test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

New tactical Warbirds, Opinions?

johankreigjohankreig Member Posts: 449 Arc User
edited September 2013 in Romulan Discussion
Ok so what are peoples opinions on this new ship, I got them yesterday to give me an alternative to my Adapted destroyer, at first I was a bit disapointed, they seemed a bit squishy, I tested in private pvp and found its fairly useless in the set up i have, however it shines in PVE, i re armed it for a cannon loadout and wow, its still squishy, and will melt under fire, but my AD is the same, the addition of the battle cloak and singluarity more than makes up for this, after a bit of testing and getting used to it, I find its an excelent escort, does some serious damage with the 2 set and the quads are just as daft as the others, the final fun peice it has is the Death Ray, similar to the Garumba, Klingon Bus, and Fed Dred, it has a powefull energy beam attack that if used right can shred a target.

Over all i am loving this ship, tho forgot to put my valdore console on it so will be changing that later and see if that helps its performance, I am interested in seeing what others are thinking to this ship.
Jorhana Kreig: KDF, Tal'is: Romulan Fed, Shona'a: Romulan KDF, Johan Paul Kreig: Fed
Post edited by johankreig on
«134

Comments

  • Options
    baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    i think it is a nice escort, no doubt. But at this point there is no real reason for me to change my mogai or dhelan in favour of this new ship.

    as i wrote in 2 other posts already, the ship lacks a fifth tac console OR 5 forward weapons to set it appart from the 3 (or 4) other tactical warbirds (escort like romulan ships)
    Go pro or go home
  • Options
    lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,825 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    johankreig wrote: »
    Ok so what are peoples opinions on this new ship, I got them yesterday to give me an alternative to my Adapted destroyer, at first I was a bit disapointed, they seemed a bit squishy, I tested in private pvp and found its fairly useless in the set up i have, however it shines in PVE, i re armed it for a cannon loadout and wow, its still squishy, and will melt under fire, but my AD is the same, the addition of the battle cloak and singluarity more than makes up for this, after a bit of testing and getting used to it, I find its an excelent escort, does some serious damage with the 2 set and the quads are just as daft as the others, the final fun peice it has is the Death Ray, similar to the Garumba, Klingon Bus, and Fed Dred, it has a powefull energy beam attack that if used right can shred a target.

    Over all i am loving this ship, tho forgot to put my valdore console on it so will be changing that later and see if that helps its performance, I am interested in seeing what others are thinking to this ship.

    I have two questions...one is which ship exactly do you refer to as the klingon *bus*? I only recall the guramba having a beam of death. Second is if you have access to the Reman skins with the ship?

    I been trying to find out if the ship has them since it didn't on tribble but haven't gotten any answer so far.
  • Options
    potatobob7potatobob7 Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Yes, you can use the Reman skins on it.
  • Options
    corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Funny, I must be the only player to not think that the quad cannons are useless.

    The phaser and disruptor variants have always worked quite well for me. Will be trying the plasmas when I buy my Ar'kiff later today. Then again, I don't now and never will PvP so maybe that accounts for the general attitude towards them.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • Options
    stoutesstoutes Member Posts: 4,219 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    The problem with quads, is that they take a bit of power from engines, and causes an extra drop in weapon power (when other weapons are fired as well). And yeah, extra engine power == extra speed defense.
  • Options
    royalsovereignroyalsovereign Member Posts: 1,344 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Well, I picked up the Ar'kala yesterday, outfitted him with stuff I had in my inventory and jumped into the Rhi missions. It definitely made short work of the Elachi - carved thru the Monbosh like it was butter. I kinda feel like going back to the Last Stand mission that took me over an hour in my D'D and see how this bird handles it.
    "You Iconians just hung a vacancy sign on your asses and my foot's looking for a room!"
    --Red Annorax
  • Options
    royalsovereignroyalsovereign Member Posts: 1,344 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    stoutes wrote: »
    The problem with quads, is that they take a bit of power from engines, and causes an extra drop in weapon power (when other weapons are fired as well). And yeah, extra engine power == extra speed defense.
    Now *this* explains a lot - to date the only escorts I've used are the Fed Advanced (and Mirror Advanced) and a couple of BoPs on red side. I felt like this ship was a bit sluggish in comparison, but never having used quads before I didn't think about the engine drain.
    "You Iconians just hung a vacancy sign on your asses and my foot's looking for a room!"
    --Red Annorax
  • Options
    corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    One thing I find annoying is, the 30 inertia rating. STO uses that rating backwards of how it should be. The Dhelan with a base 450 crew is at least ~30 to 50% larger than the new Ar'kiff and has a 70 inertia. The new Ar'kiff has an inertia rating of 30,... you have to spend your 2 engineering slots for RCS to make it move, instead of armor,...

    Lower inertia rating SHOULD be faster, with responsiveness decreasing as the rating rises,...
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • Options
    gonjaagonjaa Member Posts: 126 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I found the Singularity drain/+res console from the Dhelan works with this ship which I find has good synergy with the tactical warbirds retrofit console.

    I like the ship a lot on my Sci VA since I can get a bit more firepower out of it when I need it with Annihilation mode while still keeping LtC and Lt. Sci slots for CC.

    This is mostly eSTF's though, I haven't flown it in pvp yet.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    rickdias5500rickdias5500 Member Posts: 95 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Omg, Omg, Omg, a Romulan pwe-pwe TAC boat.

    All sarcasm aside. really another Roumlain TAC ship. OK a so called " class" of boats that seams to be a bit TAC heavy to begin with ( how many little green crumpley fireworks shows have we had seen May of this year, be honest). War birds are either honky large monsters that won't hold together unless you really know what you are doing , or little itty-bittie target practice pop boats that are one torpedo hit away form a quick light show. Another boat with this same layout dose not help things. In the last day i have seen a few show up in the game . I have to say "no i won't buy it i have bought enough". The ones that were offered from the start were ones that either made sense story wise, or were ones that i wanted to use that were in the game from the get-go as NPC\S. What is offed with them dose not sweeten the sale neither. Some silly quad plasma cannons . No , i have tons of quad phase and disruptor tweet tweet cannons taking up space on ships that i don't use or in bank slots. I don't have need for any need for any more.They are just quads of a different flavor , and for dam sure not plasma.
  • Options
    hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    It's a good ship. Not a great one, but a good one.

    My analysis of said ship:

    Relatively solid overall, with a good console layout and good base stats. There isn't really anything that makes the ship stand out, even with the gimmick console and the quad cannons. Her hull, turn and shields are equivalent to the Federation Patrol Escort/KDF Qin Heavy Raptor. Her inertia is fine, giving her quite good kicks when she needs it. She also has the Romulan BC which gives her great ambush potential, like most Romulan Warbirds. Appearance-wise, she's beautiful, like most of the new Romulan ships, and with the Reman skin, she's downright sexy.

    As for her weapon layout, it's typical escort, so nothing new or amazing there. Her BOff layout is where things get a little wonky though. She only has an Ens Engineering BOff slot, which almost forces you to put your LtCmdr Universal to Engineering, just for survivability, OR put it to Sci and try to survive off of the weaker (but still very effective overall) HoTs.

    Her combat capability is middle of the road. Not horribly impressive, but not really lacking. Her Tactical Slots, weapon layout, and BOff layout give her a playstyle (at least tactically) like most escorts, but you need to be careful what you put in the LtCmdr Universal.

    My final assessment:

    6/10. An aesthetically pleasing, balanced ship overall, but some glaring weaknesses that eclipse her strengths.

    As Baudl said, there is no reason to switch to this ship from any of the other plethora of tactically heavy vessels. If I had this ship or my Ha'feh (freebie)/Mogai/Scimitar, I would stick with the Ha'feh/Mogai/Scimitar. There is no incentive really to use this.

    As for the Cmdr version? Gold. Solid gold. A great alternative to the D'deridex, with a wonderful BOff and console layout, and great stats as well.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • Options
    psyburnstarspsyburnstars Member Posts: 14
    edited September 2013
    I give the the ship a solid 8/10 overall. I've been running the ship since yesterday, and I've been very satisfied with its performance just running run of the mill gears on it. The only drawback (and its not a big one to me) is the boff setup. I think the easiest way to fix that would be to make the lt science slot a universal slot as well. That way, you could have more diverse boff layouts with this ship. However, the boff layout isn't a game killer for me in anyway and I've done while well running engineering the universal slot. I'm awaiting the fleet version of this ship, and I hope that they add either a 5th tac console or a 3rd engineering console and make that boff layout change (though I doubt that'll happen). I think that would make this warbird standout from the others.
  • Options
    ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I dont understand the ship at all. It has destroyer size, inertia, and BOFF seating, with escort turn-rate and hull strength. Its too weak to be a destroyer like the Mogai, too ungainly to dogfight like the T'varo, and the Dhelan is better as an all-around escort. Seems like it was released because something had to carry the quad cannons.
  • Options
    davidwforddavidwford Member Posts: 1,836 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Looking over the base stats, it is an escort-ish ship at T4. People were whineing and complaining about the D'Deridex as being too slow and clumsy. The programers solved that little complaint with this ship. I'm not upset at having another ship if only for more variety of ship flying around.
  • Options
    chrystofer10chrystofer10 Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I am confused I got the ar'kif tactical warbird retrofit and I am missing the Quad Plasma Cannons, when I am looking at my status (my fore and aft weapons)? they aren't listed?
  • Options
    vonhellstingvonhellsting Member Posts: 543 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    For me it's a good fit not too slow but strong enough to take a few hits and it has a reasonably good looking model to boot.
    The Lobi Crystals are Faaaakkkkee!
  • Options
    lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,825 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I am confused I got the ar'kif tactical warbird retrofit and I am missing the Quad Plasma Cannons, when I am looking at my status (my fore and aft weapons)? they aren't listed?

    You need to buy the Ar'Kala for the quad cannons.

    http://sto.gamepedia.com/Ar%27Kala_Tactical_Warbird
  • Options
    hasukurobihasukurobi Member Posts: 1,421 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I guess I will just reiterate what many have said here.

    This ship LOOKS good on pure appearance and seems to be what we had wished the D'Deridex was from the onset.

    As far as the performance though... It has a lot of Competition that outshines it. The Valor, especially the Fleet one, the Fleet Dhelan, the Fleet T'Varo, and the Vet ship all are superior to this ship.

    Losing subsystem power is harsh on Romulans so if you want to use Annihilator mode you are really weakening your already flimsy tank. Taking away your Singularity Powers to use the beam further aggravates this problem and in PvP the chances of keeping a target in line with that beam are slim to none. In PvE the beam is decent but it is not going to be enough to really make the ship better than the others listed.

    Quad Cannons are also a big problem because they suck down too much energy and destroy your engine power which ultimate slows you down and makes you turn worse which is extremely unwanted on this ship.

    So basically... It looks beautiful and has a decent layout but its tricks are not that great and if you do not want those then there are a lot of other options which are blatantly superior.
  • Options
    potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I picked up the ship, I've only tested her a bit in PVE and am satisfied with her.

    But then I don't find the Mogai or Dhelan attractive at all, so have just been usind the Fleet T'varo. I also picked up the scimitar 3-pack which I am still coming to terms with.

    This new ship I find very appealing as an alternate to my T'varo.

    Next to the D'D which is beautiful but unplayable, and the T'varo which is the perfect little Romulan hot rod, I think this new ship is the most visually appealing. Same console choices as the Advanced Escort is fine with me.

    My only complaint at all is that if she is the tactical Warbird, what does that make l the other?

    I would have perfered something more along the lines of Klingon battle Cruiser with a Romulan twist.

    But perhaps at some point we will get a Romulan companion to the Kamarang, as a science battle cruiser would be sufficiently Romulan.

    At any rate I am sure I will enjoy her.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • Options
    royalsovereignroyalsovereign Member Posts: 1,344 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    hasukurobi wrote: »
    As far as the performance though... It has a lot of Competition that outshines it. The Valor, especially the Fleet one, the Fleet Dhelan, the Fleet T'Varo, and the Vet ship all are superior to this ship.
    So several Fleet T5.5 ships are better than this ship? Say it ain't so! I guess we should all ragequit right now! ;)

    Which one are we talking about? Better than the T4 with the quad cannon? Or better than the T5 Retrofit?

    I bought one yesterday, because its a beauty, and I had the zen sitting there that I'd bought on sale. I don't care that it doesn't pwn in PvP. Not all of us give a fig about PvP.
    "You Iconians just hung a vacancy sign on your asses and my foot's looking for a room!"
    --Red Annorax
  • Options
    stofskstofsk Member Posts: 1,744 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    The Ar'kala skin looks magnificent, and I remember it handled well on Tribble. The only thing I'm not sure about is whether it will replace my Mogai or T'Varo. I'll probably get the Ar'kala at least as I have a 2nd character to level.

    I'm also waiting to see what the Fleet version looks like too. I can see this ship being used as a sciscort, but the T'Varo does that better. The Lt.Commdr universal slot only seems to work for eng or sci boffs. The mogai can support a aux2batt build pretty comfortably. On the other hand, the Ar'kala looks better than the mogai :3
  • Options
    johankreigjohankreig Member Posts: 449 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    mine is quite durable, depends on how you equip it, its easily as good as my adapted destroyer, the plasma damage boost is handy as is the beam, I am only set up for pve, but so far its destroying borg, tholians and what ever gets sent against the starbase. its more durable than any of its predecessor's and its consoles make it very viable, the quads are just what I expected, as a cannon boat its got god turn even with its inertia rating, and is on par I would say, with the multi vector escort which I also have.
    Jorhana Kreig: KDF, Tal'is: Romulan Fed, Shona'a: Romulan KDF, Johan Paul Kreig: Fed
  • Options
    corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Given it's stats, I see the Ar'kiff being at least as durable as a non-Fleet T'Varo, and I don't hear many complaints about those,...

    The Retrofit Ar'kiff has the same basic stats as the Dhelan Retrofit in strength and such, and no one TRIBBLE about it much either, so,... I think some people just like to complain.

    The exception to the above is of course turn/inertia rates, and Boff layout which is expected.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Existing Romulan C-Store ships are superior. Boff & Console arrangements are very poor. Not to mention the other C-Store Warbirds offer better performance if you want a specific style.

    You want traditional high Cmdr / LtCdr TAC stations? Regular Ha'feh is superior

    You want a destroyer with Cmdr TAC & LtCdr ENG stations? The c-store Mogai is superior.

    You want a ESC-SCI? The c-store Dhelan is superior.

    This new ship is outclassed already by existing warbirds. Your performance will drop even more when you stuff the Plasma Quad Cannons.

    Quad Cannons, all types, not only drop weapon energy, but engine energy also. That alone is a dealbreaker for me. Also, Quad Cannons also have [dmg]x4 mods. The absolute worst mods you can have on any weapon possible, x4. If you want "pew" with cannons and can swing narrow arc weapons around easily, DHCs are still superior. And DHCs will not nerf your ENG power while firing.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    f8explorer#7814 f8explorer Member Posts: 1,328 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    recon2130 wrote: »
    Saw a couple of the new ships in STFs and other events last night. They look good but thats about all they are good for from the looks of it. Kept my engineering skills busy thats for sure trying to keep them alive!

    I swear there is a bug that allows the hull to take major hits and melt away even with full shields.
    Joint Forces Commander ... / ... proud member of ... boq botlhra'ghom / AllianceCenCom!
    " We stand TOGETHER and fight with HONOR!"

    U.S.S. Maelstrom, NCC-71417 (Constitution III-class/flagship) --- Fleet Admiral Hauk' --|-- Dahar Master Hauk --- I.K.S. qu'In 'an bortaS (D7-class / flagship)
  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    genhauk wrote: »
    I swear there is a bug that allows the hull to take major hits and melt away even with full shields.

    Probably a simple case of the player not using the LtCdr Universal station on ENG. EPTS gone, go bye bye when under fire in an STF.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    doffingcomradedoffingcomrade Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    It's uninspiring and inflexible. It's not BAD, being that it's the same as one of the common Temporal Destroyer layouts, but it's not offering anything Romulans don't have. The Universal station is a fake choice: You really can't use it for anything other than Engi, unless you want a paper plane. We saw how well that worked out for the Kumari. Unlike the versatility of most of the other Romulan warbirds, this one has a complete lack of flexibility and a locked-in layout as a result of Fake Uni Choice. It's a firmly mediocre ship, and in the world of Romulan OPness, Mediocre = TRIBBLE.

    Plus, it has no fleet version, because apparently copypasting a fleet version was too much work. Between the Dhelan and the Mogwai, you can easily get a better ship in fleet-level flavor.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    hasukurobihasukurobi Member Posts: 1,421 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    So several Fleet T5.5 ships are better than this ship? Say it ain't so! I guess we should all ragequit right now! ;)

    Which one are we talking about? Better than the T4 with the quad cannon? Or better than the T5 Retrofit?

    I bought one yesterday, because its a beauty, and I had the zen sitting there that I'd bought on sale. I don't care that it doesn't pwn in PvP. Not all of us give a fig about PvP.

    I am talking about the lvl 50 ship using both the Quads and its console. So basically using the full set on the end level ship.

    Also I am not talking about just PvP. It also does not really shine in PvE by comparison to most of its realistic competition. (Not even getting into the Scimitar here...)

    However, it is not "Bad" it just is not particularly "Good". Meaning that if you want the best ship that is reasonably affordable then this is not really it. If you already have the other ships then this still loses. If you are fine with it being a bit less than stellar but still functional and truly love the looks (which are beautiful) then it is fine.

    corelogik wrote: »
    Given it's stats, I see the Ar'kiff being at least as durable as a non-Fleet T'Varo, and I don't hear many complaints about those,...

    The Retrofit Ar'kiff has the same basic stats as the Dhelan Retrofit in strength and such, and no one TRIBBLE about it much either, so,... I think some people just like to complain.

    The exception to the above is of course turn/inertia rates, and Boff layout which is expected.

    It only suffers from Tank and Output issues when using its Quads and Console especially when compared to the Fleet T'Varo (Come on... They are one of the easiest to get), Fleet Dhelan (Nearly the same ease), and even the Vet Ship (Hard to get or easy depending).

    genhauk wrote: »
    I swear there is a bug that allows the hull to take major hits and melt away even with full shields.

    1) Low Shield power = Low Resistance

    2) There is, discharge your shuttlecraft. If you don't you can sometimes end up taking damage to the shuttle's hull somehow and that really screws up your tank.
  • Options
    lsloan31lsloan31 Member Posts: 49 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Frankly, these ships were not needed. Congrats Cryptic for coming out with these 'tactical'ships in the faction that is already stuffed with 'tactical' ships. Could have been a great opportunity to throw some slightly more engineering/science orientated ships into the mix but you stuck to type since this is a DPS game nowadays.

    And even then as most have already pointed out, they don't even offer anything new over T'Varos, Dhelans and Mogais!
Sign In or Register to comment.