test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Vesta class screen shot

1246

Comments

  • dant158#3249 dant158 Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Oh hey, look with LCDRMiller posted on twitter....
    https://twitter.com/LCDRMiller/status/253901148854034432/photo/1/large

    I got excited and thought an equivalent KDF ship was coming out simultaneously.

    Ever in hope :(
  • digimatldigimatl Member Posts: 44 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Oh hey, look with LCDRMiller posted on twitter....
    https://twitter.com/LCDRMiller/status/253901148854034432/photo/1/large

    :eek: want. now.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Now that's a great screenshot, LCDRMiller. That paint really makes it an extraordinary ship. I love it.

    Actually, if it has at least 6 weapon slots and 3 tac console slots (which it should, right?), consider it bought, no matter what the boff slots are, how manoeuvrable it is...

    (I just hope it will still look that great on my settings.)

    EDIT: Heheh, just one more little condition: It mustn't cost more than 2500 Zen, 2000 would be great, though. :)
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    toiva wrote: »
    Now that's a great screenshot, LCDRMiller. That paint really makes it an extraordinary ship. I love it.

    Actually, if it has at least 6 weapon slots and 3 tac console slots (which it should, right?), consider it bought, no matter what the boff slots are, how manoeuvrable it is...

    (I just hope it will still look that great on my settings.)

    EDIT: Heheh, just one more little condition: It mustn't cost more than 2500 Zen, 2000 would be great, though. :)

    or if it does cost 2500 , it better be worth it :p
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    rrincy wrote: »
    or if it does cost 2500 , it better be worth it :p

    My prediction is it will. Cryptic spent extra effort on this and probably paid money out for it. The design is basically subcontracted and its outside their standard license.

    My prediction is that they'll also make it "worth it" by making it a 10 console ship that comes with multiple consoles and a set bonus.

    This thing is going to be more than the Armitage... less than the Odyssey 3 pack.

    And knowing how gimmicky the ship is, it will probably be disappointing without taking into account consoles and "must have" for Sci players when you factor in consoles.
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I'll add, I think it may be something they add an extra to, in addition to consoles, like the Regent, in order to boost demand for what I expect will be a 3000-3500 ZEN ship.

    So I'm thinking in addition to consoles, a wide angle DHC or Quad Cannon that uses one of its mod slots on an [Arc] mod. Which will draw in sales from Dreadnaught and escort captains who want the wide angle cannons.
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    will be interesting to see
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • vinru821vinru821 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Am I the only one that thinks its looks like a friggin flying tampon?
    :eek:
  • novapolaris#2925 novapolaris Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Not sure if anyone else knows this, but CBS actually gave the green light for Cryptic to use *all* of Mark Rademaker's ships, not just the Vesta. Link
  • direphoenixdirephoenix Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    theoryfive wrote: »
    Not sure if anyone else knows this, but CBS actually gave the green light for Cryptic to use *all* of Mark Rademaker's ships, not just the Vesta. Link

    Hence why I asked this way back on post #25:
    So when are we getting a Merian-class T5 Fleet Light Cruiser?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Raptr profile
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    well ' all ' is a bit redundant , since its two currently that could be used for sto , the vesta and the merian

    although the merian as a t5 light cruiser would be great
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • novapolaris#2925 novapolaris Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Hence why I asked this way back on post #25:

    Ah, okay. I missed that. I think the Merian would make a great (semi) modern replacement for the Miranda. Going by the information provided on it, it may be the first ship that isn't a shuttle to receive special engines if it were ever added to STO.
    rrincy wrote: »
    well ' all ' is a bit redundant , since its two currently that could be used for sto , the vesta and the merian

    True. Wasn't sure how else to put it.
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    he has done other ships , just not sure those are right for sto
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • mellestadstomellestadsto Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I would love the light cruiser. One of my all time favorite Trek ship designs. So sleek!
  • edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • rheatitanrheatitan Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    rrincy wrote: »
    he has done other ships , just not sure those are right for sto

    I wouldn't mind having the spirit class as a shuttle/T1 ship

    http://www.ewe-squad.com/public-nx/spiritfull.jpg
  • azniadeetazniadeet Member Posts: 1,871 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    How about ... The Norway?

    I've never heard of this one before, so I looked it up:
    http://wiki.starbase118.net/wiki/images/e/e6/Norwayclass_ship.jpg

    Damn, that's a sexy ship. Want!
  • xenovitaxenovita Member Posts: 120 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Here she is a little bigger :)https://twitter.com/LCDRMiller/status/253901148854034432/photo/1/large

    LCDRMiller, JamJamz and the entire team did an amazing job on her! We can't wait for you to see her in-game.

    Cheers,

    Brandon =/\=

    Indeed, beautiful design, just the ship I was waiting!

    :)
    Division Hispana
    www.divisionhispana.com
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    a modified version of the norway is already in game , its one of the heavy escort skins
    as for the ' saucers'
    aside from the akira , and the alternate cruiser skins , there arent any ' new' ships with saucers , starfleet has moved away from that design , they did so way back with the D
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • rheatitanrheatitan Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    rrincy wrote: »
    a modified version of the norway is already in game , its one of the heavy escort skins
    as for the ' saucers'
    aside from the akira , and the alternate cruiser skins , there arent any ' new' ships with saucers , starfleet has moved away from that design , they did so way back with the D

    I think your thinking of the steamrunner class

    http://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars/blueprints/sexton/steamrunner-class.jpg

    http://www.stowiki.org/File:Federation_Heavy_Escort_%28Zephyr%29.png
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • tebsutebsu Member Posts: 372 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    rrincy wrote: »
    love how people always assume its massive because of the shape;)
    its pretty much the same length as a sovereign

    well then let me correct my statement: this ship looks ugly because of its proportions. too thin, too long, bottom looks really weird because that deflector part is going all the way up without being level at least a few meters
    What ? Calaway.
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited October 2012
    people said very similar things when they first saw the enterprise D after being so used to the TOS enterprise ;)
    its different , not everyones going to like it, thats true of anything :)
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • rheatitanrheatitan Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    rrincy wrote: »

    oh ya forgot about the oslo class .....
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    theoryfive wrote: »
    Not sure if anyone else knows this, but CBS actually gave the green light for Cryptic to use *all* of Mark Rademaker's ships, not just the Vesta. Link

    Not quite.

    They gave Mark Rademaker the greenlight to deal with Cryptic.

    Which means Cryptic may use them. But it may mean they have to pay Rademaker a fee for each one... Which means I imagine they'd weigh it on Vesta sales and cost of in-house designs. Because it's doubtful any Rademaker ship would outsell the Vesta unless Rademaker did one HECK of a sales job or in-house staff at Cryptic was too busy/expensive.
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    My reaction?

    What, ANOTHER non-canon ship?

    How about the Ambassador class we've been asking for years to have? How about the Constellation? The Norway? Steamrunner? You know, ships that were actually in the SHOWS and FILMS?

    How about a refit system that will let us use other canon ships at higher tiers (NX/Constitution)?


    I grow weary of this "Star Trek" game that has so little actual Star Trek content in it...

    They're intentionally holding on the Ambassador. Demanding it sooner won't get it sooner and they already said yes to putting it in. They want the first Ambassador to be a certain NPC ship.
  • edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • jjumetleyjjumetley Member Posts: 281 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Don't like the design. The same was with Regent and Odyssey. I guess there are problems with balance. I realise it's difficult to design yet another ship with saucer, secondary hull and two nacelles but that just doesn't justify doing now ships at all cost.

    It's not that I don't like non-canon ships. I don't like ships that look wrong. I like the Merian class, and I like the Probert Ambassador (I hate the onscreen Ambassador).
  • corsair114corsair114 Member Posts: 276
    edited October 2012
    I hope we get the option of using the forward-swept pylon variant as well. Kinda prefer that look for the Vesta more than the rear-swept pylons.

    Oh, yeah, hey Mr. Rademaker, if you're lookin', how's that revamp of the Intrepid coming along?
Sign In or Register to comment.