wow!! I did not expect that they fix it so quickly, damn!! very impressed by your react time lately cryptic, or shall i said thomas:). all fix, lance hardpoint, windows, lance curve, and the one that i was waiting for the andromeda console!! god this ship is magnificent, thank for you vid matt btw:) it good to have this…
i don't think so. well first,let put asside the obvious intention to shock the audience by getting the most powerfull ship starfleet created been kick in the TRIBBLE to show you how serious the dominion is. even without that, we know that the founders had already infiltrated Starfleet for at least 1 years and knew…
[quote="warmaker001b;12742244"][quote="reyan01;12741887"][quote="warmaker001b;12741828"]The console for the Dreadnoughts is kind of meh but I think holds more value for Engineers. Engineers have lots of tricks to spike up their subsystem power levels at almost steady levels. The console lets you go +40 over your Subsystem…
[quote="zero2362;1205183"]The console says it can equip to any starfleet dreadnought. It can be used on the old Galaxy-X but not the new one.[/quote] Yep, that the first thing i check after buying the thing:) And of course i check if it also go to my old fleet galaxy dread, and here it work! Why i am not that much surprise?
hahaha! well... to be honest, i completely anderstand your way of thinking on that subject. being in this game from the beguining and actively participating in the " what is your beef with the galaxy" and " needed upgrade to galaxy class" threads, i can not denied that your reaction make sense. even if i don't bielieve…
the galaxy x have always been in this game a more tactical version of the galaxy retrofit, not the other ways around. the fact that the tier 6 galaxy got a lt commander tact and 3 tact console is just because that the new common basis for tier6 cruiser nowaday, and most of the recent tier 5 cruiser as well. it is not a…
yep, not to name them, the " what is your beef with the galaxy" and "needed upgrade to galaxy class", not much people left from that time. but seeing the changes made to the galaxy and now the galaxy x, everything was suggested in these 2 old thread. so it wasn't a waiste of time after all:)
[quote="sevenofnine13141;12737070"]@neo1nx The T6 Galaxy-X should be able to equip the cloak, if I am correct. After all, the Fleet T5 Galaxy-X was able to equip the Cloak console, so... it's possible.[/quote] Of course it will, you did not get it. I was speaking about an integrated cloack, meaning that it would not take a…
nice work again, like with the galaxy class model, nice options, some that i known yeodred was waiting for ( venture nacelle on the galaxy). even the monarch class, yeah i remember some people asking for it in the forum, hope they are still here tho... my god that would be icing on the cake!! but i don't hold by breath on…
Exept that it still have a ridiculous accuracy mechanism, and that nowaday a SS beam shot with oss on mk14gear will do more damage! But i suppose that this is not an issue anymore since accuracy was important on pvp and that part of the game is rather dead right now. As for the somekind of battle cloack? Why not? It not…
Dem is only worth if you combine it with marion doff, rsp cooldown was not much a problem with auxtobat but especially with the doff that can extend it duration to 23sec, it is now of a little use thank to the new tackyon beam power that force you to hull tank.
If you don't use auxtobat and bfaw, or don't use a reciprocity build with bfaw, you can use attack pattern delta in the lt slot or in the lt commander one. It will debuf your npc and buf you up ( it a very good tanking skill )
yeah, i haven't think about it this way, it nullify the " theory" that i have made against the " longer= more powerfull " where i introduced a limit in energy build up that would arise before we reach the 200 emitter build up. but as you explain if that were the case the phaser shot of the galaxy would not be very…
well, i bielieve that the theory of drunk is correct, but that a biased opinion, i strongly bielieve that a galaxy class have, at least, the same but probably more firepower than let said a sovereign. but let play devil advocate here, the guys that said longer is not more powerfull wanted to demonstrate it by saying that…
i think it is because of the way it was explained. the way you present it leave too much the impression that in the end it is a fan biased opinion. even i was thinking that in the beguining. this is usually how you proceed to demonstrate this "theory", ready? here we go: longer arry = more powerfull array, because:…
it been a long time now that i read those arguments concerning this idea ( longer= more powerfull ). it been very enjoyable to read, really. i saw the opinion of drunk, the one of others like edalgo who think that it just a way to get enemy in firering arc but not somekind of cumulative energy system. drunk post a passage…
3 tac console on a ship that cryptic originally design to be primaraly tank/healer/support how many years did some people fight to have it on this ship? 3 tactical power at lt commander level... for a healboat ( granted is is not so uncommun these day, but for a galaxy?) how long did we fight for them to make the 3nd eng…
no it is not, because it will come eventually, don't worry. doing this skin right must take a lot of time, i prefer them to do it slowly but with no error. cryptic don't sell too much ship at once also. they done a 3 pack, then it will certainly be escort. later we will have the skin for the galx with a tier6 model of…
well ask matt for it, here his handle on the forum: mattjohnsonva he wrote the 4th post in this thread: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1416221 well like i said it certainly need a little buff to be relevant again nowaday, if this weapons ever was... however i do have a great experience with the weapons,…
ha, i anderstand what you meant now, well that interesting but we are not talking about the lance here don't we? it is a different type of weapon than the one in the show then, no? or are your version is in fact more accurate to the show?
whoever? that a lot of firepower!! it goes to the bop up to the tholian recluse. that sound like an iwin button to me, not that we don't have any in the game but still. i concur that this weapons, as of today need more firepower, but not to the point were it will automatically 1 shot anything that happened to be on his…
POLARONBEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAM!!!!! HAHAHA! i thaught you were out the game you naughty! hey you known i am going to name my new galaxy lol@polaronbeam, just for the lulz ha cmon don't do that face! it a joke, chillout! you known i can't help myself, i don't deny the part of me that is 9 years old is having a…
yes the lance may need an update concerning it firepower right now,mk14 beam array with beam overload do the job better. the best way to do it would be a 1 iteration shot ( no chance to miss the second and therefore lossing 50% dmg). because the biggest problem with the lance right now is that the enemy must STAY perfectly…
I doubt about that considering that from geko own words, the gal x is the best seller ship of the game, i hardly see cryptic pass on that considering the demand
Not that much, most of the people that are behind the galaxy and galaxy x thread are very happy with the result, the guy you see complaining were not in these threads to support us along the way during the last 3 years. I am certainly in for a dreadnought version for sure, but i would like cryptic to take his time with it,…
i like the genral idea, yes like i always said, tier 5 or tier 6 , the gal x need a lt commander tac, but not more in my opinion, 4 tac console at tier 6 at 5 at fleet level i am also good for that altho 4 at fleet level is good too. i would love it turn rate raise to 7 and inertia to 30. and i would love that the cloaking…