Archer Skill Changes in "Dynasty" Expansion
Comments
-
unceuncerave wrote: »If they didn't need it before they won't need it now. Only fails without the coin to build a good archer will.unceuncerave wrote: »Again I'll say it. If they didn't need it before they won't need it now.
Do I really have to say it a third time decus?
And on that note how many archers do you think are sage? Let alone will go to sage even AFTER this update? Very few.
The ratio of fail demon to fail sage is about 20:1 IJS.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] for GD Onion 2012 b:victory0 -
shotwhointhewhat wrote: »I like how the sages are talking about demon having crutches and all.
After update, how many sages are going to be leaning on that crit boof like they couldn't stand without it?
I have no problem killing r9s without "leaning" on any crit buff... how is it going to be any different after the buff... they'll still die just as the same.1. If I kill you; do something about it yourself, don't go complaining to my wife.
2. If you have less kill counts then me, don't expect me to take pk advice from you.
3. If you are hiding behind an alt, don't expect me to acknowledge your existence.
Tokichiro - Heavy Armor Fish / Kiyoshi - Dual Blade Elf0 -
Kiyoshi - Heavens Tear wrote: »I have no problem killing r9s without "leaning" on any crit buff... how is it going to be any different after the buff... they'll still die just as the same.
If you have no problem killing rank 9s, then they suck. If any rank 9 is good, it should be tough to kill them unless you overpower them in shard/refines.0 -
You guys are so cute. You don't see the irony in this? In this thread, to choose a cultivation that offers advantages has been labelled as having a crutch, yet here you go and defend Sages saying "oh the good Sages won't need the new Quickshot because they're good" hahaha.
You're all leaning on crutches for getting lv 11 skills, and for getting R9. I could say that the vast majority of R9 archers lean on their R9 crutch because they suck, so there you go. XDElena Costel: I wash my hands of this affair.
Legerity: *drags you back* *stains your hands with said affair*
Elena Costel: Noooo... I don't want to have a dirty affair with Lady Legerity...
Qui: b:dirty0 -
unceuncerave wrote: »Do I really have to say it a third time decus?
Do I really need to explain levity to you?
More to the point, I have NEVER understood the superiority complex that the sage archers on these forums have. To claim that there are more fail demon archers than sage archers is, in and of itself, logically flawed. When you increase the sample size, then you skew results. Also, and this is directed generally, to claim that cultivation options are "crutches" is not only condescending, but it's idiotic. That's like if I said that sage clerics rely on the "Magic Shell channeling crutch" or that demon BMs rely on the "8 second HF crutch." Inherent attributes are just that. Yes, demons get neato bonuses to crit and aps via skills. You can argue the effectiveness all you'd like, but arguing that sage is better because you don't rely on beneficial procs that you identify as aiding lesser-skilled players is just mindless posturing.Proving that not only archers do math since 2009. b:victory
Current math challenge: pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1029711&page=45
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Any skills that can be used to kill you will interrupt BB when successful." -truekossy | "...Sage archers are kind of like Mac owners. They are proud of the weirdest and most unnecessary things." -Aesthor | "We ALL know Jesus doesn't play PWI. He may have suffered a lot for humanity, but he'd NEVER punish himself this way." -Abstractive | "I approve of bananas." -SashaGray0 -
Decus - Dreamweaver wrote: »Do I really need to explain levity to you?
More to the point, I have NEVER understood the superiority complex that the sage archers on these forums have. To claim that there are more fail demon archers than sage archers is, in and of itself, logically flawed. When you increase the sample size, then you skew results. Also, and this is directed generally, to claim that cultivation options are "crutches" is not only condescending, but it's idiotic. That's like if I said that sage clerics rely on the "Magic Shell channeling crutch" or that demon BMs rely on the "8 second HF crutch." Inherent attributes are just that. Yes, demons get neato bonuses to crit and aps via skills. You can argue the effectiveness all you'd like, but arguing that sage is better because you don't rely on beneficial procs that you identify as aiding lesser-skilled players is just mindless posturing.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] for GD Onion 2012 b:victory0 -
Decus - Dreamweaver wrote: »Do I really need to explain levity to you?
More to the point, I have NEVER understood the superiority complex that the sage archers on these forums have. To claim that there are more fail demon archers than sage archers is, in and of itself, logically flawed. When you increase the sample size, then you skew results. Also, and this is directed generally, to claim that cultivation options are "crutches" is not only condescending, but it's idiotic. That's like if I said that sage clerics rely on the "Magic Shell channeling crutch" or that demon BMs rely on the "8 second HF crutch." Inherent attributes are just that. Yes, demons get neato bonuses to crit and aps via skills. You can argue the effectiveness all you'd like, but arguing that sage is better because you don't rely on beneficial procs that you identify as aiding lesser-skilled players is just mindless posturing.
9 seconds buddy. b:byeDo you hate me? Good, that makes for an adequate conversation starter.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
No you're not getting it, Sage doesn't require more skill because it's the same auto attacking in most situations! All archers crit and most Purge, thus all archers roll hits for luck. To call out Demons for "relying on luck" better mean you people are killing with 1% crit rate and no Purge bow, which is simply not true.
It stands to reason that any bad archer out there can roll either cultivation path, or choose no cultivation path, and let their R9 gear auto attack them to victory in most situations. It's just very pretentious to imply that the Sage path actually requires more skill when archers of both paths would use normal attacks against their intended targets in mass PvP situations. I don't even think most Sage archers would say Sage requires more skill, most would say Sage path requires more gear.Elena Costel: I wash my hands of this affair.
Legerity: *drags you back* *stains your hands with said affair*
Elena Costel: Noooo... I don't want to have a dirty affair with Lady Legerity...
Qui: b:dirty0 -
3 lines!
Archer section sucks! all i see is math! losers
Kawaijen a pve archer man! stop arguing with this loser regarding pvp!
Quilue U so hawt! b:dirty0 -
shotwhointhewhat wrote: »If you have no problem killing rank 9s, then they suck. If any rank 9 is good, it should be tough to kill them unless you overpower them in shard/refines.
Not my fault that 99.9% of the players suck. Gear up or uninstall...1. If I kill you; do something about it yourself, don't go complaining to my wife.
2. If you have less kill counts then me, don't expect me to take pk advice from you.
3. If you are hiding behind an alt, don't expect me to acknowledge your existence.
Tokichiro - Heavy Armor Fish / Kiyoshi - Dual Blade Elf0 -
You're obviously more skilled if you use more of your skills.0
-
Niteshadows - Harshlands wrote: »9 seconds buddy. b:bye
I love how you ignored the entire post to fix a small error that has nothing to do with the main point being said. Right, I forgot, you're the dude that quoted yourself in your sig.
/coolbearwaveProving that not only archers do math since 2009. b:victory
Current math challenge: pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1029711&page=45
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Any skills that can be used to kill you will interrupt BB when successful." -truekossy | "...Sage archers are kind of like Mac owners. They are proud of the weirdest and most unnecessary things." -Aesthor | "We ALL know Jesus doesn't play PWI. He may have suffered a lot for humanity, but he'd NEVER punish himself this way." -Abstractive | "I approve of bananas." -SashaGray0 -
Kiyoshi - Heavens Tear wrote: »Not my fault that 99.9% of the players suck. Gear up or uninstall...
If they have R9 they are already geared up you mean learn how to play or uninstall.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sidwinder-HT0 -
its a very nice idea0
-
Sidwinder - Heavens Tear wrote: »If they have R9 they are already geared up you mean learn how to play or uninstall.
If you have r9... you would know that r9 by itself is **** (for archers)... probably worse then ****. At stock, I have less hp then my geared tt90 set. Took me quiet a bit of refines to get its hp to match my geared r8 set. A decent part of the r9 population has +5-7 refines or even lower... there is really no difference one shotting one of those as compared to someone with tt90 gears. People need to understand that gear and refines need to go hand in hand. Getting one without the other is a huge waste of time.1. If I kill you; do something about it yourself, don't go complaining to my wife.
2. If you have less kill counts then me, don't expect me to take pk advice from you.
3. If you are hiding behind an alt, don't expect me to acknowledge your existence.
Tokichiro - Heavy Armor Fish / Kiyoshi - Dual Blade Elf0 -
Quilue - Sanctuary wrote: »No you're not getting it, Sage doesn't require more skill because it's the same auto attacking in most situations! All archers crit and most Purge, thus all archers roll hits for luck. To call out Demons for "relying on luck" better mean you people are killing with 1% crit rate and no Purge bow, which is simply not true.
It stands to reason that any bad archer out there can roll either cultivation path, or choose no cultivation path, and let their R9 gear auto attack them to victory in most situations. It's just very pretentious to imply that the Sage path actually requires more skill when archers of both paths would use normal attacks against their intended targets in mass PvP situations. I don't even think most Sage archers would say Sage requires more skill, most would say Sage path requires more gear.
^ This.
Archers play the same way and use the same skills. Mostly the same few skills and auto attack stuff.
If an archer is a fail, they fail regardless of cultivation.Ring Engraving/Amulet Carving Guide - pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1174451
Retired from PWI.
b:bye0 -
Kiyoshi - Heavens Tear wrote: »If you have r9... you would know that r9 by itself is **** (for archers)... probably worse then ****. At stock, I have less hp then my geared tt90 set. Took me quiet a bit of refines to get its hp to match my geared r8 set. A decent part of the r9 population has +5-7 refines or even lower... there is really no difference one shotting one of those as compared to someone with tt90 gears. People need to understand that gear and refines need to go hand in hand. Getting one without the other is a huge waste of time.
Nope don't have R9 I don't pvp, though I should of put a ? at the end of my post because I wasn't sure what you meant but now I do.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sidwinder-HT0 -
Vindis - Dreamweaver wrote: »^ This.
Archers play the same way and use the same skills. Mostly the same few skills and auto attack stuff.
If an archer is a fail, they fail regardless of cultivation.
Heh @ archers play the same way. And LOL @ sage auto attacks in mass pvp.0 -
BTW, the reason I came here was not to troll the pointedly stupid discussion you're having about sage archers, but to thank asterelle. I'm astonished at the work she/he puts in on archer related stuff. Whoever you are, you are cool. Thanks again.
-W0 -
That crit bonus is seriously needed!!
No longer will sage archers considered fail due to cultivation path!
Time for Devote to update the thread[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
youtube.com/bhavenmurji
pwcalc.com/65816fd7725681e10 -
Bhavyy - Raging Tide wrote: »That crit bonus is seriously needed!!
No longer will sage archers considered fail due to cultivation path!
Time for Devote to update the thread
Even with the crit boost I wouldn't go sage on a lower geared archer.... and at high-end gear cultivation doesn't matter anyways so it's not like it changes anything there.
And yes, I'm making that decision based on playing both cultivation paths.0 -
Bhavyy - Raging Tide wrote: »That crit bonus is seriously needed!!
No longer will sage archers considered fail due to cultivation path!
Time for Devote to update the thread
No one considers sage archers fail because of their culti path. It just so happens that a lot of sage archers actually fail. Some of the most respected archers on HT back in the day were sage (defected, Kiyoshi, thehate).[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Anatidaephobia - The Fear That You are Being Watched by a Duck0 -
Iyania - Heavens Tear wrote: »No one considers sage archers fail because of their culti path. It just so happens that a lot of sage archers actually fail. Some of the most respected archers on HT back in the day were sage (defected, Kiyoshi, thehate).
This.
Plus, every true archer knows that the most OP archer is a sage with TT99 +5. We merely choose not to go on the path of sage because that temptation would make the game far too easy.0 -
Hmm just curious with the skill changes....
Would demon serated arrow actually be decent now? since it heals 100 hp now o_o
And uhh how much bleed ticks would that be o.o0 -
Reninz - Dreamweaver wrote: »Hmm just curious with the skill changes....
Would demon serated arrow actually be decent now? since it heals 100 hp now o_o
And uhh how much bleed ticks would that be o.o
Hahahahahahahahahahaha... no.0 -
Reninz - Dreamweaver wrote: »Hmm just curious with the skill changes....
Would demon serated arrow actually be decent now? since it heals 100 hp now o_o
And uhh how much bleed ticks would that be o.o
Would 100 HP save you from death? No? Then it's useless.
As for the bleed ticker, I guess we have to decide when we actually use it, but looking at the numbers, I think it's not worth it....[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Anatidaephobia - The Fear That You are Being Watched by a Duck0 -
But will it make people rage?0
-
Just want to ask a question
I just read on the Chinese PW web. It says sage stormrange eagle decreases 50% phy and mag def not 50% phy and mag attack. Which is correct? I am sure it 's phy and mag def because i read that line many times
Proud to be a sage archer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!0 -
Sint - Harshlands wrote: »But will it make people rage?Teramat - Archosaur wrote: »Just want to ask a question
I just read on the Chinese PW web. It says sage stormrange eagle decreases 50% phy and mag def not 50% phy and mag attack. Which is correct? I am sure it 's phy and mag def because i read that line many times
Proud to be a sage archer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!0 -
stormrage decreases phy and magic attack.
i am wondering about the translation. the DoTs state that the damage is based on weapon attack. is this a fail in the translation? cause that actually means the DoTs are getting weaker. my weapon damage does roughy 2500, thats 1/2 of the current damage my DoTs do. im hoping that the correct definition is base physical damage, that would make them actually better.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 697 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk