test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
spacecatz#6038 Arc User
Reactions
Comments
-
Is this why the developers seemingly ignored the forums for the longest time because of other preferred sources to communicate with the players?
-
I was using "ST:D" with the : well before the forum censor was in place, I used the : because I didn't want to upset people who thought it was a bad acronym just because it's the same as a less desirable term and : is in the full title Star Trek: Discovery, now the idea has been misconstrued and instead looked at as a…
-
Well it is a bit hard to do this since the stuff is still being shoehorned into current story missions.
-
It's clearly obvious that they are asking for some non-discovery ships to be released for a change, we haven't had many for a while now outside of the Titan. You clearly haven't thought out your response that well and are assuming they are buying things they don't want.
-
Well that's just like your opinion man.
-
Why should some of the 20th anniversary pack stuff be DIS based? Shouldn't it be something unique from the games own timeline or even completely new?
-
Ugh, of course they will put the klingorc above the more recent Klingon characters in the timeline on the forum art.
-
A new ship from the latest show is already considered 'legendary' lmfao.
-
what they didn't mention is that it follows discovery designs, I think they should've followed the designs from the games own timeline
-
I don't like the discovery warp out, it sounds like the ship is expelling gas.
-
Ugh, I absolutely hate those OP shards which home in and can ohk you.
-
It's almost as if the devs want to troll people who don't like STD.
-
Who's Disco Connie? Is she a great disco dancer?
-
Honestly I think they've lost it with this hashtag. It has got to be the cringiest thing I've seen them ever do.
-
What, tardigrades are supposed to be microscopic lifeforms on this planet, why are they suddenly big?
-
TLJ should be the worst, it is much worse than 1 and 2, I would even say TFA was worse than them also.
-
Yeah because making prequel after prequel is definitely moving forward and not staying in the past.
-
You said "fanbase" you didn't specify which fanbase, I assumed you meant the entire fanbase not just the people on the forum and FB for STO.
-
The fanbase doesn't think they have the authority to declare what is canon, they are pointing out the inconsistencies the new show is having with the previous established canon.
-
Yeah, I'm "petty" for having an opinion, riiight.
-
Grungy looking ships which look like garbage scowls.
-
No because starships don't dance.
-
The only reason why they are locked behind paywalls is to lower the amount of people flying those fugly pos ships.
-
The crossfield class, it looks like a rusty pizzacutter and is so disproportionate, it's the fugliest thing I have ever seen. The universe class doesn't look good at all, it looks like an oval pancake with spindly nacelles.
-
The excelsior is fine, the Discovery on the other hand is fugly it looks like a rusty pizza cutter, the Universe is not much better either as it looks like a squashed pancake with spindly naccelles.
-
Anybody notice how they keep adding something from discovery to the news pictures now? When they talked about the Jem battlezone they showed the uss discovery, and on this they showed the discovery uniform. Neither have anything to do with what was advertised.
-
It's nu canon called canon despite the fact that it clashes with the rest of the canon in Star Trek's entirety. They could make the Klingons unicorns which fartout rainbows and it would still be considered canon.
-
I am pretty sure people come here to attribute to the conversation and not to spam pony pics. Bronies get a room.
-
But that's more in line with the TOS version of the MU, not the game or DS9 versions of the MU.
-
I still think the Discovery ship is fugly including the Ent-J, also the Kelvin Connie's pylons are oddly bent and the nacelles are too close together.