test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Da big *NEW TREK TV SHOW* thread!

12324262829101

Comments

  • angarus1angarus1 Member Posts: 684 Arc User
    I like that the saucer seems to share its hubcap design with the USS Franklin from Beyond.

    The rest of the ship just doesn't cut it for me. ;)
  • darakossdarakoss Member Posts: 850 Arc User
    Hmmm NCC-1031. Pře TOS?
    i-dont-always-funny-meme.jpg
    original join date 2010

    Member: Team Trekyards. Visit Trekyards today!
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    Yeah I still despise the Galaxy, it looks like Timmeh from South Park all bloated head and tiny body with vestigal limbs. The USS TIMMEH!

    I like this new one though, it's a homage to a design from one of the great sci fi artists of our lifetimes and it's both original and visually interesting. I'd take it over the JJprize in a heartbeat.
    iconians wrote: »
    I can't wait for the T6 Discovery 3-pack hitting the C-store.

    OOOO! One has a triangle, one has a hexagon and the 3rd has a rhombus hull!

    Don't forget that Thomas Marrone designs one of them so it'll somehow look like an Ambassador-class. ;)​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • monkeybone13monkeybone13 Member Posts: 4,640 Arc User
    Surely they're not serious? Ewwwww!
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    mhall85 wrote: »
    Fuller confirmed the show will be in the PRIME timeline, but would not say WHEN in that timeline...

    Based on the registry number, I'm thinking sometime between enterprise and TOS.

    That ship desperately needs to be used for target practice though ... and people said the JJ-Prise was ugly ...
    Nah, looks better than the TMP Connie. :p
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    Surely they're not serious? Ewwwww!

    They are serious.

    ... and don't call them Shirley.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    darakoss wrote: »
    Hmmm NCC-1031. Pře TOS?

    Those numbers don't really work that way. There was some TNG ships with lower numbers.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    I'm very very happy to learn that we will have at least one season of real Trek!

    Yep, and coming just six months after the latest real Trek movie!
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • kelshandokelshando Member Posts: 887 Arc User
    Well puts more light on why they had to hide this behind a pay wall lol
  • sheldonlcoopersheldonlcooper Member Posts: 4,042 Arc User
    I'm very very happy to learn that we will have at least one season of real Trek!

    Yep, and coming just six months after the latest real Trek movie!

    Prelude to Axanar? Well, it may not be a full length feature but it was pretty good I agree.
    Captain Jean-Luc Picard: "We think we've come so far. Torture of heretics, burning of witches, it's all ancient history. Then - before you can blink an eye - suddenly it threatens to start all over again."

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

  • sarreoussarreous Member Posts: 336 Arc User
    Okay, okay. I actually watched the video. It does look a little better than the concept art. *Sigh*. I'll give it a chance.
  • zero2362zero2362 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    darakoss wrote: »
    Hmmm NCC-1031. Pře TOS?

    Those numbers don't really work that way. There was some TNG ships with lower numbers.

    Experamental ships (NX) have a seperate numbering to the main fleet and so do ships that share a name like the Enterprises. That might explain the number inconsistencies

    343rguu.jpg

  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    zero2362 wrote: »
    farmallm wrote: »
    darakoss wrote: »
    Hmmm NCC-1031. Pře TOS?

    Those numbers don't really work that way. There was some TNG ships with lower numbers.

    Experamental ships (NX) have a seperate numbering to the main fleet and so do ships that share a name like the Enterprises. That might explain the number inconsistencies

    I'm trying to remember the article on this subject. I think it was in one of my books. I'm digging into this.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • postinggumpostinggum Member Posts: 1,117 Arc User
    Connie and a D7 got romantic?

    First they wreck the movies, then fan/semi pro/low budget pro films and now TV.
  • zero2362zero2362 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    edited July 2016
    So we have TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT, and now we have TRIBBLE. Brilliant
    343rguu.jpg

  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    zero2362 wrote: »
    now we have TRIBBLE. Brilliant

    Should have used protection.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • lordgyorlordgyor Member Posts: 2,820 Arc User
    Axanar isn't happening.
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited July 2016
    zero2362 wrote: »
    farmallm wrote: »
    darakoss wrote: »
    Hmmm NCC-1031. Pře TOS?

    Those numbers don't really work that way. There was some TNG ships with lower numbers.

    Experamental ships (NX) have a seperate numbering to the main fleet and so do ships that share a name like the Enterprises. That might explain the number inconsistencies

    Found a decent article on this.

    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/registries.htm
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • psiameesepsiameese Member Posts: 1,650 Arc User
    It's true that the Enterprise's (1701) sister ship, the Constellation, sported a registry of NCC-1017. So hard to say where, exactly, NCC-1031 will sit.
    (/\) Exploring Star Trek Online Since July 2008 (/\)
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    Yeah I still despise the Galaxy, it looks like Timmeh from South Park all bloated head and tiny body with vestigal limbs. The USS TIMMEH!

    I like this new one though, it's a homage to a design from one of the great sci fi artists of our lifetimes and it's both original and visually interesting. I'd take it over the JJprize in a heartbeat.​​

    And there is a very good chance that we will get it sometime next year.

    Until CBS tells us, there is no guarantee of what type of show it will be. We could be stuck with the same ships and crews for the entire series, but just have them switch between each episode. It also could be a new crew each episode or a new crew each season. There is even the possibility of having multiple ships from different times. The ship we just saw could be from the pre-TOS or pre-TNG era while the next ship they introduce could be from post-Nemesis.
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    ashrod63 wrote: »
    Can anyone work out what the number is, specifically how many digits? It starts 103, but beyond that... bit too dark. Might be able to determine rough time frames.

    TRQghgG.jpg

    1031.

    So, prior to TOS, presumably.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    psiameese wrote: »
    It's true that the Enterprise's (1701) sister ship, the Constellation, sported a registry of NCC-1017. So hard to say where, exactly, NCC-1031 will sit.

    Very true, cause the Constitution was NX or NCC 1700. If you went by the NCC number, it would put the Constellation older.

    This is why you can't go by the NCC numbers on age of ship.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • amosov78amosov78 Member Posts: 1,495 Arc User
    Fuller's mentioned in the past about going back to the 60's feel for a Star Trek show, if that's the case then setting it somewhere in the boundaries of that time frame wouldn't make it jump out as being too different. You certainly would have difficulty trying that approach post TNG/DS9/VOY.
    U.S.S. Endeavour NCC-71895 - Nebula-class
    Commanding Officer: Captain Pyotr Ramonovich Amosov
    Dedication Plaque: "Nil Intentatum Reliquit"
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    bernatk wrote: »
    Wake up forum!
    The day we've been waiting for!

    https://twitter.com/startrekcbs/status/756974219322273792

    The birth of the ugliest Trek ship ever?
    Impossible, that was in TMP. :p Fortunately that eyesore was destroyed. :p
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited July 2016
    bernatk wrote: »
    NCC-1031, so it will play probably between ENT and TOS, pre-kelvin timeline.

    Watch the twitter about moar info...

    You can't go by that. The USS Constellation had an older number. Which would predate it and the Constitution the Class ship.

    Constitution - 1700
    Enterprise - 1701
    Hood - 1703
    Constellation 1071


    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    farmallm wrote: »
    psiameese wrote: »
    It's true that the Enterprise's (1701) sister ship, the Constellation, sported a registry of NCC-1017. So hard to say where, exactly, NCC-1031 will sit.

    Very true, cause the Constitution was NX or NCC 1700. If you went by the NCC number, it would put the Constellation older.

    This is why you can't go by the NCC numbers on age of ship.

    Nope, but it gives you a pretty good idea. Especially since the YouTube video says "Test Flight", which I'm pretty sure indicates that it takes place around the era it was launched.

    I suppose there's the possibility that the writers nitpicked through Memory Alpha to find loopholes to make an older NCC registry for a ship despite the show itself taking place in a different time frame, but I'm going to bet that isn't the case, and the show takes place sometime between Enterprise and TOS.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    dlmc85 wrote: »
    I read someone noticed an IDIC symbol, i'm trying to see where
    the overall shape of the ship when seen from a certain angle.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • evilmark444evilmark444 Member Posts: 6,951 Arc User
    I'm very very happy to learn that we will have at least one season of real Trek!

    Yep, and coming just six months after the latest real Trek movie!

    Prelude to Axanar? Well, it may not be a full length feature but it was pretty good I agree.

    No, not that silly fan film that's never going to be finished, I was taking about Star Trek: Beyond, the latest movie in the current Real Trek film series! I hear it's even better than the last two as well, isn't it an awesome time to be a Trek fan??
    Lifetime Subscriber since Beta
    eaY7Xxu.png
  • sqwishedsqwished Member Posts: 1,475 Bug Hunter
    To quote Scotty from the TNG episode Relics, "everyone woman has her charms you just have to know where to look" referring to a shuttle craft.
    Oh, it's not broken? We can soon fix that!

  • kelshandokelshando Member Posts: 887 Arc User
    There was already a thread started again this......
This discussion has been closed.