test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

ICD on Crushing Roots

123457

Comments

  • k9madrushk9madrush Member Posts: 534 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2015
    damnwidget wrote: »
    Sincerely, this whining about the Hunter Ranger crushing roots is just ridiculous. I play an Executioner MI Rogue and I can easily evade/kill two of them at the same time, even with better gear score than me. There are some of them that hit harder but in general their burst is not enough to kill me not even to get close and I am wearing just Grim Executioner PvP and a piece of Burning with lvl 7 and 5 runes and blue artifacts.

    If the HR needs something is lot of fixes as at least three of their main powers are just useless right now as they are bugged in the 4th rank, the trapper build is the only viable one in PvP and is not "that good". Even cordon of arrow last like 0.2 secs and this is a tier IV power.

    I guess for perma-stealth/sab rogues it will be even easier to evade/kill them, if you stack ItC you can even ignore them. I don't know how hard is to evade their daze/root rotations with other classes but I don't think they deserve a nerf at all, they should be able to kill other classes and they have their mechanics to do it.

    stack ITC.... which game are you referring to... I cant recal any stack on ITC and roots becomes a spike damage if TR uses ITC which is bad news if you know that.
  • mirrorballsmirrorballs Member Posts: 877 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2015
    So whining about a daze and a root at the same time (= which is effectively a stun), which supposedly should be only for short intervals but in reality easily chained through CD reducing traits, which often initiates from 80' range in one of the fastest launched projectile attacks in the game is ridiculous...

    ...and yet for some reason that didn't stop you people from whining about Scoundrel TRs until the whole function now effectively went extinct. Such lovely double standard hypocrisy.


    Your chain dazes should be limited to at max maybe 3 seconds, and the daze inducing features need an ICD of 5 seconds. This is what HRs deserve, no more, no less.
  • utuwerutuwer Member Posts: 393 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    k9madrush wrote: »
    stack ITC.... which game are you referring to... I cant recal any stack on ITC and roots becomes a spike damage if TR uses ITC which is bad news if you know that.

    Do you know that ItC also grants TR 100% deflect chance while active?

    And in this game, ONLY TR has 75% deflect severity (not GF, not OP, not GWF), which means TR only gets hit by 25% damage of the original attacks when deflecting them, and that 25% will be mitigated further by defense and tenacity stat.

    That is why everyone including TRs hate MI Sabo TRs because they can rotate between stealth and ItC almost infinitely (with decent gears of course).
    You say 4v5 is impossible? Cool story bro.
  • piejalpiejal Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 403 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    So whining about a daze and a root at the same time (= which is effectively a stun), which supposedly should be only for short intervals but in reality easily chained through CD reducing traits, which often initiates from 80' range in one of the fastest launched projectile attacks in the game is ridiculous...

    ...and yet for some reason that didn't stop you people from whining about Scoundrel TRs until the whole function now effectively went extinct. Such lovely double standard hypocrisy.


    Your chain dazes should be limited to at max maybe 3 seconds, and the daze inducing features need an ICD of 5 seconds. This is what HRs deserve, no more, no less.

    don't feed the troll
  • damnwidgetdamnwidget Member Posts: 17 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    k9madrush wrote: »
    stack ITC.... which game are you referring to... I cant recal any stack on ITC and roots becomes a spike damage if TR uses ITC which is bad news if you know that.

    If you contextualize the word stack in my post you should be able to guess that I am speaking about put it in your encounters bar obviously. And your answer is in here already.
    utuwer wrote: »
    Do you know that ItC also grants TR 100% deflect chance while active?

    And in this game, ONLY TR has 75% deflect severity (not GF, not OP, not GWF), which means TR only gets hit by 25% damage of the original attacks when deflecting them, and that 25% will be mitigated further by defense and tenacity stat.

    That is why everyone including TRs hate MI Sabo TRs because they can rotate between stealth and ItC almost infinitely (with decent gears of course).

    And that is why I said that for Saboteurs Perma-Stealth should be even easier to evade/kill them (in more or less equal gear conditions of course).
  • marnivalmarnival Member Posts: 1,432 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    So we have clown nr 1 Mirroballs alias Kweassa etc etc namechanges seams the norm for you and we all understand why. Talking about hypocrisy and then ask for nerf of Hrs.
    This is the guy that late in module 5 told gfw and sw to l2p and dodge EXE- wounderful....
    So whining about a daze and a root at the same time (= which is effectively a stun), which supposedly should be only for short intervals but in reality easily chained through CD reducing traits, which often initiates from 80' range in one of the fastest launched projectile attacks in the game is ridiculous...

    ...and yet for some reason that didn't stop you people from whining about Scoundrel TRs until the whole function now effectively went extinct. Such lovely double standard hypocrisy.


    Your chain dazes should be limited to at max maybe 3 seconds, and the daze inducing features need an ICD of 5 seconds. This is what HRs deserve, no more, no less.

    Then we have clown nr 2 k9madrush how writes things like this below, who also said Hr does very well against gwfs and i offered him 100k for each win with his HR against my mod 5 geared lvl 63 gwf and ofc not word from him since then.
    wow! 12k damage is fine if your a range class what do you want to shoot at melee classes nuclear warheads with your bows? Seriously your showing your true colors your a hypocrite who pretends a class is weak dont play tricks on us we have HR and I know one complete rotation of 9 encounters excluding dailies can shave one person. Drop the act I know my HR and I quit playing melee class coz CW and HR is ubbbbberrrr OP.

    Lets crunsh some numbers from reality then up with the only tool we have to get an overlook of the pvp landskape the leaderboard.


    lvl 60-69 bracket sorted under kills as the normal pages are totally haywire.

    First 5 pages 31-Trs 5- Hrs

    Kills and deaths for first 5 of each class

    1 Tr 1840 - 497 .................................1 Hr 885 - 320
    2 Tr 1485 - 152......................................2 Hr 737 - 233
    3 Tr 1344 - 132......................................3 Hr 632 - 411
    4 Tr 1312 - 126......................................4 Hr 547 - 332
    5 Tr 1229 - 549......................................5 Hr 497 - 210


    Kills total Tr 7210 death total 1456 KD ratio 5.02 Kills total Hr 3295 death total 1506 KD ratio 2.18

    Now lets take a look at lvl 70 bracket and see if things even out as these to gentlemen(clowns) claimes Hr is OP and need a nerft.

    Lvl 70 first 5 pages sorted under kills as for same reason as above numbers of Trs 25 and Hrs 10.

    Kills and death for first 5 Tr and Hrs lvl 70.

    1 Tr 2863 - 99..................................1 Hr 1413 - 655
    2 Tr 2189 - 435....................................2 Hr 1314 - 567
    3 Tr 2128 - 223....................................3 Hr 1160 - 501
    4 Tr 1629 - 648....................................4 Hr 1159 - 428
    5 Tr 1583 - 317....................................5 Hr 1149 - 625


    Kills total first 5 Trs 10392 deaths total 965 KD ratio 10,76 !!!!!!!!

    Kills total first 5 Hrs 6195 dearhs total 2776 KD ratio 2.23.

    Just some pure fact collected ingame easy enough for all to see but hey Hr need a nerf according to these 2 genius Trs who is not bias at all but purly objective in game status caring about the overall game play more then their own class....... dont you take their word for it ???
  • k9madrushk9madrush Member Posts: 534 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2015
    utuwer wrote: »
    Do you know that ItC also grants TR 100% deflect chance while active?

    And in this game, ONLY TR has 75% deflect severity (not GF, not OP, not GWF), which means TR only gets hit by 25% damage of the original attacks when deflecting them, and that 25% will be mitigated further by defense and tenacity stat.

    That is why everyone including TRs hate MI Sabo TRs because they can rotate between stealth and ItC almost infinitely (with decent gears of course).

    evrybody knows that so its not worth mentioning only dumb people do. Oh wow! so that is what stack means! amazing! but isnt that chain and not stack? coz stack is multiple effect that goes on top of each other thats what I know. But wow! brilliant! so stack and chain ITC is just the same! Now I know :rolleyes:
  • mehguy138mehguy138 Member Posts: 1,803 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    marnival wrote: »
    -snip-

    Let's not compare HRs and TRs, TR are so far ahead of every other class, that it's pointless to even discuss it.

    I absolutely HATE the fact that Crushing Roots is a must have feature, slot it or gtfo. But I also hate that it takes more then 4 full rotations + disruptive shot and careful attack to kill someone. I'm not implying that HR is OP or UP, HR is plain broken because of one single class feature and a couple of crucial bugs.
    M6 almost drains your soul given how boring it is. (c) joocycuzzzzzz
  • utuwerutuwer Member Posts: 393 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    k9madrush wrote: »
    evrybody knows that so its not worth mentioning only dumb people do. Oh wow! so that is what stack means! amazing! but isnt that chain and not stack? coz stack is multiple effect that goes on top of each other thats what I know. But wow! brilliant! so stack and chain ITC is just the same! Now I know :rolleyes:

    Sorry, but I never said anything about stacking. What I said is about the last part of your statement, which is somehow you forgot it.
    k9madrush wrote: »
    stack ITC.... which game are you referring to... I cant recal any stack on ITC and roots becomes a spike damage if TR uses ITC which is bad news if you know that.

    ItC negates that spike damage because it simply deflects 75% of its damage and the 25% left will be mitigated by defense and tenacity stat(if TR have any).
    You say 4v5 is impossible? Cool story bro.
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    k9madrush wrote: »
    evrybody knows that so its not worth mentioning only dumb people do. Oh wow! so that is what stack means! amazing! but isnt that chain and not stack? coz stack is multiple effect that goes on top of each other thats what I know. But wow! brilliant! so stack and chain ITC is just the same! Now I know :rolleyes:
    why wont you 1v1 the lower geared gwf? scared? cause it sure looks like it you know your *** will be handed to you.
  • ofnieslafofnieslaf Member Posts: 381 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    hahah u mad bro? because i completely destroyed everything you said?because your so stupid you didnt realize 3+3=6?btw ill quote you anytime i feel like it like right now

    ur on a new level of mental r3ratdation.

    in no way in his post he said HR's had 9 encounters, you either quoted the wrong person or you're beyond moronic.

    you seriously need psychiatric help. seek it.

    regards
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    ofnieslaf wrote: »
    ur on a new level of mental r3ratdation.

    in no way in his post he said HR's had 9 encounters, you either quoted the wrong person or you're beyond moronic.

    you seriously need psychiatric help. seek it.

    regards

    eh i quited the wrong thing. but i know he said it. looks like he edited it out. anyways i think your the one who needs help. you seem awefuly worried about my health. you keep talking about it in every single comment you make.stop being so obsessed with me.
    btw here my "joke of a char" sorry i dont pay my life savings into this game some people want a house to live in.http://i.imgur.com/EiQlG04.png i have rank 7's and 8's and id say thats pretty **** good for me.
  • joocycuzzzzzzjoocycuzzzzzz Member Posts: 577 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    eh i quited the wrong thing. but i know he said it. looks like he edited it out. anyways i think your the one who needs help. you seem awefuly worried about my health. you keep talking about it in every single comment you make.stop being so obsessed with me.
    btw here my "joke of a char" sorry i dont pay my life savings into this game some people want a house to live in.http://i.imgur.com/EiQlG04.png i have rank 7's and 8's and id say thats pretty **** good for me.

    I didn't say anything like that nor edited anything you schizophrenic child.

    Next time pay attention who you quote.
    Beta player

    One of the many Control Wizards that misses Shard Of The Endless Avalanche. RIP Shard (Beta-Mod3)
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    I didn't say anything like that you schizophrenic child.

    Next time pay attention who you quote.

    im not schizophrenic nerd rage. btw thats your new nickname. im bipolar huge difference. pm me ill let you come to my house so i can kick your *** personally.ok ccccuuzzz? ****ing ******ed name btw.
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    k9madrush wrote: »
    HR have perma root+daze+6 encounters.....ohh wait 9 encounter with Swiftness of the Fox feat in trapper tree
    and that 3 charge hindering shot? spam it with disruptive shot and HR does not need to worry coz fox cunning cunning/shift
    and Marauder's rush/escape will provide back to back invulnerability. Ohh wait HR tab got no ICD so he can spam it hustle free.

    Range class in this game have unreasonable advantage over melee class for having so many cc.... that will put another cc on top of it press tab use all 3 encounters and there you go spam the previous 3 again use a cheap encounter to daze and you dont have to worry coz you still have dodges and a long range escape encounter..... easy hustle free class just kill from a distance spam cc and annoy.

    dude 9 encounters? really? hrs do not have 9 encounters only an idiot who cant count would think so.
  • kahfakahfa Member Posts: 86 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    "actually, everything that can beat me is OP and needs to be nerfed because bla bla bla, also, you can't have a conflicting opinion cuz u are a nobody and i am one of the best in-game and i am part of a known guild. u still wanna talk? fight me ingame bla bla bla"

    *looks at someone in this thread*

    inb4 fight me, come at me brahhh
    Misfits
  • xxxgriessonxxxxxxgriessonxxx Member Posts: 115 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    I tell you these guys are clueless, proven over and over again
  • mirrorballsmirrorballs Member Posts: 877 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2015
    k9madrush wrote: »
    Now its CWs and HRs having a debate this looks fun blackwolf versus joocycuzzzzzz let the forums begin! now lets see who among this two class will prove whos the most broken.

    This is HR vs everybody else, and the way they try to defend their own broken chain-CCing, while those vocal champions themselves once having been the biggest anti-TR whiners arguing for nerf to our own TR chain-CCing, is what makes them so sick and disgusting.

    Truthfully speaking, I'll bet they never expected that the devs were going to remove it from us TRs, and then essentially give it to their class with an easier, more effective version. But too bad, the devs did it, so now, they just say two different, hypocrite things from the same mouth. Turn from face to heel on a snap, and then defend it so dearly.

    No principle. No integrity. Just greed all over. Typical of whiners.
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Brilliant, Holmes. Now tell me how many of them were Scoundrels, or how this completely worthless piece of trash you posted is relevant in anyway with the current issue at hand which you're so desperately trying to veer off and shut out from open discussion.

    You abandoning your own jackshi* of a principle now? The same craparse of a stance you took along with idiot agitators like Lucan when you so solemnly attacked and criticized how chain CCing is a problem and it is not balanced? Like the time you spent over 30 minutes sending hate PMs to me after I whooped your <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font>, cussing and crying that chainc CC TRs are broken and anyone using them should be [censored]? Don't try to deny this jackshi*. I still have the screenshots. The only thing stopping me from exposing what a truly little spoiled brat you are is that the moderators don't approve of worsening feuds by exposing snotty spoiled brats on open forums. (Although your sick, pathetic behavior has made it awfully tempting, I'll admit).

    For the gazillionth time, starting from way back in mod5 5 months ago, I told you I couldn't care jackshi* about what other TR builds are doing. THIS IS A CHAIN CC ISSUE.. Stop trying to wriggle out of this topic by posting useless irrelevant information to cloud the issue.


    Your friggin' broken class is:


    ■ chain-CCing more often, in shorter disruptive intervals in between each other, than us Scoundrel TRs could
    ■ starting the chainc-CCing rotation from 5 times longer distance, than us Scoundrel TRs could
    ■ effectively dealing worse form of CCs (daze+root = stun), than compared to what us Scoundrels used to deal
    ■ and dealing much higher average damage than what us Scoundrels can currently deal


    You don't know of this? Understandable. Since every Scoundrel now went frickin' extinct after the changes.

    So tell me, why should your kind be exempt from the same line of nerfs, exempt from being stopped of chain CCing people, when effectively what your kind is doing is many times worse than we ever could? Why should your broken <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> of chain dazing not be issued the same internal CD restrictions us Scoundrels have?
    because our class is plagued with more bugs than you can count on both hands.fix the bugs then nerf us. dont nerf us then not fix the bugs.
  • landoras1975landoras1975 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 88 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    teribad15 wrote: »
    yea roots definitely needs an ICD the moment HR apply roots to you its over.

    Yep, most annoying skill right now, please fix.
  • marnivalmarnival Member Posts: 1,432 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Brilliant, Holmes. Now tell me how many of them were Scoundrels, or how this completely worthless piece of trash you posted is relevant in anyway with the current issue at hand which you're so desperately trying to veer off and shut out from open discussion.

    Tr rule pvp withe broken **** like piercing, 100%crit , itc dubble procs whish makes there KD ratio redicules high compared to any other class including the second most op class Cw.

    Your history speaks for itself your been laughed at for several expansions and even many among your own class think your an
    embarrassment and the rest see you as a clown(exeption is your equally stupid and ignorant fellow Tr mjytresz).
    You abandoning your own jackshi* of a principle now? The same craparse of a stance you took along with idiot agitators like Lucan when you so solemnly attacked and criticized how chain CCing is a problem and it is not balanced? Like the time you spent over 30 minutes sending hate PMs to me after I whooped your <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font>, cussing and crying that chainc CC TRs are broken and anyone using them should be [censored]? Don't try to deny this jackshi*. I still have the screenshots. The only thing stopping me from exposing what a truly little spoiled brat you are is that the moderators don't approve of worsening feuds by exposing snotty spoiled brats on open forums. (Although your sick, pathetic behavior has made it awfully tempting, I'll admit).

    Nobody gives a **** about what you think it is clear that your are clueless and only writing to see your own name written in some forum.
    Your butthurt becaue I kicked your butt all over with actual facts when you try to defend the Tr class and now jump at some bandwagon trying to make Hr something OP broken when Tr in fact still are 10 times more broken.

    And that is why number of how common a class is and kd ratio matters its facts and not fiction.

    Write what you want as nobody takes you seriously any more - Name change 3 times at least - time for another forum clown.
  • felixkamfelixkam Member Posts: 99 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    This is HR vs everybody else, and the way they try to defend their own broken chain-CCing, while those vocal champions themselves once having been the biggest anti-TR whiners arguing for nerf to our own TR chain-CCing, is what makes them so sick and disgusting.

    Truthfully speaking, I'll bet they never expected that the devs were going to remove it from us TRs, and then essentially give it to their class with an easier, more effective version. But too bad, the devs did it, so now, they just say two different, hypocrite things from the same mouth. Turn from face to heel on a snap, and then defend it so dearly.

    No principle. No integrity. Just greed all over. Typical of whiners.

    If you've read the posts, the vast majority of HRs are more than happy to have crushing roots removed, or reworked in return for compensation in other areas such as damage and/or improved dodges, as well as bug fixes.
    /snip
    Nobody's denying that there's something wrong with chain cc. In fact that's what most people on this topic are talking about. That is to say, how this could be fixed. Blackwolf in particular is advocating for the removal of Crushing Roots in favour of a mass fixing of bugs, and improvements in some of the aspects of HR. Likewise, most HRs actually agree with him, because we understand how frustrating it is to have to chain cc someone for 20+ encounters as opposed to a CWs 5 power freeze kill combo.

    Now as to the actual points you posted. First of all, multiple short dazes is nowhere near as bad as an extremely long continuous stun. The main reason being that in the first case, you are capable of responding via the activation of something such as a GFs Shield, Impossible to Catch, Repel, OPs Sancturary, GWFs Unstoppable, etc... However in the event of a long daze, lasting, easily in excess of 6 seconds just via the capstone, you can't respond even with a short animation attack making it much more severe of an affect.

    Second of all, about the chain cc-ing from 5 times the range of a TR. In the optimal case, a HR can initiate a constricting shot from 92 feet away. The Scoundrel TR has access to Shadow Strike as do all TRs. This has a 40 feet range. 92/40 = 2.3. Therefore the HR in the best case, running a suboptimal class feature, and a low damage encounter can initiate chain cc from 2.3 times the distance of a TR using a low damage encounter. If you're a whisperknife the range would be increased to 60 feet via Vengance's Pursuit, which means that the ratio would be even less.

    Third of all, nobody is disputing the fact that a root + a daze is extremely powerful. Everyone realises that a modified version of the CWs freeze is pretty devastating in terms of crowd control. So yes, even HRs realise how bad this is, and guess what? Most of us have no qualms about crushing roots being made to not daze constantly and interrupt the enemies long casting times.

    Fourth of all, the claim that a HR can output more damage than a scoundrel TR. Suffice it to say that so long as a HRs roots are not affected by armour penetration, a Trapper HR will do less damage then a wet noodle, that is to say slightly more than an OP without Divine Judgement does.
    Personal Projects - Check out my take on these D&D classes for Neverwinter:
    Complete:
    - The Monk - http://nw-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?865991-The-Monk-A-Relatively-Detailed-Proposal-for-a-New-Class

    Under Work:
    - The Primal Totemist
    - The Wild Sorcerer
    - The Summoning Binder
  • thedemienthedemien Member Posts: 830 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    felixkam wrote: »
    If you've read the posts, the vast majority of HRs are more than happy to have crushing roots removed, or reworked in return for compensation in other areas such as damage and/or improved dodges, as well as bug fixes.

    I don't think he would care about balancing or fixing HR. too much whiners about 'OP broken HRs'. No matter how much devs break the class ( stated so many times about Control strength not working right), reduce it damage( roots give 0), make majority of encounters useless or how 80% of rank 4 power giving negative(nerfing) HR. Fix HR. Fix other classes. Balance then.
    There still will be people that will cry when they got killed by geared to control HR (one of few still left in game) - mine has 1.5 control strength atm. Cause why? 0 tenancy. 0 skill understanding. too much used to be - I can one shot everything/ control everything.
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    felixkam wrote: »
    If you've read the posts, the vast majority of HRs are more than happy to have crushing roots removed, or reworked in return for compensation in other areas such as damage and/or improved dodges, as well as bug fixes.


    Nobody's denying that there's something wrong with chain cc. In fact that's what most people on this topic are talking about. That is to say, how this could be fixed. Blackwolf in particular is advocating for the removal of Crushing Roots in favour of a mass fixing of bugs, and improvements in some of the aspects of HR. Likewise, most HRs actually agree with him, because we understand how frustrating it is to have to chain cc someone for 20+ encounters as opposed to a CWs 5 power freeze kill combo.

    Now as to the actual points you posted. First of all, multiple short dazes is nowhere near as bad as an extremely long continuous stun. The main reason being that in the first case, you are capable of responding via the activation of something such as a GFs Shield, Impossible to Catch, Repel, OPs Sancturary, GWFs Unstoppable, etc... However in the event of a long daze, lasting, easily in excess of 6 seconds just via the capstone, you can't respond even with a short animation attack making it much more severe of an affect.

    Second of all, about the chain cc-ing from 5 times the range of a TR. In the optimal case, a HR can initiate a constricting shot from 92 feet away. The Scoundrel TR has access to Shadow Strike as do all TRs. This has a 40 feet range. 92/40 = 2.3. Therefore the HR in the best case, running a suboptimal class feature, and a low damage encounter can initiate chain cc from 2.3 times the distance of a TR using a low damage encounter. If you're a whisperknife the range would be increased to 60 feet via Vengance's Pursuit, which means that the ratio would be even less.

    Third of all, nobody is disputing the fact that a root + a daze is extremely powerful. Everyone realises that a modified version of the CWs freeze is pretty devastating in terms of crowd control. So yes, even HRs realise how bad this is, and guess what? Most of us have no qualms about crushing roots being made to not daze constantly and interrupt the enemies long casting times.

    Fourth of all, the claim that a HR can output more damage than a scoundrel TR. Suffice it to say that so long as a HRs roots are not affected by armour penetration, a Trapper HR will do less damage then a wet noodle, that is to say slightly more than an OP without Divine Judgement does.
    please add me in game ive seen many of your posts and youve won my respect. wolf4@blackxxwolf3
  • ryfghbvryfghbv Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    You wrong, the ambush encounter have 3 charges too, that makes 12 encounter and wait, the melee feat makes your at will became encounters so you have 16 encounter, all of them on a chain deals half of damage of desintegrate! we need to nerf all the 16 encounters. Sure range players have such a advantage, so a big advantage that melee classes can jump on your face and make range so usefull!!
  • mirrorballsmirrorballs Member Posts: 877 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2015
    thedemien wrote: »
    I don't think he would care about balancing or fixing HR. too much whiners about 'OP broken HRs'. No matter how much devs break the class ( stated so many times about Control strength not working right), reduce it damage( roots give 0), make majority of encounters useless or how 80% of rank 4 power giving negative(nerfing) HR. Fix HR. Fix other classes. Balance then.
    There still will be people that will cry when they got killed by geared to control HR (one of few still left in game) - mine has 1.5 control strength atm. Cause why? 0 tenancy. 0 skill understanding. too much used to be - I can one shot everything/ control everything.

    Everything you have mentioned, applies exact same to the Scoundrel TR in mod5. The end result was still a nerf. So should the same be to the trapper. Simple as that.
  • suddenlyslowsuddenlyslow Member Posts: 818 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Everything you have mentioned, applies exact same to the Scoundrel TR in mod5. The end result was still a nerf. So should the same be to the trapper. Simple as that.

    Wouldn't they have to make the trapper worse at daze/rooting than the other tree's in order to be the same as the Scoundrel? I did not play the scoundrel much after the nerf so I could be wrong as before it was too easy for the capstone to apply over the other dazes and override and shorten them so I wonder if that got changed any.
  • blackxxwolf3blackxxwolf3 Member Posts: 1,539 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Wouldn't they have to make the trapper worse at daze/rooting than the other tree's in order to be the same as the Scoundrel? I did not play the scoundrel much after the nerf so I could be wrong as before it was too easy for the capstone to apply over the other dazes and override and shorten them so I wonder if that got changed any.
    yup with only one viable tree if it gets nerfed with no bug fixes you can say bye bye to hr at least trs had 2 viable trees.
  • suddenlyslowsuddenlyslow Member Posts: 818 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    yup with only one viable tree if it gets nerfed with no bug fixes you can say bye bye to hr at least trs had 2 viable trees.

    TR is really down to 1 now. Another is playable but not competitive and one is entirely wrecked. I guess other classes are similar but you don't hear from them as much. The SW being the most worse off and the HR having but a single choice.
  • mirrorballsmirrorballs Member Posts: 877 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2015
    felixkam wrote: »
    Now as to the actual points you posted. First of all, multiple short dazes is nowhere near as bad as an extremely long continuous stun. The main reason being that in the first case, you are capable of responding via the activation of something such as a GFs Shield, Impossible to Catch, Repel, OPs Sancturary, GWFs Unstoppable, etc... However in the event of a long daze, lasting, easily in excess of 6 seconds just via the capstone, you can't respond even with a short animation attack making it much more severe of an affect.

    Completely false.

    ■ Even if a daze may not persist per se, a timed repetition is more than enough to effectively prohibit any retaliatory action. We already had a working example in the form of Constricting Arrow circa. mod2. Should I repeat for everyone else who weren't around at that time why people absolutely hated it so much? Sure, in theory it was nothing but two or three repeating "constrictions" which caused a very short stun during the entire duration it was on you. It wasn't a "persisting" stun. So to the layman, its actual uptime seemed short. But in reality, it didn't matter if the stun wasn't persisting. It did its job -- by 'pulsing' into action every time you were about to use/cast something. The entire short-daze chaining from the Trappers are a vastly upgraded version of Constriction Arrow, both in duration and lethality.

    ■ The "TRs can easily CC for over 6 seconds straight" argument. So many times explaining why it doesn't happen. I can explain the mechanics in the exact same context as you've explained the trapper mechanics, although it would be pointless and unnecessary since nobody cared to listen to it back in mod5. Instead, they simply resorted to an imaginary, exaggerated version of reality so affectionately referred to as "the permadaze".
      long-chain daze is the territory of WK Scoundrels, not the MIs which are the gross majority -- as in, easily over 80~90% of the entire PvPing MI population.
      long-chain daze is a product of idea situation and set-up, just as your explanation of an 'ideal situation' with the trapper. This can also be explained why if you wish it so
      the range of damage a Scoundrel TR could dish out was nigh pathetic, just as your explanation with the trapper. 6-second daze doesn't mean anything when the result of your one-sided pummeling is less than 30% of the target health. I've already shown since mod5 preview days how a Scoundrel can do a one-sided beating against a BiS GWF for minutes, and then being snagged by one lucky hit instantly ends the fight in a defeat. I wasn't exactly on the same BiS level, but my GS still was over 20k with a PvP build, power concentration and 42k HP. Didn't mean shi*.

    To sum it up:

    ■ In all practicality and actual combat, MIs weren't really too optimized for Scoundrel use. Their chain-daze capabilities are much shorter than a WK's, and thus their integrated offense/defense abilities coming from CCs were weak. But of course, they more than made up for this weakness with -- what else? -- ITC and the broken shi* OP SE. On the contrary, due to the unique factor of how the first shot of VP does not consume stealth, it was actually WKs that could impose a devastatingly long chain by use of multiple encounters, not MIs.

    ■ ...and yet, in actual combat still the MIs were more effective. Why? Again, ITC and SE. So in reality, when facing a MI Scoundrel of equal measure you weren't being killed by it because it was a Scoundrel/dazer. You were killed by it because they were simply the broken easymode MIs were.

    ■ Your take on the Scoundrel TR is just as much an "exaggeration" as any other hounding your precious trappers, and yet, you fail to realize this.

    Second of all, about the chain cc-ing from 5 times the range of a TR. In the optimal case, a HR can initiate a constricting shot from 92 feet away. The Scoundrel TR has access to Shadow Strike as do all TRs. This has a 40 feet range. 92/40 = 2.3. Therefore the HR in the best case, running a suboptimal class feature, and a low damage encounter can initiate chain cc from 2.3 times the distance of a TR using a low damage encounter.

    Scoundrels don't use SS to daze. Sabos do. There's a reason for it, but I'm not gonna explain unless asked to. At any rate, to cut to the chase, the only power we really use to 'chain-daze' anything is Dazing Strike. This is a melee power with a 15' range.

    If you're a whisperknife the range would be increased to 60 feet via Vengance's Pursuit, which means that the ratio would be even less.

    If you're a Whisperknife, that is true, but then every single one of your "ohhh, trapper roots aren't that serious, guys with CC breakers escape it all the time" arguments immediately stop applying, doesn't it.

    Third of all, nobody is disputing the fact that a root + a daze is extremely powerful. Everyone realises that a modified version of the CWs freeze is pretty devastating in terms of crowd control. So yes, even HRs realise how bad this is, and guess what? Most of us have no qualms about crushing roots being made to not daze constantly and interrupt the enemies long casting times.

    So what's stopping you from asking for an interal CD?

    Fourth of all, the claim that a HR can output more damage than a scoundrel TR. Suffice it to say that so long as a HRs roots are not affected by armour penetration, a Trapper HR will do less damage then a wet noodle, that is to say slightly more than an OP without Divine Judgement does.

    LOL. Scoundrel TR. "Go try it". Especially in mod6.

    You have no idea how much we'd give to become a wet noodle.
Sign In or Register to comment.