test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

PTS Update FC.30.20120706a.1

1235»

Comments

  • hocofaisanhocofaisan Posts: 190 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    SNIP.

    I now understand its not worth explaining this to you, as you have an agenda.

    I put my thoughts out there with numbers, Falchoin has put a superior analysis.
    You choose to ignore anything that doesn't support your FALSE supposition that Nightwarrior is balanced.
    Total additive damage bonuses with Night Warrior:
    No Focus stacks: 189.5%
    8 Focus stacks: 309.5%

    Total additive damage bonuses with Way of the Warrior:
    No Focus stacks: 226.5%
    8 Focus stacks: 346.5%

    Note: There are diminishing returns on additive damage bonuses as well when using a freeform, so the above numbers are not going to translate directly to the damage numbers given below.

    Dodge/Avoidance (using D/A primary defense):
    No Passive - 43.5% dodge / 60% avoidance
    Night Warrior - 48.7% dodge / 66% avoidance
    Way of the Warrior - 52.8% dodge / 70.4% avoidance

    It doesn't take half a second of rough math to realize something is way out of whack here.
    Remember, Freeforms have diminishing returns that brings the additive bonuses even closer.
    Remember that Nightwarrior has Intrinsic Penetration allowing it to close the gap even more or exceed other passives.

    Note that No passive up there also includes all of the projector offensive passives as they give neglible defensive utility.

    Lets also remember that Night warrior gives Free powers and Greater Damage buffing from stealth on top of all this.


    Either way If this power goes live in its current outlandish form, that I think is frankly embarrasing to Cryptic as a development team, I win anyway since I will just respec all my toons to it.

    Sadly it will make Cryptics already marginal content even more trivialized.
    POSITIVE ABOUT CO IN 2013!
  • xaadexaade Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Good point, I think I'll stick to thinking of it as an Active Offense paired with a Passive.

    Sneak disables during taking damage and can only be re-enabled (unless a tank peels off threat) with Smoke Bomb and Evasive Maneuvers (at a 50% ratio). I believe that's the perfect balance for someone looking to be an assassin. If you prefer to restore the disabled during combat, that's fine, as long as evasive maneuvers and smoke bomb wipe combat.

    Enabling sneak doesn't wipe threat, so it can't be used more than once during a fight outside of special powers will cooldown.

    Anything else would trivialize the stealth aspect of the passive.

    If anything then lower the base damage of the passive a few %.

    I really don't see anything wrong with the power as is, because it's exceptionally situational.

    Let's look at what it takes to build a good stealth.

    Smoke Bomb
    Smoke Grenade
    Evasive Maneuvers
    Night Warrior
    2 or 3 Active offenses.

    Thats 6-7 powers right there. And we still don't have attacks.

    Then we have to invest 6 points in SB,SG,EM alone to make them work at all.

    That's all to get a single target bonus while in stealth....

    Not AoE...
    Doesn't work while damaged.
    Only works for one attack.

    I just don't see how this is unfair.
  • dataweaver42dataweaver42 Posts: 166 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    As things stand on the PTS right now, you can only get Sneak by taking Night Warrior, and it only works while Night Warrior is slotted. I've got it in red because this is a massive bug: Sneak should be available independent of Night Warrior, and it should be up to the player to decide how he wants to use it. For example, I'm trying to put together a "heal from the shadows" type who stays out of the fighting and simply heals and buffs her team-mates; to put together this Support character, I am required to slot an Offensive Passive.
  • sigmaseven0sigmaseven0 Posts: 714 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    hocofaisan wrote: »
    I now understand its not worth explaining this to you, as you have an agenda.

    I put my thoughts out there with numbers, Falchoin has put a superior analysis.
    You choose to ignore anything that doesn't support your FALSE supposition that Nightwarrior is balanced.
    O'rly?
    how do you get "night-warrior is balanced" from this?
    NW needs to be toned down.
    Ive already said shadow strike hits too hard, sneak needs a cool-down and even begrudgingly am willing to go along with NW and sneak/shadow strike being separated as a bundled package.
    or this? LINK
    Your the 2nd person to put those words in my mouth today. Maybe your more concerned about being rite than furthering this discussion.

    With regard to the cryptic math you didnt answer my question you only requoted this:
    Total additive damage bonuses with Night Warrior:
    No Focus stacks: 189.5%
    8 Focus stacks: 309.5%

    Total additive damage bonuses with Way of the Warrior:
    No Focus stacks: 226.5%
    8 Focus stacks: 346.5%

    These numbers suggest that WOTW is providing more damage. Now i understand that cryptic maths and diminishing returns mean that these numbers may not be accurate in combat, but this is far from showing that NW will out damage WOTW in the context of AOEs and potentially single target maintains v trash -villain mobs.

    You yourself said "It doesn't take half a second of rough math" but im dyslectic and not good at math so indulge me and post the numbers or combat logs. After all it would only take "a half a second".

    PVP is starving without rewards

    1. Please give us Daily PVP missions that reward Questionite.
    2. Please give us an exchange rate between Acclaim and Recognition so that PVP has access to all "On Alert" PVE rewards.
  • kaiserin#0958 kaiserin Posts: 3,222 Cryptic Developer
    edited July 2012
    xaade wrote: »
    Stuff about sneak not working in combat

    Sneak works in combat, even if you have aggro, even if you have dots running on an enemy. You do not need to buy any excess stealth enabling powers to get off anything sneak related. It's probably not supposed to work in combat, but it currently does.
  • sigmaseven0sigmaseven0 Posts: 714 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I'm also getting tired of people saying I'm "ignoring the facts" or "wont admit that I'm wrong" just because some one wants to twist the facts.

    hocofaisan, I've already publicly apologized to you in this thread when i was in fact wrong proving that I'm not to big to own up to when I've made a mistake.
    Don't try to demonize me to diminish my points. My only "agenda" is to make this pass the best it can be.

    PVP is starving without rewards

    1. Please give us Daily PVP missions that reward Questionite.
    2. Please give us an exchange rate between Acclaim and Recognition so that PVP has access to all "On Alert" PVE rewards.
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    kaizerin wrote: »
    Sneak works in combat, even if you have aggro, even if you have dots running on an enemy. You do not need to buy any excess stealth enabling powers to get off anything sneak related. It's probably not supposed to work in combat, but it currently does.

    The patch notes indicated to me, Sneak is supposed to work incombat, but not while you take or inflict damage, it sounds appropriate, however there probably be some 2-4 second check to this to prevent someone from sneaking immediately after a hit
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    As things stand on the PTS right now, you can only get Sneak by taking Night Warrior, and it only works while Night Warrior is slotted. I've got it in red because this is a massive bug: Sneak should be available independent of Night Warrior, and it should be up to the player to decide how he wants to use it. For example, I'm trying to put together a "heal from the shadows" type who stays out of the fighting and simply heals and buffs her team-mates; to put together this Support character, I am required to slot an Offensive Passive.

    I actually find this point viable, Sneak being seperated from Night Warrior would be perfectly reasonable, as I stated before, Sneak in its live form with the PTS buffs would make Sneak a good power and not overpowered.
  • hocofaisanhocofaisan Posts: 190 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    O'rly?
    how do you get "night-warrior is balanced" from this?

    or this? LINK
    Your the 2nd person to put those words in my mouth today. Maybe your more concerned about being rite than furthering this discussion.

    With regard to the cryptic math you didnt answer my question you only requoted this:
    Total additive damage bonuses with Night Warrior:
    No Focus stacks: 189.5%
    8 Focus stacks: 309.5%

    Total additive damage bonuses with Way of the Warrior:
    No Focus stacks: 226.5%
    8 Focus stacks: 346.5%

    These numbers suggest that WOTW is providing more damage. Now i understand that cryptic maths and diminishing returns mean that these numbers may not be accurate in combat, but this is far from showing that NW will out damage WOTW in the context of AOEs and potentially single target maintains v trash -villain mobs.

    You yourself said "It doesn't take half a second of rough math" but im dyslectic and not good at math so indulge me and post the numbers or combat logs. After all it would only take "a half a second".
    You are missing some major pieces of the puzzle.

    Free Forms Diminishing Returns.
    Damage Penetration.

    Go reread Falchoin's post, I am unwilling to give the farm away on the forums about Additive buffs.

    Lets also not forget what nightwarrior gets on top of everything else most active offenses provide:

    Free Stealth Power
    Free Massive melee spike power
    Free Dodge/Avoidance ratings.
    POSITIVE ABOUT CO IN 2013!
  • xaadexaade Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    kaizerin wrote: »
    Sneak works in combat, even if you have aggro, even if you have dots running on an enemy. You do not need to buy any excess stealth enabling powers to get off anything sneak related. It's probably not supposed to work in combat, but it currently does.

    Really, because I can't seem to stay in sneak since I get knocked out when taking damage.

    Good luck on a 2 second charge.

    What I said was that you can't reliably use sneak in combat, unless someone pulls threat off you, or you use something to wipe threat (like smoke bomb or Evasive advantaged).
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    hocofaisan wrote: »
    You are missing some major pieces of the puzzle.

    Free Forms Diminishing Returns.
    Damage Penetration.

    Go reread Falchoin's post, I am unwilling to give the farm away on the forums about Additive buffs.

    Lets also not forget what nightwarrior gets on top of everything else most active offenses provide:

    Free Stealth Power
    Free Massive melee spike power
    Free Dodge/Avoidance ratings.

    Oh my goodness, you're arguing like a child, HE SAID HE GETS IT. Will you STOP COMPLAINING AND MOVE ON.

    EDIT: didn't want to double post, but want to mention, the addition of charge time reduction from passives like Aura of Arcane Clarity and Night Warrior on to other MELEE passives (debateable with ranged passives, but most offensive passives need buffs, as they largely lag behind defensive/support *cough cough, AoPM* passives).
  • championshewolfchampionshewolf Posts: 4,376 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    xaade wrote: »
    Really, because I can't seem to stay in sneak since I get knocked out when taking damage.

    Good luck on a 2 second charge.

    What I said was that you can't reliably use sneak in combat, unless someone pulls threat off you, or you use something to wipe threat (like smoke bomb or Evasive advantaged).

    Because you are suppose to lose sneak when you take damage. That's in the notes. You won't lose sneak for entering combat now, also in the notes.
    Champions Online player since September of 2008, forumite since February of 2008.
    Silverspar on PRIMUS
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • xaadexaade Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    hocofaisan wrote: »
    You are missing some major pieces of the puzzle.

    Free Forms Diminishing Returns.
    Damage Penetration.

    Go reread Falchoin's post, I am unwilling to give the farm away on the forums about Additive buffs.

    Lets also not forget what nightwarrior gets on top of everything else most active offenses provide:

    Free Stealth Power
    Free Massive melee spike power
    Free Dodge/Avoidance ratings.

    OMG, then kill the <BLANKED> melee spike power. I don't want/need, and if this is causing the whole argument then kill it with fire.

    If stealth has a CD longer than 10 seconds, doesn't have bonus damage to ranged, or if NW doesn't give equal base damage to ranged, then it's a wasted passive and I'd rather them scrap the dang thing.

    Finally I have a passive with decent defense, and a flat damage buff. The fact that I can use a stealth playstyle is a bonus. And the power doesn't give any more total damage increase than ANY OTHER PASSIVE...

    Heck, even AoED was given a proc on crit to have MOAR damage.

    I'm tired of the whiners killing everything.

    Tone it down, yes, but I think it can be done by scrapping the stealth melee attack, and lowering the stealth bonuses.

    But DO NOT TAKE AWAY RANGED DAMAGE.
  • xaadexaade Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Because you are suppose to lose sneak when you take damage. That's in the notes. You won't lose sneak for entering combat now, also in the notes.

    You completely and repeatedly miss what I'm saying and play captain obvious with what I've already said.

    Losing while taking damage prevents you from solo spamming sneak attacks.

    The only way to reliably re-enter stealth when you don't have someone taking threat away from you, is by using a threat clearing power (Evasive advantaged).

    Third time I've said that.

    This is fair, and it allows you to have a method to reenter stealth so stealth spiking isn't just some gimic, but a part of your rotation for long duration fights.


    Guys, this is the same dang thing that any other stealth power in any other MMO game does. This is not a revolutionary idea.
  • sigmaseven0sigmaseven0 Posts: 714 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Falchoin your the numbers guy so please chime in.
    Does NW have the best AOE dmg or not? And if so does is it better against MVs and up or across the board?

    PVP is starving without rewards

    1. Please give us Daily PVP missions that reward Questionite.
    2. Please give us an exchange rate between Acclaim and Recognition so that PVP has access to all "On Alert" PVE rewards.
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    xaade wrote: »
    Tone it down, yes, but I think it can be done by scrapping the stealth melee attack, and lowering the stealth bonuses.
    Lowering the nearly nonexistant steath bonuses? Please can we not do that? Lets actually buff sneak and make it good on its own, then seperate it from Night Warrior, infact, rename Night Warrior to something else, remove the penetration, keep everything else, remove Shadow Strike aswell, and perhaps a bit more additive (since penetration was removed, sneak seperated, and shadow strike removed)
  • rafahil893rafahil893 Posts: 50 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I think it's all good now for the most part. I do realize that Shadow Strike is a bit too much, but if it does get nerfed then it should also get its cooldown reduced accordingly.
  • dataweaver42dataweaver42 Posts: 166 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I actually find this point viable, Sneak being seperated from Night Warrior would be perfectly reasonable, as I stated before, Sneak in its live form with the PTS buffs would make Sneak a good power and not overpowered.
    Indeed. I'd even nerf it slightly: make it nerf your speed (without killing your travel power) the same way that Block does, unless you take a 1-point Silent Running Advantage.

    And even then, it's probably effective enough that the only reason to include it for free with Night Warrior is that Night Warrior is useless without Sneak. Indeed, I'd be inclined to make Sneak a (possibly the prerequisite for Night Warrior, instead of tossing it in as a freebie. Note that this makes Night Warrior harder to acquire than other Slotted Passives, which is itself a problem that would need to be resolved.
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Indeed. I'd even nerf it slightly: make it nerf your speed (without killing your travel power) the same way that Block does, unless you take a 1-point Silent Running Advantage.

    Actually, it already does that, not as much as Blocking, but there is a small reduction in speed with sneak on.
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    xaade wrote: »
    Sneak disables during taking damage and can only be re-enabled (unless a tank peels off threat) with Smoke Bomb and Evasive Maneuvers ...

    Forgot Ego Placate unless you mean the above powers auto-reapply the Sneak. If so then that was removed as of this latest patch. It's a two-step process regardless.
    xaade wrote: »
    ... everything else...

    Situational is not Passive. The only thing Passive about Night Warrior is the bonus to all damage buff.

    I don't see it as an option I see it as a "hack" to make the entire game system conform to a specific playstyle.

    To play in the way that you see as viable, why would you need another attack other than the one they give for free?

    Other than that, I call that investment into a playstyle just like any other build. Things can be tweaked or changed to promote it being easier to play in that way.

    Instead of picking 2-3 Active Offensives (which only one can be used every 30 seconds) a single Active Offense could work better with that playstyle.

    The other stealth powers could be tuned to make having only one or two to be viable instead of the whole gamut.
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • dataweaver42dataweaver42 Posts: 166 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I stand corrected.

    I haven't had a chance to test out the "stealth healer" concept yet. My main concern is what happens when you gain Aggro while stealthed - either through direct healing of a teammate or through "passive healing" such as what Medical Nanites cause.
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Indeed. I'd even nerf it slightly: make it nerf your speed (without killing your travel power) the same way that Block does, unless you take a 1-point Silent Running Advantage.

    Or make Sneak a Block Replacer?
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • theapygoostheapygoos Posts: 384 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Or make Sneak a Block Replacer?

    this
    /signed
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    theapygoos wrote: »
    this
    /signed

    I disagree with this, as Sneak as a block...well, in PvP everyone has Crippling Challenge, so Sneak is dead flat, in PvE its useless because...who blocks again?
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    I disagree with this, as Sneak as a block...well, in PvP everyone has Crippling Challenge, so Sneak is dead flat, in PvE its useless because...who blocks again?

    The sneak part of the Block Replacer would only be applied when you are not being hit or attacking for like X seconds (equivalent to Out of Combat). Then stay on after X seconds upon the release of block to allow performing an Alpha Strike within it's duration.

    If you can't be seen, then how would one be able to apply Crippling Challenge prior to the Alpha Strike?
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • hocofaisanhocofaisan Posts: 190 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Falchoin your the numbers guy so please chime in.
    Does NW have the best AOE dmg or not? And if so does is it better against MVs and up or across the board?
    The power applies to all vector types equally. It doesn't have a specific provision for reduced AoE damage.
    The damage penetration applies to all attacks made when this passive is equipped as well.
    POSITIVE ABOUT CO IN 2013!
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    The sneak part of the Block Replacer would only be applied when you are not being hit or attacking for like X seconds (equivalent to Out of Combat). Then stay on after X seconds upon the release of block to allow performing an Alpha Strike within it's duration.

    If you can't be seen, then how would one be able to apply Crippling Challenge prior to the Alpha Strike?

    Two words: Perception gear.
    Three more words (incase thats not enough): Legacy Perception Gear.
    ...Oh by the way, Sneak's current perception benefit is far too weak, still, imo, I really think perception stealth should not rise with the rank of sneak, but be a high flat number, the bonuses you get from sneak should rank, such as damage bonus, etc.
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Two words: Perception gear.
    Three more words (incase thats not enough): Legacy Perception Gear.
    ...Oh by the way, Sneak's current perception benefit is far too weak, still, imo, I really think perception stealth should not rise with the rank of sneak, but be a high flat number, the bonuses you get from sneak should rank, such as damage bonus, etc.

    But see numbers are something we all can work with. :biggrin: Mechanics are something we have to deal with.

    I'd rather we first have solid mechanics before going LIVE.
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • falchoinfalchoin Posts: 363 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Against villain+ enemies Night Warrior should grant higher dps than other offensive passives IF you do not already have defense penetration. AoE or single target makes no difference since the Night Warrior defense penetration applies to both (except in some circumstances like when the damage doesn't come directly from your character like the additional bounces from Boomerang Throw or electric arcs).

    If you're using maintains or other non-charge powers against minions then you'll get more dps out of most other offensive passives assuming all the damage types match.

    However, the slightly lower damage against henchman is more than made up for by the "extra" damage against the tougher targets in my opinion.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • dataweaver42dataweaver42 Posts: 166 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Or make Sneak a Block Replacer?
    While I don't have a problem with this in principle, it strikes me as a needless complication and a potential source for bugs in practice. As much as is practical, I'd like to keep Sneak as much as it was like prior to Night Warrior being added, just buffed a little and with a few of its restrictions scraped off so that you aren't dropping out of stealth mode at the drop of a hat.

    As for Night Warrior, let me +1 the suggestion from the last round of feedback of having it build up a damage buff based on time in stealth mode, instead of the one-note wonder that is this iteration's "sneak attack" power. Cleaner and more versatile.
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    While I don't have a problem with this in principle, it strikes me as a needless complication and a potential source for bugs in practice. As much as is practical, I'd like to keep Sneak as much as it was like prior to Night Warrior being added, just buffed a little and with a few of its restrictions scraped off so that you aren't dropping out of stealth mode at the drop of a hat.

    As for Night Warrior, let me +1 the suggestion from the last round of feedback of having it build up a damage buff based on time in stealth mode, instead of the one-note wonder that is this iteration's "sneak attack" power. Cleaner and more versatile.

    That's fair. I figured it would actually be more streamlined in practice and those potential bugs are there cause of inherent problems with blocking itself that should be addressed anyways.

    Something I mentioned before is that we only get one option at this moment in the PTS to accept rather than trying out two ideas to see which one works better for everyone. So with it being "good on paper". Can't really make a proof-of-concept myself now can I? ;)

    I'm curious on your ideas on potential bugs that could happen though that's at your discretion to bring up.
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    While I don't have a problem with this in principle, it strikes me as a needless complication and a potential source for bugs in practice. As much as is practical, I'd like to keep Sneak as much as it was like prior to Night Warrior being added, just buffed a little and with a few of its restrictions scraped off so that you aren't dropping out of stealth mode at the drop of a hat.

    This I support, I still honestly believe the LIVE version of sneak should be given the buffs it recieved in this last patch, and then add in more perception (Or my previous suggestion of giving Sneak a nonscaling very high perception stealth, like say, the equivalent of EM's advantage)
  • xaogarrentxaogarrent Posts: 632 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    kaizerin wrote: »
    Once again you can apply Sneak in combat, with aggro, with bleeds running, without anyone to take aggro from you. (Shadow Strikes at 0:06 (37213) and 1:07 (36069)). You do not need any other stealth granting power.

    I really fail to see anything special here. In fact, all watching this video does is make me go "Oh, it's like an IO'd Stalker fighting an EB in CoV." The only difference is here you have to time Sneak right, and in CoV you'd just mash Placate every so often. Well, that and instead of just doing high flat damage, AS had a large portion of "special" (basically irresistible) damage that just ripped chunks off bosses.

    AS > Placate > Total Focus/Insert-Spike-Attack-Here would actually kill or nearly kill anything that wasn't an EB or higher outright, it's why you brought a good Stalker to high level content involving any difficult normal spawn critters: done right, they could kill the LTs and Bosses with dangerous debuffs before they could get them off.

    Of course, this was AFTER they buffed stalkers, because as it turned out being invisible and doing huge spike damage on a long-ish cooldown really wasn't enough to justify them over most of the other Villain classes in most people's eyes. Consider that for a moment, especially since most CO hybrid characters are more comparable to redside classes than blueside classes.

    ...I just recently realized something really disturbing. We're all eating Sodapop3's "humble pie."
  • xaadexaade Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    kaizerin wrote: »
    Once again you can apply Sneak in combat, with aggro, with bleeds running, without anyone to take aggro from you. (Shadow Strikes at 0:06 (37213) and 1:07 (36069)). You do not need any other stealth granting power.

    One thing though, You could take a toon maxed for sustained damage, and do that much damage over time as a NW.

    Otherwise, we agree.

    The problem isn't stealth,
    Isn't NW bonuses,
    Isn't the damage restrictions on busting stealth.

    It's solely Shadow Strikes fault.

    Then the answer is to re-evaluate shadow strike....

    Maybe a longer activation time?

    Make it to where you can't pull it off unless you don't have aggro in practice. (not literally disabled mind you).
  • championshewolfchampionshewolf Posts: 4,376 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    xaade wrote: »
    Then we agree.

    The problem isn't stealth,
    Isn't NW bonuses,
    Isn't the damage restrictions on busting stealth.

    It's solely Shadow Strikes fault.

    Then the answer is to re-evaluate shadow strike....

    Maybe a longer activation time?

    Make it to where you can't pull it off unless you don't have aggro in practice. (not literally disabled mind you).

    You keep reaching. The damage bonus from both shadow warrior and sneak is a bit on the insane side.
    Champions Online player since September of 2008, forumite since February of 2008.
    Silverspar on PRIMUS
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • xaadexaade Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    You keep reaching. The damage bonus from both shadow warrior and sneak is a bit on the insane side.

    Level 30 - R1 passives

    Superstat - DEX 89
    Demistats - EGO 77, INT 66

    Electric Form - 40%
    Ebon Destro - 30%
    Quarry - 32% Phy, 16% non-Phy
    WotW - 51% Phy melee, 37% melee, 20% Phy
    NW - 32% Base, 57% Ranged sneak, 82% Melee sneak, 15% damage resist ignored.

    So ranged is just a little over.
    Melee is significantly higher...

    But, the 25% and 50% are static, and at R3, 50% and 100%.

    So, taking up to level 40, and R3 on passives

    Dex - 171, Ego 111, Int 95

    Electric Form - 62%
    NW - 50%, 100% ranged sneak, 150% melee sneak
    WotW - 80% Phy melee

    Remember, you can't charge attacks while you have aggro and get the bonus damage, because if anything hits you, you get knocked out of stealth.

    The only way to guarantee another stealth attack is to use a tap activate, or use a threat wipe.

    So, shadow strike needs to be a charge...

    Other than that, maybe lower the bonus damage, but I just don't see how it's not fair.

    150 damage bonus if you don't have aggro (or a tap only), 80% damage bonus all the time without any effort.

    So, ultimately, put a 10 second cooldown on sneak, and a 1 second charge time on shadow strike, and call it a day.

    BTW, exiting sneak is supposed to put a 15 second cooldown on the power. That bug is hurting the balance a little.
  • goldencalfgoldencalf Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Are you supposed to be able to remain in Stealth whilst interacting with things, because that seems a bit broken? I did the end of Reign of Frogs whilst remaining invisible and not having to fight a thing.
  • hocofaisanhocofaisan Posts: 190 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Diminishing returns and defense, xaede.
    POSITIVE ABOUT CO IN 2013!
  • mrf0rz1mrf0rz1 Posts: 556 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    kaizerin wrote: »
    NW is a silly passive unto itself and I'll just refer you to Falchoin's number crunching post. It just has too much good stuff going on.

    Yes yes, and yes. I'm sure nobody would mind a removal of one of these wonderful features. I'd bet either the defense penetration or the charge time discount. Unless if looking to remove Way of the Warrior, Shadow Form, Pestilence, Kinetic Manipulation, ID mastery, Ego Form, Electric Form, Fiery Form, Ice Form, Stormbringer, Unstoppable and Targeting Computer, of course. Cause frankly, not alot of people give a damn about Shadow Strike, it's that little wanna-be-cool bonus you get when you take the wonderful decision to pick Night Warrior over any other offensive passive.

  • championshewolfchampionshewolf Posts: 4,376 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    xaade wrote: »
    Level 30 - R1 passives

    Superstat - DEX 89
    Demistats - EGO 77, INT 66

    Electric Form - 40%
    Ebon Destro - 30%
    Quarry - 32% Phy, 16% non-Phy
    WotW - 51% Phy melee, 37% melee, 20% Phy
    NW - 32% Base, 57% Ranged sneak, 82% Melee sneak, 15% damage resist ignored.

    So ranged is just a little over.
    Melee is significantly higher...

    But, the 25% and 50% are static, and at R3, 50% and 100%.

    So, taking up to level 40, and R3 on passives

    Dex - 171, Ego 111, Int 95

    Electric Form - 62%
    NW - 50%, 100% ranged sneak, 150% melee sneak
    WotW - 80% Phy melee

    Remember, you can't charge attacks while you have aggro and get the bonus damage, because if anything hits you, you get knocked out of stealth.

    The only way to guarantee another stealth attack is to use a tap activate, or use a threat wipe.

    So, shadow strike needs to be a charge...

    Other than that, maybe lower the bonus damage, but I just don't see how it's not fair.

    150 damage bonus if you don't have aggro (or a tap only), 80% damage bonus all the time without any effort.

    So, ultimately, put a 10 second cooldown on sneak, and a 1 second charge time on shadow strike, and call it a day.

    BTW, exiting sneak is supposed to put a 15 second cooldown on the power. That bug is hurting the balance a little.

    Well, it's obvious you don't even look at your numbers and you still are reaching. And the 15 second cooldown bug on sneak isn't hurting the power at all. Really, quit reaching. Regardless of the cooldown or not this is really OP. Especially since people will have that cut down to abotu 7 seconds thanks to their gear.
    Champions Online player since September of 2008, forumite since February of 2008.
    Silverspar on PRIMUS
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • calapsarcalapsar Posts: 33 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Shadow Strike a potentially deadly attack on this, its damage is so high. You're allowed to sneak up on you - do not be offended that your throat was cut in pvp. However, I want to offer a little bit of a different solution, in order to avoid exploit in pve: remember the Death Ray advantage for Experimental Blaster, which allows you to apply damage equal to target's HP, but does not act on Super Villain and above (including the players, which in my opinion it is necessary to fix) so that Shadow Strike may act on the same principle, but with a modified list of exceptions.
  • somebobsomebob Posts: 982 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    So, uh, can we get a PTS patch, guys?

    It's kinda hard to think about testing anything when my main's DPS power Conflagration is doing 0 damage and costing 0 energy to use.

    Yeah, I know you want us to test the new powers and such, but I couldn't even think of testing the new Alerts (which I see are going Live today totally untested - nice work!) due to this.
    Owner and Lead Moderator for the Primus Database. Post your Hero today!
    Razira's Primus Database Page
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Lowering the nearly nonexistant steath bonuses? Please can we not do that? Lets actually buff sneak and make it good on its own, then seperate it from Night Warrior, infact, rename Night Warrior to something else, remove the penetration, keep everything else, remove Shadow Strike aswell, and perhaps a bit more additive (since penetration was removed, sneak seperated, and shadow strike removed)

    I've decided to quote this, because I'm pushing this idea, It gives us an all damage passive without forcing melee only, or ranged only, to take it for stealth, and brings the passive further inline, in the quote it says removing penetration, but another idea would be to give Offensive passives charge time bonuses and not remove this passive's penetration.
  • keikomystkeikomyst Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Yeah, a true theme-neutral all-around offense passive is great. Hybridize powersets to your heart's content. How about it?
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    somebob wrote: »
    So, uh, can we get a PTS patch, guys?

    It's kinda hard to think about testing anything when my main's DPS power Conflagration is doing 0 damage and costing 0 energy to use.

    Yeah, I know you want us to test the new powers and such, but I couldn't even think of testing the new Alerts (which I see are going Live today totally untested - nice work!) due to this.

    It's likely to happen either today or tomorrow, as they pushed out the rest of the stuff today to LIVE.
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • theapygoostheapygoos Posts: 384 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    i hope the crash on character select screen bug didnt touch live..
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    theapygoos wrote: »
    i hope the crash on character select screen bug didnt touch live..

    I hope so too. But they were actively investigating it so it's very possible that they caught it in time.
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • blademaster5121blademaster5121 Posts: 956 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    keikomyst wrote: »
    Yeah, a true theme-neutral all-around offense passive is great. Hybridize powersets to your heart's content. How about it?

    Exactly, and its what many people have been hoping for, but forcing it to be the stealth passive is becoming an issue.
  • dagconfaraday#1221 dagconfaraday Posts: 89 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Exactly, and its what many people have been hoping for, but forcing it to be the stealth passive is becoming an issue.

    That can be applied to the concept for stealth we're presented with on the PTS in general that it all feels "forced" and not natural.
    _____________

    The guy who formally posted as @Sky_Commander. Now posts as: "劫"
  • raediyaraediya Posts: 38 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Test: Melee Damage (Dragon's Claws) Way of the Warrior vs. Night Warrior

    The goal of this test is to compare the passive benefits of Night Warrior versus that of Way of the Warrior in regards to damage. This is by no means a comprehensive test. The target of this test, Kigatilik, is an immobile entity without knockback attacks. Damage will vary against a different target with significant random damage or an abundance of knockbacks (Gravitar). Damage will also be modified by the target's resistance. Both charge and tap damage is tested because of Night Warrior's charge speed bonus.

    Since the test is solely a damage test, ability to tank is ignored, and a healer provides the necessary survivability. While the build has sufficient available slots to add enough survivability to survive, having a healer allows the test to ignore a source of variability.

    Each test is parsed for about 1 million of Kigatilik's health, continuous chaining of charged Dragon's Claws or tapping Dragon's Claw in each test.

    Significant Powers:
    Energy Builder: Rain of Steel
    Attack: Dragon's Claws
    Circle of Arcane Power (tap test)
    Form of the Tiger (charge test)
    Form of the Tempest (tap test)

    This test ignores using any Active Offenses, Active Defenses, On-Next-Hit powers. Night Warrior's Sneak and Shadow Strike are also not used.

    Constrained Variables:
    Role: Melee Damage
    Strength: 63
    Dexterity: 524
    Constitution: 18
    Intelligence: 194
    Ego, Presence, Recovery, Endurance: 10
    Offense: 313.6
    Critical Chance: 48.6%
    Critical Severity: 109.4%

    Passives:
    Way of the Warrior: +118% Physical Melee and Bleed Damage, +97% other Melee Damage, +51% other Physical Damage, +103 Dodge Chance, +103 Avoidance, +54 Energy on target dodge.
    Night Warrior: +81% Damage, 15% Damage Penetration, +31% Charge Speed, +52 Dodge Chance, +52 Avoidance.

    Dragon's Claws Damage (tooltip):

    Way of the Warrior + 8 Focus: 2047-4364 Charge: 0.83s
    Night Warrior + 8 Focus: 1975-4212 Charge: 0.63s

    Results:

    WotW Tap DC: DPS: 3837.0 Damage: 1008361.7 Time: 262.1
    WotW Charge DC: DPS: 4222.9 Damage: 994921.6 Time: 235.6
    NW Tap DC: DPS: 4444.3 Damage: 1002191.6 Time: 225.5
    NW Charge DC: DPS: 5739.3 Damage: 996351.9 Time: 173.6

    Screenshots:
    Way of the Warrior Setup
    Way of the Warrior DPS
    Night Warrior Setup
    Night Warrior DPS

    Thanks to @Sashamari for providing the role of healer.
Sign In or Register to comment.