test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

T5 Constellation Class.

12346

Comments

  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    eldarion79 wrote: »
    Actually, the Stargazer NCC-2893 was referenced in game in the mission Researcher Rescue. The Stargazer discovered ancient ruins in the Kassae System in 2349.
    The ship doesn't exist as a playable ship. There is no T1 Constellation. No T5 Constellation. No one has it in mothballs.

    People keep confusing Constitution with Constellation and posting about the Constitution in this thread. This isn't a T5 Constitution Class Thread.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The ship doesn't exist as a playable ship. There is no T1 Constellation. No T5 Constellation. No one has it in mothballs.

    People keep confusing Constitution with Constellation and posting about the Constitution in this thread. This isn't a T5 Constitution Class Thread.

    It doesn't really matter if it is playable or not, it is still in the game. Yeah, people need to realize that this a CONSTELLATION thread not a CONSTITUTION thread.
  • thlaylierahthlaylierah Member Posts: 2,987 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The T5 Constitution has to be put in first seeing without it there wouldn't be a Constellation, Soveriegn etc.

    Or a STO for that matter.
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The T5 Constitution has to be put in first seeing without it there wouldn't be a Constellation, Soveriegn etc.

    Or a STO for that matter.

    The Constitution as a playable ship is in the game, in fact, you can have Constitution interiors with TOS era uniforms. So in the words of a wise man, quit your ********.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    eldarion79 wrote: »
    It doesn't really matter if it is playable or not, it is still in the game. Yeah, people need to realize that this a CONSTELLATION thread not a CONSTITUTION thread.
    Let's review. Someone posted THIS:
    If making a T5 Con Mc'badarse is an issue, why not make missions that make us use the ships we have mothballed?

    So I ask you ... HOW can someone use a mothballed Constellation?

    Get back to me when you figure that out.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I think he is referring to ships that we have discarded, but I could be wrong.
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Let's review. Someone posted THIS:



    So I ask you ... HOW can someone use a mothballed Constellation?

    Get back to me when you figure that out.

    I think he's referring to the idea that the fleet mothballs old ships upon decommissioning them, rather like modern navies to to some extent.
    Rather than your literal interpretation of it as ships that we have mothballed.

    Actually, I think it'd be rather cool to have pve missions where people are forced into old "clunker" ships for a little while :D
    I need a beer.

  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I think he's referring to the idea that the fleet mothballs old ships upon decommissioning them, rather like modern navies to to some extent.
    Rather than your literal interpretation of it as ships that we have mothballed.

    Actually, I think it'd be rather cool to have pve missions where people are forced into old "clunker" ships for a little while :D

    Like how Riker used the Hathaway or Kirk used the Enterprise in TSFS (granted the Enterprise was slated to be retired).
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I think he's referring to the idea that the fleet mothballs old ships upon decommissioning them, rather like modern navies to to some extent.
    Rather than your literal interpretation of it as ships that we have mothballed.
    I don't think that's what he meant. He first mentions "instead of a T5 Con McBardarse" ... which suggests the poster thinks this is a T5 Constitution thread. And the poster does use the phrase "ships we have mothballed."

    I'm sticking by my take on the post. The person thought we were discussing a T5 Constitution, didn't realize it was a Constellation thread, and the person's suggestion to use ships we have mothballed isn't really viable since the Constellation isn't a ship anyone can "captain" in the game.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • gpgtxgpgtx Member Posts: 1,579 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    eldarion79 wrote: »
    Actually, the Stargazer NCC-2893 was referenced in game in the mission Researcher Rescue. The Stargazer discovered ancient ruins in the Kassae System in 2349.

    oh, Sternbach wrote the article about the Constellation-class and Intrepid-class in the Magazine.

    that's the stargazer-A a T3 heavy cruiser
    victoriasig_zps23c45368.jpg
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    gpgtx wrote: »
    that's the stargazer-A a T3 heavy cruiser

    Um no, the Stargazer-A was not even commissioned yet. The mission referred to Picard and the Stargazer from 2349.
  • gpgtxgpgtx Member Posts: 1,579 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    whoops thought the date was 2409
    victoriasig_zps23c45368.jpg
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    gpgtx wrote: »
    whoops thought the date was 2409

    Accidents happen. I would like to see the Constellation-class as the first true healing and support carrier, probably close to what the KDF Varanus is.
  • xigbargxigbarg Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I already know its not a connie thread. Sheesh, you people. Con'Mcbadarse was made due to the fact that people are asking for an old ship, much like the excelsior, and automatically bring it to T5 status without a T2-4 varient. How can we bring back a ship that people haven't mothballed yet? Like some people said, we don't have any to mothball thus it has been mothballed as a whole.

    Edit: Should have reworded it because the excelsior has a t3 varient so it makes the whole sentence weird like.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I think my brain just short circuited.

    ;)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • auriciusauricius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    BUMP! And while we're at it... we need the Norway too! :D
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    xigbarg wrote: »
    due to the fact that people are asking for an old ship

    Speaking of old ships, it looks like the TOS era Bird of Prey will be the starter ship for the Romulans. AND a T5 Retrofit.

    How's that make any sense?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Speaking of old ships, it looks like the TOS era Bird of Prey will be the starter ship for the Romulans. AND a T5 Retrofit.

    How's that make any sense?

    It doesn't.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Speaking of old ships, it looks like the TOS era Bird of Prey will be the starter ship for the Romulans. AND a T5 Retrofit.

    How's that make any sense?

    The same is true of the Klingon B'rel. And Somraw.

    Honestly, we should be flying T5 Connies and NX Escorts by now! :D
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • captainbmoneycaptainbmoney Member Posts: 1,323 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Speaking of old ships, it looks like the TOS era Bird of Prey will be the starter ship for the Romulans. AND a T5 Retrofit.

    How's that make any sense?

    I don't know. I guess CBS[John Van Citters] is finally not saying no?

    Like my fanpage!
    https://www.facebook.com/CaptainBMoney913
    Join Date: August 29th 2010
  • corbinwolf#9797 corbinwolf Member Posts: 565 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The same is true of the Klingon B'rel. And Somraw.

    Honestly, we should be flying T5 Connies and NX Escorts by now! :D

    I SUPPORT THIS! GIVE ME MY CONNIE>... Pretty please... :rolleyes:

    Seriously, I'd take a Fleet T5 Connie with the Excelsior's BOFF and stats quite happily.... or the Ambassadors.... or the Breen... Id take a picture of a t5 connie at this point. sigh
    "The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward." - Rocky Balboa (2006)
  • flotaargentinaflotaargentina Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    lexusk19 wrote: »
    Ok so heres my request slash argument for the Constellation class to be T5.

    In the Next Generation episode Peak Performance Commander Riker takes command of a Constellation class star ship to participate in simulated combat with the Enterprise. His ship was beat up, torn apart, run down, warp inert, and overall in bad condition. In a few hours he had it going and engaged the Enterprise.

    In the next few scenes he managed to inflict heavy damage to the Enterprise by using a ruse for cover. The point here is that with new weapons and new equipment the Constellation class took on a Galaxy class and would have probably won the fight.

    So lets bring this ship into the game. ^^ I wont try to think up stats for it but maby give it a sensor ghost console? Or the ability to perform the Picard maneuver? It would be pretty sick to appear off your targets bow and get a shiled penetration buff on weapons for a few seconds form it. hehe Well there it is, lets hear constructive feedback. :)

    The Episode.
    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Peak_Performance_%28episode%29

    The Ship.
    http://www.klingon-empire.org/photopost/data/500/galexploration_constellatn.gif

    Constellation Hull in game:

    http://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/1904209_406977836106194_1835298824_n.png

    http://scontent-b-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/1621797_406977896106188_602074121_n.png

    http://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/1621745_406977829439528_206706688_n.png


    http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/1891034_406977876106190_617080512_n.png
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Zombie! Zombie! Zombie!

    I think we should start calling Zombie threads Borg threads, as the Borg are the zombies of the Trek Universe. :)
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    Zombie! Zombie! Zombie!

    I think we should start calling Zombie threads Borg threads, as the Borg are the zombies of the Trek Universe. :)

    Nah, doesn't sound as good.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • darakossdarakoss Member Posts: 850 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    lexusk19 wrote: »
    Ok, the Constellation is not a carrier to the best of my knowledge. From what was seen in show it was just a cruiser with 4 nacelles. On to next point, Constellations are not small! Look at the episode the battle. It is only slightly smaller than a Galaxy class. The Enterprise D is shown towing one, clear size comparison right there. Also the argument about age will never work. Excelsior was around when the Constitution was about. That means the Exc predates the Constellation by a great many years. And the Exc is one of the best ships in the game!

    It was a miscalling issue..sorta like the Defiant issues from DS9. The Constellation also uses a Constitution/Miranda saucer section with added extras around it which we all know are nowhere near the size of a Galaxy class. It was a goof onscreen. plain and simple. They had to use a model on the quick.
    i-dont-always-funny-meme.jpg
    original join date 2010

    Member: Team Trekyards. Visit Trekyards today!
  • aedayaeday Member Posts: 63 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Well.. after so long asking for this we have our answer.

    & IT WAS YES!
    "I'm a science officer. It's my job to have a better idea."
  • mjaybirdmjaybird Member Posts: 106 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    it is all good fed get a new ship but as always the KDF and Romulans get left out and get screwed over. Where is the love for people that do not play fed
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Braaaaainnnssssss...

    Seriously, this thread has been necroed twice on one page.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • vermatrixvermatrix Member Posts: 335 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    starswordc wrote: »
    Braaaaainnnssssss...

    Seriously, this thread has been necroed twice on one page.


    Forum rules, regulations, and etiquette escape me, It's considered bad to post in an old thread while at the same time it's considered bad to make a new thread which is the same or similar to an old one, by that logic no one should ever post anything in a forum because a person will get attacked by people either way.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
This discussion has been closed.