Maybe so, but look how much new info you just dropped in 1 sentence: That definitely should have been in the article. And even though she has a word limit, new info > rehashed old info.
The dev team has such a ridiculous double standard. One minute they'll tell us they dont want to talk about long term plans because things change, then the next they'll talk about FE's coming back a year from now. Yeah, whatever. I'll believe it when I see it. Until then its just hot hair :rolleyes:
Wow, really? Thats it? This is probably the biggest event STO has ever been a part of, and absolutely nothing new? No big announcements? Thats just sad :(
Wow, really? Thats it? This is probably the biggest event STO has ever been a part of, and absolutely nothing new? No big announcements? Thats just sad :(
You are responding to things no one even said(aka a "straw man" argument). No one said ANYTHING about 'they should have fixed every single bug before it went live'. Some bugs will always make it live, and that is just the reality of programming. But that isnt the point here. The point is that the foundry was ALREADY down…
That same statement *should* apply to all of the devs except the upper management. But he said: So unless he was only referring to Dan and Jack, it sounds like he is giving other team members more decision making power than they really have.
Are you designing this game for yourselves or for the players? If the former, then please let us know now so we can stop wasting time making requests. But if the latter, then what the players want should be more important than whether you or someone else on the team may personally want customizable transporters. If that is…
What is the ETA on this? Today? Tomorrow? Next week? Not asking for an exact time, just an estimate. Surely the team must have some idea of how severe an issue this is.
Tumberboy's post is just a typical example of the contradictory logic the dev team uses. Whenever *they* want to do something that doesnt technically make sense, they come up with a lame excuse about a group of engineers wanting to build a replica of an NX or people getting to choose their own uniforms in STO's time…
I guess there should be a T5 NX in the fleet store then. If you can kill Neghvar's in an NX at T1 they why shouldnt you be able to do the same at T5? I saw no insult. Maybe you do not understand what that word means.
If they ever actually add Romulans to the game, I'll create you a poll with them as an option. But it looks to me like this poll is about the factions that actually exist, not the ones that dont.
They dont. The people who post on the forums are a very small minority of the playerbase(I'm guessing 10% or less), so you have absolutely no idea what the other 90% think.
Dont worry, you have every right to be wrong if you want to. I dont actually care whether you believe it or not, I'm just explaining it for the benefit if anyone reading who might be misled by your posts :)
Whether you agree or not has nothing to do with how I sleep at night, I'm just telling you what happened. Maybe it is, but we dont get to decide the story, they do. They've even gone so far as to recently say that the new comic series that takes place between the movies is canon:…
Nope, he's right on the money. Picard wasnt really flying through time, Q was just playing with him. It was nothing more than a Q version of a holodeck.
Thats fine, because like I said: the game's story says there are holo-emmiters that can make your ship look like another one(even one from another faction). So it shouldnt be hard for you to roleplay that any connies you see are also holo-emmiters.
No offense, but I dont really CARE about your immersion. You can play your character however you want and its none of my business. Likewise, I can play my character however I want and its none of your business. But lets just say you are a roleplayer that gets their panties in a wad about immersion. If you see a connie…
Its not your answer I care about, its theirs. The fact is the excalibur isnt the same ship as the connie, and your personal opinion about it looking too similar means nothing.
Dude, seriously? Why wasnt it ALWAYS a priority to use identical testing procedures? Its like you dont even care about getting it right until it breaks and you look bad. Then all of a sudden its a priority to do it right next time.
They should have actually done what they were supposed to do in the first place, which is make sure the content they are releasing onto the live server works. Of course, it goes without saying that there will always be bugs that slip through, so dont think I'm talking about some perfect bug free release. But breaking an…