New Website and Feedback
Comments
-
Please change it back.
PLEASE!0 -
outside of the old, dark background, which was so hard to read, nothing was wrong with it. what IS wrong with this new version is if you insist on putting the **** **** artwork on.
i thought the TOS forbade such as she. i guess its ok, so long as it suits the tastes of the company.but it isnt something that everyone wants to see or agrees with. i will ban my children from coming here, if that female is visible, and i hope that other Christian parents will do the same[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
(and hugs to Flauschkatze for the sig!)
"Thanks for writing me-- it's always great to hear from a vet.
-FrankieRaye"
Playing here since '08b:heart0 -
I'm not too fond of this revamp myself either.
The website now looks more like the other PW websites, instead of having a more unique lay-out.
And the color combination on the forum doesn't even fit with the avatars.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]b:laugh
---
"Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics."0 -
FoxRunning - Heavens Tear wrote: »outside of the old, dark background, which was so hard to read, nothing was wrong with it. what IS wrong with this new version is if you insist on putting the **** **** artwork on.
i thought the TOS forbade such as she. i guess its ok, so long as it suits the tastes of the company.but it isnt something that everyone wants to see or agrees with. i will ban my children from coming here, if that female is visible, and i hope that other Christian parents will do the same
i lol'd. HARD. in RL.
might as well ban your kids from the game entirely, because we have ****tons of characters running around ingame wearing less than half the clothing that assassin in the forum background isI have officially "won the game"... Actually, I decided it was time to leave.
Joined sometime in March of 2009 - right after Dreamweaver opening.
Retired on March 16, 2010... 1 year later...0 -
FoxRunning - Heavens Tear wrote: »outside of the old, dark background, which was so hard to read, nothing was wrong with it. what IS wrong with this new version is if you insist on putting the **** **** artwork on.
i thought the TOS forbade such as she. i guess its ok, so long as it suits the tastes of the company.but it isnt something that everyone wants to see or agrees with. i will ban my children from coming here, if that female is visible, and i hope that other Christian parents will do the same[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
advice to fledgling archers:
Going sage is like drunken sex, at first she may look good, but when you wake up the next morning; you'll look at her and go WHAT HAVE I DONE.0 -
WaffleChan - Sanctuary wrote: »it also forbids religious discussion. keep you catholicism morals to yourself, this isnt the place for it, nor does anyone want to see them.
agreed b:laughI have officially "won the game"... Actually, I decided it was time to leave.
Joined sometime in March of 2009 - right after Dreamweaver opening.
Retired on March 16, 2010... 1 year later...0 -
im pretty sure shes the only one who 'disagrees' with seeing it. there is nothing lude about it, only what the mind of the beholder makes it out to be. theres something seriously wrong with her if she think something as beautiful as a female's body is taboo. so seriously? banning children? typical behavior of the hypocrites of religion[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
advice to fledgling archers:
Going sage is like drunken sex, at first she may look good, but when you wake up the next morning; you'll look at her and go WHAT HAVE I DONE.0 -
Religion stuff removed - HawkI have officially "won the game"... Actually, I decided it was time to leave.
Joined sometime in March of 2009 - right after Dreamweaver opening.
Retired on March 16, 2010... 1 year later...0 -
FoxRunning - Heavens Tear wrote: »outside of the old, dark background, which was so hard to read, nothing was wrong with it. what IS wrong with this new version is if you insist on putting the **** **** artwork on.
i thought the TOS forbade such as she. i guess its ok, so long as it suits the tastes of the company.but it isnt something that everyone wants to see or agrees with. i will ban my children from coming here, if that female is visible, and i hope that other Christian parents will do the same
You already started that debate once and you lost horribly
Don't bring it up again please.
Also, +1 to what WaffleChan said.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
FoxRunning - Heavens Tear wrote: »outside of the old, dark background, which was so hard to read, nothing was wrong with it. what IS wrong with this new version is if you insist on putting the **** **** artwork on.
i thought the TOS forbade such as she. i guess its ok, so long as it suits the tastes of the company.but it isnt something that everyone wants to see or agrees with. i will ban my children from coming here, if that female is visible, and i hope that other Christian parents will do the same
lady, with all due respect... GET REAL.0 -
is the ranking list still available?0
-
I don't like the new forum layout. An option to switch bk between old & new looks would be nice.b:cute [SIGPIC]http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o160/ChisaiUsagi/wewewe.jpg[/SIGPIC] b:cute0
-
I dont like the "Buzz stream", it seems a bit offtopic...0
-
I honestly think scrolling down on these forums would make me collapse. It's awful. Change it back.Risingson - 7x Psychic
Indalecio - 3x Cleric0 -
O dear O dear.
The old Forum looked smart and professional .
The new Forum looks tacky and the kinda thing anyone can knock up on countless free forum makers.
Forget that .. it looks worse than alot of free forums amatuers make.
Seriously on opening up the "new" forum, my first reaction was " WOW who cut their funding"and " O well money must be tight., games on the way out"
Really reflects badly on the games image0 -
More ads = more income b:chuckle0
-
religious discussion removed - HawkI speak for myself. My opinions are my own.
Assuming I speak for others is therefor void.0 -
Promivius - Dreamweaver wrote: »Religious discussion
Sorry, but religious talk is prohibited on these boards. I've edited it out of your post.0 -
Krades - Heavens Tear wrote: »I dont like the "Buzz stream", it seems a bit offtopic...Sorry, but religious talk is prohibited on these boards. I've edited it out of your post.
Hmm MOD I was making a point that it is bad to have discussion about religion..
Shakes head.I speak for myself. My opinions are my own.
Assuming I speak for others is therefor void.0 -
Understood. Either way, it's still prohibited.0
-
-
i don't like this layout
it doesn't fit the game b:sad0 -
On the home page I get stuck on the download zen layout as an issue.
2 big buttons and then blank space..
Odd.I speak for myself. My opinions are my own.
Assuming I speak for others is therefor void.0 -
nyuu T T
it's so.. white o.o bring back the old one T T it looked so cool[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Thanks Silvychar for the awesome sig
Characters:
waterfal - lvl 90 demon ferrari veno
Hazumi_chan - lvl 9x sage seeker0 -
Macenza - Raging Tide wrote: »atleast fix the fail of the 2 badly un-matched buttons
You need to clear your cache for the buttons to show up properly.
Regarding the forum... while I do prefer a lighter background, this set-up doesn't quite flow. An ideal solution could be to allow people to set their own background/font colours. Given this ability, I would probably make this background a light blue rather than white. I've not really checked out the main page yet - breakfast is more important than QQ b:cute.
PS Someone said the avatars don't match so much - I would agree. Additionally, the button for checking out quoted posts is reaaaally tiny.0 -
so we have 42 pages of No. And we still have this blinding template .
And please remove that banner which advertising Torchlight. That game is not even worth it to spend so much money on itMy in-game name is:
V i l k a s P i l k a s
where l is L b:victory
Sorry for my bad english b:surrender0 -
what you guys did b:shocked
i want the old style b:angry
this is so normal..and it sux.. b:cry
give us back the old style b:sadUseing ↑ in Forsaken World forum too
NightRage, WaffleChan, MistaBwanden, SoIar, WraithTanker, BeingHope, Zanyru won't be forgotten~!
RedsRose,Boogiepanda,NiightmareXz,Airyll u guys said everything that i wanned to say =] b:victory[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
the entire site and forum now sucks, so this is wot all the cs gold pays for0
-
Just woke up, go into forums and BANG flashbang in the face!Seriously i don't like this one.
It looks generic,plain nothing special about it,the old one was 1k% better0 -
had to google forum pages cos non of the buttons work on website.
why fix what isn't broken0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk