test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Galactic News Network [PC]

R&D Pack Promotion Ship Stats

pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
edited August 2016 in Galactic News Network [PC]
The stats are in for the new old new 23rd Century T6 Starships!

You can see the stats for the Temporal Light Cruiser, D7 Temporal Battlecruiser, and T'liss Temporal Warbird here!

~Morrigan "LaughingTrendy"
Post edited by pwlaughingtrendy on
«134

Comments

  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    I think I speak for the entire STO playerbase when I say this was a great move by PWE/Cryptic.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • sgtfloydpepper#7911 sgtfloydpepper
    sgtfloydpepper#7911
         Member Posts: 1,111 Arc User
    You linked to the promotion page. >_>
    1xe027q.png
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    Trendy is just being an Agent of Yesterday by posting yesterday's page.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • l3ct3rl3ct3r Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    Only a matter of time for dual Cmndr. seating. ^^
  • orion0029orion0029 Member Posts: 1,122 Bug Hunter
    iconians wrote: »
    I think I speak for the entire STO playerbase when I say this was a great move by PWE/Cryptic.​​

    Sarcasm?

    Lol, I'm finding it kinda funny that these 23rd century remakes put my 25th century ships to shame.




    To: Starfleet Corps of Engineers
    Re: Modern Ship Designs

    You have failed in your mission.

    That is all.

    Orion
  • alexraptorralexraptorr Member Posts: 1,192 Arc User
    Great.... not only do you lock away the ships from the majority of the playerbase, they are also OP as hell.
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid." - Q
  • cryptkeeper0cryptkeeper0 Member Posts: 989 Arc User
    Not surprising in the least. Have fun ruining trust of some players, this doesn't make it any better.
  • cuchulainn74cuchulainn74 Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    Is there another ship with 3xLtCmdr seating? I can't think of one.
    Fleet Admiral CuChulainn - U.S.S. Aegis KT Intel Dreadnought Cruiser
    vGdvFsX.jpg


  • alexraptorralexraptorr Member Posts: 1,192 Arc User
    cryptkeeper0 wrote: »
    Not surprising in the least. Have fun ruining trust of some players, this doesn't make it any better.

    If only this forum had a like or +1 button.
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid." - Q
  • qbecks7qbecks7 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    Another peak of idiocy. Didn't think that was possible so short after yesterdays announcement, but congrats Cryptic, you managed it.
    200 years outdated, small, weak ships now seem better than 25th, 26th and even 31st century ships.
    I hope somebody will gift the TRIBBLE who thought of this promo, but especially of the ship's stats, a new brain since theirs seems not to be working. Or the $-signs in their eyes just drown every logical thought.
    Sad...
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    The "Built to Last" trait seems kind of lackluster when compared to all the various damage buff starship traits that are now available.

    The Corbomite Maneuver seems kind of "meh" in a game where things tend to die within 3 seconds of opening fire.

    The Molecular Deconstruction beam is something I played with on my Paladin, and honestly it was nothing to write home about.

    The Kelvin Timeline ships seem to offer more bang for their buck with their versatility.

    I think the only thing these ships have going for them is the additional forward weapon slots, but over all they seem outclassed by better ships.

    Still, I guess for the people who want their T6 Connie, yay?​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
    lowestlvl wrote: »
    you linked the promo trendy
    Yeah. Sorry about that, updated now!
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    Wow the Boff setups are incredible. Missing those cruiser commands though.
    Youtube:
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCJZ5FBJ9bFaZ6yAFiNpZiRQ/featured?view_as=subscriber
    Twitter:
    https://twitter.com/CaptainCidStorm
  • cuchulainn74cuchulainn74 Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    alexraptorr wrote: »
    Great.... not only do you lock away the ships from the majority of the playerbase, they are also OP as hell.

    It's funny, I don't think they look particularly OP. The 3xLtCmdr is intriguing, but there are drawbacks to having only four Boffs compared to 5 or 6. Nothing else looks especially OP. It looks well built. Different, not better.
    Fleet Admiral CuChulainn - U.S.S. Aegis KT Intel Dreadnought Cruiser
    vGdvFsX.jpg


  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,485 Arc User
    It's pretty much what could be expected. No surprises.
    Combonite is a bit cheesy, but then again the whole of TOS is cheese.

    It was interesting to see, but no sale ( no R&D sale to gain access to them) for me.
    Especially the TOS style ship design rubs me the wrong way.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    I stopped believing in the fairy tale that CBS doesn't allow an endgame Constitution when the reply to "At least give us a T5 Excalibur/Vesper/Exeter!" was "CBS doesn't allow an endgame Constitution." Yes, Cryptic has been lying the whole time. Unfortunately they lied so long that my Federation Klingon was forced to get a Defiant-like ship with a battle cloak. So yeah, unless you offer a Constitution-class with the Romulan battle cloak from "The Enterprise Incident" I'm not interested. Too little, too late." I'm sure you'll still find plenty of people who will pay for it, but I'm not one of them.
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • jonathanlonehawkjonathanlonehawk Member Posts: 674 Arc User
    Whelp -- Looks like I'll be trying to get at least 2 of these ships, if not all three... damn it. I also need to change my sig. The stats are great, But I really wish they ALL had intel as the secondary spec. Command and Pilot without the innate mechanics are kind of lackluster. Not gonna stop me from getting them of course.
    Formerly Known as Protector from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    STOSIG.png
    Please enable us to buy a token with Zen to faction change a 25th Century FED to a TOS FED.
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    T7 ships incoming!
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    sunfrancks wrote: »
    T7 ships incoming!

    Honestly, that is the only thing that could possibly one-up the troll factor at this point. Of course now that I've said that, I fully anticipate it to be worse.​​
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    iconians wrote: »
    sunfrancks wrote: »
    T7 ships incoming!

    Honestly, that is the only thing that could possibly one-up the troll factor at this point. Of course now that I've said that, I fully anticipate it to be worse.​​

    You keep making it easy for them... ;)
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • nikolunusnikolunus Member Posts: 162 Arc User
    I think the Romulans are getting the short end of the stick on this one. Less fire power, much less hull, less shields. She turns better yes, at least she has that. Over all though i have nothing left in the coffers to even try to get her. Good luck to everyone going after these may you get them within the first 4 trys.
    Space is vast, it's wonderful and maddening. Yet in that madness is some of the greatest beauty I have ever seen.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    Hmm. The first Triple Lt.Cmdr ship and the first ships with the ability to slot 7 spec abilities. Nice example of power creep, I think - slightly better then what we had before, but not so much that people start crying murder.

    Well, except the people that always cry murder.
    assimilatedktar wrote: »
    I stopped believing in the fairy tale that CBS doesn't allow an endgame Constitution when the reply to "At least give us a T5 Excalibur/Vesper/Exeter!" was "CBS doesn't allow an endgame Constitution." Yes, Cryptic has been lying the whole time.
    No. Things just changed. That was always a possibility. It seems likely (but I think still mostly speculation and we are probably never getting a clear official answer on that) is that the "No-Endgame-Connie" restriction was put in place for the new Star Trek Timeline that was launched around the same time as STO - to avoid any "confusion" or whatever marketing speak they use, only the Konnie was to be relevant, and Cryptic did not get rights to the new Konnie yet. But this has now, finally, for the 50 year anniversary of Star Trek and with the release of the 3rd movie in the Kelvin Timeline, changed.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    The Corbomite Maneuver might be useful in the type of queues where you have interact objectives that can be interrupted by enemy fire, like that Expanse Queue whose name I forgot.
    nikolunus wrote: »
    I think the Romulans are getting the short end of the stick on this one. Less fire power, much less hull, less shields. She turns better yes, at least she has that. Over all though i have nothing left in the coffers to even try to get her. Good luck to everyone going after these may you get them within the first 4 trys.
    Enhanced Battle Cloak. Singularity Powers. That's the package that all Romulan ships get, and they pay for it with blood, err, I mean hull and shields. And of course it's an Escort Type Warbird, so like most Escorts it has only 7 weapon slots.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • scarlingscarling Member Posts: 708 Arc User
    lol this is the most unreal troll I've ever seen. Glad I don't like boxy, out of date, 60's tos designs or I'd be out a ton of money.
  • djf021djf021 Member Posts: 1,382 Arc User
    cuchulainn74 wrote: »
    Is there another ship with 3xLtCmdr seating? I can't think of one.

    Unless I misread it, it's actually 4x LtCmdr seating, with the ability to slot a full 5 Level III abilities. Freakin amazing!
    C4117709-1498929112732780large.jpg

    Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship, because while you're there... you can make a difference.
    -Captain James T. Kirk
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    LOL... WOOT... "Corbomite Maneuver"

    However.. those seating spots... 1 Commander and 3 Lt Commander?

    AT first I was thinking if I got lucky and one would drop, that I would sell it... Now I'm not so sure... my AoY Tac may yet get the T6 TOS Connie (refit skin)...

    *Runs off to start working on his head canon for how a Refit Connie was brought out of mothballs and refit with current tech...*
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,485 Arc User
    nikolunus wrote: »
    I think the Romulans are getting the short end of the stick on this one. Less fire power, much less hull, less shields. She turns better yes, at least she has that. Over all though i have nothing left in the coffers to even try to get her. Good luck to everyone going after these may you get them within the first 4 trys.

    Enhanced Battle Cloak. The T5U T'varo is already a lethal stealth bomber. The T6 malem tops that with the pilot seating and this temporal warbird takes it to the next level with the temporal and pilot combo.

    The only thing which the romulans can grind their teeth about is the 23c look.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • breadandcircusesbreadandcircuses Member Posts: 2,355 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    djf021 wrote: »
    cuchulainn74 wrote: »
    Is there another ship with 3xLtCmdr seating? I can't think of one.

    Unless I misread it, it's actually 4x LtCmdr seating, with the ability to slot a full 5 Level III abilities. Freakin amazing!

    You misread; they're T6, so they have 13 BOff abilities (in this case 1 seat x 4 from Cmdr + 3 seats x 3 from LtCmdr).
    Ym9x9Ji.png
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    I do not like Geko ether.
    iconians wrote: »
    With each passing day I wonder if I stepped into an alternate reality. The Cubs win the world series. Donald Trump is President. Britain leaves the EU. STO gets a dedicated PvP season. Engineers are "out of control" in STO.​​
  • arakim5arakim5 Member Posts: 82 Arc User
    edited August 2016
    What's the drop rate? $300.00 for another ship, even a T6 Connie... I don't know.
Sign In or Register to comment.