Basically I moving 1 weapon forward ala Kumari, Scimitar and Avenger and adding 1 unversal slot. There is no reason why BoP should lose an ensign slot because it is all universal. Other P2W ships have universal slots too and besides ... most people slot Cmdr, Lt Cmdr for Tac, and Lt for Science and Engineering anyways.
I also made it more science oriented to allow some room for Hoh'sus (the ugly beast).
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
I do agree the upcoming raider buff, when its applied to the Raider line at a later date, will be a perfect time to offer a new KDF raider BoP for sell with better stats and a better fore/aft weapons layout.
except, of course, it isn't going to happen. They'll come out with an all-universal Federation "raider" optimized to use the new ability, and able to take the cloaking console (or with a console for Battlecloak).
and any "New" KDF raider will be "Delayed for content" indefinitely while the Romulans and the Federation get a stream of new ships.
Honestly, if they give feds such a cloak / BC raider then I am done. I am actually fine with Feds getting a raider with NO cloak but extra speed as long as KDF gets its much delayed BoP. But a Fed BoP WITH cloak (any cloak) is one too many line crossed. As Picard says, "... this far NO further ..."
I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt but I have been disappointed before.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
except, of course, it isn't going to happen. They'll come out with an all-universal Federation "raider" optimized to use the new ability, and able to take the cloaking console (or with a console for Battlecloak).
and any "New" KDF raider will be "Delayed for content" indefinitely while the Romulans and the Federation get a stream of new ships.
At that point STO will have jumped the shark, or have gone from milking the cash cow to dry humping it non-recognizable corpse.
I pray You are wrong and the Devs never cross that line just to make a buck.
At that point STO will have jumped the shark, or have gone from milking the cash cow to dry humping it non-recognizable corpse.
I pray You are wrong and the Devs never cross that line just to make a buck.
To quote Darth Vader:
"I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
Raider change comes at a "later date". So it could be next year, or it could be within a couple weeks.
And who knows? There is a chance they may come out with a new BoP with all the talk of a new kdf 5 fore weapons ship and now the Raider changes being announced.
Personally I'd be happy if I could just use the Hegh'Ta skin on any of the Fleet BoP varients.
how does the Breen raider sit as precursor to Fed raiders? the same way that the Chel Ghett sits as precursor to the Avenger.
Meaning, "not at all"? I don't see how the Chel Grett is related to the Avenger in any way, shape, or form. The Chel Grett is fat escort, in no way resembling a battlecruiser. It did not testbed any mechanics that the Avenger uses. It seems wholly unrelated.
The Feds deserve to have a ship classified as a Raider, anyway: The Failquarius, BoP Without A Cloak. It's already used to being clamped on something's butt, it may as well feature butt-hugging as a mechanic.
The devs finally give our raiders the thing they are missing, and all some here can do is whine, whine, whine. I can litterally hear the tears fall to the ground when reading some posts in this thread.
That's pretty much it.
Instead of being happy that a type of ship that didn't really get much of an upgrade when the fleet versions came into play, perhaps THE most iconic Klingon type of ship in the canon universe is getting a buff, it's all about crying and complaining that the other side could be getting something, too.
As far as cloaks are concerned, all I can see is that a potential Fed-only raider (if they're ever going to release one) could get the ability to mount the Defiant's cloak console. If they had planned to go down a different way, to grant Fed built-in or even battlecloaks, they'd surely have done so with the Avenger.
Instead of being happy that a type of ship that didn't really get much of an upgrade when the fleet versions came into play, perhaps THE most iconic Klingon type of ship in the canon universe is getting a buff, it's all about crying and complaining that the other side could be getting something, too.
As far as cloaks are concerned, all I can see is that a potential Fed-only raider (if they're ever going to release one) could get the ability to mount the Defiant's cloak console. If they had planned to go down a different way, to grant Fed built-in or even battlecloaks, they'd surely have done so with the Avenger.
Problem is that this kind of things are done in such a long time span (what is it, about 2 years since F2P?), like this vastly demanded raider buff, that when they finally come there're not many people capable to view as positively as one could.
I mean, isn't it like unappealing that to make a thing as giving a buff to something pre-existing took WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY longer than making at least 3 years worth of generic content? A simple buff.
It's like if Sony declared to make an updated version of the PS3 only AFTER having launched PS5 (and Sony infact didn't do that, but quite the opposite).... With the Cryptic this logic simply doesn't stand unless you look at economic profit that they might gain by putting out something newer than reworking something already exisiting, which anyway is not practical at all: delay a problem until you realize you screwed up enough stuff to actually take you the same effort in fixing it as when you made new content as a whole....
How does our concerns differ from all the fed ******** we hear on the forums? The whines about the Galaxy, the avenger BC, the lack of cloaking on the Breen Raider that is still unrealeased, the Defiant having a cloak console and the fact it takes up a slot, the whine about the Defiant needs a battle cloak, the newest whine that "it makes sense" the feds need a dedicated raider class?
Some of you feds are real quick to jump on the cross and point fingers at KDF concerns and complain about our voicing them when you have just as many whines about similiarly stupid stuff.
I'm just running a guess based on their track record. I could be totally off base with it, but look:
(Fed exclusive)
Avenger, has most of what the KDF, as opposed to FED, fanbase wanted in a new BC type ship, is patterend on a product-improved version of the Tor'kaht, they actually went so far as to make it a better Aux 2 Batt platform, and gave it better inertia for better handling...and classed it as a "Battle Cruiser"-a range only KDF had before that.
the Atrox and the Armitage: the Armitage matched answering desires KDF side, the Atrox was a product-improvement over the Vo'quv.
(Romulan)
T'Varo: take everything RIGHT about the B'rel, add a tac console and nifty powers, beef up hull and shields, and make it cross-faction while you release the Plas Leech in a lockbox to the feds. All that's right on a B'rel retro, includng EBC, but basically for the Fed side of the ledger and product-improved.
Meanwhile, we've gotten two gimped versions of feddie sci platforms (the gorn ships) and a 'Flagship' that's a gimped version of the Odyssey with a slight reclass-three plus years ago.
how does the Breen raider sit as precursor to Fed raiders? the same way that the Chel Ghett sits as precursor to the Avenger.
So...my bet is, if we see a 5 fore "Raider" it's going to be for the Federation, and it will have Battlecloak-maybe as a console, but it WILL have it.
Reason being, the trend is Federation gets 5 fore weapon, Rom/Fed gets 5F Weapon. KDF gets "IOU".
Romulans get new ship last quarter.
Feds get New ship last quarter.
KDF gets "IOU".
The staff's been systematically treating KDF like the beta-test for new Federation equipment for a while now, and Geko's been pretty dismissive of KDF player concerns for a while now, they're Fed-and-fed-only focused for a while now, and they've been porting capabilities either directly or indirectly to the fed side for a while now.
so...
Yeah, not only do I predict the Federation will have a Raider with Battlecloak soon, but it will be BETTER than anything KDF has. It'll be c-store, have ten consoles, all universal layout, 5 fore/2 aft weapons, .22 or better accelleration, turn rate of 20-21 base, and an inertial in the eighties to nineties, and more hull, with a shield mod in the range of .98 to 1.
The seating will probably be close to, if not identical to, the Hegh'ta, though they may give it an additional ensign.
ugh
my first thought when reading about a new raider mechanic in the breen ship was 'feds must be getting the "raider" class in some form or another, most likely the bop we have been wishing for with an escort skin'.
so yeah, i think youre right. there is no way cryptic would put any effort into anything that would primarily benefit the kdf.
as far as the feddies wondering why the kdf arent jumping for joy... well i, for one, know better. it says more about cryptics actions over the past years than it says about the kdf playerbase.
I would prefer to keep the torches and pitchforks onstandby until we know whats going on.
Things may be exactly as they appear. A breen raider for all and updates for the KDF raiders later.
If not, there is ****te all we can about it.
I would prefer to keep the torches and pitchforks onstandby until we know whats going on.
Things may be exactly as they appear. A breen raider for all and updates for the KDF raiders later.
If not, there is ****te all we can about it.
Folks...the stats haven't been posted for the Breen raider, and we don't know the exact details of the 'flanking' mechanic yet.
Let's see what it IS first, THEN deal with the details.
Remember, it won't have one of the biggest things that BoPs do: A battlecloak.
It all really does depend on how much they treated this Breen ship like a raider. Does it have a heavy or full uni layout? Is it more of a 3/3/3 mix with one extra console, or something else? 4 BOFFs or maybe even 5? Is it a 'raider' in name, but treated like an escort in stats?
Once the stats are posted later, then we can handle all that then.
I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
Folks...the stats haven't been posted for the Breen raider, and we don't know the exact details of the 'flanking' mechanic yet.
Let's see what it IS first, THEN deal with the details.
Remember, it won't have one of the biggest things that BoPs do: A battlecloak.
It all really does depend on how much they treated this Breen ship like a raider. Does it have a heavy or full uni layout? Is it more of a 3/3/3 mix with one extra console, or something else? 4 BOFFs or maybe even 5? Is it a 'raider' in name, but treated like an escort in stats?
Once the stats are posted later, then we can handle all that then.
some of the tantrums to come require warm-up exercises and drills to get back in shape first
How does our concerns differ from all the fed ******** we hear on the forums? The whines about the Galaxy, the avenger BC, the lack of cloaking on the Breen Raider that is still unrealeased, the Defiant having a cloak console and the fact it takes up a slot, the whine about the Defiant needs a battle cloak, the newest whine that "it makes sense" the feds need a dedicated raider class?
Some of you feds are real quick to jump on the cross and point fingers at KDF concerns and complain about our voicing them when you have just as many whines about similiarly stupid stuff.
There you are comparing the KDFs behaviour to that of the Feds again, trying to justify it. Bad behaviour on another factions or persons part doesn't justify ones own. It's the same kind of arguement that the TRIBBLE have been using to justify the holocaust. "Hitler wasn't soo bad, because Stalin killed a lot of people, too"
A large part of the vocal KDF community is simply eaten up with envy. They don't seem to be able to be happy for the things they get and would rather have the opposite side get something taken away, than to see both sides get the same benefit at the same time.
I for one am glad that my Hegh'ta is going to get some kind of utility and don't give a f*** if that same utility is going to be added to the Aquarius, Sabre or even a Scimitar.
I too am approaching this new Raider mechanic with a healthy dose of pessimism.
Right now we have nothing but empty words that lack any substance so we will have to take a wait and see stance has to what is to come from this new Raider Mechanic.
Like many others outside of the yet to be released Breen Raider, I hope that the Feds do not get any Raider class vessels although technically the Marquis Raiders were Federation vessels.
I just cannot see Cryptic creating a New Raider Mechanic and not giving the Federation player base multiple options of vessels to use the Mechanic with.
Maybe we will see the introduction of 2409 Marquis Raiders or the reclassification of the Defiant to a Raider class vessel :P
Has for the Breen Raider, I am hoping that it will be a useful open faction vessel .
Like others, my worries comes from wether or not the Breen Raider will be a full universal platform or not.
If it is, then I will throw up my hands and scream "DONE!" and walk away, as it would be the final nail in the coffin for the KDF being unique in any way.
Comments
R.I.P
Honestly, if they give feds such a cloak / BC raider then I am done. I am actually fine with Feds getting a raider with NO cloak but extra speed as long as KDF gets its much delayed BoP. But a Fed BoP WITH cloak (any cloak) is one too many line crossed. As Picard says, "... this far NO further ..."
I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt but I have been disappointed before.
- Judge Aaron Satie
At that point STO will have jumped the shark, or have gone from milking the cash cow to dry humping it non-recognizable corpse.
I pray You are wrong and the Devs never cross that line just to make a buck.
R.I.P
To quote Darth Vader:
"I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further."
- Judge Aaron Satie
And who knows? There is a chance they may come out with a new BoP with all the talk of a new kdf 5 fore weapons ship and now the Raider changes being announced.
Personally I'd be happy if I could just use the Hegh'Ta skin on any of the Fleet BoP varients.
The Feds deserve to have a ship classified as a Raider, anyway: The Failquarius, BoP Without A Cloak. It's already used to being clamped on something's butt, it may as well feature butt-hugging as a mechanic.
That's pretty much it.
Instead of being happy that a type of ship that didn't really get much of an upgrade when the fleet versions came into play, perhaps THE most iconic Klingon type of ship in the canon universe is getting a buff, it's all about crying and complaining that the other side could be getting something, too.
As far as cloaks are concerned, all I can see is that a potential Fed-only raider (if they're ever going to release one) could get the ability to mount the Defiant's cloak console. If they had planned to go down a different way, to grant Fed built-in or even battlecloaks, they'd surely have done so with the Avenger.
Problem is that this kind of things are done in such a long time span (what is it, about 2 years since F2P?), like this vastly demanded raider buff, that when they finally come there're not many people capable to view as positively as one could.
I mean, isn't it like unappealing that to make a thing as giving a buff to something pre-existing took WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY longer than making at least 3 years worth of generic content? A simple buff.
It's like if Sony declared to make an updated version of the PS3 only AFTER having launched PS5 (and Sony infact didn't do that, but quite the opposite).... With the Cryptic this logic simply doesn't stand unless you look at economic profit that they might gain by putting out something newer than reworking something already exisiting, which anyway is not practical at all: delay a problem until you realize you screwed up enough stuff to actually take you the same effort in fixing it as when you made new content as a whole....
Some of you feds are real quick to jump on the cross and point fingers at KDF concerns and complain about our voicing them when you have just as many whines about similiarly stupid stuff.
R.I.P
If this wasn't a rhetorical question, I'd answer, "Because the devs actually give the Federation something more than the back of their hand."
I'm sure your DPS is great, but as Kahless said, "a petaQ with high system mastery is still a petaQ." (Well, he should have said it...!)
I for one hope the new breen raider is exactly what it is, a pleasant free ship for all.
R.I.P
my first thought when reading about a new raider mechanic in the breen ship was 'feds must be getting the "raider" class in some form or another, most likely the bop we have been wishing for with an escort skin'.
so yeah, i think youre right. there is no way cryptic would put any effort into anything that would primarily benefit the kdf.
as far as the feddies wondering why the kdf arent jumping for joy... well i, for one, know better. it says more about cryptics actions over the past years than it says about the kdf playerbase.
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
Things may be exactly as they appear. A breen raider for all and updates for the KDF raiders later.
If not, there is ****te all we can about it.
R.I.P
i may win lotto tomorrow too.
free jkname
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
Let's see what it IS first, THEN deal with the details.
Remember, it won't have one of the biggest things that BoPs do: A battlecloak.
It all really does depend on how much they treated this Breen ship like a raider. Does it have a heavy or full uni layout? Is it more of a 3/3/3 mix with one extra console, or something else? 4 BOFFs or maybe even 5? Is it a 'raider' in name, but treated like an escort in stats?
Once the stats are posted later, then we can handle all that then.
some of the tantrums to come require warm-up exercises and drills to get back in shape first
If you do your responsible for buying the pitchforks and torches if this gets noisy.
I'll bring beer.
R.I.P
I bring the loud speakers.
There might be someone who would want them >.>
There you are comparing the KDFs behaviour to that of the Feds again, trying to justify it. Bad behaviour on another factions or persons part doesn't justify ones own. It's the same kind of arguement that the TRIBBLE have been using to justify the holocaust. "Hitler wasn't soo bad, because Stalin killed a lot of people, too"
A large part of the vocal KDF community is simply eaten up with envy. They don't seem to be able to be happy for the things they get and would rather have the opposite side get something taken away, than to see both sides get the same benefit at the same time.
I for one am glad that my Hegh'ta is going to get some kind of utility and don't give a f*** if that same utility is going to be added to the Aquarius, Sabre or even a Scimitar.
Right now we have nothing but empty words that lack any substance so we will have to take a wait and see stance has to what is to come from this new Raider Mechanic.
Like many others outside of the yet to be released Breen Raider, I hope that the Feds do not get any Raider class vessels although technically the Marquis Raiders were Federation vessels.
I just cannot see Cryptic creating a New Raider Mechanic and not giving the Federation player base multiple options of vessels to use the Mechanic with.
Maybe we will see the introduction of 2409 Marquis Raiders or the reclassification of the Defiant to a Raider class vessel :P
Has for the Breen Raider, I am hoping that it will be a useful open faction vessel .
If it is, then I will throw up my hands and scream "DONE!" and walk away, as it would be the final nail in the coffin for the KDF being unique in any way.