After all the negative feedback, I'd like to say that with bondings back to 100% (or close to) uptime and the other current numbers I believe these changes are going to be great.
A few things will probably have to be tweaked here and there but the removal of the double RP events alone is a very very very welcome change and I can't wait to finally be able to use my RP anytime I want rather than once every two or three months.
The only part of any of these changes I like is removing the need of a second enchant to rank up. The rest really just seems like a ploy to scare away a fair amount of the player base and force players who have multiple toons to play on each one longer than the 5 minutes it takes to set professions and pray. I have 7 toons on console and 2 on PC. This is bad news for players who have far more toons than me. Now a player with 30 toons will have to play on each one for RP instead of passing on loot to refine. I purchased several legendary bags and bank slots on multiple toons just to carry the stacks of rp stones I was earning. Now that investment seems wasted. And who was asking for these changes? I can think of several other stuff that could be 'fixed'. All the time it's taking to make THIS a reality could have been used to fix those other issues. I don't understand. Things that need to be fixed get ignored or "set aside" to implement things that don't need to be fixed.
Founder of Knights of Ra guild in Neverwinter PS4. Founder of The Arashikage Clan in Defiance, formally of PlayStation Home.
Maybe this is already mentioned but shouldn't demonic and draconic give 2800 hp to match the x4 multiplier compared to normal stats?
Triple stat enchantments definitely have gotten a buff in this one. Before they gave 31% more stats than single enchantments; now they give 40% more stats. For double enchantments we went down from 20% extra to 15% extra.
Maybe this is already mentioned but shouldn't demonic and draconic give 2800 hp to match the x4 multiplier compared to normal stats?
No, I actually think this is 100% intentional....with the idea being to make augments a more viable alternative - consider that augments transfer HPs to their owner, but bonding runestones on summoned companions do not.
From that perspective, the excessive HPs actually make sense - to make augment-based builds more viable.
Hoping for improvements...
0
treesclimberMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 1,161Arc User
Maybe this is already mentioned but shouldn't demonic and draconic give 2800 hp to match the x4 multiplier compared to normal stats?
No, I actually think this is 100% intentional....with the idea being to make augments a more viable alternative - consider that augments transfer HPs to their owner, but bonding runestones on summoned companions do not.
From that perspective, the excessive HPs actually make sense - to make augment-based builds more viable.
I disagree boosting one runestone to make augments build viable is not an excuse, what i need is defence on my companion? I will not get it because it's dumb to not get an empowered.
I said maybe gifts comming from the user and not from the companions would be a good idea but maybe I'm seeing the picture wrong, making the bonus come from the player, for example, is just duck tapping the problem because it's not just about bondings, if a companion is that slow in reaching the target, it will be under performing with all other runestones, so the problem is also on companions being fast enough to keep with the party.
At the current state (100% uptime 65%) i would say the gift with bonding runestones is around 170% in a full dungeon run with a top companion, facing this other runestones need a buff, after all all players comming to NWO in the future will be presented with all runestones at nearly the same price.
@noworries#8859 any chance you can add some movement bonus to the runestones that applies to companions only?
I sent a similar ticket when I failed 30 times upgrading 2 rank 6's, a 30% chance on each. Support said that was what made refining "exciting". Odds were over 1/100,000 to fail 16 times in a row, followed by 14 more on the next. I was really excited the entire time.
Nah, you're calculating the wrong thing, it's nowhere NEAR 1/100000 for your whole situation. You don't want "fail 16, succeed, fail 14, succeed, in that order". That's unlikely but it COULD have happened several other ways. You want the odds of "failing 30 times and succeeding once in any order, then succeeding once" to correctly match your situation. "Failing 30 times and succeeding twice in any order" is actually more like it, except you wouldn't have kept going if you succeeded early.
Regardless: 16 fails is a 0.3% chance, or 1/300. 14 fails is 0.6%, or 1/150. Sucks that you were the unlucky dude twice in a row, but in a mere *450* players, you were two of them.
You don't just add the fractions and say 1/300 + 1/150 = 1/450. I was off too, had 18 fails, then 12 following that. .7^18 is 1.6/1000, .7^12 is 13.8/1000, odds of happening back to back like that 1 in 45,455(22 in a million). Response from Malv: "To be honest, the refining success chance rate is one of the exciting in-game system that I've encountered in Neverwinter." Yeah right
I wasn't adding the fractions, I was being flippant about the fact that you had two rare-but-not-all-that-unlikely events one after another.
The odds you you getting *those exact results* in *that exact order* are pretty low, but a better measure really would be "30 failures and 2 successes in 32 trials at p=.3", which is (32c2)*0.7^30*0.3^2. A quick trip past Wolfram Alpha tells me that's 0.1%. That's a mere 1/1000.
That's a little misleading because in the 1/1000 case those two successes could come ANYWHERE, whereas in Neverwinter you stop as soon as you get two successes. For more accurate odds, you should probably go with "30 failures and one success in 31 trials, followed by exactly one success", which would be (31c1)*0.7^30*0.3 * 0.3 = 0.0006 = about 1 in 1600.
I feel your pain - I failed *64* times in a row on a 5% last night[1] - but saying that your failure was 1/45K is just misleading.
[1]: Actually about a 3.7% chance. Failing 64 times in a row SOUNDS like a lot, but it turns out it happens to about 1/27 of all people trying a 5% upgrade.
@noworries#8859 I really hope superior enchantment stones drop from other places than T9G, or that their drop rate is fairly high.
Otherwise I see them going for millions of AD a piece (similar to release fartouched residuum prices). That price won't decline like fartouched did as demand will be constant due to everyone wanting r14 and unparalleled enchants.
About the Empowered Runestones... HP is usually 4x other stats. So considering you're getting 2000 for other stats, HP should've been 8000... 32000 is quite certainly a mistake... @noworries#8859
All enchantments are messed up wrt. HP... R13 Radiants give 3500 instead of 3400, Dual-stat enchants give 2200 HP instead of 2300... Triples give 2400 instead of 2800... It MUST be x4, else everything goes wrong.
Also, the enchantment stats are way off... Please run through them again... Empowered is the most glaring example... 32000 HP is equivalent to 8000 of other stats
Empowered was specifically set high to make it an interesting viable option. There has obviously been some players chatting about this so I'd enjoy hearing different opinions on that numbers and if they should be brought down some (I think 8000 is too low to make them something players might use, but maybe people feel that is enough).
1
adinosiiMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 4,294Arc User
Empowered was specifically set high to make it an interesting viable option. There has obviously been some players chatting about this so I'd enjoy hearing different opinions on that numbers and if they should be brought down some (I think 8000 is too low to make them something players might use, but maybe people feel that is enough).
No, I actually think this is 100% intentional....with the idea being to make augments a more viable alternative - consider that augments transfer HPs to their owner, but bonding runestones on summoned companions do not.
From that perspective, the excessive HPs actually make sense - to make augment-based builds more viable.
The thing is, the additional HP goes a long way towards making augments a viable alternative for certain classes/builds/situations. Right now we are at the point where Bonding stones are just a category above anything else, but the proposed changes will change that - people will have to consider the advantages and disadvantages for their particular classes/builds.
Sure, there will be classes/builds where Bonding runestones on summoned pets remain the best choice, but there will be other situations where augments are clearly the way to go. I think you got the hit point bonuses just about right for that to be realistic.
For me personally, I expect tp keep on using bondings on my main (DC), augments on my GF and OP ... not yet sure about the rest - have to see how things work out in the end.
Having empowered at 32000HP will make them an option, and if runestones would give 4000 points instead of 2000 probably would make more players use augments instead of bondings.
Empowered was specifically set high to make it an interesting viable option. There has obviously been some players chatting about this so I'd enjoy hearing different opinions on that numbers and if they should be brought down some (I think 8000 is too low to make them something players might use, but maybe people feel that is enough).
I actually think it's great, what I would like to see in addition to this is more augments with varied offense/defense slot combos and equip slot combos.
Right now if I wanted to HP stack the bullet pup is the only option. There are tons of options for regular companions in terms of runestone slots and equip slots. We just need the same diversity on augments.
Likewise augments need more competitive active bonuses. Right now if I wanted to switch to an augment I'd basically be giving up a 4% damage boost, or 10% defense shred. No augments in the game have anything that good (owlbear cub being the exception for some builds).
I'm not saying they need active bonuses on par with the archons, but It'd be nice to get something useful in return.
Maybe in the future Brutal Bonding : 575 power/crit.
IMO, this will give us a new way to build our stats, i mean, i could use 2 bonding and one Bolt bonding to have my arpen. I don't know if this is a good ideia, but i think it could be awesome, for us and for the game.
You can sell it on companion packs at zen store and drop from lockboxes.
beckylunaticMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 14,231Arc User
edited September 2017
Assorted mechanics questions:
Is event refinement going to be allowed to be used universally (lumens from Simril and all the weird stuff from Liars) or fundamentally changed?
TBH, with the excess amount players can end up with (of lumens in particular), being able to use them on anything would be a welcome addition, and reward event participation without being too incredibly unbalancing due to seasonal availability.
-------------
Are invocation coffers being streamlined? You may want to keep one with enchants and one with gemstones just to have an additional source of (bound) enchants for people to rank up, but the two with different types of stones will be obsolete. Overall, I like this change for invoke coffers assuming they'll be able to drop green/blue/purple enchantment stones but getting a purple one won't be tainted by it being the wrong kind.
-------------
Will there be any difference in rewards between Dread Ring lairs now, or basically all in the same pool?
-------------
How will you change the HE reward items from EE zones? Each of these could drop an enchant or a specific type of stone. Also, insignias were added to their loot table but not the tooltip, which should be addressed with any other adjustments.
--------------
Will enchantment stones be allowed to stack higher than marks? Will they be possible to convert into RP if you end up with bound ones you feel you don't need?
--------------
CASK OF WONDERS. Can it please be made in some way wonderful again?
beckylunaticMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 14,231Arc User
Various lockbox packs drop stones and marks that will be obsolete. The stones will be possible to crunch into RP at their max value presumably indefinitely, but will the script that converts old marks into the new enchantment stones run on acquisition of any new items, or will all the past boxes have to be updated to take them into account?
I've seen some discussion in different places on Tenebrous which isn't quite accurate so I updated the chart to be more clear. The proc chance increases with additional enchants, the percentage of hitpoints done in damage does not. So the max would be 7% of hit points at a 28% chance.
@noworries#8859 It is too bad Cryptic has changed the earning system for Developers to commission based. That is usually applied to Marketing positions, but then Cryptic doesn’t have a marketing department, do they? This earning system change does at least explain why the last several mods have been forcing the player base towards P2W via the Zen market. Announcing legendary companion bonuses just months before a planned bonding stone NERF to gain quick sales is actually short sighted. A marketing professional could have told you as much. This is just one example of the extortion styled system changes that have been put into effect. Seriously, from a marketing prospective, you guys really need to crawl out of your cubicles. Do you remember what happened to United Airlines stock after a video of a passenger being dragged off a plane went viral? 250M loss. Customers don’t like to have something they have paid for with their time or money taken away from them. They will demonstrate that fact with their future buying choices, which I am sure will be apparent to Cryptic soon enough. These changes to a refinement system are a thinly disguised, short sighted, attempt to make more money. Let me be clear – I am what you might call a whale. I play NWO because I played NWN with my friends years ago. Before that it was PnP DnD starting with the first released box set. Now these same friends and I are all well into our careers, have families and obligations that make this game a welcome diversion and something we don’t mind dropping $150/month on if it saves us precious time. We won’t try for 70 Pres wards to get that 1% because it just isn’t worth it when we only have a couple of hours to play. We just pay for the Coal and go so we can keep working towards BiS. I know several players like this, and there are more of you out there than will probably admit, but the point is it is players like myself who keep the Cryptic coffers full. That said, I have great appreciation for the players who contribute massive amounts of time and energy to understanding the game mechanics and read through the math to help casual/serious players understand the workings of things like stat bonuses and the like. And to this end I am amazed that Cryptic would so blatantly disregard the efforts it takes players who can’t afford this increasingly P2W game just to keep up. These are the players that affect the casual players like myself the most. Imagine if you will, how I am going to be influenced if my entire guild alliance is leaving because of the latest NERFs to bondings along with proposed NERFs to SH boons. These are guild players with years more experience than I have in the game and have apparently already suffered through several bait and switch maneuvers like this before. If I look online at websites that are generally dedicated to MMORPGs, Cryptic has a terrible reputation. But it seems the developers don’t realize it or care. Again, a little marketing research would be a wise investment. As mentioned above, the player base I represent does not have a lot of free time. And we are too advanced in our careers to tolerate businesses that deliberately and intentionally waste what time we have. The financial aspect, probably has some kind of false advertising lawsuit capabilities to it, but that doesn’t really matter if no one is playing the game. And if we aren’t playing, we aren’t spending our RL dollars at the Zen market. And then of course your commissions aren’t very high.
About the Empowered Runestones... HP is usually 4x other stats. So considering you're getting 2000 for other stats, HP should've been 8000... 32000 is quite certainly a mistake... @noworries#8859
All enchantments are messed up wrt. HP... R13 Radiants give 3500 instead of 3400, Dual-stat enchants give 2200 HP instead of 2300... Triples give 2400 instead of 2800... It MUST be x4, else everything goes wrong.
Also, the enchantment stats are way off... Please run through them again... Empowered is the most glaring example... 32000 HP is equivalent to 8000 of other stats
Empowered was specifically set high to make it an interesting viable option. There has obviously been some players chatting about this so I'd enjoy hearing different opinions on that numbers and if they should be brought down some (I think 8000 is too low to make them something players might use, but maybe people feel that is enough).
I think it depends. Do the extra HP carry over to a player via bondings or eldritch? If not, then I would leave the HP right threre, as the base HP of companions is really pitiful against level 70+ opponents.
I have a question regarding companion stats in general: when I look at them, they seem really pathetic compared to player stats (1000 here, 2000 there, etc.) On a player these stats would be really awful, so it begs the question: do companions use the same stat curves as players?
Edit: just went over the updated tables. With a 1/8 chance to proc and an 8s cooldown, I really think the serene runestone needs a boost. In practical terms it means that a companion will have taken quite a few hits on average between procs, and they have much lower HP and defense than players (assuming the stat curves for defense are the same).
70% boost from a rank 14 indomitable??? You just made certain Powries VERY happy!
Harper Chronicles: Cap Snatchers (RELEASED) - NW-DPUTABC6X Blood Magic (RELEASED) - NW-DUU2P7HCO Children of the Fey (RELEASED) - NW-DKSSAPFPF Buried Under Blacklake (WIP) - NW-DEDV2PAEP The Redcap Rebels (WIP) - NW-DO23AFHFH
My Foundry playthrough channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Ruskaga/featured
@noworries#8859 Can you please provide the estimated cost of an Ultimate Mark of Power? I realize that this variable may still be in flux, but a ballpark estimate would be helpful in trying to wrap my head around the changes. Is it 2x a SMoP? 5x? 10x?
@noworries#8859 Can you please provide the estimated cost of an Ultimate Mark of Power? I realize that this variable may still be in flux, but a ballpark estimate would be helpful in trying to wrap my head around the changes. Is it 2x a SMoP? 5x? 10x?
125k AD for a UMoP
oh really?
Yes really, preview builds are known to have some bugs in them as things are still being tested. The price will be 125k
@noworries#8859 Can you please provide the estimated cost of an Ultimate Mark of Power? I realize that this variable may still be in flux, but a ballpark estimate would be helpful in trying to wrap my head around the changes. Is it 2x a SMoP? 5x? 10x?
125k AD for a UMoP
oh really?
Yes really, preview builds are known to have some bugs in them as things are still being tested. The price will be 125k
Cool, thanks for the clarification. Was curious which one was wrong. I assume it all is WIP ... including what that devs say
About the Empowered Runestones... HP is usually 4x other stats. So considering you're getting 2000 for other stats, HP should've been 8000... 32000 is quite certainly a mistake... @noworries#8859
All enchantments are messed up wrt. HP... R13 Radiants give 3500 instead of 3400, Dual-stat enchants give 2200 HP instead of 2300... Triples give 2400 instead of 2800... It MUST be x4, else everything goes wrong.
Also, the enchantment stats are way off... Please run through them again... Empowered is the most glaring example... 32000 HP is equivalent to 8000 of other stats
Empowered was specifically set high to make it an interesting viable option. There has obviously been some players chatting about this so I'd enjoy hearing different opinions on that numbers and if they should be brought down some (I think 8000 is too low to make them something players might use, but maybe people feel that is enough).
Oh... Thanks for clarifying that. With that I think its best to remove all HP sources from the character and use other stats instead and leave HP to empowered stones.
About the Empowered Runestones... HP is usually 4x other stats. So considering you're getting 2000 for other stats, HP should've been 8000... 32000 is quite certainly a mistake... @noworries#8859
All enchantments are messed up wrt. HP... R13 Radiants give 3500 instead of 3400, Dual-stat enchants give 2200 HP instead of 2300... Triples give 2400 instead of 2800... It MUST be x4, else everything goes wrong.
Also, the enchantment stats are way off... Please run through them again... Empowered is the most glaring example... 32000 HP is equivalent to 8000 of other stats
Empowered was specifically set high to make it an interesting viable option. There has obviously been some players chatting about this so I'd enjoy hearing different opinions on that numbers and if they should be brought down some (I think 8000 is too low to make them something players might use, but maybe people feel that is enough).
Oh... Thanks for clarifying that. With that I think its best to remove all HP sources from the character and use other stats instead and leave HP to empowered stones.
Comments
A few things will probably have to be tweaked here and there but the removal of the double RP events alone is a very very very welcome change and I can't wait to finally be able to use my RP anytime I want rather than once every two or three months.
Triple stat enchantments definitely have gotten a buff in this one. Before they gave 31% more stats than single enchantments; now they give 40% more stats. For double enchantments we went down from 20% extra to 15% extra.
Twitch
Patreon
From that perspective, the excessive HPs actually make sense - to make augment-based builds more viable.
I said maybe gifts comming from the user and not from the companions would be a good idea but maybe I'm seeing the picture wrong, making the bonus come from the player, for example, is just duck tapping the problem because it's not just about bondings, if a companion is that slow in reaching the target, it will be under performing with all other runestones, so the problem is also on companions being fast enough to keep with the party.
At the current state (100% uptime 65%) i would say the gift with bonding runestones is around 170% in a full dungeon run with a top companion, facing this other runestones need a buff, after all all players comming to NWO in the future will be presented with all runestones at nearly the same price.
@noworries#8859 any chance you can add some movement bonus to the runestones that applies to companions only?
The odds you you getting *those exact results* in *that exact order* are pretty low, but a better measure really would be "30 failures and 2 successes in 32 trials at p=.3", which is (32c2)*0.7^30*0.3^2. A quick trip past Wolfram Alpha tells me that's 0.1%. That's a mere 1/1000.
That's a little misleading because in the 1/1000 case those two successes could come ANYWHERE, whereas in Neverwinter you stop as soon as you get two successes. For more accurate odds, you should probably go with "30 failures and one success in 31 trials, followed by exactly one success", which would be (31c1)*0.7^30*0.3 * 0.3 = 0.0006 = about 1 in 1600.
I feel your pain - I failed *64* times in a row on a 5% last night[1] - but saying that your failure was 1/45K is just misleading.
[1]: Actually about a 3.7% chance. Failing 64 times in a row SOUNDS like a lot, but it turns out it happens to about 1/27 of all people trying a 5% upgrade.
What are you doing that makes it impossible to move RP items before converting them into currency?
Neverwinter Census 2017
All posts pending disapproval by Cecilia
Otherwise I see them going for millions of AD a piece (similar to release fartouched residuum prices). That price won't decline like fartouched did as demand will be constant due to everyone wanting r14 and unparalleled enchants.
Sure, there will be classes/builds where Bonding runestones on summoned pets remain the best choice, but there will be other situations where augments are clearly the way to go. I think you got the hit point bonuses just about right for that to be realistic.
For me personally, I expect tp keep on using bondings on my main (DC), augments on my GF and OP ... not yet sure about the rest - have to see how things work out in the end.
Right now if I wanted to HP stack the bullet pup is the only option. There are tons of options for regular companions in terms of runestone slots and equip slots. We just need the same diversity on augments.
Likewise augments need more competitive active bonuses. Right now if I wanted to switch to an augment I'd basically be giving up a 4% damage boost, or 10% defense shred. No augments in the game have anything that good (owlbear cub being the exception for some builds).
I'm not saying they need active bonuses on par with the archons, but It'd be nice to get something useful in return.
you guys could get the same stats from azures,darks, silvery,rad....
Fierce bonding : 1050 crit/defence 65% stat
Bold Bonding 1050 arpen/lifesteal 65% stats
Maybe in the future Brutal Bonding : 575 power/crit.
IMO, this will give us a new way to build our stats, i mean, i could use 2 bonding and one Bolt bonding to have my arpen.
I don't know if this is a good ideia, but i think it could be awesome, for us and for the game.
You can sell it on companion packs at zen store and drop from lockboxes.
@noworries#8859
what do think ?
@noworries#8859
Is event refinement going to be allowed to be used universally (lumens from Simril and all the weird stuff from Liars) or fundamentally changed?
TBH, with the excess amount players can end up with (of lumens in particular), being able to use them on anything would be a welcome addition, and reward event participation without being too incredibly unbalancing due to seasonal availability.
-------------
Are invocation coffers being streamlined? You may want to keep one with enchants and one with gemstones just to have an additional source of (bound) enchants for people to rank up, but the two with different types of stones will be obsolete. Overall, I like this change for invoke coffers assuming they'll be able to drop green/blue/purple enchantment stones but getting a purple one won't be tainted by it being the wrong kind.
-------------
Will there be any difference in rewards between Dread Ring lairs now, or basically all in the same pool?
-------------
How will you change the HE reward items from EE zones? Each of these could drop an enchant or a specific type of stone. Also, insignias were added to their loot table but not the tooltip, which should be addressed with any other adjustments.
--------------
Will enchantment stones be allowed to stack higher than marks? Will they be possible to convert into RP if you end up with bound ones you feel you don't need?
--------------
CASK OF WONDERS. Can it please be made in some way wonderful again?
Neverwinter Census 2017
All posts pending disapproval by Cecilia
Neverwinter Census 2017
All posts pending disapproval by Cecilia
What tier of Enchantment Stones will drop in new dungeon?
And what tier will be converted from old marks?
Let me be clear – I am what you might call a whale. I play NWO because I played NWN with my friends years ago. Before that it was PnP DnD starting with the first released box set. Now these same friends and I are all well into our careers, have families and obligations that make this game a welcome diversion and something we don’t mind dropping $150/month on if it saves us precious time. We won’t try for 70 Pres wards to get that 1% because it just isn’t worth it when we only have a couple of hours to play. We just pay for the Coal and go so we can keep working towards BiS. I know several players like this, and there are more of you out there than will probably admit, but the point is it is players like myself who keep the Cryptic coffers full. That said, I have great appreciation for the players who contribute massive amounts of time and energy to understanding the game mechanics and read through the math to help casual/serious players understand the workings of things like stat bonuses and the like. And to this end I am amazed that Cryptic would so blatantly disregard the efforts it takes players who can’t afford this increasingly P2W game just to keep up. These are the players that affect the casual players like myself the most. Imagine if you will, how I am going to be influenced if my entire guild alliance is leaving because of the latest NERFs to bondings along with proposed NERFs to SH boons. These are guild players with years more experience than I have in the game and have apparently already suffered through several bait and switch maneuvers like this before. If I look online at websites that are generally dedicated to MMORPGs, Cryptic has a terrible reputation. But it seems the developers don’t realize it or care. Again, a little marketing research would be a wise investment.
As mentioned above, the player base I represent does not have a lot of free time. And we are too advanced in our careers to tolerate businesses that deliberately and intentionally waste what time we have. The financial aspect, probably has some kind of false advertising lawsuit capabilities to it, but that doesn’t really matter if no one is playing the game. And if we aren’t playing, we aren’t spending our RL dollars at the Zen market. And then of course your commissions aren’t very high.
I have a question regarding companion stats in general: when I look at them, they seem really pathetic compared to player stats (1000 here, 2000 there, etc.) On a player these stats would be really awful, so it begs the question: do companions use the same stat curves as players?
Edit: just went over the updated tables. With a 1/8 chance to proc and an 8s cooldown, I really think the serene runestone needs a boost. In practical terms it means that a companion will have taken quite a few hits on average between procs, and they have much lower HP and defense than players (assuming the stat curves for defense are the same).
70% boost from a rank 14 indomitable??? You just made certain Powries VERY happy!
Blood Magic (RELEASED) - NW-DUU2P7HCO
Children of the Fey (RELEASED) - NW-DKSSAPFPF
Buried Under Blacklake (WIP) - NW-DEDV2PAEP
The Redcap Rebels (WIP) - NW-DO23AFHFH
My Foundry playthrough channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Ruskaga/featured
The marks convert over to the same tier on a 1 for 1 basis, and where those marks used to drop the new enchantment stones will drop.
oh really?
Signature [WIP] - tyvm John
Signature [WIP] - tyvm John
Also, the tooltip says "rarely". I have a super bad feeling about this... but by "rarely", what would you estimate the drop chances to be?
Signature [WIP] - tyvm John