test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Possible for the JJ Enterprise to be in STO?

1457910

Comments

  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    It's accurate about how I feel about it. but let's go back to my original point. NO JJprise in this game not needed, not wanted.

    ... By You.


    Which totally negates the validity of your arguments...

    ... other than to prove that you have a very self-centric attitude.

    And since you neither own nor control the game, puts you in the rather dubious position of looking very foolish.
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • millimidgetmillimidget Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Remember the episode where Tom Paris and Janeway turned into amphibious creatures and mated?
    Was that the one where they went all transwarp on the universe?

    Anyway, the fans obviously weren't carrying the franchise. Nemesis would have been the last movie, and Enterprise the last series, if it wasn't for the relaunch.

    At least now we can hope there will be another series at some point in the future (hopefully not set in the JJ-verse).

    And if it is the last gasp of the franchise as it sells out, so be it. At least its not ending with Entercrap.
    "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society." - Aristotle
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,283 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Was that the one where they went all transwarp on the universe?

    that's the one
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • millimidgetmillimidget Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    that's the one
    And here I thought that was one of Voyager's better episodes.
    "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society." - Aristotle
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,283 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    And here I thought that was one of Voyager's better episodes.

    high praise, considering even the producers of said episode said it was a big mistake
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    And here I thought that was one of Voyager's better episodes.

    It is..., as long as one doesn't try to logically or scientifically explain the premise.

    Which holds true for many 'good' Trek episodes.

    :D
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • millimidgetmillimidget Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    daveyny wrote: »
    It is..., as long as one doesn't try to logically or scientifically explain the premise.

    Which holds true for many 'good' Trek episodes.
    I still get a kick out of seeing Geordi execute an epic maneuver (there's a Voyager clip a little further in).

    Not that it's the same, but yeah, logic and trek don't always go hand in hand.

    If they did, there wouldn't be much use for Vulcans.
    "Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society." - Aristotle
  • spork87spork87 Member Posts: 239 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    trek21 wrote: »
    And it's also accurate that you've proved a dozen times over that you do not care about other's logic, and that you will cling to your delusional opinion, even though it is clearly wrong.

    And I find it sickening that you claim to know how Gene Roddenberry would have responded were he alive. You disrespect him by doing so

    Being a true fan does not have barriers, sprok87.

    If you like it, you are a fan, that much is obvious. But being a true fan means you will approach all source material (meaning JJ Trek and the newest movie) with an open mind, and give your opinion, because you are a fan. These new fans may not have liked or noticed ST before JJ Trek, but they loved the movie, and it got their interest in ST, so they apply because they're willing to give what came before a chance.

    It's the same with us 'older' fans; we must be willing to give JJ Trek a chance, even if our ultimate opinion is 'we don't like it', 'could have been better', 'love it' etc. Claiming the movie should never have existed, is not canon, and other such arguments do not fall under open mind... and therefore exclude you from being a true fan.

    As does claiming someone is not a true fan simply because their opinion is different.

    its ok to be narrow minded when your right
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,283 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    its ok to be narrow minded when your right

    it's NEVER okay to be narrow-minded, and if you think it is, you completely missed the whole point of star trek, and if you completely missed the whole point of star trek, you are no fan
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • thratch1thratch1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    its ok to be narrow minded when your right

    At first I thought I was just having a hard time taking you seriously because of the stupid typo in your sig.

    But now I have an actually good reason.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • agentexeideragentexeider Member Posts: 180 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    uss917019 wrote: »
    Hey guys just wanted to ask if its possible that in the future they will make the alternate version of the Enterprise the one from JJ Abrams one.

    If they do put that one I would certainly buy it:D

    NO! and damn you for even suggesting such a thing.
  • spork87spork87 Member Posts: 239 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    it's NEVER okay to be narrow-minded, and if you think it is, you completely missed the whole point of star trek, and if you completely missed the whole point of star trek, you are no fan

    sure it is, saying murder is wrong is narrow minded, saying its wrong to **** children is narrow minded. So if you think the whole point of trek is to keep an open mind about everything, accept that murder isnt evil and its ok to abuse children.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • thratch1thratch1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    sure it is, saying murder is wrong is narrow minded, saying its wrong to **** children is narrow minded. So if you think the whole point of trek is to keep an open mind about everything, accept that murder isnt evil and its ok to abuse children.

    oh my god.

    This is so dumb, I just... I can't even... wow.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • sasheriasasheria Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    sure it is, saying murder is wrong is narrow minded, saying its wrong to **** children is narrow minded. So if you think the whole point of trek is to keep an open mind about everything, accept that murder isnt evil and its ok to abuse children.

    Say What??

    How is abuse children even in the same category as Star Trek Canon discussion?


    The terms on open mind, is that as long it is Star Trek related (Officially carry the Star Trek title) then it is part of Canon.

    What I mean by official, it is officially release by entities like JJ Trek. Fan Fiction doesn't count BUT books with Star Trek titles can count as Canon as long the creator (or his group) authorized it.

    Since JJ Trek is official, it is canon.

    Now..... whether we like or dislike the story, that is a different matter, but that is where open mind comes into play. At first, I was very hesitant on JJ Trek because I thought it was going to be a whole "reboot" which could "erase/override" old canon of the movie (i.e. replace it) BUT!!!!!!!!!!

    It was made to alternate timeline instead. So the original and next gen STILL exist (and not reboot) while JJ Trek exist also.
    To grow old is inevitable, to grow up is optional.
    Please review my campaign and I'll return the favor.
  • tinkerstormtinkerstorm Member Posts: 853 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    You are. And if Gene Rodenberry and his wife were still alive they would have stopped the direction JJ Wreck went.
    Gene was alive when The Wrath of Khan was made, and that movie went in all kinds of directions Gene did not want.
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    thratch1 wrote: »
    oh my god.

    This is so dumb, I just... I can't even... wow.
    That was basically my reaction too... that's why I haven't bothered to reply (to her).

    Because of that, and a few other things she's said, I feel there is nothing meaningful I could say that would actually get through, at least the way I intended it.
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • sander233sander233 Member Posts: 3,992 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    sure it is, saying murder is wrong is narrow minded, saying its wrong to **** children is narrow minded. So if you think the whole point of trek is to keep an open mind about everything, accept that murder isnt evil and its ok to abuse children.

    You are clearly out of your tiny mind.

    I was going to bring into the argument the TNG episode "Half a Life" in which we come to accept a culture that euthanizes its citizens when they turn sixty, but on second thought I have no desire to waste any time arguing the nuances of relativistice morality with someone who equates making a movie with murder.
    16d89073-5444-45ad-9053-45434ac9498f.png~original

    ...Oh, baby, you know, I've really got to leave you / Oh, I can hear it callin 'me / I said don't you hear it callin' me the way it used to do?...
    - Anne Bredon
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,283 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    trek21 wrote: »
    That was basically my reaction too... that's why I haven't bothered to reply (to her).

    Because of that, and a few other things she's said, I feel there is nothing meaningful I could say that would actually get through, at least the way I intended it.

    what can you possibly say to knock some sense into a terrorist? because something so disgusting like that said so brazenly makes me think that's what he is, or at the very least someone who belongs in an insane asylum
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • meurikmeurik Member Posts: 856 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I'm not delusional. and face it 50% if that like JJ Wreck the rest don't with a passion
    It's fact if a good portion rejects it. and a good portion does. the rest of you are so desperate to make a new trek work you miss the errors of JJ and his approach.

    I'm curious; Where do you get off speaking for 50% of the people who saw the 2009 movie, and/or love Trek?

    Where does this "fact" about a good portion of people rejecting the 2009 movie? Source?
    HvGQ9pH.png
  • maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    It's called imaginary statistics and is often used by people whose arguments are falling apart.
    There is no reason why we couldn't get the 2K9 Enterprise into the game other than legal licensing aspects. It would be very easy for the game authors to create some kind of story to justify it's inclusion, we already have 2 races that mess with crossing time and dimensions, Q and the Tholians with the Iconians as a possible 3rd race. The only thing keeping it out of the running is if Cryptic is refused permission to use it, or if Cryptic chooses not to.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • spork87spork87 Member Posts: 239 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    trek21 wrote: »
    That was basically my reaction too... that's why I haven't bothered to reply (to her).

    Because of that, and a few other things she's said, I feel there is nothing meaningful I could say that would actually get through, at least the way I intended it.

    calling me a she is very in polite. See thats the problem with people and what they think Star Trek was about, it was about humanity and what we could achive, but never setting aside what makes us human and that means holding fast to certain things. TNG ignored that and set aside humanity.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    calling me a she is very in polite. See thats the problem with people and what they think Star Trek was about, it was about humanity and what we could achive, but never setting aside what makes us human and that means holding fast to certain things. TNG ignored that and set aside humanity.
    First off, I apologize about calling you a she since you say you're not, but it's often hard to tell gender on an internet forum.

    And second... you have your opinion about what Star Trek was about; that's okay. But do not presume to say that's what every opinion about Star Trek should be, because that is rude. And narrow-minded, which as previously stated, is not a good thing for you to have, and is rapidly eroding your fan status and credibility.
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,283 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    calling me a she is very in polite.
    trek21 wrote: »
    And second... you have your opinion about what Star Trek was about; that's okay. But do not presume to say that's what every opinion about Star Trek should be, because that is rude. And narrow-minded, which as previously stated, is not a good thing for you to have, and is rapidly eroding your fan status and credibility.

    the fact that you spoke about murder and **** so casually certainly didn't help your credibility either, and made your impoliteness comment look extremely hypocritical
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • sasheriasasheria Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    calling me a she is very in polite. See thats the problem with people and what they think Star Trek was about, it was about humanity and what we could achive, but never setting aside what makes us human and that means holding fast to certain things. TNG ignored that and set aside humanity.

    I am not sure what season of TNG you were watching, but I didn't get that from watching practically almost all the season (I grew up with it when it first aired) and watching the classics on TV with commercials ;)

    That aside. STO is a different beast altogether. We have cross faction ships we fly around and even time travel. So I don't think it is far fetch to have alter universe ship coming into play (we already have mirrored universe) so in short of Legal, I don't see why not.

    But if you are arguing it is against canon, I think STO threw that book out the window long ago ;)
    To grow old is inevitable, to grow up is optional.
    Please review my campaign and I'll return the favor.
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I gave JJ Wreck a chance. I watched it. and while a good movie. NOT Trek and the stuff I know about the latest movie has not encourage me to watch it. And just because Paramount made it doesn't make it canon. It's more money milking for them.
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    spork87 wrote: »
    sure it is, saying murder is wrong is narrow minded, saying its wrong to **** children is narrow minded. So if you think the whole point of trek is to keep an open mind about everything, accept that murder isnt evil and its ok to abuse children.

    Are we being Punk'd???
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    And just because Paramount made it doesn't make it canon.
    Yes it does.

    That's as clear as I can make it for you. And even then I fear it's not enough.
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,283 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I gave JJ Wreck a chance. I watched it. and while a good movie. NOT Trek and the stuff I know about the latest movie has not encourage me to watch it. And just because Paramount made it doesn't make it canon. It's more money milking for them.

    for the last god-damn time, if the company that owns an IP says that something made with that IP is canon, THEN IT'S CANON! end of discussion!
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    And just because Paramount made it doesn't make it canon.

    I'm pretty sure that is the very definition of canon.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    two words. NOT CANON:P
Sign In or Register to comment.