test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

STAR TREK: DISCOVERY - Trailer 1

1246

Comments

  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    mhall85 wrote: »
    Star Wars had 10 years of advancement, and a larger budget to tell a 2-hour story.

    The Original Series operated on a TV budget, which was constantly getting cut by the network, to tell 79 hours worth of story.

    It's apples and oranges.

    Not really. We know why TOS has a low budget vs. ANH but look at Doctor Who, a show infamous for its shoestring budget, during the 1st and 2nd Doctors period the aesthetics of the show went from the stark utilitarian sets of Skaro or Mondas to the semi-industrial look of Human space stations to some very TOS like sets (lava lams as controls?). The problem is not with budget, it's with the dated styles. Primary coloured mesh and flat featureless walls will look out of place no matter how much money you spend on them. Industrial is easy on the other hand. It's easy and cheap to stick greebles on the walls and make everything grey, it also stands the test of time.

    This was probably made for less than the budget of a single TOS episode (split screen included)...
    p5.JPG

    ...But video quality aside it dosn't scream 1980s (vision of 2150s) in the way TOS screams 1960s (vision of 2300s).​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,472 Arc User
    Do we have to establish bona fides first? Fine, been a fan since watching TOS in its first run (as a toddler, to be sure, but then the reruns started on channel 11 a few years later...) Never cared for the cartoon, thought season one of TNG was too derivative but showed promise, didn't care for season one of DS9 but later it rocked, was saddened by VOY's failure to develop its premise, enjoyed ENT for the most part (but hated that finale - in my headcanon the series ended the previous week with "Terra Prime", and for some reason somebody's bad fanfic was aired the following week).

    And this trailer actually has me interested in the new show. I'd like to know what's up with Groove-Face Guy, and why in the name of sanity anyone would genetically engineer a race for the specific purpose of sensing approaching death. What are the circumstances under which Our Heroine will be transferred from the Shenzou to the Discovery, and why won't she have command despite her captain's recommendation? What's up with these Klingons? Are they in fact part of the Empire, or a faction that's split off in search of this "coffin ship" so casually mentioned? And all these are raised in just the few minutes of film we see here. I dig the uniforms, which look like a development from ENT, and I really don't mind the changed aesthetic - I loved the view of the old Enterprise bridge on the holodeck in "Relics", but I can also see where it could look really dated to a modern audience. And ENT showed us what happens when you try to engineer a TV show to appeal to a specific, rather narrow audience (let's be honest with ourselves here, guys, even today Trek fans are a tiny minority of TV watchers) - miss your goal by even a little bit, and you have no audience at all.
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • lordrezeonlordrezeon Member Posts: 399 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    And this trailer actually has me interested in the new show. I'd like to know what's up with Groove-Face Guy, and why in the name of sanity anyone would genetically engineer a race for the specific purpose of sensing approaching death. What are the circumstances under which Our Heroine will be transferred from the Shenzou to the Discovery, and why won't she have command despite her captain's recommendation? What's up with these Klingons? Are they in fact part of the Empire, or a faction that's split off in search of this "coffin ship" so casually mentioned? And all these are raised in just the few minutes of film we see here. I dig the uniforms, which look like a development from ENT, and I really don't mind the changed aesthetic - I loved the view of the old Enterprise bridge on the holodeck in "Relics", but I can also see where it could look really dated to a modern audience. And ENT showed us what happens when you try to engineer a TV show to appeal to a specific, rather narrow audience (let's be honest with ourselves here, guys, even today Trek fans are a tiny minority of TV watchers) - miss your goal by even a little bit, and you have no audience at all.

    The whole concept of the Klingons having some manner of dedicated funeral ship seems odd to me. Despite all I've seen of the Klingons over the years, they just don't strike me as the types to go this far with their funeral rituals. Unless maybe this is the remains of somebody super important. Perhaps the crew of the Shenzou accidentally blow the ship up and provoke the long fabled Four Year War with the Klingons. I think it seems highly likely that the Shenzou is destroyed in the first episode, the cards just seems stacked against it.

    As for why our heroine isn't going to be the captain of the Discovery... You can't expect her to rail against The Man if she is The Man. ;) Joking aside, the trailer seems to make a point of her being a social outcast because of her mixed heritage, so it is clear that racism is going to be a theme this show focuses on.
  • edited May 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    p5.JPG

    ...But video quality aside it dosn't scream 1980s (vision of 2150s) in the way TOS screams 1960s (vision of 2300s).​​
    I had to look twice to be sure that wasn't from an ep of:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRXGyZro3Qw
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    I feel like they're trying to emphasize the wonder -- and terror -- of probing the unknown, hence the name (Discovery) and the flashy visuals. The changing aesthetics are a bit jarring, but I'm intrigued enough by the premise to let it slide. Will reserve judgement until we know more.
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • jcswwjcsww Member Posts: 6,830 Arc User
    The show hasn't caught my interest so far. However, I am looking forward to obtaining those new uniforms as soon as PWE gets them into the game.
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    iconians wrote: »
    I'm looking forward to all the hate directed at the new Star Trek show by people who complain there hasn't been a new Star Trek show since Enterprise got cancelled.​​

    I wouldnt mind if CBS was actually making a star trek show, but this? this is pig slop in a trek wrapper , until the fanbase itteraly draws a line in the sand and tells CBS to go take a flying leap till they stop defacating on the IP.

    I hate to admit this but peters axanar was more trek then TRIBBLE.

    Oh you mean, the mockumentary where the majority of it is pew pew along with talking heads along with action shots that directly mirrors the KT movies scenes.

    I cannot wait for this new iteration of Star Trek.
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    eldarion79 wrote: »
    iconians wrote: »
    I'm looking forward to all the hate directed at the new Star Trek show by people who complain there hasn't been a new Star Trek show since Enterprise got cancelled.​​

    I wouldnt mind if CBS was actually making a star trek show, but this? this is pig slop in a trek wrapper , until the fanbase itteraly draws a line in the sand and tells CBS to go take a flying leap till they stop defacating on the IP.

    I hate to admit this but peters axanar was more trek then TRIBBLE.

    Oh you mean, the mockumentary where the majority of it is pew pew along with talking heads along with action shots that directly mirrors the KT movies scenes.

    I cannot wait for this new iteration of Star Trek.

    no as in the look of it axanar looked more trek then TRIBBLE ,which looks like trek contacted an TRIBBLE and someone is filming the results.
  • crypticarmsmancrypticarmsman Member Posts: 4,115 Arc User
    rattler2 wrote: »
    I'm still wondering how they show rank on the Discovery uniforms.

    Pay close attention to the dots on the Starfleet Delta pin/insignia on the uniform. ;)
    Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    TOS_Connie_Sig_final9550Pop.jpg
    PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    Anyone else remember in TNG episode "Genesis" when Worf devolved into a prehistoric proto Klingon?

    Take away all the spikes and the spider mandible looking things and you got something not too far from what we are seeing in Disocvery

    27L8tlJ.png

    nYB8LaV.png

    Huh ... I definitely see the resemblance, perhaps then these are the next evolutionary stage on the road to normal Klingons? Maybe the uniforms were designed to evoke the spikes their ancestors had? If these do indeed end up being ancient Klingons the design probably won't bother me much, provided they also include either a standard or augment-infected Klingon at some point in the series.
    rattler2 wrote: »
    I'm still wondering how they show rank on the Discovery uniforms.

    Pay close attention to the dots on the Starfleet Delta pin/insignia on the uniform. ;)

    That's another thing I find odd, why is the Delta symbol in use at this point, when it was previously established that all ships had their own unique insignias until the completion of the Enterprise's mission? It doesn't really bother me much, tbh I didn't even realize that was even the case until AoY (not exactly a fan of TOS, so I've only seen a handful of episodes), but I do find it odd, and I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone complain about that.
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter

    That's another thing I find odd, why is the Delta symbol in use at this point, when it was previously established that all ships had their own unique insignias until the completion of the Enterprise's mission? It doesn't really bother me much, tbh I didn't even realize that was even the case until AoY (not exactly a fan of TOS, so I've only seen a handful of episodes), but I do find it odd, and I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone complain about that.

    Because that's not the case. All pre TOS ships use the delta. Franklin, Kelvin, Starfleet Command in ENT, the non Enterprise crews in the KT. Several non-Ent crew use them in TOS including some of the Defiant and the other crew in Court Martial. Enterprise is the flagship so it uses the delta as do other ships. It's even on Friendship One.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter

    That's another thing I find odd, why is the Delta symbol in use at this point, when it was previously established that all ships had their own unique insignias until the completion of the Enterprise's mission? It doesn't really bother me much, tbh I didn't even realize that was even the case until AoY (not exactly a fan of TOS, so I've only seen a handful of episodes), but I do find it odd, and I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone complain about that.

    Because that's not the case. All pre TOS ships use the delta. Franklin, Kelvin, Starfleet Command in ENT, the non Enterprise crews in the KT. Several non-Ent crew use them in TOS including some of the Defiant and the other crew in Court Martial. Enterprise is the flagship so it uses the delta as do other ships. It's even on Friendship One.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    Which raises the question of why it wasn't that way in TOS...
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    Anyone else remember in TNG episode "Genesis" when Worf devolved into a prehistoric proto Klingon?

    Take away all the spikes and the spider mandible looking things and you got something not too far from what we are seeing in Disocvery

    27L8tlJ.png

    nYB8LaV.png

    Don't make it any less stupid.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    Which raises the question of why it wasn't that way in TOS...

    Well in TOS the badges were designed for different branches. The ones worn by the crew of the Antares in 'Charlie X' were for the cargo fleet, the ones worn by Decker and Stone were Starfleet Command, the ones worn on the outposts in 'Arena' and 'The Neutral Zone' (along with a different coloured top now I look at it) were for Outposts. That's why you can see members of the Defiants crew with the delta in TOS. At some point in TOS they changed it and the Constellation and Exeter got their own despite being Constitution/Starship classes. Then in TAS the Huron and Bonaventure got different badges (different to the Antares cargo badge) and it all became a mess.​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,472 Arc User
    And of course there's the fact that while Gene may (or may not - at this remove, it's hard to say) have intended that each ship have its own badge design, there's nothing in canon that states this as such. (In fact, I have a much easier time believing that the delta was a Starfleet-in-general design all along than that the Enterprise's voyages became so legendary that everyone adopted the same insignia because Jim Kirk was more important than the Fleet as a whole.)

    Yes, there were shirts from other ships that had a slightly different thing on the chest - but I'm just as willing to ascribe this to another of the many continuity errors that plagued the show. (Remember that in the 1960s, season-long story arcs weren't really a thing. It was never meant to have continuity.)
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • This content has been removed.
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    And of course there's the fact that while Gene may (or may not - at this remove, it's hard to say) have intended that each ship have its own badge design, there's nothing in canon that states this as such. (In fact, I have a much easier time believing that the delta was a Starfleet-in-general design all along than that the Enterprise's voyages became so legendary that everyone adopted the same insignia because Jim Kirk was more important than the Fleet as a whole.)

    Yes, there were shirts from other ships that had a slightly different thing on the chest - but I'm just as willing to ascribe this to another of the many continuity errors that plagued the show. (Remember that in the 1960s, season-long story arcs weren't really a thing. It was never meant to have continuity.)
    Especially given that TOS was the show least concerned about any sort of continuity.

    Trek never tried to have any sort of consistency until TNG, and even it didn't care THAT much about it.
    But there's consistency and consistency. Yes, TOS had none whatsoever, each episode was pretty much a lore unto itself, but it still had a definable look which later episodes paid respect to. For all Alec Peters' asshattery, he at least created something which looked appropriate to the era Prelude was set in, and Star Trek Continues showed that it's more than possible to recreate the TOS look and feel with contemporary sets and it not look cheesy, so for the Discovery folks to say '10 years before Kirk and the Enterprise', and then show something which would be quite in keeping post-Nemesis, it's somehow managing to miss the broadside of a barn while standing inside it. If they had just said they were rebooting the series, or setting it in the Kelvin Timeline, or setting it post-Nemesis, then fine, but to do what they've done? That loses my interest, and when a good majority of the comments I have seen online are people saying that they think that The Orville is 'more Trek', that suggests a massive error on Les Moonves' part.
    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    so... you care more about aesthetics than the plot?
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • josemialotjosemialot Member Posts: 46 Arc User
    No matter what they say, thouse are not Klingons.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    josemialot wrote: »
    No matter what they say, thouse are not Klingons.

    Go on them. Tell all the boys and girls at home why not.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • josemialotjosemialot Member Posts: 46 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    josemialot wrote: »
    No matter what they say, thouse are not Klingons.

    Go on them. Tell all the boys and girls at home why not.

    Because 50 years of history say they are not.

  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    josemialot wrote: »
    artan42 wrote: »
    josemialot wrote: »
    No matter what they say, thouse are not Klingons.

    Go on them. Tell all the boys and girls at home why not.

    Because 50 years of history say they are not.

    Really. Why specifically. Because you're blind or because new things make you huddle up in a ball on the floor until they go away?

    They look like Klingons. We've got lovely close ups in good lighting showing nigh identical make-up to TNG/ID style Klingon with slightly wider noses and deeper eye make-up. That's not personal interpretation that's direct observation.

    I wonder what sort of tantrum people threw when the Trill were changed for DS9...
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • josemialotjosemialot Member Posts: 46 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    They look like Klingons. We've got lovely close ups in good lighting showing nigh identical make-up to TNG/ID style Klingon with slightly wider noses and deeper eye make-up. That's not personal interpretation that's direct observation.

    Really? http://trekmovie.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/dsc-leaked-klingon-set-photo.jpg

    Thouse things look like this to you: https://fsmedia.imgix.net/c3/45/e7/29/9e03/4fe7/9919/03bd57e7e04f/bing-klingon-translatorjpg.jpeg
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    josemialot wrote: »
    artan42 wrote: »
    josemialot wrote: »
    No matter what they say, thouse are not Klingons.

    Go on them. Tell all the boys and girls at home why not.

    Because 50 years of history say they are not.

    Really. Why specifically. Because you're blind or because new things make you huddle up in a ball on the floor until they go away?

    They look like Klingons. We've got lovely close ups in good lighting showing nigh identical make-up to TNG/ID style Klingon with slightly wider noses and deeper eye make-up. That's not personal interpretation that's direct observation.

    I wonder what sort of tantrum people threw when the Trill were changed for DS9...
    Sadly, most people simply never noticed the change to the way Trill looked because there was only ever one episode with them before that.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,472 Arc User
    TOS Klinks don't look like TMP Klinks don't look like TNG Klinks don't look (quite) like TUC Klinks.

    Or, y'know, maybe they're different Klingon ethnicities and folks are being kind of bigoted here. We don't have enough data yet.
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited May 2017
    Sadly, most people simply never noticed the change to the way Trill looked because there was only ever one episode with them before that.

    The real sad thing is that they changed it purely to not "deface" a "beautiful actress" (also implying that this was the reason they casted her in the first place) - Terry Farrel looks good no argument, but it once again shows off how concerned Star Trek always has been with "T&A". It was always more important how something looks now than what was established. However, I still feel this doesn't really negate concerns about a show discarding the entirety of established aesthetics. I think it boils down to "why does it have to be a damn prequel again, when nobody really wants a prequel?"​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    I think it boils down to "why does it have to be a damn prequel again, when nobody really wants a prequel?"​​
    Speak for yourself. There's a lot of aspects of the in-universe history I'd love to see explored.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.