test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Rise of Tiamat Preview Patch Notes NW.35.20141104a.1

1246

Comments

  • Options
    kwsapphirekwsapphire Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 671 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    shiani1 wrote: »
    I just got off the preview with my HR and when she rides on her mount now she has an arm raised and sometimes has her offhand in it. It looks dumb, and I hope it's something that will get fixed and not something that was believed to be cool. Thanks!

    What kind of mount were you riding? That might help track down the issue..
    qtPt2I
  • Options
    hustin1hustin1 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 3,462 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    shiani1 wrote: »
    I just got off the preview with my HR and when she rides on her mount now she has an arm raised and sometimes has her offhand in it. It looks dumb, and I hope it's something that will get fixed and not something that was believed to be cool. Thanks!

    Different mounts have different animations. My HR usually rides a Small Forest Stag, and the riding animation shows her with one hand on the reins and another held out behind her. Which mount were you using?
    Harper Chronicles: Cap Snatchers (RELEASED) - NW-DPUTABC6X
    Blood Magic (RELEASED) - NW-DUU2P7HCO
    Children of the Fey (RELEASED) - NW-DKSSAPFPF
    Buried Under Blacklake (WIP) - NW-DEDV2PAEP
    The Redcap Rebels (WIP) - NW-DO23AFHFH
    My Foundry playthrough channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Ruskaga/featured
  • Options
    rfmacedorfmacedo Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I like those changes.
    I've been playing the game for about 2,5 months more or less.
    Without any "serious" farming/grinding, just the basic during the week + more during weakends i have almost everything i need on PVE.
    The only thing missing now is my INT belt for CW.

    Considering all my artifacts are almost orange, weapon artifact is orange, i cannot complain about it.
    It's frikking 2 months only.

    If i'm tired of the game, i just stop it, plain and simple.
    Also ppl tend to be too *****y about PVE, as stated by another guy, they shouldn't.
    PVP you can decent gear very quickly without paying too much (or at all).
    PVE you don't have to compete with nobody, and even with 1 month of game, i could do my job "properly" in all dungs i was part of.
    Serioously, BiS is not a right, is a privilege.
    I think it should be harder, and this patch should be the very fix of it.
  • Options
    animalustanimalust Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 573 Bounty Hunter
    edited November 2014
    When are you guys gonna Fix Warlock Fury spec? U said u fixed Necrotic damage not procing Creeping death... well you lied, u only seemed to fix 1 ability.. WHat about all of the Necrotic Damage adds from Paragon? Weapon Enchant damage such as Terror and Blood?
  • Options
    free2payfree2pay Member Posts: 284 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    panderus wrote: »
    Yep, I've been reading the various threads about the topic, thanks.
    I only have one question for you : do you think Cleric is viable to win in PvP
    leadership with this change?
  • Options
    chemboy613chemboy613 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,521 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    kwsapphire wrote: »
    Personally I don't mind some refining items being account bound. I can't say I agree with people who think every one of their characters should be able to get seven artifacts to legendary level with a minimal investment of time or AD. After all, they're "legendary" for a reason. They should be fairly difficult to get. I've personally been refining up my artifacts only with what enchantments drop while playing the game, and any I get from opening lockboxes.

    Now, I do understand the concern in PvP. I've invested a decent amount of time in my main character and she still only has a gear score of 11k. I haven't farmed dungeons, and I suppose I could, but generally I just poke around and do content that I find fun. Given that I don't PvP, this isn't too much of an issue. The only real issue for me is that a lot of dungeons are just too difficult with a lower gear score like that, even if you surpass the minimum required score. But if I wanted to PvP? Forget it! I can't (and don't want to) compete with people who farm (or bot, or whatever) to get a 24k gear score. (I'm not implying that everyone with that high of a GS used illicit means.) I'm not sure I'll ever get a GS that high. So it's a good thing I don't want to PvP.

    I'm perfectly content with using artifacts that aren't yet at legendary status. I'll rank them up as I'm able. I expect it to take a long time. It would be nice if we could use enchantments in gear artifacts (belts, etc.) as well, instead of just gemstones. It would be REALLY cool if we could use all the trash equipment for refinement points too. I don't even bother identifying all the trash, but I do bother to "greed" as much of it as I can. As my inventory fills up, I use my portable store artifact to sell it all off, make a silver or so per piece. Not that I need the gold really, but I can't bring myself to waste it by leaving it on the floor and walking away. I see so many people in dungeons pass on the green equipment because it's not even worth identifying, and I understand that. Wouldn't it be cool if we could use that trash equipment to refine up artifact equipment? It would make that stuff actually useful again..

    Anyway, as I said, I'm not really upset by the change. There are some measures that could vastly improve the refinement process in my opinion, but either way I still have fun playing the game. It's not necessary for me to have everything at max rank just to enjoy my time. Just MHO of course.

    Agreed that things should be somewhat difficult to obtain, but the projections by farming or by buying zen are unreasonable. They should be difficult, of course, but be reasonably difficult, not require a full time job farming foundries or spending several hundred dollars.
  • Options
    shiani1shiani1 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 316 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    kwsapphire wrote: »
    What kind of mount were you riding? That might help track down the issue..

    I'm riding the Lord's polar bear. The right hand goes up and she looks like a rodeo rider...really not cool looking at all.
    Kianni Ravenmoon and Izyana Sol'Eetah




  • Options
    shiani1shiani1 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 316 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    hustin1 wrote: »
    Different mounts have different animations. My HR usually rides a Small Forest Stag, and the riding animation shows her with one hand on the reins and another held out behind her. Which mount were you using?

    Riding the Lord's polar bear, but I've used that mount for some time now and today was the first time I had this weird animation, and only on the preview. So I have to assume it has something to do with the patch. Normally she has both hands in front of her like she's holding reins, and that looks fine.
    Kianni Ravenmoon and Izyana Sol'Eetah




  • Options
    naicalusnaicalus Member Posts: 645 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Fix the previous post's issue, and fix the TR's missing walk animation. It's supposed to look like this:

    http://www.iankunx.net/veldrinwalk.jpg

    Not like a slowed down, empty handed combat run that leads to stopping with a weird jerking motion that looks like I broke my knees, or landing from jumping like I hurt myself. :/

    And last I knew the Throne from the Protector's Jubilee event still has the sitting animation playing way too fast, leading to jerking about like you're having some kind of minor seizure.
    Largely inactive, playing Skyforge as Nai Calus.
  • Options
    rashylewizzrashylewizz Member Posts: 4,265 Bounty Hunter
    edited November 2014
    clonkyo1 wrote: »
    This will bring not balance at all to the game... As i said on a deleted post (seems like 'sarcams' to criticize stupid stuff is not "feedback" but type lies and false/misleading reports/explanations are...), now, the FotM class will be (again) CW with Renegade Tree... I do not really understand why is so hard to you, devs, to make al real balance over all classes, not ones prevailing over the others each time you try to "balance" the game... yet, the funnies thing at all on this matter is that, ALWAYS, the "balanced class" are CW and HR classes...

    Nope, the new flavor of the month classes are still gonna be the TR
  • Options
    arcticblitzarcticblitz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 126 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    panderus wrote: »
    Classes and Balance

    [*]All enchantments and other items that give RP dropped through Fey Blessing, Dragon Hoard and Tymora's Blessing enchantments are now Bound to Account. This change is not retroactive.

    Please for the love of Tymora don't do this, If you absolutely insist on going through this change drop the RP requirement of Artifact equip by 50% , Remove the Enchants cool down, increase the drop chance % on each level of the enchant and finally increase the RP value on all Green / Blue / Epic equipment.
    Blitzy : PVE only Barbarian
    Martin ConDion PVE only Ranger

    Guild Founder: -HunterS-
  • Options
    mstrssihrmstrssihr Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    macjae wrote: »
    Rewards for Actually Playing the Game: For a while, large sections of the player base has become increasingly frustrated with the comparative lack of rewards for actually playing through the content. A large part of the problem here is in the lottery-like nature of gaining the very rare rewards that give meaningful payouts (like artifact belts, artifacts or boon tomes) while the more consistent rewards are fairly niggardly. The main way that some players make profit towards advancement is by trading on the Auction House (which is inherently exploitative of other players) and spending a lot of time clicking through leadership alts (which is inherently inflationary of the total AD supply), not actually playing. Bots provided a vital service for players here in that it made those profits spendable for advancement at a cost that's reasonable in terms of time invested.

    The Current Solution Suffers From Mission Creep: Making these enchants bound to account will also cause another issue; botterss will use them to refine non-BtA enchantments, which while it may decrease the returns on some refining stones (like resonance stones), will still allow them to harvest most of the value, and sink the higher-end enchantment market in the process. So the logical extension of the current policy will be to make those BtA too, or institute some other measure that punishes players most of all.

    The core problem is really that many measures instituted to harm botting also harms legitimate play on several different levels; both in terms of the ability to attain rewards from playing, and in terms of the ability to acquire rewards from the market. It does benefit the player group that sells such materials themselves, but those would benefit even more from a solution that would raise overall rewards from playing in such a way that it preempts bots.

    That said, here are some proposals and reasonings behind them:

    • Players should receive some BoE refining stones for each epic dungeon or periodic dungeon (like Biggrin's Tomb or Arcane Reservoir) that they complete. As completing the epic boss fights probably isn't the bots' forte (and it would likely take far too much effort to gear/program bots to do so), this would effectively move that market from bot-driven to player-driven. Each dungeon should give at minimum an Aquamarine or Flawless Sapphire, with a chance of a better item, like a Black Opal, Blood Ruby or Brilliant Diamond (possibly as a boss drop). Higher-tier content should give better rewards or have higher drop rates on better refining stones. Most or even all epic dungeon bosses should drop a BoE refining stone or mark in addition to the current rewards they give (and not green stuff either).
    • Along similar lines, the reward chests in foundries should be augmented with at least a peridot during foundry hour. Alternately, or in addition, completing the daily Foundry quest should also give some refining stones or marks. Boosting foundry rewards is good for fostering more variety in-game, which is probably good for player retention.
    • The contents of Coffers of Wondrous Augmentation should be boosted a bit to give players access to better refining consolation prices, and to reflect the increasing refining requirements of the game. Their random refining stone drops should all be boosted by at least one step: Peridots to Aquamarines, Aquamarines to Flawless Sapphires, rank 4s to rank 5s, and rank 5s to rank 6s. Maybe give a chance for higher-tier refining stone drops too. All BtA.
    • Epic items should reward far more RP than they currently do when fed to artifact equipment. This would increase player-specific rewards for some activities; notably completing end-game bosses and using PvP gear bought from glory as refining materials. Since equipment can only be used to refine bound items, and the glory gear is BoP (should be changed to BtA) already, this will benefit legitimate players and give a reasonable ability to advance through playing PvP too, without inviting more bots.
    • Another way to hit bots (and predatory AH speculators) is to make green and blue refining marks (union, power, stability) available at the Wondrous Bazaar at a slightly lower cost than Marks of Potency of the same rank. These are required to advance artifact items, and the current costs are probably hurting newer players most of all. This would help players and further dampen the incentives to bot skill nodes.
    • While you're working on issues related to bots, changing the reward structure for PvP to discourage botting it would also be nice, as long as it also benefits legitimate players. This would mean: Removal of the ability to salvage PvP gear, awarding some RAD for each PvP *victory* (as bots aren't generally good at winning), double the victory RAD during PvP hour, and reducing or eliminating the RAD rewards for the daily quest. This would also hit those players who "only do PvP for the daily", which isn't necessarily a bad thing either. In addition, each player on a winning team could be awarded 1-3 BtA peridots, scaling like the base glory rewards for longer games.
    • If the drops from Dragon Hoard and Fey Blessing Enchantments are made BtA, the percentage chance of a drop should increase a bit, giving greater periodic rewards for using them.
    • The issue of bots crafting higher-tier enchantments and selling those instead could be averted to some extent by increasing player access to one of the main limiting factors: Wards. Players could earn a Preservation Ward for completing a certain number of epic dungeons or winning a certain number of PvP games. Bots would have less ability to access these rewards, which would make their ward costs slightly higher, driving down their competitiveness compared to legitimate players. The number of wards given shouldn't be great enough to hurt Zen Store sales (and may in fact encourage sales, as players may attempt to fuse more often with more free wards and more refining points), just enough to dent bot price margins.


    I just had a total Nergasm reading this, holy <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> if we got a single wish granted from our Developers it certainly should be THIS. DEVS PLEASE READ!! <3
    - Major Peachy Bottom * Gutbuster's Brigade -

    "Last request - microtransactions for alllll old skins for zen/weapon appearance changes, 500 zen to make ur wep glow the color/enchant you want it... You will make more off that one item than any other zen item ever made." freshour

    "beckylunatic" Gateway AH should have column headers to sort by buyout, bid, end time, quantity, etc. These disappeared iirc with the module launch. It's obnoxious.
  • Options
    iandarkswordiandarksword Member Posts: 978 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Having played during Open Beta, survived "Caturday", and seen this ban-aid before, it will simply cause the botters to shift to another means of botting, it will not fix the underlying cause. They'll simply move to the next non-BoA easily attainable form of virtual income, which will then become BoA, and the cycle repeats. This solution in a sense, makes botting more profitable in the long run as the botters creep into ever higher markets. The last time there was a mass BoA upgrade, the economy exploded with inflation and they had to take sufficient measures to combat the problem (Sgt. Knox companion.) Economical problems have plagued the overall game off and on since before launch, "Caturday" survivors know this. In my opinion, the cash shop and bazaar prices are 20-30% too high for key items, or the key items are unavailable, forcing the need to farm or (in exploiters' case, bot) for equivalents. The only time I consider spending the small amount of Zen I am able to afford in my real world budget, is when something is on sale (usually 20-30% off.) There are many other ways to combat the botting situation than making things BoA, they likely require more time and payroll investment, but if they'd simply invest in that early, they'll resolve the situation rather than watch it become more and more fiscally difficult to ignore. I'm not a programmer, so I don't have any suggestions on solutions. I just have observations of past practices and the effects. The source for the bots needs to be addressed, or they'll continue to re-occur causing increasing problems.
    "I don't know, I'm making it up as I go..."
    Featured Foundry Quest: Whispers of an Ancient Evil [v3] - NW-DQ4WKW6ZG
    Foundry Quest: Harper Chronicles: Blacklake - NW-DCPA4W2Q5
  • Options
    chemboy613chemboy613 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,521 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Having played during Open Beta, survived "Caturday", and seen this ban-aid before, it will simply cause the botters to shift to another means of botting, it will not fix the underlying cause. They'll simply move to the next non-BoA easily attainable form of virtual income, which will then become BoA, and the cycle repeats. This solution in a sense, makes botting more profitable in the long run as the botters creep into ever higher markets. The last time there was a mass BoA upgrade, the economy exploded with inflation and they had to take sufficient measures to combat the problem (Sgt. Knox companion.) Economical problems have plagued the overall game off and on since before launch, "Caturday" survivors know this. In my opinion, the cash shop and bazaar prices are 20-30% too high for key items, or the key items are unavailable, forcing the need to farm or (in exploiters' case, bot) for equivalents. The only time I consider spending the small amount of Zen I am able to afford in my real world budget, is when something is on sale (usually 20-30% off.) There are many other ways to combat the botting situation than making things BoA, they likely require more time and payroll investment, but if they'd simply invest in that early, they'll resolve the situation rather than watch it become more and more fiscally difficult to ignore. I'm not a programmer, so I don't have any suggestions on solutions. I just have observations of past practices and the effects. The source for the bots needs to be addressed, or they'll continue to re-occur causing increasing problems.

    Been here since caturday too.

    Wisdom in this post.

    +1
  • Options
    jaotutjaotut Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 576 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I think they need to reassess how making refining items from Fey and Dragon Hoard's BoA is going to hurt majority of the players. When they previously had refining items from Coffer of Wondrous Augmentation BoA, it didn't have a very big impact on the game, as people can still purchases wards and enchantments made from wards at an affordable price on AH.

    However, this situation is different. They need to put themselves in the player's shoes. Work out the cost for a player to get BiS gear, whether it is by purchasing Zen, or playing the game, or a combination of both without buying any RP that is sold on the AH. Those cost (and time spent farming) have already been worked out by some players in other posts, and they're just some crazy numbers that a normal gamer would not be able to achieve.

    So I suggest offering players some realistic alternatives before even thinking about going ahead with this decision (of making certain RP BoA). Right now a lot of loyal players are giving suggestions to make this game better and don't want it to die. Don't just <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> these guys off. If you treat your customers well, then you will have a good long term relationship with them.
    Merlin - CW Merlyn - HR Psylocke - TR Black Widow - GWF


    Have the gear and skills, but lack the friends to play with? Come and apply for Essence of Aggression. We have been here and strong since beta. (Immature, rude, and arrogant people will not be accepted)
  • Options
    llewelyn89llewelyn89 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 129 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    One of my biggest problem with the change to enchants & refining options is bag space.
    I'll live with the bound bit and the extra time everything will take, but now I'm going to need 2 slots for all rank 4s (an extra 10 when there isn't an event running) and pearls, peridots, refining stones, etc (probably another 5 or 6 most days) and it's going to be problematic.
    I don't want to stop every 5 or 10 minutes and refine so I have bag space.
    Could our introductory bag (forget its name) be expanded?
    Or could we get another bag slot? I'll pay for another greater bag of holding if I can use it fully - but they are really devalued when you have to lose another bag to replace it.
  • Options
    ghoulz66ghoulz66 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 3,748 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Not impressed with mod 5 just because it has beloved Tiamat in it. Live broadcast showed how laggy it will be running a 25 man raid with everyone tossin off special effects, and the devs on the livestream claimed nothing is set in concrete, as 2 weeks till launch would be enough time to tweek n adjust graphic performance.

    Wasn't the siege of neverwinter just 12 or 15 people per instance? Performance went down the toilet there. Nearly double the people though? This game's engine can't handle that so I don't know why they would continue with it.
  • Options
    soriniakovsoriniakov Member Posts: 107 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    panderus wrote: »
    Hey all,

    Just popping in real quick to let you all know that I have forwarded some of your concerns to some of our developers before the workday ended and intend to follow up Monday to discuss the issue.

    That you all for your feedback. These are the sorts of issues we hope the preview shard can catch for us so we can make sure we are making the best decisions for the game.

    panderus, HR Trapper has no control still! Old bugs weren't fixed!

    Ancient Roots feat doesn't affect roots duration (there is no +5 seconds to strong root)

    Biting Snares +60% control bonus doesn't work: actually bonus same as before with +30% (without this feat roots work 2sec, with this feat +30% in m4 currently roots work 3sec, with this feat +60% on preview roots work 3sec again, but 4sec should!)

    Also Biting Snares control duration bonus doesn't affect on stun/daze from Disruptive Shot and Bear Trap - this is a very big problem in pvp!

    new one for Swiftness of the Fox found:

    sometimes cd reduction bonus doesn't work (does nothing with current cds of powers). reloging can solve this issue

    Trapper tree positioned as control hr tree, but all control is totally broken, please fix it!
  • Options
    adinosiiadinosii Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 4,294 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    What the RP BtA change means is that there is virtually no chance for me to get my items to legendary status. I have been spending the AD I earn from leadership and from selling loot on the AH on buying peridots and resonance stones. Moreover, I have in the past spent a considerable amount of mobney on Zen, exchanged that for AD (or for items I have then sold for AD), and spent the AD on refinement items.

    As a result, I have 3 legendary items (belt and two artifacts) and was working my way towards getting my third artifact and main hand to Legendary as well.

    Wit this change that is no longer feasible. I have no reason to spend money on the game any more, and very little motivation to play it any more.
    Hoping for improvements...
  • Options
    yokanaanyokanaan Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 151 Bounty Hunter
    edited November 2014
    Simple solution to make both sides happy - remove internal cooldown from those enchantments and either lower amount of RP needed for legendary or give us special refining stones (bound) which we can earn through some quests.

    Then no one will complain about drops being BtA and bots will be useless since you will be able to upgrade on your own.
  • Options
    sygfried94sygfried94 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 264 Bounty Hunter
    edited November 2014
    why not putting the drop from dragon enchant or other depend also of the mob lvl (for exemple the drop lvl can be depend of the amount of damage you did on the mob)
  • Options
    sr2normandysr2normandy Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 56
    edited November 2014
    What about new profession, where we can get decent (decent for us players) amount of refining stones which will be BoA...???
    Your solution will kill most of the playerbase...
  • Options
    sr2normandysr2normandy Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 56
    edited November 2014
    sygfried94 wrote: »
    why not putting the drop from dragon enchant or other depend also of the mob lvl (for exemple the drop lvl can be depend of the amount of damage you did on the mob)

    It is not fair... All the classes have different DMG output... >>> CW's DMG vs. DC's DMG - not comparable
  • Options
    nurmoodnurmood Member Posts: 342 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    adinosii wrote: »
    As a result, I have 3 legendary items (belt and two artifacts) and was working my way towards getting my third artifact and main hand to Legendary as well.

    Wit this change that is no longer feasible.

    Haha that is how "legendary" those equipment pieces are - you almost got 4 of them in like what? 2 month? redicolous :D
  • Options
    freshourfreshour Member Posts: 623 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    macjae wrote: »
    The change to BtA refining items would probably pretty much be an unmitigated disaster for the game's overall player population, which would also affect profitability. It has become increasingly difficult for newer players to catch up to BiS level with each module; this would make it almost exponentially more so. For established players, it would mean their ability to advance further would become almost completely stymied.

    One fundamental question is whether it's intended on the developer side that only whales should be able to attain the best stuff in the game, or whether that should also be open to free players who invest sufficient (and not excessive) time to actually playing the game. That aside, there are some other issues to consider which could be addressed alongside this issue.

    Rewards for Actually Playing the Game: For a while, large sections of the player base has become increasingly frustrated with the comparative lack of rewards for actually playing through the content. A large part of the problem here is in the lottery-like nature of gaining the very rare rewards that give meaningful payouts (like artifact belts, artifacts or boon tomes) while the more consistent rewards are fairly niggardly. The main way that some players make profit towards advancement is by trading on the Auction House (which is inherently exploitative of other players) and spending a lot of time clicking through leadership alts (which is inherently inflationary of the total AD supply), not actually playing. Bots provided a vital service for players here in that it made those profits spendable for advancement at a cost that's reasonable in terms of time invested.

    The Current Solution Suffers From Mission Creep: Making these enchants bound to account will also cause another issue; botterss will use them to refine non-BtA enchantments, which while it may decrease the returns on some refining stones (like resonance stones), will still allow them to harvest most of the value, and sink the higher-end enchantment market in the process. So the logical extension of the current policy will be to make those BtA too, or institute some other measure that punishes players most of all.

    The core problem is really that many measures instituted to harm botting also harms legitimate play on several different levels; both in terms of the ability to attain rewards from playing, and in terms of the ability to acquire rewards from the market. It does benefit the player group that sells such materials themselves, but those would benefit even more from a solution that would raise overall rewards from playing in such a way that it preempts bots.

    That said, here are some proposals and reasonings behind them:

    • Players should receive some BoE refining stones for each epic dungeon or periodic dungeon (like Biggrin's Tomb or Arcane Reservoir) that they complete. As completing the epic boss fights probably isn't the bots' forte (and it would likely take far too much effort to gear/program bots to do so), this would effectively move that market from bot-driven to player-driven. Each dungeon should give at minimum an Aquamarine or Flawless Sapphire, with a chance of a better item, like a Black Opal, Blood Ruby or Brilliant Diamond (possibly as a boss drop). Higher-tier content should give better rewards or have higher drop rates on better refining stones. Most or even all epic dungeon bosses should drop a BoE refining stone or mark in addition to the current rewards they give (and not green stuff either).
    • Along similar lines, the reward chests in foundries should be augmented with at least a peridot during foundry hour. Alternately, or in addition, completing the daily Foundry quest should also give some refining stones or marks. Boosting foundry rewards is good for fostering more variety in-game, which is probably good for player retention.
    • The contents of Coffers of Wondrous Augmentation should be boosted a bit to give players access to better refining consolation prices, and to reflect the increasing refining requirements of the game. Their random refining stone drops should all be boosted by at least one step: Peridots to Aquamarines, Aquamarines to Flawless Sapphires, rank 4s to rank 5s, and rank 5s to rank 6s. Maybe give a chance for higher-tier refining stone drops too. All BtA.
    • Epic items should reward far more RP than they currently do when fed to artifact equipment. This would increase player-specific rewards for some activities; notably completing end-game bosses and using PvP gear bought from glory as refining materials. Since equipment can only be used to refine bound items, and the glory gear is BoP (should be changed to BtA) already, this will benefit legitimate players and give a reasonable ability to advance through playing PvP too, without inviting more bots.
    • Another way to hit bots (and predatory AH speculators) is to make green and blue refining marks (union, power, stability) available at the Wondrous Bazaar at a slightly lower cost than Marks of Potency of the same rank. These are required to advance artifact items, and the current costs are probably hurting newer players most of all. This would help players and further dampen the incentives to bot skill nodes.
    • While you're working on issues related to bots, changing the reward structure for PvP to discourage botting it would also be nice, as long as it also benefits legitimate players. This would mean: Removal of the ability to salvage PvP gear, awarding some RAD for each PvP *victory* (as bots aren't generally good at winning), double the victory RAD during PvP hour, and reducing or eliminating the RAD rewards for the daily quest. This would also hit those players who "only do PvP for the daily", which isn't necessarily a bad thing either. In addition, each player on a winning team could be awarded 1-3 BtA peridots, scaling like the base glory rewards for longer games.
    • If the drops from Dragon Hoard and Fey Blessing Enchantments are made BtA, the percentage chance of a drop should increase a bit, giving greater periodic rewards for using them.
    • The issue of bots crafting higher-tier enchantments and selling those instead could be averted to some extent by increasing player access to one of the main limiting factors: Wards. Players could earn a Preservation Ward for completing a certain number of epic dungeons or winning a certain number of PvP games. Bots would have less ability to access these rewards, which would make their ward costs slightly higher, driving down their competitiveness compared to legitimate players. The number of wards given shouldn't be great enough to hurt Zen Store sales (and may in fact encourage sales, as players may attempt to fuse more often with more free wards and more refining points), just enough to dent bot price margins.

    This guy is definitely on the right track. If every patch was more along these lines as far as being in the right direction, we would have a pretty sick game right now. However, every patch seems to take 2 steps forward for one class, and 5 steps backward for the other classes. The next patch then removes those 2 steps forward and gives the 5 steps back a step forward but in only one feat tree.

    - The problem with BIG changes is you set the new bar at which a player rates the class. GF's rate the class now based off a broken item, rather than their class. Instead of fixing the glyph (removing it) - the entire class was nerfed considerably.
    - DC's will now base their idea of what a DC should be off the PTR mod 5 DC who can literally 1v1 any class, and yes, even HR's can't kill some of the best DC's while the DC can kill 90% of everyone it faces. Did anyone ever play DND? Sure a multi-class DC could be viable for combat, but unless spec'd with bard/red dragon desciple, or monk/rogue they weren't THAT tanky (ignoring sanctuary), and their DPS wasn't that great either, however their buffs were like... BEAST MODE.
    - GWF's base it off mod 2 (god mode) or mod 3 (demi-god 3 hit mode). However, ignoring their 40-50k AOE builds of late, they seem to be more balanced now than ever.
    - CW's have always been viable. Sure, mod 3 it took some skill, before shard was nerfed it was VERY based on skill in deciding if he would win or not, mod 4 has made it much more of an easy mode class
    - HR's were admitted as the favorite dev class from the start. They have been ages beyond any class in self healing, unmitigatable damage, and their ability to wreck an enemy node or home node for the entire game unless mobbbbbed to death.

    - I think your changes to the classes are fine. You made CW's able to not be timed anymore, now we have to anticipate and hope to get their rotations down, or we die. But CW's in older DND could NUKE people so I'm fine with that, however with certain things being server side, and others client based (I know you have your reasons because of people using macros), it makes the fight a very very skewed rock paper scissors.

    - My suggestion. Take the HR. The fan boy favorite, who the players love to play, and the Dev's love to see win and hate to nerf. (We get it, you dont heal as much yet still can be nearly full hp from soulforge in one rotation now... so you're still fine). And base all the other classes off of that. Make them the standard, and base what YOU (we play your game), see fit for each classes role (again, you decide this) vs an HR. If DC's should be healers, they should heal more than HR. If TR's should be the highest single target DPS, make them that way vs HR single target, If GF's are tanks, scale their tanking ability to surpass that of an HR (it's not even close right now). I think then you would fine more balance, rather than this uproar of CC every patch as one path gets obliterated, and one path becomes the silk road to glory (we all QQ and spend 75k ad to respec). I think you would find if you forced us to spend AD/zen LESS, and let us enjoy the game, we would actually end up spending more on your game rather than other games.

    I'm not sure how this exactly pertains to this patch, and if this is considered slander. But it is more just a really really big fan of DND and especially Neverwinter Nights (the first one of course), and lastly someone who wants to see the latest game with Neverwinter on the title be as good as it can be.
  • Options
    urterrorurterror Member Posts: 77 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    macjae wrote: »
    The change to BtA refining items would probably pretty much be an unmitigated disaster for the game's overall player population, which would also affect profitability. It has become increasingly difficult for newer players to catch up to BiS level with each module; this would make it almost exponentially more so. For established players, it would mean their ability to advance further would become almost completely stymied.

    One fundamental question is whether it's intended on the developer side that only whales should be able to attain the best stuff in the game, or whether that should also be open to free players who invest sufficient (and not excessive) time to actually playing the game. That aside, there are some other issues to consider which could be addressed alongside this issue.

    Rewards for Actually Playing the Game: For a while, large sections of the player base has become increasingly frustrated with the comparative lack of rewards for actually playing through the content. A large part of the problem here is in the lottery-like nature of gaining the very rare rewards that give meaningful payouts (like artifact belts, artifacts or boon tomes) while the more consistent rewards are fairly niggardly. The main way that some players make profit towards advancement is by trading on the Auction House (which is inherently exploitative of other players) and spending a lot of time clicking through leadership alts (which is inherently inflationary of the total AD supply), not actually playing. Bots provided a vital service for players here in that it made those profits spendable for advancement at a cost that's reasonable in terms of time invested.

    The Current Solution Suffers From Mission Creep: Making these enchants bound to account will also cause another issue; botterss will use them to refine non-BtA enchantments, which while it may decrease the returns on some refining stones (like resonance stones), will still allow them to harvest most of the value, and sink the higher-end enchantment market in the process. So the logical extension of the current policy will be to make those BtA too, or institute some other measure that punishes players most of all.

    The core problem is really that many measures instituted to harm botting also harms legitimate play on several different levels; both in terms of the ability to attain rewards from playing, and in terms of the ability to acquire rewards from the market. It does benefit the player group that sells such materials themselves, but those would benefit even more from a solution that would raise overall rewards from playing in such a way that it preempts bots.

    That said, here are some proposals and reasonings behind them:

    • Players should receive some BoE refining stones for each epic dungeon or periodic dungeon (like Biggrin's Tomb or Arcane Reservoir) that they complete. As completing the epic boss fights probably isn't the bots' forte (and it would likely take far too much effort to gear/program bots to do so), this would effectively move that market from bot-driven to player-driven. Each dungeon should give at minimum an Aquamarine or Flawless Sapphire, with a chance of a better item, like a Black Opal, Blood Ruby or Brilliant Diamond (possibly as a boss drop). Higher-tier content should give better rewards or have higher drop rates on better refining stones. Most or even all epic dungeon bosses should drop a BoE refining stone or mark in addition to the current rewards they give (and not green stuff either).
    • Along similar lines, the reward chests in foundries should be augmented with at least a peridot during foundry hour. Alternately, or in addition, completing the daily Foundry quest should also give some refining stones or marks. Boosting foundry rewards is good for fostering more variety in-game, which is probably good for player retention.
    • The contents of Coffers of Wondrous Augmentation should be boosted a bit to give players access to better refining consolation prices, and to reflect the increasing refining requirements of the game. Their random refining stone drops should all be boosted by at least one step: Peridots to Aquamarines, Aquamarines to Flawless Sapphires, rank 4s to rank 5s, and rank 5s to rank 6s. Maybe give a chance for higher-tier refining stone drops too. All BtA.
    • Epic items should reward far more RP than they currently do when fed to artifact equipment. This would increase player-specific rewards for some activities; notably completing end-game bosses and using PvP gear bought from glory as refining materials. Since equipment can only be used to refine bound items, and the glory gear is BoP (should be changed to BtA) already, this will benefit legitimate players and give a reasonable ability to advance through playing PvP too, without inviting more bots.
    • Another way to hit bots (and predatory AH speculators) is to make green and blue refining marks (union, power, stability) available at the Wondrous Bazaar at a slightly lower cost than Marks of Potency of the same rank. These are required to advance artifact items, and the current costs are probably hurting newer players most of all. This would help players and further dampen the incentives to bot skill nodes.
    • While you're working on issues related to bots, changing the reward structure for PvP to discourage botting it would also be nice, as long as it also benefits legitimate players. This would mean: Removal of the ability to salvage PvP gear, awarding some RAD for each PvP *victory* (as bots aren't generally good at winning), double the victory RAD during PvP hour, and reducing or eliminating the RAD rewards for the daily quest. This would also hit those players who "only do PvP for the daily", which isn't necessarily a bad thing either. In addition, each player on a winning team could be awarded 1-3 BtA peridots, scaling like the base glory rewards for longer games.
    • If the drops from Dragon Hoard and Fey Blessing Enchantments are made BtA, the percentage chance of a drop should increase a bit, giving greater periodic rewards for using them.
    • The issue of bots crafting higher-tier enchantments and selling those instead could be averted to some extent by increasing player access to one of the main limiting factors: Wards. Players could earn a Preservation Ward for completing a certain number of epic dungeons or winning a certain number of PvP games. Bots would have less ability to access these rewards, which would make their ward costs slightly higher, driving down their competitiveness compared to legitimate players. The number of wards given shouldn't be great enough to hurt Zen Store sales (and may in fact encourage sales, as players may attempt to fuse more often with more free wards and more refining points), just enough to dent bot price margins.



    This guy knows his stuff!
    paladin_signature_by_whiitelotus-d330x28.png

    | Cìrdan - GF | Cìrdan The Lightbringer - OP |
    < Guild: Pugno Fiammante >
  • Options
    lerdocixlerdocix Member Posts: 897 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    macjae wrote: »
    The change to BtA refining items would probably pretty much be an unmitigated disaster for the game's overall player population, which would also affect profitability. It has become increasingly difficult for newer players to catch up to BiS level with each module; this would make it almost exponentially more so. For established players, it would mean their ability to advance further would become almost completely stymied.

    One fundamental question is whether it's intended on the developer side that only whales should be able to attain the best stuff in the game, or whether that should also be open to free players who invest sufficient (and not excessive) time to actually playing the game. That aside, there are some other issues to consider which could be addressed alongside this issue.

    Rewards for Actually Playing the Game: For a while, large sections of the player base has become increasingly frustrated with the comparative lack of rewards for actually playing through the content. A large part of the problem here is in the lottery-like nature of gaining the very rare rewards that give meaningful payouts (like artifact belts, artifacts or boon tomes) while the more consistent rewards are fairly niggardly. The main way that some players make profit towards advancement is by trading on the Auction House (which is inherently exploitative of other players) and spending a lot of time clicking through leadership alts (which is inherently inflationary of the total AD supply), not actually playing. Bots provided a vital service for players here in that it made those profits spendable for advancement at a cost that's reasonable in terms of time invested.

    The Current Solution Suffers From Mission Creep: Making these enchants bound to account will also cause another issue; botterss will use them to refine non-BtA enchantments, which while it may decrease the returns on some refining stones (like resonance stones), will still allow them to harvest most of the value, and sink the higher-end enchantment market in the process. So the logical extension of the current policy will be to make those BtA too, or institute some other measure that punishes players most of all.

    The core problem is really that many measures instituted to harm botting also harms legitimate play on several different levels; both in terms of the ability to attain rewards from playing, and in terms of the ability to acquire rewards from the market. It does benefit the player group that sells such materials themselves, but those would benefit even more from a solution that would raise overall rewards from playing in such a way that it preempts bots.

    That said, here are some proposals and reasonings behind them:

    • Players should receive some BoE refining stones for each epic dungeon or periodic dungeon (like Biggrin's Tomb or Arcane Reservoir) that they complete. As completing the epic boss fights probably isn't the bots' forte (and it would likely take far too much effort to gear/program bots to do so), this would effectively move that market from bot-driven to player-driven. Each dungeon should give at minimum an Aquamarine or Flawless Sapphire, with a chance of a better item, like a Black Opal, Blood Ruby or Brilliant Diamond (possibly as a boss drop). Higher-tier content should give better rewards or have higher drop rates on better refining stones. Most or even all epic dungeon bosses should drop a BoE refining stone or mark in addition to the current rewards they give (and not green stuff either).
    • Along similar lines, the reward chests in foundries should be augmented with at least a peridot during foundry hour. Alternately, or in addition, completing the daily Foundry quest should also give some refining stones or marks. Boosting foundry rewards is good for fostering more variety in-game, which is probably good for player retention.
    • The contents of Coffers of Wondrous Augmentation should be boosted a bit to give players access to better refining consolation prices, and to reflect the increasing refining requirements of the game. Their random refining stone drops should all be boosted by at least one step: Peridots to Aquamarines, Aquamarines to Flawless Sapphires, rank 4s to rank 5s, and rank 5s to rank 6s. Maybe give a chance for higher-tier refining stone drops too. All BtA.
    • Epic items should reward far more RP than they currently do when fed to artifact equipment. This would increase player-specific rewards for some activities; notably completing end-game bosses and using PvP gear bought from glory as refining materials. Since equipment can only be used to refine bound items, and the glory gear is BoP (should be changed to BtA) already, this will benefit legitimate players and give a reasonable ability to advance through playing PvP too, without inviting more bots.
    • Another way to hit bots (and predatory AH speculators) is to make green and blue refining marks (union, power, stability) available at the Wondrous Bazaar at a slightly lower cost than Marks of Potency of the same rank. These are required to advance artifact items, and the current costs are probably hurting newer players most of all. This would help players and further dampen the incentives to bot skill nodes.
    • While you're working on issues related to bots, changing the reward structure for PvP to discourage botting it would also be nice, as long as it also benefits legitimate players. This would mean: Removal of the ability to salvage PvP gear, awarding some RAD for each PvP *victory* (as bots aren't generally good at winning), double the victory RAD during PvP hour, and reducing or eliminating the RAD rewards for the daily quest. This would also hit those players who "only do PvP for the daily", which isn't necessarily a bad thing either. In addition, each player on a winning team could be awarded 1-3 BtA peridots, scaling like the base glory rewards for longer games.
    • If the drops from Dragon Hoard and Fey Blessing Enchantments are made BtA, the percentage chance of a drop should increase a bit, giving greater periodic rewards for using them.
    • The issue of bots crafting higher-tier enchantments and selling those instead could be averted to some extent by increasing player access to one of the main limiting factors: Wards. Players could earn a Preservation Ward for completing a certain number of epic dungeons or winning a certain number of PvP games. Bots would have less ability to access these rewards, which would make their ward costs slightly higher, driving down their competitiveness compared to legitimate players. The number of wards given shouldn't be great enough to hurt Zen Store sales (and may in fact encourage sales, as players may attempt to fuse more often with more free wards and more refining points), just enough to dent bot price margins.

    Quoting this one more, because this guy gets it.

    Sorry PW, but you will NOT fight off bots by making everything harder for the player.

    Perhaps you try to hoard more money from zen store refining items, but players will simply resist that on a large scale. I could have a CAR for the price of upgrading artifact weapon to legendary. I'm not saying it should be easy, but it shouldn't take months of daily grind or half of your salary to get to it.
  • Options
    schweifer1982schweifer1982 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,662 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    panderus wrote: »

    Items and Economy
    • All enchantments and other items that give RP dropped through Fey Blessing, Dragon Hoard and Tymora's Blessing enchantments are now Bound to Account. This change is not retroactive.

    HI panderus i have a few question .
    If i buy now few stack of RP now from AH they will be bound to my account after this patch note go to live?
    Yes ? or Not?

    And if i use now hoard or any affected enchant and i got some rp points in enchant from will be bound after patch or they will be normal as y say "its retroactive".

    So if i understand it rigth before patch they are not bound and after patch any enchant i got after update from hoard will be bound.
    Is this rigth?

    Another question what if i use the bound enchants (i got from hoard or fey) to refine some lets say Radiant enchant from 4-to-5 they will be bound after i used bound rp on it?

    If i want to upgrade some bound radiant 4-to-5 they will be bound after i upgraded it ?



    Feedback : Any way i 100% support this change time to deal with those bots .

    PS:To all how are aganst this change farming RP with those enchants you can still upgrade your artifacts this change only effect bots and not active players. I think this is a good move and protect us real players.
    GWF 3700Ilvl Éjsötét & ProPala 3200Ilvl Menydörgés (main) & Szürkefarkas 2600 ilvl
This discussion has been closed.