Actually, the Nausicans and Gorn are alien enough that they could already be showing both males and females and humans might not be able to tell the difference.
Little do they realize, those actually are female Naausicans. The males are pre-sapient, exist only for breeding purposes, and average about a meter tall. They also lack the prominent pincer-like fangs of the females, as they subsist primarily on fruit-equivalent (the sugars give them enough energy to keep up with the larger, more active females).
(Before anyone starts spitting here, yes, all that is entirely invented on the spur of the moment. The fact is, we know very little about Naausicans at all, except that they're alien. Problem is, everybody seems to expect them to conform to human standards of appearance.)
(Oh, and semi-canonical sources have already stated that like terrestrial lizards, the primary visual distinction between male and female Gorn is that the females are larger. So if you want to play a female Gorn, just crank those body sliders up and you're good to go.)
It's because sex sells jonsills. They want those bazongas!
Remember what happened to the man later in that comic, though...
> @somtaawkhar said: > (Quote) > > Is like night and day difference
It’s true that the video also has the new textures and shoulder pads.
I think people are concerned about the fact that the new hair “styles” are just variants on the dreads.
Other posters are keen to point out STO hair tends to be plastic and doesn’t move or bounce. There is also another problem with the ridged forehead design because it clip into the hair. That is why even an alien using “ridged” headshape automatically looses 90% of the hair options.
Also if you look at something like the abominable mugato in the winter TFO the fuzzy texture looks fine from a distance, but would look horrible on the back of your character’s head.
So I think the dreads are not an aesthetic choice but really reflect some technical limitations. That being said, we need Martok hair real bad—not just for the Klingons. My Marc Bolan boff has the top hat, but the Seven wavy hair is not metal enough for him.
Where is the time (Delta storyline and iconian storyline) that a game content update WAS indeed a update??? This years 10th celebration that gave us simply said NOTHING on ANY storyline at all. I am playing this game from mid 2014 up to today every day now and honestly the game is loosing it's grip on me. The game already looks awesome on my 4K systems (both pc and Xbox one X ) so i don't know untill i see the updates if it will be the plus factor on the update. However what ( in my honest opinion ) i and a lot of other players are really looking forward to is a expansion of story missions, and not one or two per season like the discovery story line, but like when the delta storyline came online, now THAT was complete storyline with almost every server update a new mission. What we now get is almost every two weeks a new ship in the ZEN store. Please go back to mission creation where players can DO something with those new ships instead of overwhelming us with ships only for the ZEN part... Most of the time i play the Xbox version and there we even don't get our 500 free zen that we get on the pc version each month. At the beginning of the Xbox release of the game Cryptic claimed that it was due to a Microsoft non-willing posture, but now, several years later i see other games where it can be done... As i see it the pc version is the "testing" platform and the Xbox and Playstation are the golden gooses. I already know that because of this last sentense my post will be deleted shortly after posting but i don't care.
Well new missions would be nice too. But we got a brand new voice acted patrol and two epic sized missions this year already... that is nothing to scoff at for only being 3 or 4 months in to 2020.
I hope we get another episode before the Summer event, but who knows with business being as it is now.
And outside of the patrols and adventure zone Delta Rising had 6 missions. But you are right, that was a lot of content—probably the biggest release in STO. But I kinda think it was more of an exception than a standard... but I wasn’t playing a lot from 2015 to 2018, so my perspective may be off.
When they have six months in between updates, they can come up with more then 2 missions in my opinion. That being said, i do not want to break the game down, and i realise that now during the covid 19 epidemic things are very hard to do. But it is going on like this the last three seasons, that is why i finally decided to get it of my chest. Last update was almost single sided ground mission. only the last part was in space (if i remember correctly, only played it once because it felt like a complete waist of time doing it two weeks in a row). But again, i still love the game but they can do a lot better then this, as we've seen in the past.
Where is the time (Delta storyline and iconian storyline)
Delta Rising was an expansion, not an update. Not only that, but Delta Rising only happened after a year and a half of only getting 3 new story missions.
When they have six months in between updates, they can come up with more then 2 missions in my opinion. That being said, i do not want to break the game down, and i realise that now during the covid 19 epidemic things are very hard to do. But it is going on like this the last three seasons, that is why i finally decided to get it of my chest.
They haven't had 6 months between updates since forever.
Recently its been 4 months per update with two mission each update. Which is actually up from their normal, which used to be 3 months for one mission
Normally there is a big update in September, and one in Februari so yes six months apart, and that has been going as since i joined the game in mid 2014
'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
Judge Dan Haywood
'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Can we please bring this thread back to the Year of Klingon instead of our personal interpretation of a Klingon? Sorry to burst your bubble but the Klingons in Star Trek: Discovery are Klingons whether you like it or not. Enough with the true Scotsman fallacy! Also, the difference to the Klingons' appearance is stylistic, who knows maybe it will change again during S3 whenever that happens. Otherwise, I do not see the Orc to them. So in conclusion the DSC Klingons are real Klingons. If you want to not believe that, that is up to you. Stop with the gatekeeping please! Thanks.
"Enough with the true Scotsman fallacy?" Good thing I am really Scottish then, lol. Not sorry that I am busting your bubble but you are literally being offended by a meme. There is even one of the same image in reverse. I never said you couldn't play as one. I am allowed to dislike and not consider them as Klingons that is my prerogative.
I am still discussing Klingons. Their aesthetics is one of them. it literally says "Year of Klingon" The hint is in the name for you. At no point did I say that you can't play DSC Klingorcs. Please learn the definition of gate keeping and use it correctly. Thanks! Toodles!
PS. Just because apples and oranges are fruits doesn't mean they have anything in common. They taste nothing alike and nor do they look the same in either appearance or texture. You screaming that it does and demand I say the same isn't going to EVER HAPPEN.
Recently I was watching "For the love of Spock" on netflix (I think) and in the docco, Leonard Nimmoy (among many others) made it pretty clear that budget per episode / film; directly determined what they could do in either. Especially where the creature shop is concerned, its very much an evolving process. -- Now, I think I read somewhere that DSC episodes are up to $11 million each? Pretty sure thats the highest Star Trek has ever had to work with per episode and the result is marvelous!
No, not well said at all. A personal witch hunt shouldn't be validated. I wasn't holding a sign up saying "NO KLINGON DSC ORCS ALLOWED". Someone stating their dislike for something doesn't translate to bullying or gate keeping.
That was the 60s... everyone knows that. It isn't some revelation. The difference between that design and DSC is those designers worked on top of the original complexion and built on top of the foundation. Discovery broke the mold and then murdered the mold-maker and decided to create something radically different. If it wasn't for all the Trekkies decrying it in season 1 they wouldn't have panicked and tried to appease them by throwing hair on their heads at the last minute in S2 or remove great deal of the rubber masks around their faces. Or throw in D7 class battle cruisers in the S2 finale. LOOK!!!! REMEMBER THEM!!! IT JUST LIKE TREK!! WE KNOW TREK!! SEE!! TEEHEE!! I can appreciate a few parts of DSC. That isn't one of them.
"especially where the creature shop is concerned, its very much an evolving process."
I wouldn't call devolving the same thing as evolution unless you're Gorilla Grodd that is. To be fair to JJ at least he kept them resembling Klingon. All he did was shave them and give few of them ridge piercings but they still remained for the most part the same design.
Yeah $9-$11 million. Sure visually good in some parts. Doesn't help the script etc. Throwing endless money at something doesn't automatically make something good.
Congrats on being a Scotsman but the fallacy still remains. No, I was not offended by the meme. They are Klingons whether you like or not besides they are in the timeline between ENT and TOS. So in the next series set in the future, they could revert to the the Michael Westmore-like Klingons. I know you did not say that one cannot play DSC Klingons. I used the word gatekeeping correctly and your memes showed it. I did not scream it, I wrote it. I am not demanding you say the same, I am saying they are Klingons because the ones in charge have declared them Klingons because besides the different aesthetics, they still are Klingons.
Now, let's return to talking about the Year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingons.
Can we please bring this thread back to the Year of Klingon instead of our personal interpretation of a Klingon? Sorry to burst your bubble but the Klingons in Star Trek: Discovery are Klingons whether you like it or not. Enough with the true Scotsman fallacy! Also, the difference to the Klingons' appearance is stylistic, who knows maybe it will change again during S3 whenever that happens. Otherwise, I do not see the Orc to them. So in conclusion the DSC Klingons are real Klingons. If you want to not believe that, that is up to you. Stop with the gatekeeping please! Thanks.
"Enough with the true Scotsman fallacy?" Good thing I am really Scottish then, lol. Not sorry that I am busting your bubble but you are literally being offended by a meme. There is even one of the same image in reverse. I never said you couldn't play as one. I am allowed to dislike and not consider them as Klingons that is my prerogative.
I am still discussing Klingons. Their aesthetics is one of them. it literally says "Year of Klingon" The hint is in the name for you. At no point did I say that you can't play DSC Klingorcs. Please learn the definition of gate keeping and use it correctly. Thanks! Toodles!
PS. Just because apples and oranges are fruits doesn't mean they have anything in common. They taste nothing alike and nor do they look the same in either appearance or texture. You screaming that it does and demand I say the same isn't going to EVER HAPPEN.
Recently I was watching "For the love of Spock" on netflix (I think) and in the docco, Leonard Nimmoy (among many others) made it pretty clear that budget per episode / film; directly determined what they could do in either. Especially where the creature shop is concerned, its very much an evolving process. -- Now, I think I read somewhere that DSC episodes are up to $11 million each? Pretty sure thats the highest Star Trek has ever had to work with per episode and the result is marvelous!
No, not well said at all. A personal witch hunt shouldn't be validated. I wasn't holding a sign up saying "NO KLINGON DSC ORCS ALLOWED". Someone stating their dislike for something doesn't translate to bullying or gate keeping.
That was the 60s... everyone knows that. It isn't some revelation. The difference between that design and DSC is those designers worked on top of the original complexion and built on top of the foundation. Discovery broke the mold and then murdered the mold-maker and decided to create something radically different. If it wasn't for all the Trekkies decrying it in season 1 they wouldn't have panicked and tried to appease them by throwing hair on their heads at the last minute in S2 or remove great deal of the rubber masks around their faces. Or throw in D7 class battle cruisers in the S2 finale. LOOK!!!! REMEMBER THEM!!! IT JUST LIKE TREK!! WE KNOW TREK!! SEE!! TEEHEE!! I can appreciate a few parts of DSC. That isn't one of them.
"especially where the creature shop is concerned, its very much an evolving process."
I wouldn't call devolving the same thing as evolution unless you're Gorilla Grodd that is. To be fair to JJ at least he kept them resembling Klingon. All he did was shave them and give few of them ridge piercings but they still remained for the most part the same design.
Yeah $9-$11 million. Sure visually good in some parts. Doesn't help the script etc. Throwing endless money at something doesn't automatically make something good.
Congrats on being a Scotsman but the fallacy still remains. No, I was not offended by the meme. They are Klingons whether you like or not besides they are in the timeline between ENT and TOS. So in the next series set in the future, they could revert to the the Michael Westmore-like Klingons. I know you did not say that one cannot play DSC Klingons. I used the word gatekeeping correctly and your memes showed it. I did not scream it, I wrote it. I am not demanding you say the same, I am saying they are Klingons because the ones in charge have declared them Klingons because besides the different aesthetics, they still are Klingons.
Now, let's return to talking about the Year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingons.
If you look at the "timeline", it is not in in-setting order, it is in real-world order of when the series were made, and DSC was indeed made in 2017.
As for the makeup changes, at this point the only thing that makes any sense at all is that "Klingon" is not the name of a single race, rather it is more likely a national name like "American" is in the real world. DS9 even pointed out that the visual differences are real, not a Roseanne Roseannadanna "nevermind" thing where you are supposed to forget the other versions exist.
Congrats on being a Scotsman but the fallacy still remains. No, I was not offended by the meme. They are Klingons whether you like or not besides they are in the timeline between ENT and TOS. So in the next series set in the future, they could revert to the the Michael Westmore-like Klingons. I know you did not say that one cannot play DSC Klingons. I used the word gatekeeping correctly and your memes showed it. I did not scream it, I wrote it. I am not demanding you say the same, I am saying they are Klingons because the ones in charge have declared them Klingons because besides the different aesthetics, they still are Klingons.
Now, let's return to talking about the Year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingons.
No the fallacy doesn't remain. Yes you were offended otherwise you wouldn't be implying I am "hateful gatekeeper" trying to ruin your fun. You and other new poster advocating that I am hater the moment I said I didn't like parts of DSC. Your entire statement is contradictory. You're demanding. You want me to agree with you that these are Klingons of Trek. That these orc monstrosities are in the same timeline as ENT/TOS/TMP/TNG/Voy/DS9. They're two separate species or offshoots from my standpoint. You know they could have easily solved this... they could have explained that they're different subspecies or ancient Klingon of the past that were in cryosleep. No! Instead they took a massive dump over the continuity. Didn't even try to make sense of it. So no I won't ever consider them other than Klingorcs. The writers 'in charge' also 'declare' shooting stars can be seen while being in open space (no planets). Guess what? They are still wrong.
"Let return to talking about the year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingon"
There you go again. You know it's ironic you claim I am controlling what you're allowed to say and like yet you are the real gatekeeper. I am discussing Klingons. Even the DSC ones even though I dislike them. You on the other hand keep telling others what to post. Well too bad... You're just going to have to live with your fellow poster not liking what you do. We are not the Borg.
Post edited by terranempire#7881 on
"Great men are not peacemakers, Great men are conquerors!" - Captain Archer" "When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way." - Captain Janeway #Support Mirror Universe I.S.S. Prefixes
I remember someone writing in another topic that we have too much focus on Klingon content. 😂
Here hoping you actually get this content for a whole year.
"Great men are not peacemakers, Great men are conquerors!" - Captain Archer" "When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way." - Captain Janeway #Support Mirror Universe I.S.S. Prefixes
Can we please bring this thread back to the Year of Klingon instead of our personal interpretation of a Klingon? Sorry to burst your bubble but the Klingons in Star Trek: Discovery are Klingons whether you like it or not. Enough with the true Scotsman fallacy! Also, the difference to the Klingons' appearance is stylistic, who knows maybe it will change again during S3 whenever that happens. Otherwise, I do not see the Orc to them. So in conclusion the DSC Klingons are real Klingons. If you want to not believe that, that is up to you. Stop with the gatekeeping please! Thanks.
"Enough with the true Scotsman fallacy?" Good thing I am really Scottish then, lol. Not sorry that I am busting your bubble but you are literally being offended by a meme. There is even one of the same image in reverse. I never said you couldn't play as one. I am allowed to dislike and not consider them as Klingons that is my prerogative.
I am still discussing Klingons. Their aesthetics is one of them. it literally says "Year of Klingon" The hint is in the name for you. At no point did I say that you can't play DSC Klingorcs. Please learn the definition of gate keeping and use it correctly. Thanks! Toodles!
PS. Just because apples and oranges are fruits doesn't mean they have anything in common. They taste nothing alike and nor do they look the same in either appearance or texture. You screaming that it does and demand I say the same isn't going to EVER HAPPEN.
Recently I was watching "For the love of Spock" on netflix (I think) and in the docco, Leonard Nimmoy (among many others) made it pretty clear that budget per episode / film; directly determined what they could do in either. Especially where the creature shop is concerned, its very much an evolving process. -- Now, I think I read somewhere that DSC episodes are up to $11 million each? Pretty sure thats the highest Star Trek has ever had to work with per episode and the result is marvelous!
No, not well said at all. A personal witch hunt shouldn't be validated. I wasn't holding a sign up saying "NO KLINGON DSC ORCS ALLOWED". Someone stating their dislike for something doesn't translate to bullying or gate keeping.
That was the 60s... everyone knows that. It isn't some revelation. The difference between that design and DSC is those designers worked on top of the original complexion and built on top of the foundation. Discovery broke the mold and then murdered the mold-maker and decided to create something radically different. If it wasn't for all the Trekkies decrying it in season 1 they wouldn't have panicked and tried to appease them by throwing hair on their heads at the last minute in S2 or remove great deal of the rubber masks around their faces. Or throw in D7 class battle cruisers in the S2 finale. LOOK!!!! REMEMBER THEM!!! IT JUST LIKE TREK!! WE KNOW TREK!! SEE!! TEEHEE!! I can appreciate a few parts of DSC. That isn't one of them.
"especially where the creature shop is concerned, its very much an evolving process."
I wouldn't call devolving the same thing as evolution unless you're Gorilla Grodd that is. To be fair to JJ at least he kept them resembling Klingon. All he did was shave them and give few of them ridge piercings but they still remained for the most part the same design.
Yeah $9-$11 million. Sure visually good in some parts. Doesn't help the script etc. Throwing endless money at something doesn't automatically make something good.
Congrats on being a Scotsman but the fallacy still remains. No, I was not offended by the meme. They are Klingons whether you like or not besides they are in the timeline between ENT and TOS. So in the next series set in the future, they could revert to the the Michael Westmore-like Klingons. I know you did not say that one cannot play DSC Klingons. I used the word gatekeeping correctly and your memes showed it. I did not scream it, I wrote it. I am not demanding you say the same, I am saying they are Klingons because the ones in charge have declared them Klingons because besides the different aesthetics, they still are Klingons.
Now, let's return to talking about the Year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingons.
I have no idea what the word gatekeeping means to you, but in context it really doesn't make any sense. There is no attempt in any of those posts to keep people away/out from something, figuratively or otherwise. No one can stop anyone from liking something, nor rejecting it.
It would be closer to "gatekeeping" and how bastardized the use of the word has become if the statement was something like "I like disco Klingons," and the reply was "Well you're not a real fan of Klingons." That's still a pathetic excuse to call someone a gatekeeper in that case, because effectively there is no "gate" to keep. If on the other hand that would be used to deny someone a membership to the Klingon Fan Club, that would definitely be gatekeeping.
Long overdue. Maybe fix the Klingon Fleet Starbase transporter pad now?
and perhaps to NOT have to beam to the planet and then to the shipyard? who was the idiot that thought THAT up?
Speaking of Klingon transporters, it would be great if they had the TOS Klingon transporter effect as an option (the almost silent "flame shimmer" one from the series, not the movie era one that is just a red version of the Fed movie one).
> @warmonger360 said: > (Quote) > > and perhaps to NOT have to beam to the planet and then to the shipyard? who was the idiot that thought THAT up?
> @keepcalmchiveon said: > (Quote) > > so then it would need to be a space station. it sucks to a degree, but i would prefer the city be scaled down and less mega space to get from point a to b, and keep the shipyard. but if we got both...mums the word.
The shipyard is a station orbiting the planet. You just have to turn around from the warp-in point to see it. If you fly towards it, you can even beam in directly to it...
I thought it was common knowledge. I guess they should consider changing the warp point so it is more apparent.
I'd be happy with the additional transporter commands like SFA has. Beam to First City, Beam to Academy Beam to Shipyard Beam to ship.. how hard is that?
Long overdue. Maybe fix the Klingon Fleet Starbase transporter pad now?
and perhaps to NOT have to beam to the planet and then to the shipyard? who was the idiot that thought THAT up?
so then it would need to be a space station. it sucks to a degree, but i would prefer the city be scaled down and less mega space to get from point a to b, and keep the shipyard. but if we got both...mums the word.
it already IS a space station, unless I'm the only one who beams to planet, then either back to ship or direct to shipyard and THEN to ship, only to find a station.
and yeah, must to be being needing ToS Klingon transporter effect
WE SURVIVE!
aut vincere aut mori pro imperio
either to conquer or to die for the Empire
The shipyard and space station at Qo'nos are separate. When you enter the Qo'nos system, to your left will be the space station, to your right will be the shipyard, and in front of you is the planet. Flying in range of either should allow you to beam onto them, or dock. I can't say for sure on this, as I seldom go to Qo'nos. I tend to head to Ganalda station instead. It has a better setup than Qo'nos.
As you enter Ganalda, the back hallway to the club, to the right of that entrance is a security officer. The hallway to the right will take you to a tailor and ground requisitions area. The hallway to the left will take you to ship selection/management/requisition and bank/mail/exchange.
Comments
> (Quote)
>
> Is like night and day difference
It’s true that the video also has the new textures and shoulder pads.
I think people are concerned about the fact that the new hair “styles” are just variants on the dreads.
Other posters are keen to point out STO hair tends to be plastic and doesn’t move or bounce. There is also another problem with the ridged forehead design because it clip into the hair. That is why even an alien using “ridged” headshape automatically looses 90% of the hair options.
Also if you look at something like the abominable mugato in the winter TFO the fuzzy texture looks fine from a distance, but would look horrible on the back of your character’s head.
So I think the dreads are not an aesthetic choice but really reflect some technical limitations. That being said, we need Martok hair real bad—not just for the Klingons. My Marc Bolan boff has the top hat, but the Seven wavy hair is not metal enough for him.
I hope we get another episode before the Summer event, but who knows with business being as it is now.
And outside of the patrols and adventure zone Delta Rising had 6 missions. But you are right, that was a lot of content—probably the biggest release in STO. But I kinda think it was more of an exception than a standard... but I wasn’t playing a lot from 2015 to 2018, so my perspective may be off.
Normally there is a big update in September, and one in Februari so yes six months apart, and that has been going as since i joined the game in mid 2014
l don't know.
l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
Congrats on being a Scotsman but the fallacy still remains. No, I was not offended by the meme. They are Klingons whether you like or not besides they are in the timeline between ENT and TOS. So in the next series set in the future, they could revert to the the Michael Westmore-like Klingons. I know you did not say that one cannot play DSC Klingons. I used the word gatekeeping correctly and your memes showed it. I did not scream it, I wrote it. I am not demanding you say the same, I am saying they are Klingons because the ones in charge have declared them Klingons because besides the different aesthetics, they still are Klingons.
Now, let's return to talking about the Year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingons.
If you look at the "timeline", it is not in in-setting order, it is in real-world order of when the series were made, and DSC was indeed made in 2017.
As for the makeup changes, at this point the only thing that makes any sense at all is that "Klingon" is not the name of a single race, rather it is more likely a national name like "American" is in the real world. DS9 even pointed out that the visual differences are real, not a Roseanne Roseannadanna "nevermind" thing where you are supposed to forget the other versions exist.
https://trekmovie.com/2018/09/21/michael-dorn-talks-star-treks-new-klingons-marina-sirtis-explains-why-she-doesnt-watch-discovery/
I tend to think discovery Klingons are an attempt to rationalize Kelvin design with TNG... but that is just my take on it.
More interesting maybe. Shatner says he is ready to become digital Kirk.
https://trekmovie.com/2018/02/03/william-shatner-says-cgi-technology-is-the-key-to-his-return-to-star-trek/
I doubt Cryptic would be able to bring him in though...it’s not just his ego. It’s his ego’s salary expectations.
I’m teasing we all love Shatner!
Truth.
No the fallacy doesn't remain. Yes you were offended otherwise you wouldn't be implying I am "hateful gatekeeper" trying to ruin your fun. You and other new poster advocating that I am hater the moment I said I didn't like parts of DSC. Your entire statement is contradictory. You're demanding. You want me to agree with you that these are Klingons of Trek. That these orc monstrosities are in the same timeline as ENT/TOS/TMP/TNG/Voy/DS9. They're two separate species or offshoots from my standpoint. You know they could have easily solved this... they could have explained that they're different subspecies or ancient Klingon of the past that were in cryosleep. No! Instead they took a massive dump over the continuity. Didn't even try to make sense of it. So no I won't ever consider them other than Klingorcs. The writers 'in charge' also 'declare' shooting stars can be seen while being in open space (no planets). Guess what? They are still wrong.
"Let return to talking about the year of the Klingon and not your hatred of DSC Klingon"
There you go again. You know it's ironic you claim I am controlling what you're allowed to say and like yet you are the real gatekeeper. I am discussing Klingons. Even the DSC ones even though I dislike them. You on the other hand keep telling others what to post. Well too bad... You're just going to have to live with your fellow poster not liking what you do. We are not the Borg.
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way." - Captain Janeway
#Support Mirror Universe I.S.S. Prefixes
I remember someone writing in another topic that we have too much focus on Klingon content. 😂
Here hoping you actually get this content for a whole year.
"When diplomacy fails, there's only one alternative - violence. Force must be applied without apology. It's the Starfleet way." - Captain Janeway
#Support Mirror Universe I.S.S. Prefixes
I have no idea what the word gatekeeping means to you, but in context it really doesn't make any sense. There is no attempt in any of those posts to keep people away/out from something, figuratively or otherwise. No one can stop anyone from liking something, nor rejecting it.
It would be closer to "gatekeeping" and how bastardized the use of the word has become if the statement was something like "I like disco Klingons," and the reply was "Well you're not a real fan of Klingons." That's still a pathetic excuse to call someone a gatekeeper in that case, because effectively there is no "gate" to keep. If on the other hand that would be used to deny someone a membership to the Klingon Fan Club, that would definitely be gatekeeping.
and perhaps to NOT have to beam to the planet and then to the shipyard? who was the idiot that thought THAT up?
aut vincere aut mori pro imperio
either to conquer or to die for the Empire
Speaking of Klingon transporters, it would be great if they had the TOS Klingon transporter effect as an option (the almost silent "flame shimmer" one from the series, not the movie era one that is just a red version of the Fed movie one).
The-Grand-Nagus
Join Date: Sep 2008
> (Quote)
>
> and perhaps to NOT have to beam to the planet and then to the shipyard? who was the idiot that thought THAT up?
> @keepcalmchiveon said:
> (Quote)
>
> so then it would need to be a space station. it sucks to a degree, but i would prefer the city be scaled down and less mega space to get from point a to b, and keep the shipyard. but if we got both...mums the word.
The shipyard is a station orbiting the planet. You just have to turn around from the warp-in point to see it. If you fly towards it, you can even beam in directly to it...
I thought it was common knowledge. I guess they should consider changing the warp point so it is more apparent.
I still cannot seem to embed the image here.
<img src="https://gamepedia.cursecdn.com/sto_gamepedia/c/c0/First_City_Shipyard_exterior.png">
[img]https://gamepedia.cursecdn.com/sto_gamepedia/c/c0/First_City_Shipyard_exterior.png [/img]
My character Tsin'xing
it already IS a space station, unless I'm the only one who beams to planet, then either back to ship or direct to shipyard and THEN to ship, only to find a station.
and yeah, must to be being needing ToS Klingon transporter effect
aut vincere aut mori pro imperio
either to conquer or to die for the Empire
As you enter Ganalda, the back hallway to the club, to the right of that entrance is a security officer. The hallway to the right will take you to a tailor and ground requisitions area. The hallway to the left will take you to ship selection/management/requisition and bank/mail/exchange.