test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Scimitar post-dev blog reactions (Feedback)

13468911

Comments

  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    msk5 wrote: »
    We're talking about the first in a new breed of ships in STO,

    Ehm, nope, we are talking about the 5th 5000 Zen 3-pack.:rolleyes:
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • matrix0matrix0 Member Posts: 261 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    gaalom wrote: »
    You want to put in a ship thats op fine, but this is too far. For several months players have been telling you the cruiser needed a dps upgrade. So what do you do? You do nothing! Then you bring out this Scimitar with 5 forward weapon slots? What the hell.

    To add insult to injury escorts do not even get five forward weapon slots, and you have it a base turn rate higher then the Galaxy, the Bortas, Odyssey, and D'deridex class. To make matters worse this ship is supposed to be way bigger then any of those classes.

    The Scimitar class starship needs to be nerfed before release. To a base turn rate of 4 to 5, especially given its size. It also needs its weapon slots reduced to four forward or four aft. If you want to have five forward weapon slots. Then add that to all tier 5 class star ships. Special consoles are one thing but this goes way beyond that. You are not even pretending to balance this ship.

    After all the complaining about the Galaxy Dreadnought, and Galaxy class starships needing better turn rate, you do this?

    Too many weird and worrisome players nowadays. Scim hasn't been released/tested, and yet everyone1 seems so transfixed. We all know that stats description isnt always true. Moreover, there is a small print that says the devs reserve the right to modify it.

    So unless the ship is released and tested... there is no point of over reacting or worry. Well, theta console seems like a super dmg dealer for STF gates... but I don't think it will ever hit anything in pvp. It's more like a sitting duck console in pvp to me.
  • voicesdarkvoicesdark Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    4 consoles and the helmsman trait will put this thing at a minimum persistent turn rate of 16.7 not even factoring in the additional amount from evasive, cloak, etc.

    Effectively this thing could easily become an escort if built right.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ussweatherlightussweatherlight Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    What on earth are you talking about?

    We don't even know how the thing will perform yet. Anyone dumb enough to use the thaleron pulse deserves what they get as well.
    _____________________________________________

    "Second star on the right, and straight on till morning."

    U.S.S. Weatherlight
  • captainwestbrookcaptainwestbrook Member Posts: 224 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Actions speak louder than words. Just buy it if you love it. Don't need to speak up, bank statements speak for themselves :P
    Join www.UFPlanets.com
    5 FED Fleets | 3 KDF Fleets - T5 Colony on both factions
    Mack.png
  • nakedcrooknakedcrook Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    gaalom wrote: »
    You want to put in a ship thats op fine, but this is too far. For several months players have been telling you the cruiser needed a dps upgrade. So what do you do? You do nothing! Then you bring out this Scimitar with 5 forward weapon slots? What the hell.

    To add insult to injury escorts do not even get five forward weapon slots, and you have it a base turn rate higher then the Galaxy, the Bortas, Odyssey, and D'deridex class. To make matters worse this ship is supposed to be way bigger then any of those classes.

    The Scimitar class starship needs to be nerfed before release. To a base turn rate of 4 to 5, especially given its size. It also needs its weapon slots reduced to four forward or four aft. If you want to have five forward weapon slots. Then add that to all tier 5 class star ships. Special consoles are one thing but this goes way beyond that. You are not even pretending to balance this ship.

    After all the complaining about the Galaxy Dreadnought, and Galaxy class starships needing better turn rate, you do this?

    Your PRECIOUS escorts have been Cryptic's wife, secret lover, and vegas wife since STO day 1.

    You are whining and complaining about the Scimitar having five forward weapons...but I doubt you even batted an eye at the Andorian Escort

    You Escort fanboys, who think that Escorts should be the be all and end all of power, performance, domination, and winning is what is wrong with STO. It is alright for the escorts to have 5 forward weapon slots...but not a cruiser, or, heaven forbid, the mighty Scimitar.

    I hope the Scimitar literally bends the the word "ESCORT" over and pummels it until the escort doesn't even have to push anymore. It would serve the escort kiddies their just come-uppins.


    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Bluegeek
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    If you oppose the Reputation nerf, feel free to use my signature
  • gaalomgaalom Member Posts: 531 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This is not worrying, this is not complaining this is simply wrong. They do not give the defiant a battle cloak, they do not give the Galaxy class Dreadnought a better turn rate, they do not give the galaxy class a better turn rate. Now why do you think that is? Its called balance. You can troll me all you want, and claim I am worrying or that I am simply complaining. This is no where near balanced to other tier 5 cruisers. If you do not believe that, I suggest you start looking at those ships and compare them to this thing. Another thing why was it that the spinal lance of the Galaxy class Dreadnought was nerfed? It was consider to be too op. You are really going to sit there and tell everyone in sto its balanced compared to other cruisers.

    As far as the Andorian escort goes bud I do not fly ships that do not belong in this timeline of star trek.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I think they have other things on their mind, like whether the ship is OP, UP, or has enough hangars.

    Also, I think there's a simple in-universe explanation why it doesn't have a "perfect cloak": technology has developed a lot since "Nemesis" and a cloak that was once "perfect" might now be "regular".
  • yomatofanyomatofan Member Posts: 90 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Completely true... Cruisers have been gimped on the Federation side for MONTHS. The only Cruisers worth a damn in this game now are the Sovereign and Excelsior (Just as Geko likes it with his constant hard on for the Excelsior, a 120 year old obsolete ship)

    I think it just comes down to this...

    The Federation are not the focus of the game anymore, pretty soon they will end up as neglected as the Klingons in favor for the Romulans because of LoR. We all knew this would happen, Cryptic are unable to do things for more then one faction at a time... They've never been able to balance these ships either.

    Some at Cryptic LOVES the Scimitar, if you get what I mean. Its the Excelsior-fest all over again...
  • wufangchuwufangchu Member Posts: 778 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    To hell with your balance. learn to use tactics and stratagems. You dont think lifes fair? Too bad, it isnt. Get used to it. The scimitar had to be heavily nerfed just to get it into the game.. the original scimitar WAS OP.. Way OP.. And compared to existing ships, its just mediocre now.. we'll get our first real look at it in eight and a half hours. till then lets save the judgements of what it can and cannot do, and put this stupid argument in the trash where it belongs.
    wraith_zps7pzgamff.jpg
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    i'm not really impressed with the Scimitar stats... at best it's very a good PvE ship, but in PvP it will be dominated by the likes of the Jem'hadar Attack Ships and Fed Escorts due to the Scimitar low to mediocre Eng console slots and inferior turn rate, and don't think the Scimitar 3 piece Uni consoles bonuses will save u, because i promise u it won't... it's just another tier 5 zen store ship thats gonna be put down with the wind in PvP.

    So better off for Rommie players to stick with the T'varo and Dhelan retrofits and Ha'feh classes if they wanna fight in PvP.
  • burstdragon323burstdragon323 Member Posts: 853 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    So, now we have another Tac-Heavy ship for the romulans.

    Cryptic, STOP TRIBBLE SCIENCE.

    We have THREE Science vessels. THREE.

    There are enough combat vessels. Release some science vessels to add some balance.

    NOTE: Any comments that say "Use X ship" will be ignored. This is a thread about ships, not gameplay.
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    NOTE: Any comments that say "Use X ship" will be ignored. This is a thread about ships, not gameplay.

    So it's a thread about ships, but you say we can't recommend another ship?

    Here's your answer. Cryptic isn't TRIBBLE science. You have a ship with 5 sci consoles and a Ltcmdr and Lt Sci. How is that "TRIBBLE science"? Why did you imagine the Scimitar as anything other than tactical?
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • gypsybladegypsyblade Member Posts: 730 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    How are science captains getting shafted.....

    They aren't required to fly a science ship.....
  • aexraelaexrael Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    NOTE: Any comments that say "Use X ship" will be ignored. This is a thread about ships, not gameplay

    So if it isn't about "gameplay", your point is entirely irrelevant. If you are simply after ships for aesthetics you are in for a surprise as gameplay takes precedence.
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    yeah well as heretick said: 5 sci consoles (on one variant) 2 to 6 possible sci boff stations...just hard to understand where this ship variant is not sci heavy.

    where there's a new ship there is one that will complain...allways.


    also, gypsiblade is absolutely right. Where does it say sci captains are allowed only sci ships. personally i find the sci ship/sci captain combo rather weak compared to the other 2 combos.


    anyway, another random rant with very little facts to support it.
    Go pro or go home
  • erei1erei1 Member Posts: 4,081 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Everytime a new ship is released, a lot of people start whining "the ship is op". They'll stop sooner or later, once they release it's not op. Or once another ship is released, and they have something else to bash.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • captainwestbrookcaptainwestbrook Member Posts: 224 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Wait, were you expecting the Scimitar to be a Science Dreadnought?
    Join www.UFPlanets.com
    5 FED Fleets | 3 KDF Fleets - T5 Colony on both factions
    Mack.png
  • smokeybacon90smokeybacon90 Member Posts: 2,252 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    The Tulwar looks like a dream Science Vessel. The Lt Cmdr Uni gives you so many options.
    NOTE: Any comments that say "Use X ship" will be ignored. This is a thread about ships, not gameplay.

    This is a sig worthy one-liner. Ignore comments about ships because this is a thread about ships? :rolleyes:
    EnYn9p9.jpg
  • gaalomgaalom Member Posts: 531 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Stupid arguments are you kidding me, can you prove me wrong on what I just said about the Defiant, Galaxy class, and Galaxy class dreadnought?

    This is a post about an opinion I have, and the stats as it sits right now says this ship trumps all current cruisers out there. Life isnt fair? Making one hell of an assumption about my life.

    As it stands I could say more but Ill wait and see what happens for now.
  • stongbadsstongbads Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    One hangar bay is lame and is an extreme slap to the face. What next? They're going to require your to own every Romulan ship and be a Lifetime member in order to purchase the single drone fighter for it? So the Romulan shipwrights couldn't figure out how to cram in a second hangar bay in a ship the size of DS9?
  • begeracbegerac Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Best part is...how the hell they are able to fire ultra doom fire mode of green lights without warpcore to power it? Instead we have singularity core, and it should not be able to power up Thalaron Weapon. Where the pup Robin? I mean where is Thalaron Core Cryptic?
  • linkjoylinkjoy Member Posts: 60 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Waaaaaaaaaaa!! (Toys get thrown out of the pram!) Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaaa! I want my mummy! Waaaaaaa!

    http://i.stack.imgur.com/jiFfM.jpg

    Original Poster I want to welcome you to most of the responses you get. Because there are 40 year olds who act like 12 year olds if you dare insult the almighty Cryptic!

    Original Poster, I agree with you. See what Cryptic is doing (and what most MMO's do eventually) is instead of fixing things, or improving on other such items in the game, is push out content to make the quickest buck possible.

    I have been playing MMO's for 15 years (since EQ1 days) and when this starts to happen, it means the game is failing. I have seen it, and at this point you either keep playing with the current bad company just pushing new content and not caring about fixing, or just stop playing, vote with you wallet and end it.

    I have. I just like to check the forums from time to time now to see the trolls, since when you don't agree with the massess they Either

    A) Laugh at you
    B) Do what this guy does, whine that you whined.
  • mewmaster101mewmaster101 Member Posts: 1,239 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    begerac wrote: »
    Best part is...how the hell they are able to fire ultra doom fire mode of green lights without warpcore to power it? Instead we have singularity core, and it should not be able to power up Thalaron Weapon. Where the pup Robin? I mean where is Thalaron Core Cryptic?

    The scimitar in the movie used a singularity core as far as we know, the thalaron radiation was only used for the cannon and not to power the ship

    BTW, technically they are called singularity warp cores. the only difference between the two types is that one uses a small singularity to power it, the other uses matter/anti-matter. While the Anti-matter warp cores seem more powerful, the singularity warp cores can apparently be used as a weapon without damaging the ship in any way.

    on-topic: I Love the Scimitars design, always have since i saw the movie. I am very tempted to buy it, if only because of the design and nothing else.
  • alopenalopen Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    mimey2 wrote: »
    Plus, as it said in the article, it apparently also allows the bonus turn because of battle cloak to last for as long as the de-cloaking bonus. Meaning, it'll be able to turn really well for the time of the extra buff if you de-cloak to attack. Plus the normal bonuses of de-cloaking.

    Can't think of a bigger reason for a ship to cloak in and out constantly than for a big huge cruiser to keep the turn bonus up as long as possible. Makes this thing scream for Reman boffs. ;)
  • marikaoniki1marikaoniki1 Member Posts: 85 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    gaalom wrote: »
    You want to put in a ship thats op fine, but this is too far. For several months players have been telling you the cruiser needed a dps upgrade. So what do you do? You do nothing! Then you bring out this Scimitar with 5 forward weapon slots? What the hell.

    To add insult to injury escorts do not even get five forward weapon slots, and you have it a base turn rate higher then the Galaxy, the Bortas, Odyssey, and D'deridex class. To make matters worse this ship is supposed to be way bigger then any of those classes.

    The Scimitar class starship needs to be nerfed before release. To a base turn rate of 4 to 5, especially given its size. It also needs its weapon slots reduced to four forward or four aft. If you want to have five forward weapon slots. Then add that to all tier 5 class star ships. Special consoles are one thing but this goes way beyond that. You are not even pretending to balance this ship.

    After all the complaining about the Galaxy Dreadnought, and Galaxy class starships needing better turn rate, you do this?

    I don't really have the energy to pick apart your complaint, and the fact that you and people like you constantly say how every ship Cryptic introduces these days is "overpowered" before it even gets into the game


    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~Bluegeek
  • kaltoumkaltoum Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    This is very acceptable...

    To romulans i mean :D
    Once upon a time in galaxy far far away......
  • ajma420ajma420 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Emergency, Emergency, call the Wambulance!

    The scimitar IS OP, but only because of the consoles. The 5/3 weapons slotting is acceptable as the Andorian Escorts have a 5/2 setup (forgot about those did you?). The turn rate is appropriate for its hull strength - 40k - as my kar'fi has a turn rate of 7 and a hull of 38k. The ship isn't THAT enormous - slightly larger a Ha'apax. I think the stats are completely acceptable for this ship.

    Stop complaining and just grind the 5000 zen to get it
    Light Speed! - No, light speed is too slow. We need LUDICROUS SPEED!

    Ajma420 - Lv 50 Tac - Pride of the Federation
    Catherine The Great - Lv 50 Tac - Pride of the Empire
    Vladimir - Lv 50 Tac - Pride of the Rihannsu Empire
  • futurepastnowfuturepastnow Member Posts: 3,660 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Cruisers don't need a DPS upgrade. You need to learn how to make a proper Aux to Batt build and enjoy the era of the 12+k cruiser that some of us live in.
  • kaltoumkaltoum Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Waaaaaaaaaaa!! (Toys get thrown out of the pram!) Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaaaaa! I want my mummy! Waaaaaaa!

    http://i.stack.imgur.com/jiFfM.jpg

    Maturity is definitely not related to age.
    Once upon a time in galaxy far far away......
Sign In or Register to comment.