i was there i know what happened. So was all of calamity and they knowwhat happened everyone was pissed that day because the events that happened thats why they are not defending this thread cuz they are wanting the isse to drop and everyone to forget about it but im not one to let things go and this is one of the reasons you got banned.
NOW as for my pk skills i will and alyes will kill you in PK cuz you are the noob. you just QQ cuz you die by my hand every time you attack me.
Update
For further clarification, we are by no means discouraging factions from participating in TW. The fact of the matter is, there will be factions that try to cheat the system. Honestly, most of the players who are being so nit picky about the rules, are the ones who intend to abuse them. If you think your faction has a legitimate chance to win the TW, then by all means go for it.
We judge all TW wars on a case by case basis. Not just a concrete "If faction X has Y players, and they are attacking faction Z." Obviously a faction with less than 20 or so members with a low level average of say 30 is not going to win versus a big guild. But now what if that faction only has 20 members strong, but they're all level 60+ and are attacking a faction that has to defend a lot of territories. Maybe they think they can sneak in a win in against a weakly defended territory? We look at the data on our end and make the judgment call. This is where it becomes difficult for us to give hard numbers. The intention to win the war must always be there. It all comes to not having a built in system within the game to stop and discourage TW wars but rather monitored on the human side. As far as I know, we are the only version that polices these types of fake bids and we pride ourselves for not turning a blind eye to it.
Monoftalmus - Heavens Tear wrote: »You are telling lies.
Unlike your EX GUILD -TheEmpire, that have made violations based on the 1st post, we have made none.
If someone is thinking about ganks being alliances - they are not, and I have checked that with GMs before someone would think its ban able offense.
Also, the man said:
@kantorek
``Alliances
Alliances are allowed in Territory Wars provided they are not bidding on each other others Territories.
Alliances cannot fund directly or indirectly another faction to protect one of its own territories or that of their alliance members.``
This is exactly why TE has been reported in the past, and why I am noting this here.
What I think is that you are upset coz Dragons and Rad manage to get same TW time and force Enrage to lose one land after 5 months?
We dont have Rad alts nor are we ally like TE and Enrage were/are in many ppls minds. We simply bid on the dominating faction. This has little to do with being friends and has alot to do with having brains - helping your server stay more fun and multicolor.
I only post here to say we too have this problem of fake bidding and unloyal competition on HT server as well.
Even more than others since we could not get same timeslot to beat Enrage for 5 weeks in a row.
Only due to fake bidding factions have enrage managed to keep getting more land. And look now?! Oh enrage lost!!!
About TE.
Supplying a home for 30+ Enrage alts at a time, that do active TW only against Enrage enemies and if Enrage doesnt have a war, keeping Enrage mains in shelter when they rage quit for a bit so other factions wont recruit them is also, a very, 'very friendly' gesture. When 20+ Enrage TW players rushhhhhhhh to log out of Enrage 5 min TW to log in their alts and help TheEmpire beat Radiance or Dominus or whoever may be bidding on them, they just show what the deal is.
Today there are 12+ Enrage alts in TE and I had that list updated some weeks ago. There were several officers of TE that have mains in Enrage (unless they got demoted now by vivi or mse being scared of bannhammer).
Sure, MsE and Vivi (TE leaders) dont have alts in Enrage, but thats not all the leadership.
GMs will have the final say, I hope if there is some report they can check the accounts and ips for Enrage and TE Players and see who is using account stash and what is his Title in the guild.
All this has a reason. There is huge ground for caling TheEmpire = TheEnrage, let alone that there are many many good players in both guilds loyal fun etc etc.. Leaderships are bad, and I would warn them - not the members.
kk