test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Bad attempt of making a "Phase two" Star Trek show.

13

Comments

  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    brian334 wrote: »
    but by then it had already been on screen.

    Exactly. It had already been on screen. And nothing has really been done to counter that on screen evidence. While registry numbers in Deep Space 9 might have been more consistent, they haven't gone back and done anything about the registry numbers in TOS.

    Your guess might be right. But it's still just a guess. Everyone who makes the same guess you are making keeps pointing to a logic behind registry numbers that doesn't exist on screen. It's a fine guess, but it's not present in the shows themselves.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    Going by what facts we have. We can get close to the show year. Unless they provide new information. Late 2260s it was on the drawing board. Mid 2280s first time on screen in Trek 3. Then it makes another appearance in 2360s in TNG at Wolf 359. So it could be any part of this.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    It always amuses me to see Trek fans trying to argue what is/isn't in a franchise that specializes in rewriting its own canon every third episode(or more)
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • veraticusveraticus Member Posts: 250 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    It always amuses me to see Trek fans trying to argue what is/isn't in a franchise that specializes in rewriting its own canon every third episode(or more)

    Meh, they all do. Even with just 7 movies star wars couldn't keep it straight, lol.
    What sucks is that it is fans like this that ultimately cripple a franchise.

    They've already made up their minds before anything has even been said, made official or released.
    William Shatner isn't returning to play Kirk!? Its going to suck.
    I only saw the new JJverse(Seriously??) because Leonard Nimoy, the real Spock, is in it.
    A ship that isn't the Enterprise! Are they even trying anymore!
    THE WINDOW COUNT IS OFF! NEVER SEEING ANOTHER CBS TRIBBLE TREK AGAIN!
    etc etc.

    My new personal favorite though, hehe.
    Spock and Uhura!
    Watching them bluster over that is hilarious. Especially considering the Original Spock and how Uhura was always trying to get his attention.
  • ravenmorpheus2kravenmorpheus2k Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    I don't like the choice of ship design either. It's not very good. Which is why it was binned when McQuarrie put it forward.

    I'm more concerned that this new series, whilst it should be great, better than TNG even, will simply be another Voyager, Fuller having worked on it, and will follow the box ticking principles all TV/Films seem to at the moment.

    The producers have already stated they want minority, female and LBGTQ main characters and that the latter "pigeon hole" is important.

    I'd rather they didn't find that important, it's irrelevant to a sci-fi show imho - even if it is deemed a "big thing" in real world politics/morale discussions amongst those with the flag waving "look at us we're different" agenda.

    I find positive discrimination just as bad as your usual run of the mill discrimination.


    The only saving grace I can see so far is that they've told JJ Abrams to go do one...
  • This content has been removed.
  • ravenmorpheus2kravenmorpheus2k Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    He's not having anything to do with Discovery though, and it's not set in Abrams' Kelvin Timeline.
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    sorceror01 wrote: »
    The ship itself isn't totally unused, as a studio model was built and it has appeared as a background ship several times.

    See:
    latest?cb=20091211165258&path-prefix=en

    It just was never used as an Enterprise.

    Indeed - though it was barely visible, that model appeared in the 'Enterprise returns to dock' scene in STIII (TSFS). It can be seen on the left, slightly above the shuttle here:
    latest?cb=20090829194554&path-prefix=en

    The same model was also used as a Wolf-359 wreck in 'Best of Both Worlds' and as a decomissioned ship in the Qualor II Surplus Depot in 'Unification'.

    do you have a larger pic of the enterprise at spacedock ?
  • This content has been removed.
  • veraticusveraticus Member Posts: 250 Arc User
    You do realize that regardless of if this show is any good, you owe JJ in a big way right?
  • kitsunesnoutkitsunesnout Member Posts: 1,210 Arc User
    I'm actually surprised they've decided to continue creating for both timelines. How many franchise tend to do that? It's certainly reason for everyone to be happy.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    sorceror01 wrote: »
    The ship itself isn't totally unused, as a studio model was built and it has appeared as a background ship several times.

    See:
    latest?cb=20091211165258&path-prefix=en

    It just was never used as an Enterprise.

    Indeed - though it was barely visible, that model appeared in the 'Enterprise returns to dock' scene in STIII (TSFS). It can be seen on the left, slightly above the shuttle here:
    latest?cb=20090829194554&path-prefix=en

    The same model was also used as a Wolf-359 wreck in 'Best of Both Worlds' and as a decomissioned ship in the Qualor II Surplus Depot in 'Unification'.

    do you have a larger pic of the enterprise at spacedock ?
    go to the file page. http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/File:USS_Enterprise_and_USS_Excelsior_in_Spacedock.jpg
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    veraticus wrote: »
    You do realize that regardless of if this show is any good, you owe JJ in a big way right?

    Way I see it, JJ messed it up so bad. Now they doing a show to fix his mess.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    I'm actually surprised they've decided to continue creating for both timelines. How many franchise tend to do that? It's certainly reason for everyone to be happy.

    DC Comics has the movies everyone hates (see Rotten Tomatoes regarding the new Suicide Squad) and the TV universe everyone loves (see the warm reception the same Suicide Squad gets in its Arrow appearances).

    There's the TV Flash and the new Flash shown in Batman v Superman.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • veraticusveraticus Member Posts: 250 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    Way I see it, JJ messed it up so bad. Now they doing a show to fix his mess.

    Disagreements aside.
    Let's all watch it, be it good or bad. The IP needs money and viewers to survive. We can give it that.
  • chastity1337chastity1337 Member Posts: 1,608 Arc User
    daveyny wrote: »
    I still think this weird design is purposely intended to be a major part of the storyline.

    It's possibly some kind of joint venture between the Fed's and the Klingons and the reason the ship seems 'dated' is because it is a really old, rejected class-type that never went into production.

    It's the type of ship one wouldn't mind letting ones enemy's on, because the technology is so dated as to be useless if stolen.

    I'm hoping that the Discovery is intended to be a space born attempt at a "Nimbus III-The Planet Of Galactic Peace" and the whole point of the series is to show how, despite nobody really believing it will work, the mixed crew actually manages to make it succeed.

    Though the early episodes will be rife with turmoil, we slowly see the Starfleet and Klingon Defense Force crew members begin to work together as the series progresses.

    The one thing I worry about is that they find an Actor (male or female) that has the chops to carry off being the captain of this kind of crew.

    Be even more interesting if they pick someone who looks like they wouldn't have a chance, but turns out to be perfect for the job.

    I could see both sides putting the worst of the worst up as the crew, in an attempt to scuttle the idea, only to have it all work out in the end.

    Kind of like a "Dirty Dozen" in space.
    B)

    But without Lee Marvin, Ernest Borgnine, or Charles Bronson.
  • sorceror01sorceror01 Member Posts: 1,042 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    veraticus wrote: »
    You do realize that regardless of if this show is any good, you owe JJ in a big way right?

    Way I see it, JJ messed it up so bad. Now they doing a show to fix his mess.

    You can see it that way all you like, but the fact of the matter is that the new movies renewed public interest in Star Trek.

    People have been trying to get a new Trek show off the ground for years, well before the new movies. It just wasn't happening. CBS was still burned out from Enterprise and the poor reaction from so-called "fans", they were absolutely not willing to take that risk again any time soon.

    But with the new set of movies, public interest is restored, a new influx of Trek fans comes into the fold, even a percentage of old fans take no real issue with the movies, and CBS sees it as a prime time to launch a new series.

    No one is "fixing JJ's mess", because as far as the property holders are concerned, those movies were incredibly popular and profitable with the public.
    They are capitalizing on JJ's successes, as it were.
    ".... you're gonna have a bad time."
  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    http://www.slashfilm.com/star-trek-discovery-timeline/

    It appears the show is set before TOS which makes the question Prime or JJ verse pointless as it would be both.
  • trygvar13trygvar13 Member Posts: 697 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    talonxv wrote: »
    In another thread I posted this ship. It's a F-DN from Star fleet command 2. Much superior design and most would of gone ape over it.

    AllianceShot3362.jpg

    And here she is from another angle

    ulysses2.jpg

    The problem with this design and with the ship shown in the trailer is that, based on Star Trek lore, those engines cannot create a warp field. The space between the nacelles has to be empty. Any object placed between the nacelles prevents the creation of a warp field. Major design flaw... Even Voyager had to raise its nacelles in order to go to warp.
    Dahar Master Qor'aS
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,474 Arc User
    Then how did the Defiant create a warp field? Its nacelles are snugged right up against the hull.

    Meanwhile, the Discovery as shown thus far does have empty space between the nacelles - that secondary hull isn't the flat slab McQuarrie envisioned, but rather has a flat segment between two angled bits that lead up to the nacelles.​​
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    at this point... I want the Discovery just to fly it in sector space and hang out near ESD... Revel in the howling and tears.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    I like how OP claims to know Discovery is just a bad attempt at a Phase 2 show when no one has seen it yet. Unless OP is warning us from the future or something.

    @Cryptic: T6 Discovery when
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    sorceror01 wrote: »
    farmallm wrote: »
    veraticus wrote: »
    You do realize that regardless of if this show is any good, you owe JJ in a big way right?

    Way I see it, JJ messed it up so bad. Now they doing a show to fix his mess.

    You can see it that way all you like, but the fact of the matter is that the new movies renewed public interest in Star Trek.

    People have been trying to get a new Trek show off the ground for years, well before the new movies. It just wasn't happening. CBS was still burned out from Enterprise and the poor reaction from so-called "fans", they were absolutely not willing to take that risk again any time soon.

    But with the new set of movies, public interest is restored, a new influx of Trek fans comes into the fold, even a percentage of old fans take no real issue with the movies, and CBS sees it as a prime time to launch a new series.

    No one is "fixing JJ's mess", because as far as the property holders are concerned, those movies were incredibly popular and profitable with the public.
    They are capitalizing on JJ's successes, as it were.

    Going by earnings after you make ticket sales inflation correction. Beyond Bombed! It comes in at the 2nd of the lowest, lowest being Nemisis. It didn't even come close to the TMP. With the top one being 2009. And the TMP was 2nd.

    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=startrek.htm

    Bottom line, they making a show to fix his mess. As the growing trend is showing its on a steep decline.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • This content has been removed.
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    Going by earnings after you make ticket sales inflation correction. Beyond Bombed! It comes in at the 2nd of the lowest, lowest being Nemisis. It didn't even come close to the TMP. With the top one being 2009. And the TMP was 2nd.

    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=startrek.htm

    Bottom line, they making a show to fix his mess. As the growing trend is showing its on a steep decline.

    Financial earnings is not a reliable indicator of the quality of a movie. But please, spin whatever narrative you want to justify your blind zealotry.
  • nikeixnikeix Member Posts: 3,972 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    Going by earnings after you make ticket sales inflation correction. Beyond Bombed! It comes in at the 2nd of the lowest, lowest being Nemisis. It didn't even come close to the TMP. With the top one being 2009. And the TMP was 2nd.

    Were those numbers based on what the other movies earned in less than 2 weeks?

    I feel as if you might be clutching at straws to feed the fires of your hate.

    Maybe we'll take another look at the numbers after it's finished it run. That should be funny in light of the half-baked jab.

  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    Hate to burst all 3 of your bubbles. But Beyond took a 14% hit in the 1st weekend compared to Into Darkness. So that alone was already a decline. Then they took a larger hit of nearly 60% second weekend drop, a significant decline when compared to the last two films. Thanks to Jason Bourn knocking it off the 1st spot. So it couldn't last 2 weeks at #1. Don't forget Suicide Squad comes out this weekend. So that will really knock it down. So it will get to say hello to #3.

    I highly doubt Beyond will gain much more. Beyond was a bomb.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • This content has been removed.
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    Hate to burst all 3 of your bubbles. But Beyond took a 14% hit in the 1st weekend compared to Into Darkness. So that alone was already a decline. Then they took a larger hit of nearly 60% second weekend drop, a significant decline when compared to the last two films. Thanks to Jason Bourn knocking it off the 1st spot. So it couldn't last 2 weeks at #1. Don't forget Suicide Squad comes out this weekend. So that will really knock it down. So it will get to say hello to #3.

    I highly doubt Beyond will gain much more. Beyond was a bomb.
    jexsamx wrote: »
    Financial earnings is not a reliable indicator of the quality of a movie. But please, spin whatever narrative you want to justify your blind zealotry.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    Don't forget Suicide Squad comes out this weekend. So that will really knock it down. So it will get to say hello to

    That probably isn't much of a factor, going by all the hubub about that movie.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.