Where did I give a rats <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> if you knew the class name or the name of the paragon paths? I wanted to know what you meant about CHANGES you proposed. Are you telling me you want change but don't know what you want to change? Edit because of your edit: You are ffsing because you couldn't clarify that you meant the "OTHER" paragon, not the Tab functionality?
- bye bye -
2
micky1p00Member, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 3,594Arc User
Where did I give a rats HAMSTER if you knew the class name or the name of the paragon paths? I wanted to know what you meant about CHANGES you proposed.
Are you telling me you want change but don't know what you want to change?
I never proposed anything...
There are a myriad of different ways you could go about buffing or nerfing a class. I pointed out which classes I think should be buffed or nerfed, I did not say how they should go about doing that. If you hear a water leaking, you don't need to know exactly where the leak is, to know that there is a problem. In the same way, I can look at how hunter is performing in the hands of people I consider class specialists, see it is performing poorly and know it needs improvements, without having to know how I would go about making those improvements.
You are acting like I have just pronounced that a plague has been unleashed upon the forums, when all I have essentially said is, "I think there is a problem here, someone who knows more about it should look into fixing it."
There are plenty of content creators out there who will HAMSTER that they know everything about everything and propose fixes to things they know nothing about. If that is what you are expecting from me, then I am sorry to disappoint you. I am perfectly happy to admit I do not know what is the correct way to go about improving hunter and that people who know more about it should go about suggesting solutions to solve the problem.
I think if there were to be balance changes they should be:
Buff the non functional specialization of the stance switching class which I always get the name of wrong and people always complain that I do it (hence I was very general in this post).
However, I don't really think any of these are really absolutely necessary. As I said in my opening post, balance is (in my opinion) overall in a good place.
Alright, blame it on my inability to understand you, now. Maybe its your panties, not mine, but as I said; I have no problem if there IS somebody with HR knowledge going to speak about it. Also, as I said before: I wanted to know what you meant with that statement above. I didn't even plan to get the aggro for once.
Folks, I'm sadly closing this thread. It started out with some great insights/discussions but it's devolved into personal attacks and sniping at each other.
Comments
Are you telling me you want change but don't know what you want to change?
Edit because of your edit:
You are ffsing because you couldn't clarify that you meant the "OTHER" paragon, not the Tab functionality?
I got it right?
There are a myriad of different ways you could go about buffing or nerfing a class. I pointed out which classes I think should be buffed or nerfed, I did not say how they should go about doing that. If you hear a water leaking, you don't need to know exactly where the leak is, to know that there is a problem. In the same way, I can look at how hunter is performing in the hands of people I consider class specialists, see it is performing poorly and know it needs improvements, without having to know how I would go about making those improvements.
You are acting like I have just pronounced that a plague has been unleashed upon the forums, when all I have essentially said is, "I think there is a problem here, someone who knows more about it should look into fixing it."
There are plenty of content creators out there who will HAMSTER that they know everything about everything and propose fixes to things they know nothing about. If that is what you are expecting from me, then I am sorry to disappoint you. I am perfectly happy to admit I do not know what is the correct way to go about improving hunter and that people who know more about it should go about suggesting solutions to solve the problem.
Also, as I said before: I wanted to know what you meant with that statement above. I didn't even plan to get the aggro for once.