test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Yamato Class Dreadnought Cruiser [T6] is here

13567

Comments

  • mackbolan01mackbolan01 Member Posts: 580 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    gimme the f**king stats 1st, THEN i'll decide to purchase or not
  • kodiakjorgenssonkodiakjorgensson Member Posts: 26 Arc User
    admirality gal-x has better tac-sci stats then the andromeda, could possibly hint to better tac-sci seating/console setup
  • bernatkbernatk Member Posts: 1,089 Bug Hunter
    Iconic ships (including Prometheus) don't need stellar stats to sell well. That's why I'm afraid of the new Defiant. But TRIBBLE or not TRIBBLE I will buy it nevertheless.
    Tck7dQ2.jpg
    Dahar Master Mary Sue                                               Fleet Admiral Bloody Mary
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    Defiant is doomed, it will have to compete with the excellent (OP) pilot escort stats and perks. I'm really curious what kind of powercreep will come with the ship to make it more appealing.
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,463 Arc User
    bernatk wrote: »
    Iconic ships (including Prometheus) don't need stellar stats to sell well. That's why I'm afraid of the new Defiant. But TRIBBLE or not TRIBBLE I will buy it nevertheless.

    The biggest plus for the defiant will without doubt be the visuals. Boff layout will be difficult since the phantom and pilot ships have strong intel and pilot seating thereby making it difficult to get something unique for a T6 Defiant.​​
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    bernatk wrote: »
    Iconic ships (including Prometheus) don't need stellar stats to sell well. That's why I'm afraid of the new Defiant. But TRIBBLE or not TRIBBLE I will buy it nevertheless.

    The biggest plus for the defiant will without doubt be the visuals. Boff layout will be difficult since the phantom and pilot ships have strong intel and pilot seating thereby making it difficult to get something unique for a T6 Defiant.​​

    The current defiant's boff layout is pretty bad and I'm thinking that the t6 version won't be very good either. That is if cryptic stays the course with it's T6 offerings of older T5 ships. The Hestia and Resolute both were left with gimped boff layouts. However, the Andromeda's was significantly improved... so who knows. Maybe defiant fans will get thrown a bone.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    Exactly, the original layout of Galaxy was so underwhelming, that it wasn't that hard to improve it greatly.
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,463 Arc User
    Back going back to the Yamato, I'm hoping for the best but expecting the worst.
    Stats should be revealed later today and I'm sure everyone is looking forward to that.​​
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    reyan01 wrote: »
    nikephorus wrote: »
    questerius wrote: »
    bernatk wrote: »
    Iconic ships (including Prometheus) don't need stellar stats to sell well. That's why I'm afraid of the new Defiant. But TRIBBLE or not TRIBBLE I will buy it nevertheless.

    The biggest plus for the defiant will without doubt be the visuals. Boff layout will be difficult since the phantom and pilot ships have strong intel and pilot seating thereby making it difficult to get something unique for a T6 Defiant.​​

    The current defiant's boff layout is pretty bad and I'm thinking that the t6 version won't be very good either. That is if cryptic stays the course with it's T6 offerings of older T5 ships. The Hestia and Resolute both were left with gimped boff layouts. However, the Andromeda's was significantly improved... so who knows. Maybe defiant fans will get thrown a bone.

    To be fair, where the Andromedia is concerned, that was hardly difficult ;-)

    Ha ha - true enough. The T5 Galaxy had arguably the worst boff layout in the game.

    As for the Yamato I'm wagering that the Lt tac seat becomes LtCmd. Alternatively, perhaps that Ensign Universal might be made into an Lt Universal for added flexibility. Those are my two best guesses.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • zero2362zero2362 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    the pattern with T6 upgrades seems to be take the T5 boff seats and give one of them a promotion. then just lift the T5U con layout for the T6. That being said I expect the T6 Gal X to have the same boff layout as the Andromeda with a con layout of 5/2/3 with the fleet version getting an extra tac con
    343rguu.jpg

  • zero2362zero2362 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    unless there is some form of set bonus i see no reason to use the gal x con over a plasmonic leech
    343rguu.jpg

  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,001 Arc User
    zero2362 wrote: »
    unless there is some form of set bonus i see no reason to use the gal x con over a plasmonic leech

    But not many people can afford a new one these days. For these people Cryptic introduces lots and lots of alternatives without pissing off those who own/acquired the leeches. It's all an effort to stabilize the status quo, I think.​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • zero2362zero2362 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    angrytarg wrote: »
    zero2362 wrote: »
    unless there is some form of set bonus i see no reason to use the gal x con over a plasmonic leech

    But not many people can afford a new one these days. For these people Cryptic introduces lots and lots of alternatives without pissing off those who own/acquired the leeches. It's all an effort to stabilize the status quo, I think.​​

    If the con can only be used on the ships in this set I see no reason why the con cant be as good as the leech. Even if the con was as good as the leech the leech would still be better by default because it isnt restricted to specific ships

    343rguu.jpg

  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    Leech would also probably be better since it isn't going to be locked to a CD as well, if this console has one (rather than being a passive).
  • zero2362zero2362 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    Leech would also probably be better since it isn't going to be locked to a CD as well, if this console has one (rather than being a passive).
    If it was a passive i would use the new con. As is im favoring the leech. I know the leech cant stack with other similar effects but just out of curiosity if both these cons were slotted what would happen? Does the more efficient con take priority?

    343rguu.jpg

  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    So far, every T6 ship re-release kept the same console slots and weapon arrangement as their T5-U equivalents. That should be enough to let people forget about 5 front weps or 5 tac consoles.

    Now the Lt.Comm. Tac is a possibility.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,001 Arc User
    toiva wrote: »
    So far, every T6 ship re-release kept the same console slots and weapon arrangement as their T5-U equivalents. That should be enough to let people forget about 5 front weps or 5 tac consoles.

    Now the Lt.Comm. Tac is a possibility.

    Yes, but people like to stray from that, either because they don't see the pattern or they just want to embrace in wishful thinking pig-2.gif

    To be fair though, the LTC Tac on the Andromeda came completely out of nowhere. It should have gotten a LTC Sci and the Dreadnaught could now get a LTC Tac which would make more sense.​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • sorceror01sorceror01 Member Posts: 1,042 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    toiva wrote: »
    So far, every T6 ship re-release kept the same console slots and weapon arrangement as their T5-U equivalents. That should be enough to let people forget about 5 front weps or 5 tac consoles.

    Now the Lt.Comm. Tac is a possibility.

    Yes, but people like to stray from that, either because they don't see the pattern or they just want to embrace in wishful thinking pig-2.gif

    To be fair though, the LTC Tac on the Andromeda came completely out of nowhere. It should have gotten a LTC Sci and the Dreadnaught could now get a LTC Tac which would make more sense.​​

    Actually, I feel it kinda makes sense? The Galaxy class was refit during the Dominion War, mostly to give it more weapons.
    The Lt.Cdr Tac seat could be a reflection of that.
    ".... you're gonna have a bad time."
  • asuran14asuran14 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    sorceror01 wrote: »
    angrytarg wrote: »
    toiva wrote: »
    So far, every T6 ship re-release kept the same console slots and weapon arrangement as their T5-U equivalents. That should be enough to let people forget about 5 front weps or 5 tac consoles.

    Now the Lt.Comm. Tac is a possibility.

    Yes, but people like to stray from that, either because they don't see the pattern or they just want to embrace in wishful thinking pig-2.gif

    To be fair though, the LTC Tac on the Andromeda came completely out of nowhere. It should have gotten a LTC Sci and the Dreadnaught could now get a LTC Tac which would make more sense.​​

    Actually, I feel it kinda makes sense? The Galaxy class was refit during the Dominion War, mostly to give it more weapons.
    The Lt.Cdr Tac seat could be a reflection of that.

    That or to show that starfleet began to have their officers, or the officers themselves began to focus more on tactical practices making them more adapt at their use an the tactical systems of the starships. This would equally show a increase in the tactical proformance of a starcraft by more adept an trained officers in that station's useage, also it would easily be seen as better to train in tactial operations to better defend an fight during a war since losing means many lives lost even beyond the starcraft you are on.
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    toiva wrote: »
    So far, every T6 ship re-release kept the same console slots and weapon arrangement as their T5-U equivalents. That should be enough to let people forget about 5 front weps or 5 tac consoles.

    Now the Lt.Comm. Tac is a possibility.

    Yes, but people like to stray from that, either because they don't see the pattern or they just want to embrace in wishful thinking pig-2.gif

    To be fair though, the LTC Tac on the Andromeda came completely out of nowhere. It should have gotten a LTC Sci and the Dreadnaught could now get a LTC Tac which would make more sense.​​

    I agree. That would make most sense while it would differentiate the two ships.

    I'm not sure they're gonna want to make the Galaxy-X identical to the Galaxy. And I don't see the Galaxy-X getting a Lt.Comm. Sci. So maybe make the Ensign Uni a Lieutenant? Other than that, I ran out of probable ideas.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    We will either get the Lt Tac bumped up to Lt Cmdr, or the Ensign Tac will be bumped up to Lt.

    Just being realistic here, based on years of Galaxy class neglect by Cryptic..
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    questerius wrote: »
    bernatk wrote: »
    Iconic ships (including Prometheus) don't need stellar stats to sell well. That's why I'm afraid of the new Defiant. But TRIBBLE or not TRIBBLE I will buy it nevertheless.

    The biggest plus for the defiant will without doubt be the visuals. Boff layout will be difficult since the phantom and pilot ships have strong intel and pilot seating thereby making it difficult to get something unique for a T6 Defiant.​​

    Hell, when Profits Rising came out, I said that Cryptic should have attached the Defiant / Defiant-variant skins to the Phantom and watch the money roll in. Statistically, Phantom fixed every complaint leveled about the T5 Defiant. Built in cloaking device. More robust BOFF layout. Full Intel access while still maintaining the weapons and handling of the Defiant. It just needed the damn skins. Lots of people I recall sat on the fence about the Phantom. If it had Defiant skins, LOL, they would have jumped right off!

    These days? It's just hard to top the Pilot Ships, regardless of faction.

    Still, I'd expect the T6 Defiant to sell ridiculously well. Ships from the shows and movies are half the reason why we're Star Trek fans (at least for me).
    XzRTofz.gif
  • asuran14asuran14 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    Most likely the Tier six Defiant will come out at the release or near the release of the next season, since it is based ion the same arc an quadrant the Defiant was regularly used in. So i think it will get either usage of a Lt.com or even maybe a com hybrid seat of the next new specialization to come in season just not sure what it would be. Still wishing they would make either that we can have low-seat (Ens or Lt.) hybrid seatings, or that a Universal seat can use abilities from even the specializations up to a limit maybe up to one rank below the seat's rank. That would give us more usage of the specializations, while also still making a specialization ships valuable for thier full usage of specialization abilties.
  • berginsbergins Member Posts: 3,453 Arc User
    My prediction:

    Lt Tac seat becomes LtCmdr Tac/Pilot seat. Maybe Tac/Cmd.

    I think I'm buying, regardless. I've yet to buy any C-Store ships for my non-Fed toons, and these ships look pretty good to me, so if I get the 3-pack, I basically get one for free...

    Until you consider the 3-pack'll cost the same as 3 individually priced T-5 ships... Oh well...
    "Logic is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell BAD." - Spock
  • dracounguisdracounguis Member Posts: 5,358 Arc User

    I hope it only has a Lt. Tac seat. I love the insanity that caused on the forums last time the Gal-X got refurbished. o:)

    Sometimes I think I play STO just to have something to complain about on the forums.
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    The most important part of all of this is the fact the KDF ship isn't a Klingon design. The Gal-X can go suck a plasma injector for all I care and I'm indifferent on the Ha'apax-X, but man, if the Nausi ship sells? We might see the other non-Klingon ships get T6 equivalents, or at least designs for those races.

    Imagine a Gorn Vesta, or an Orion FDC with an Eng/Tac layout... mmmm... I'm almost tempted to buy the Nausi ship just to bolster their sales figures, even if I won't use it on anyone. Except for the fact I have some semblance of fiscal sense, that is. Sure, I did that with the Mogh, but I also had a toon who ended up using it until the T6 Peghqu' dropped.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    toiva wrote: »
    So far, every T6 ship re-release kept the same console slots and weapon arrangement as their T5-U equivalents. That should be enough to let people forget about 5 front weps or 5 tac consoles.

    Now the Lt.Comm. Tac is a possibility.

    I remember some guy around here asking for a 9 weapon slot T6 Scimitar o:)

    I also remember WAYYY back when that when more 5 TAC Escorts were possible due to Delta Rising and the T5U system, a number of JHAS players demanded the Bugship upgrade into 6 TAC Consoles :D
    XzRTofz.gif
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,001 Arc User
    Confirmed:

    FLEET

    Bridge Officer Stations: 1 Lieutenant Commander Tactical, 1 Lieutenant Commander Engineering/Command, 1 Commander Engineering, 1 Lieutenant Science, 1 Ensign Universal
    Console Modifications: 4 Tactical, 5 Engineering, 2 Science

    Told ya

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9585103-star-trek-online:-yamato-dreadnought-cruiser

    Not that hard if you understand how the rules for this game work instead of having unreasonable high expectations pig-2.gif

    Looks fine to me. I won't get that one probably, or at some far point in the future for some odd reason. But I really appreciate the makeover and Monarch skins pig-1.gif​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    Hah. The console is basically a modified OsS with a 2-minute CD rather than a continuous passive.

    So it'd still be better to just replace it and the Cloak with PlasLeech if one has it and a crafted UR Conductive RCS, unless one prefers to try for a decloaking alpha-strike while missing with that lance.
  • davideightdavideight Member Posts: 460 Arc User
    to sum it up:

    its a galaxy, with +hangar and +1 tac console (compared fleet version to fleet version). and again: command ... command command command. i think its time for sth else now. cant see anymore command hybrid seats. command abilities are mostly un-usable. half of them just doesnt work. the rest is just a shieldleech and torpedo autofire. and its gets really boring to play every second ship with concentrate fire and overwhelm emmiters. i dont see what this ship brings into the game, we dont actually already have twice or tripple.

    again a nice costume wasted to a boring layout.

    if they at least would change "assault fleet"thing to be more like reinforcement squad. it would at least be a little fun to play with.
Sign In or Register to comment.