test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Simple Solution for Piercing Damage

tacobeast94tacobeast94 Member Posts: 66 Arc User
edited October 2016 in PvP Discussion
I play a gf and an hr, so I see both sides of the fence when it comes to the piecing damage of the ranger. I also PvE a lot and think that side of the game has greatly improved for rangers who want to spec for a build outside of Trapper. The recent changes and influx of combat rangers in PvP has a lot of people crying for elaborate nerfs/reworks that cater to both PvP and PvE. Of course, learn and adapt is always my go to when major changes come through.

However, I believe a solution can be simple. Currently, tenacity gives players damage resistance, armor pen resistance, crit strike resistance, and control resistance. Just add another one: "Piecing Damage Resistance".

This way, PvE can be completely unaffected while addressing the pvp side of things.

I'm not saying that this is an issue needing to be fixed. I'm saying that if it is, I believe this is a sensible approach.
Post edited by tacobeast94 on
«1345

Comments

  • trentbail21trentbail21 Member Posts: 433 Arc User
    Sounds good to me. Something has to be done lol.
    Find me in game if you want and send me a domination/ gaunt invite. If you are good and im not busy ill play with you. Im not an elitist ill play with almost anyone.
  • This content has been removed.
  • tacobeast94tacobeast94 Member Posts: 66 Arc User
    @clonkyo1 what do you mean by breaking news from mod 5? Sorry, I just don't understand the reference.
  • oldbaldyoneoldbaldyone Member Posts: 1,840 Arc User
    Things like this are part of the reason I don't pvp, so take my comments with that in mind.

    That said, wouldn't being able to resist piercing damage sort of defeat the entire purpose? The feats purpose is to deal unresistable damage. Making something able to resist it seems awkward.

    Perhaps something like this:

    Melee attacks deal an additional 10/20/30/40/50% damage as Piercing damage. Piercing damage is Physical damage that cannot be resisted or deflected. (Bonus halved versus players.)

    2 cents.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User
    NO.
    I would rather revert that feat rework and give the HR the right weapon damage they deserve. 948 weapon damage for combat hrs is offensive.
  • tacobeast94tacobeast94 Member Posts: 66 Arc User
    @oldbaldyone that's a pretty simple solution as well. I like it. The main thing I have issue with is when people offer suggestions that would essentially take entire class reworks in order to implement.

    I like the kinds of changes that lie on the reasonable end of the spectrum.
  • icyphishicyphish Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,255 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    I believe you guys are all talking about HR's piercing damage. Personally I feel if they adjust HR's piercing damage to be based on Post-Mitigated damage instead of Pre-Mitigated damage, then it will be fine. That way HRs will actually stack more Armor Penetration / Power and other offensive stats to actually try to deal more damage instead of just stacking on CRIT for big Pre-mitigated damage and relay all the damage on Piercing Blade.

    BiS HR's Plant Growth (+Piercing Blade) damage without external buff is currently able to crit for 130~150k damage, in the coming mod there will be new weapon, and with the higher weapon damage I wont be suprised if they start one shotting people on crit...
    icydrake%20avatar2_zpsg7rp0xti.jpg

    Author of GWF Speed Demon PvP Build (Mod 11) <- Click to reveal the Speedy Beast! >:)
  • elu#2770 elu Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    What if they made deflect impenetrable by piercing dmg? Well, now that I think of it, that would further give the TR more survivability... nvm
  • bittynationbittynation Member Posts: 138 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    icyphish said:

    BiS HR's Plant Growth (+Piercing Blade) damage without external buff is currently able to crit for 130~150k damage, in the coming mod there will be new weapon, and with the higher weapon damage I wont be suprised if they start one shotting people on crit...

    Get real. That kind of damage would only happen on a toon without any tenacity!

    I'm surprised people haven't figured it out yet. It's not the encounter powers that's doing all the damage.

    edit: "deleted explanation"

    BTW, HRs piercing damage does get mitigated by some classes and powers, I just haven't spent the time to figure it out yet. Where as I haven't seen a TRs piercing damage get mitiaged.

    Post edited by bittynation on
  • icyphishicyphish Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,255 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    Yes that is real, 130~150k damage on a BiS GWF tested with 4.2k tenacity and 3.7k tenacity, and no tenacity does not help mitigate the piercing damage. Feel free to do more testing with combat HRs that knows how to spec their toon, such as The Vigilante, Relixuzz, Minerva, Turtle and so forth (or generally those long time HR players from EoA or Synergy.)

    And yes we know the damage comes from Piercing Blade based on Plant Growth's pre-Mitigated Damage with damage stacks such as Long Strider or other class feature damage amplifier and can be further stacked with Fire Wheel... oh and lets not forget the ~75% deflect or 95~100%+ deflect for 5~6 seconds after using a daily...
    icydrake%20avatar2_zpsg7rp0xti.jpg

    Author of GWF Speed Demon PvP Build (Mod 11) <- Click to reveal the Speedy Beast! >:)
  • bittynationbittynation Member Posts: 138 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    If you stand in the red circle for ten seconds sure it can do a lot of damage with all its ticks and procs of piercing, but what kind of idiot does that?

    No single hit from an HR can do that kind of damage and that's the way you trying to sell your point.

    I run with 33k power, using mount power jumps it to 36k plus hitting the wheel (223% crit severity), there is no single hit that can do that much damage.

    Yes, hr piercing can be mitigated by some classes and powers, but not tenacity.

    The big damage from HRs comes from procing piercing blade off of blade hurricane. Melee encounter + split strike = 4 strikes + 4 piercing blade strikes. Although if you dodge the at-will all other strikes are 0 damage.

    Blade hurricane hits are buffed by 167% (I don't remember exactly) from the original at-will, so the two hits from blade hurricane and piercing blade is much higher than the original at-will.

    Split strike appears to be broke because it only procs blade hurricane once for two strikes in the two seconds it's active, where as rapid strike will proc three times for six strikes. Each blade hurricane procs piercing blade. Edit: appears to be an issue with the dummies somehow, because it works and shows up in act when in actual pvp/pve scenarios.
    Post edited by bittynation on
  • icyphishicyphish Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,255 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    I shouldn't be the one teaching you how to play HR, but lets try...

    Long Strider (self buff 40% damage if I remember correctly...) -> Rod of Imperial Restraint (Traps the target in place for 2 seconds) -> Plant Growth (Piercing Blade) -> Whatever other Encounters/At-Wills the HR has...

    and let me give you one more tip... most top HRs are smart enough to wait till GWFs finishes their Unstoppable, then do this combo, so the GWF has zero chance of escaping the whole rotation...

    Now care to teach me how to play a GWF and dodge those...

    If you stand in the red circle for ten seconds sure it can do a lot of damage with all its ticks and procs of piercing, but what kind of idiot does that?



    No single hit from an HR can do that kind of damage and that's the way you trying to sell your point.



    I run with 33k power, using mount power jumps it to 36k plus hitting the wheel (223% crit severity), there is no single hit that can do that much damage.



    Yes, hr piercing can be mitigated by some classes and powers, but not tenacity.



    The big damage from HRs comes from procing piercing blade off of blade hurricane. Melee encounter + split strike = 4 strikes + 4 piercing blade strikes. Although if you dodge the at-will all other strikes are 0 damage.



    Blade hurricane hits are buffed by 167% (I don't remember exactly) from the original at-will, so the two hits from blade hurricane and piercing blade is much higher than the original at-will.



    Split strike appears to be broke because it only procs blade hurricane once for two strikes in the two seconds it's active, where as rapid strike will proc three times for six strikes. Each blade hurricane procs piercing blade.

    icydrake%20avatar2_zpsg7rp0xti.jpg

    Author of GWF Speed Demon PvP Build (Mod 11) <- Click to reveal the Speedy Beast! >:)
  • This content has been removed.
  • emilemoemilemo Member Posts: 1,718 Arc User
    edited October 2016

    @clonkyo1 what do you mean by breaking news from mod 5? Sorry, I just don't understand the reference.

    He means this whole piercing damage thing and the solutions suggested are old news from back when the devs first HAMSTER up with the ranger and rogue

    Also on topic, pretty soon the one class that could laugh in the face of danger.. i mean in the face of rangers will also succumb to piercing blade. Meh
    Row, row, row your boat, Gently down the stream.
    Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, Life is but a dream.
  • pando83pando83 Member Posts: 2,564 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    My 2 cents:

    either Icy's idea to calculate piercing damage post-mitigation, or

    Piercing damage might add as a "multiplier" to armor penetration, forcing the user to still stack the stat but getting more DRI from it. Would allow the users to stack way less ArP and add more power for more damage in both PvP and PvE.

    Example: piercing damage increases ArP stat effect (DRI) by 50%. So let's say 4k ArP= 40% DRI usually. With piercing damage it becomes 60% DRI. And so on.

    Considering tenacity adds ArP resistance, piercing damage would help the users to reduce the effect of ArP resistance from tenacity/ counter it. In PvP they would just be able to hit ArP cap way faster and stack more power/recovery/crit.
  • bittynationbittynation Member Posts: 138 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    What you guys seem to not understand, and probably don't care because GWFs seem to have gotten the butt end of the stick with the HR revisions, is any nerf to piercing damage needs to be coupled with a corresponding buff in burst damage output or the HR goes back to being useless. This is by far not a simple solution. Currently just a one-sided solution that leaves the HR gimped.
    Post edited by bittynation on
  • tacobeast94tacobeast94 Member Posts: 66 Arc User
    @bittynation I wouldn't go so far as to say that would "gimp" them. They would still have piercing damage and it would still hit hard in pvp. All things considered, the hr isn't the only class that can utilize piecing damage. Allowing tenacity to mitigate some amount of piecing damage (definitely nowhere close to all) just kinda gives players some kind of survivability in those regards.
  • tacobeast94tacobeast94 Member Posts: 66 Arc User
    @emilemo thanks for clearing that up for me.
  • divectoredivectore Member Posts: 190 Arc User
    icyphish said:


    Long Strider (self buff 40% damage if I remember correctly...) -> Rod of Imperial Restraint (Traps the target in place for 2 seconds) -> Plant Growth (Piercing Blade) -> Whatever other Encounters/At-Wills the HR has...

    and let me give you one more tip... most top HRs are smart enough to wait till GWFs finishes their Unstoppable, then do this combo, so the GWF has zero chance of escaping the whole rotation...

    Now care to teach me how to play a GWF and dodge those...

    First, i like how people always try to put the best of a class like if you could use them all at once, look, you can't use pathfinder's action (deflection when daily is used) lone wolf and "another damage class feature" at once, and that damage feature would be aspect of the serpent which is a single use power, and increases damage for 24%, only trapper can fully use that, because after melee use, you won't be getting the stacks till end of combat.
    Now longstrider's shot and why is not so much used in pvp: It requires the enemiy to be 30 feat away (this means it's almost a single use power as well, unless fighting a ranged class which keep it's distance), is a 3 seconds buff with a 12 seconds cooldown, it's melee instance is useless unless the enemy it's standing still and your allies are attacking it.
    Against smart BiS players, when they see i throw a longstrider's shot from distance they just move away a little, just enough to not use my encounter in time.

    As i say before, my way to fix Piercing Blades, is by changing it to be like this: "You deal 50% additional damage, half of this damage is piercing damage"
    This would make lesser to no changes for pve, but for pvp, this would be a 50% nerf. Not a ground nerf, but neither a broken power like SE, i think both HR and the rest of player would be ok with it.
  • santralafaxsantralafax Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2,896 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    I see a lot of good options here. I like the idea of a Piercing Damage Resistance as part of Tenacity. Another option would be a stackable stat Piercing Damage Resistance--though I don't think i would be better than the tenacity option. I also like IcyPhish's concept, though I would have to see how the numbers work.

    Of course, I doubt there will be anything done in the near-term--we're just making long-term suggestions. SE has been like it is for quite a number of mods, ie.
  • sh00termcl0vinsh00termcl0vin Member Posts: 287 Arc User
    edited October 2016
    The problem with piercing blades isn't really the piercing damage per se, but the way flurry works. GWFs get the worst of it though because they don't even get an immunity frame from sprint like warlocks currently do, and have to soak the full damage from flurry. I think two things need to happen to fix this:

    1. Reduce the bonus damage from flurry a bit to brings combat HRs back to being more in line with other burst DPS.

    2. Give GWFs a resist to piercing damage tied to unstoppable. Say 30% resistance to piercing damage (just an example may be a bit too high) to match the normal DR.

    Also HR trapper roots going through elven seems to be a bit much as well. Either reduce the duration or make them respect elven battle enchants again. A bump in trapper damage a bit would be a good compensation for changing this.
    image
  • This content has been removed.
  • mamalion1234mamalion1234 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 3,415 Arc User
    IN mod 10.5 or 11 if you prefer you can see clear the answer to the piercing damage.
    HORN of valhalla is -15% incoming damage( well after the 5 hit from the same target but still first hit is -3% incoming damage)
    weapon set when you dodge -10% incoming damage.
    feytouch is -18% incoming damage against the debuffed targets up to 3.
    forghammer of gond you get half damage for 5 seconds.
    champions banner in the area for 30 seconds any foe deals -8% damage
    same for defender banner as the champions banner.
    sigil of great weapon fighter 6% buff and 6 % reduce incoming damage up to 14% based how many you hit with the artifact power.

    thanks.
  • This content has been removed.
  • assassin274#4214 assassin274 Member Posts: 29 Arc User
    Best solution = take piercing damage out the game.... I see no point in it .I hope the devs get 1 shotted by a tr or 1 rotated by a hr
  • edited October 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • lirithiellirithiel Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2,482 Arc User
    When Amenar (miss you bro) first announced PB was being changed back to how it worked when they originally introduced the feat, Sandy pointed out that the new change would effectively be a nerf to pve, whereas post mitigation damage would actually increase HR damage in pve. Dunno how it works personally but I take her word for it (she has a brain for that sort of stuff). Problem is that having PB doing post-mitigated damage means Combat is back to being useless in pvp again.

    Personally I think they should just rework both Piercing Blade and Shocking Execution to something else other than piercing damage, which has caused endless problems since they came up with that 'brilliant idea' BUT we all know they won't do that.

    Btw @rayrdan they are increasing HR bow and blade damage as well as for TR weapons in Mod 10.5 \o/
    Our pain is self chosen.

    The most important thing in life is to be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Always be Batman.
  • ajlir#7970 ajlir Member Posts: 367 Arc User
    lirithiel said:

    When Amenar (miss you bro) first announced PB was being changed back to how it worked when they originally introduced the feat, Sandy pointed out that the new change would effectively be a nerf to pve, whereas post mitigation damage would actually increase HR damage in pve. Dunno how it works personally but I take her word for it (she has a brain for that sort of stuff). Problem is that having PB doing post-mitigated damage means Combat is back to being useless in pvp again.

    Personally I think they should just rework both Piercing Blade and Shocking Execution to something else other than piercing damage, which has caused endless problems since they came up with that 'brilliant idea' BUT we all know they won't do that.

    Btw @rayrdan they are increasing HR bow and blade damage as well as for TR weapons in Mod 10.5 \o/

    I don't know about that. They only say stats, not weapon damage.
  • lirithiellirithiel Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2,482 Arc User

    lirithiel said:

    When Amenar (miss you bro) first announced PB was being changed back to how it worked when they originally introduced the feat, Sandy pointed out that the new change would effectively be a nerf to pve, whereas post mitigation damage would actually increase HR damage in pve. Dunno how it works personally but I take her word for it (she has a brain for that sort of stuff). Problem is that having PB doing post-mitigated damage means Combat is back to being useless in pvp again.

    Personally I think they should just rework both Piercing Blade and Shocking Execution to something else other than piercing damage, which has caused endless problems since they came up with that 'brilliant idea' BUT we all know they won't do that.

    Btw @rayrdan they are increasing HR bow and blade damage as well as for TR weapons in Mod 10.5 \o/

    I don't know about that. They only say stats, not weapon damage.
    Ah phooey I read it wrong :( Was going by @morenthar's title on the subject in general discussion.
    Our pain is self chosen.

    The most important thing in life is to be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Always be Batman.
  • edited October 2016
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.