I think the issue is they don't want to make a GWF with dazes instead of stuns.
Anyway I think the feedback is pretty much over at it comes out in less than 20 hours. lets hope for good things in the patch notes tomorrow. (Like a fix on SOD)
0
Options
micky1p00Member, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 3,594Arc User
edited November 2014
Exposed Weakness: Stealth also causes you to ignore 5/10/15/20/25% of your target's armor.
Does this calculated as ArP or can go negative (debuff/buff) ? (PvE)
Shadowborn: Entering Stealth grants you 20/40/60/80/100% increased power for your next attack.
Perhaps making it work on encounters only will be more useful, if it trigers from at-wills / DoTs it will force crossing ones fingers, pray and a stealth->encounter button smashing instead of normal timing.
The tactician capstone feat is terrible if that's what you are referring to and reckless attacker got a rework/nerf and doesn't work as you describe, anymore. If a tactician doesn't block, he's dead in two hits, i believe. So no clue what you are even talking about.
Seems to me that what he said is correct, it's just that the mechanic doesn't actually work effectively in practice. It's the same story with many of the feat paths and paragons. The theory of how the different paths are supposed to perform is sound but the actual implementation leaves something drastically inferior or superior. Rogue in preview could potentially with some tweaks have all feats and paragons be viable in all sorts of different playstyles. That would be a breath of fresh air for diversity in this game, and something I would hope happens to all classes. I'm not expecting or holding my breath for a balanced rogue on M5 launch at this point. So long as they keep tweaking and improving over the next couple of weeks I'll be happy. If we get a series of nerf-bats and then ignored for months I'm throwing in the towel and giving up on this game.
0
Options
beckylunaticMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 14,231Arc User
edited November 2014
Tactician capstone used to only be in effect for taking unblocked damage. This is not the case since the big GF reworking, and it now doesn't matter if you're blocking or not.
Tactician capstone used to only be in effect for taking unblocked damage. This is not the case since the big GF reworking, and it now doesn't matter if you're blocking or not.
Can't say I know much about the GF class other than fighting them, and that you could attach kitchen appliances to those shoulder guards. Oh, and they are lucky that they have a ready to go bob-sled for winter time.
Seems to me that what he said is correct, it's just that the mechanic doesn't actually work effectively in practice. It's the same story with many of the feat paths and paragons. The theory of how the different paths are supposed to perform is sound but the actual implementation leaves something drastically inferior or superior. Rogue in preview could potentially with some tweaks have all feats and paragons be viable in all sorts of different playstyles. That would be a breath of fresh air for diversity in this game, and something I would hope happens to all classes. I'm not expecting or holding my breath for a balanced rogue on M5 launch at this point. So long as they keep tweaking and improving over the next couple of weeks I'll be happy. If we get a series of nerf-bats and then ignored for months I'm throwing in the towel and giving up on this game.
Naturally, since "making the theoretical mechanic to work in real life" involves actual skill. The less skilled you are, the more you trouble you have (= consequentially, the more you whine about it). Seems to be a problem with a lot of Feedback posts, lately.
Ofcourse, in some cases certain mechanics could be much too difficult to expect players of average caliber to be able to handle it effectively, in which case tweaking or rework should be done. However, being an average grade player myself, I haven't seen any such "too difficult" mechanics in the preview.
Stop making excuses. Be a man. If you know something to be broken, stop using it. Otherwise, you've got no right to be speaking of 'balance.'
Exposed Weakness: Stealth also causes you to ignore 5/10/15/20/25% of your target's armor.
Does this calculated as ArP or can go negative (debuff/buff) ? (PvE)
Shadowborn: Entering Stealth grants you 20/40/60/80/100% increased power for your next attack.
Perhaps making it work on encounters only will be more useful, if it trigers from at-wills / DoTs it will force crossing ones fingers, pray and a stealth->encounter button smashing instead of normal timing.
Exposed Weakness is ArP, I tested it on a training dummy with and without the feat, did about the same damage both times with LB.
Naturally, since "making the theoretical mechanic to work in real life" involves actual skill. The less skilled you are, the more you trouble you have (= consequentially, the more you whine about it). Seems to be a problem with a lot of Feedback posts, lately.
Ofcourse, in some cases certain mechanics could be much too difficult to expect players of average caliber to be able to handle it effectively, in which case tweaking or rework should be done. However, being an average grade player myself, I haven't seen any such "too difficult" mechanics in the preview.
Plenty of powers or feats that are clearly superior or inferior regardless of player skill. Other factors are only unlocked via skill-cap and gear combinations. GWF intimidation procs are a good example of something that's very gear dependent.
There is also the factor of reliability. Sure, something may be very powerful in a given situation, but is it reliable in a broader sense.
My current PVE rotation is complex enough that it took me a solid week to work out the muscle memory so that I wasn't making the mistakes that would get me killed. Which literally all it takes is a wrong button press a half a second early. If I did die, it was usually in 1-3 seconds full HP to dead. This was in soloing and completing major HEs in IWD, mother lode was my favorite one. I would say my TR's PVE rotation is about as effective as my lesser geared CW's. But the CW rotation has a lower skill-cap and is much more reliable. If my TR didn't have a Pvorp I wouldn't even be in the ballpark.
Although this is bugged and I absolutely agree that it is bugged, I have heard from many (and a few TR too) that damage doesn't matter and similar such nonsense. Would those same people that said damage doesn't matter then just as readily agree that this is fine too since damage doesn't matter? Or does that rule that applies to other classes not apply to the TR? I suppose if required the TR could argue "I am CC also and killing stuff fast is the best CC so...". What was the other argument I heard lately -- oh yeah "beating the content is all that counts, who cares who does what as long as the team wins".
Anyways I am just wanting to know if their viewpoint changes with the class that normally draws the short stick suddenly yanks out a tree.
You need to go to the preview news/announcements sections, and take time to read the patch notes. It's too much for us to simply explain it to you in words.
To make a long story short, mod5 TRs fight totally different (except certain buld/tactics) from the old TRs, with a totally different stealth mechanic. At-will attacks made from stealth will deplete it, so stealth is now a defense/positioning tool, and a method to deliver either big damage or utility with encounters.
Stop making excuses. Be a man. If you know something to be broken, stop using it. Otherwise, you've got no right to be speaking of 'balance.'
Although this is bugged and I absolutely agree that it is bugged, I have heard from many (and a few TR too) that damage doesn't matter and similar such nonsense. Would those same people that said damage doesn't matter then just as readily agree that this is fine too since damage doesn't matter? Or does that rule that applies to other classes not apply to the TR? I suppose if required the TR could argue "I am CC also and killing stuff fast is the best CC so...". What was the other argument I heard lately -- oh yeah "beating the content is all that counts, who cares who does what as long as the team wins".
Anyways I am just wanting to know if their viewpoint changes with the class that normally draws the short stick suddenly yanks out a tree.
1. This broken OP Exec damage is not gonna effect PvE status of the TR in anyway, but its gonna completely destroy any PvP balance and turn every other class fighting the TR to into pulp.
2. When that happens, they are gonna form a huge voice that is against the TRs, and they are going to ask the developers for a nerf.
3. When nerfs happen, it usually hits very hard.
4. So, what we're gonna be facing, is a situation where we could have stopped that goddamned stupid nerf from happening in the first place if only some PvErs showed a bit of constraint and self-discipline, and agreed to form a consensus on the limits of the TR. Instead, those people divide the community by supporting broken OP **** and then bring upon to the whole TRs a world of pain...
5. ...and after that happens, they tell us PvPers that its our fault... when us PvPers were the people who were trying to stop these changes from happening in the first place.
So how about "NO".
Stop making excuses. Be a man. If you know something to be broken, stop using it. Otherwise, you've got no right to be speaking of 'balance.'
1. This broken OP Exec damage is not gonna effect PvE status of the TR in anyway, but its gonna completely destroy any PvP balance and turn every other class fighting the TR to into pulp.
2. When that happens, they are gonna form a huge voice that is against the TRs, and they are going to ask the developers for a nerf.
3. When nerfs happen, it usually hits very hard.
4. So, what we're gonna be facing, is a situation where we could have stopped that goddamned stupid nerf from happening in the first place if only some PvErs showed a bit of constraint and self-discipline, and agreed to form a consensus on the limits of the TR. Instead, those people divide the community by supporting broken OP **** and then bring upon to the whole TRs a world of pain...
5. ...and after that happens, they tell us PvPers that its our fault... when us PvPers were the people who were trying to stop these changes from happening in the first place.
So how about "NO".
But if it doesn't matter how well one performs within their own specialties, why would it matter if the TR did poorly in damage in PvP? After all, and as you once said before, something about the good players would notice all those spectacular and wonderful things you did even if damage was not one of them and they would seek you out for their groups.
0
Options
micky1p00Member, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 3,594Arc User
1. This broken OP Exec damage is not gonna effect PvE status of the TR in anyway, but its gonna completely destroy any PvP balance and turn every other class fighting the TR to into pulp.
I guess in PvE it's the TRs ability to disarm traps people are looking for, instead of damage.
Is there a default pve tr build settled on yet? I know some people who don't read the forums or 130 pages of thread and aren't interested in bugtesting (hard to avoid in a cryptic game) on preview and they are kind of curious.
PvE TR here.
I tested the "bugged" feat. i can deal up 3-4 million damage on a puppet. On the live server it is nearly 1 million. But i used a plague fire, loghtfoot thiefe and path of blades to generate more stacks.
The lightfoot thiefe increase my damage by 500.000 damage.
My DPS on a single target is by 35.000 to 40.000 on preview. On live i have 15.000. GWFs and HR can easily have 22.000+
One of my guildmates must have something arround 30.000 DPS.
My opinion: In PvE it should be no problem because it is single target damage. In PvP it could be a harder, don't know needs more testing.
Platypus wielding a giant hammer, your argument is invalild!
personally i would say it is all fine because the TR must land several blows while he is stealthed and the you still can dodge out of the duelist flurry.
Platypus wielding a giant hammer, your argument is invalild!
Its more running around with a stealth POTB and a single big hit could kill someone due to the stacks.
POTB can easily apply ten stacks to a person then 10k damage turns into 50k.
Though shadow of demise does seem to be affected by resistances atm(other people have said).
0
Options
khimera906Member, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 898Arc User
Comments
Anyway I think the feedback is pretty much over at it comes out in less than 20 hours. lets hope for good things in the patch notes tomorrow. (Like a fix on SOD)
Does this calculated as ArP or can go negative (debuff/buff) ? (PvE)
Shadowborn: Entering Stealth grants you 20/40/60/80/100% increased power for your next attack.
Perhaps making it work on encounters only will be more useful, if it trigers from at-wills / DoTs it will force crossing ones fingers, pray and a stealth->encounter button smashing instead of normal timing.
Seems to me that what he said is correct, it's just that the mechanic doesn't actually work effectively in practice. It's the same story with many of the feat paths and paragons. The theory of how the different paths are supposed to perform is sound but the actual implementation leaves something drastically inferior or superior. Rogue in preview could potentially with some tweaks have all feats and paragons be viable in all sorts of different playstyles. That would be a breath of fresh air for diversity in this game, and something I would hope happens to all classes. I'm not expecting or holding my breath for a balanced rogue on M5 launch at this point. So long as they keep tweaking and improving over the next couple of weeks I'll be happy. If we get a series of nerf-bats and then ignored for months I'm throwing in the towel and giving up on this game.
Neverwinter Census 2017
All posts pending disapproval by Cecilia
Can't say I know much about the GF class other than fighting them, and that you could attach kitchen appliances to those shoulder guards. Oh, and they are lucky that they have a ready to go bob-sled for winter time.
Naturally, since "making the theoretical mechanic to work in real life" involves actual skill. The less skilled you are, the more you trouble you have (= consequentially, the more you whine about it). Seems to be a problem with a lot of Feedback posts, lately.
Ofcourse, in some cases certain mechanics could be much too difficult to expect players of average caliber to be able to handle it effectively, in which case tweaking or rework should be done. However, being an average grade player myself, I haven't seen any such "too difficult" mechanics in the preview.
If you know something to be broken, stop using it.
Otherwise, you've got no right to be speaking of 'balance.'
Exposed Weakness is ArP, I tested it on a training dummy with and without the feat, did about the same damage both times with LB.
Plenty of powers or feats that are clearly superior or inferior regardless of player skill. Other factors are only unlocked via skill-cap and gear combinations. GWF intimidation procs are a good example of something that's very gear dependent.
There is also the factor of reliability. Sure, something may be very powerful in a given situation, but is it reliable in a broader sense.
My current PVE rotation is complex enough that it took me a solid week to work out the muscle memory so that I wasn't making the mistakes that would get me killed. Which literally all it takes is a wrong button press a half a second early. If I did die, it was usually in 1-3 seconds full HP to dead. This was in soloing and completing major HEs in IWD, mother lode was my favorite one. I would say my TR's PVE rotation is about as effective as my lesser geared CW's. But the CW rotation has a lower skill-cap and is much more reliable. If my TR didn't have a Pvorp I wouldn't even be in the ballpark.
No, not really. Doesn't drain any stealth for me. Maybe it's a bug or something. You should report that!
We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40oI_qqVKoU&feature=youtu.be
No, because it severely breaks their new capstone content. I just soloed the first phase in like two minutes with a 13.5k TR...
Players will need only one phase to beat the heads. Here's my two-minute-damage (same 13.5k TR, 5k Power):
GFs can triple that amount, 45M in one phase. CU in the Nine Hells. You can only imagine what BiS TRs will do to the heads. We are talking seconds.
So if this indeed goes live tomorrow, farm and farm a lot. You'll never ever beat Tiamat that easy.
Apparently the Tiamat fight is postponed and not included in the launch tomorrow.
One of the many Control Wizards that misses Shard Of The Endless Avalanche. RIP Shard (Beta-Mod3)
Man, they changed the Stealth mechanic and now At-Will are also draining the stealth meter.
Anyways I am just wanting to know if their viewpoint changes with the class that normally draws the short stick suddenly yanks out a tree.
You need to go to the preview news/announcements sections, and take time to read the patch notes. It's too much for us to simply explain it to you in words.
To make a long story short, mod5 TRs fight totally different (except certain buld/tactics) from the old TRs, with a totally different stealth mechanic. At-will attacks made from stealth will deplete it, so stealth is now a defense/positioning tool, and a method to deliver either big damage or utility with encounters.
If you know something to be broken, stop using it.
Otherwise, you've got no right to be speaking of 'balance.'
1. This broken OP Exec damage is not gonna effect PvE status of the TR in anyway, but its gonna completely destroy any PvP balance and turn every other class fighting the TR to into pulp.
2. When that happens, they are gonna form a huge voice that is against the TRs, and they are going to ask the developers for a nerf.
3. When nerfs happen, it usually hits very hard.
4. So, what we're gonna be facing, is a situation where we could have stopped that goddamned stupid nerf from happening in the first place if only some PvErs showed a bit of constraint and self-discipline, and agreed to form a consensus on the limits of the TR. Instead, those people divide the community by supporting broken OP **** and then bring upon to the whole TRs a world of pain...
5. ...and after that happens, they tell us PvPers that its our fault... when us PvPers were the people who were trying to stop these changes from happening in the first place.
So how about "NO".
If you know something to be broken, stop using it.
Otherwise, you've got no right to be speaking of 'balance.'
But if it doesn't matter how well one performs within their own specialties, why would it matter if the TR did poorly in damage in PvP? After all, and as you once said before, something about the good players would notice all those spectacular and wonderful things you did even if damage was not one of them and they would seek you out for their groups.
I guess in PvE it's the TRs ability to disarm traps people are looking for, instead of damage.
I don't think any of the dungeons since the core game have traps?
anyway you forgot your sarcasm tag
i wish we could just place a trap and push people into it for their execution
I tested the "bugged" feat. i can deal up 3-4 million damage on a puppet. On the live server it is nearly 1 million. But i used a plague fire, loghtfoot thiefe and path of blades to generate more stacks.
The lightfoot thiefe increase my damage by 500.000 damage.
My DPS on a single target is by 35.000 to 40.000 on preview. On live i have 15.000. GWFs and HR can easily have 22.000+
One of my guildmates must have something arround 30.000 DPS.
My opinion: In PvE it should be no problem because it is single target damage. In PvP it could be a harder, don't know needs more testing.
POTB can easily apply ten stacks to a person then 10k damage turns into 50k.
Though shadow of demise does seem to be affected by resistances atm(other people have said).