test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Design Your Ship Round 1 [Alpha VS Beta]

1235717

Comments

  • vegeta50024vegeta50024 Member Posts: 2,336 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    c'mon People have a look at that Private Design that i linked on the Previous site ( and the Escort that could be a new Frigatte Pet for it or even later a new Playable Escort) there is more than Just Alpha and Beta! If there is enough Support they may think about it!

    Except that Cryptic wouldn't be able to use those designs.

    TSC_Signature_Gen_4_-_Vegeta_Small.png
  • mike5ivemike5ive Member Posts: 17 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
  • velquavelqua Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    I vote Beta so that it could lose to Sigma. lol
    18662390068_f716cd60e3.jpg
  • highlandrisehighlandrise Member Posts: 354 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    c'mon People have a look at that Private Design that i linked on the Previous site ( and the Escort that could be a new Frigatte Pet for it or even later a new Playable Escort) there is more than Just Alpha and Beta! If there is enough Support they may think about it!

    Except that Cryptic wouldn't be able to use those designs.

    they can contact the Designer, i mentioned the site and his name and i cant imagine why he should have anything against his Design being used in STO, HELL i will Contact him Personaly and ask him, maybe even encourage him to Post his Ship here himself! Lets be honest, that Private Design look SMEXY as hell and way better than those Schematics, it would be AWESOME if they would use this Design (and maybe that Escort Desin for a New Frigatte Pet for it).

    The More People here show their Support, the more it is likely to be happen so:

    Here is MY Vote:

    I Vote for THIS:

    torquemada_final_version_by_tomxaros-d4x5au1.png

    and i also Vote for THIS as a New Frigatte Pet for it:

    uss_hammer___sketch_by_donmeiklejohn.jpg

    uss_hammer___warp_configuration_by_donmeiklejohn-d6x2y78.jpg

    if ANYONE likes those Designs, than SHOW your Support please!
  • musmon1musmon1 Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    #TeamAlfa
    Alfa the best!
  • dralthcaandralthcaan Member Posts: 27 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    #TeamAlpha
  • mulgannon2mulgannon2 Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    I vote none of these. I think they are just too ugly and!!! "Should be hauled away, as garbage!"
  • theclouduxthecloudux Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Alpha. Beta's saucer is just to much even though the nacelles on Alpha seem odd.
  • xylylxylyl Member Posts: 45 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    My vote is for #TeamAlpha
    Thus spake Admiral Cybyl:  Alea iacta est. Ibis redibis,numquam per bello peribis. Ergo, per aspera ad astra!
  • This content has been removed.
  • sorcapprenticesorcapprentice Member Posts: 38 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    #TeamBeta
    Alpha, I like the nacelle arrangement.

    I like the Alpha nacelles better also. But when I saw what looked at the six eight doors on top of Beta's saucer I could just imagine all of the fighters streaming out at once...
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    #TeamAlpha
    It wasn't easy to decide. Beta looks like it would be able to carry more pets and it seems to have more room for an hangar deck, but at the same time the ship looks powerful enough to the point it shouldn't need any hangar pets.

    So I went with Alpha.
  • nx01dave#2438 nx01dave Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    #TeamAlpha

    If I had to pick one over the other then Alpha. saucer on beta Dosn't look right. Looks like a Mushroom.
  • keletteskelettes Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    #TeamBeta
    Oh O.o

    I thought that every ship would be participating in a single voting. So wer're doing it tournament-style, huh.

    Okay then, on this round, my bet's on Beta!

    Now to get myself a new shippie :smile:
    (ship sale at the time of writing)
    Post edited by kelettes on
    "Ad astra audacter eamus in alis fidelium."
    -
    "To boldly go to the stars on the wings of the faithful."
  • wakeoflovewakeoflove Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    grimjax69 wrote: »
    Man, I'm usually against any new Fed ships before getting more KDF and Romulan, but I'll agee that the Fed side has been lacking in decent carriers. I love the Atrox look but can't stand the layout.

    I suspect the creation of a true fed carrier will be deployed along side a KDF t6 update of the voquv, could be wrong, but since the devs have been seeming to deploy a "basically the same ship with same trait" for each faction as of late, I'm thinking the devs might be wanting to give feds a proper fed carrier to mirror the voquv so they can both launch the the same trait. Perhaps then the atrox and karfi will show up side by side with similar traits as well... or perhaps I have the match ups backwards and it will be atrox/voquv and whatever the fed carrier ends up being/karfi.
    NebulaOdyssey1_zpsqjc6anjg.jpg
    The Nebula-configured Odyssey needs to be a thing.
  • revydarkphoenixrevydarkphoenix Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    I choose Alpha; between the two ships, Alpha looks far better.
  • comandermattcomandermatt Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Alpha Hull, Beta nacells
  • giliongilion Member Posts: 686 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    I know its supposed to be a carrier, but even so I think Beta looks too fat, so Alpha it is :)
    _____________________________________________________
    Anyone want to give me a Temporal Heavy Dreadnought pack? I'll be your friend :D
  • maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    It's with dismay that I note that it's looking more and more like Cryptic is going to do yet another end run around fixing the damn Galaxy X. I chose the Beta, I like it's lines and is a welcome departure from the lately overdone arrowhead shape. Some the others look more like Prometheus variants and those with vastly different sized warp engines just look odd to me.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • klingonwerewolfklingonwerewolf Member Posts: 44 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    Beta looks far more like a true Federation ship (remeniscent of the Galaxy Class) and would look far better than Alpha as a large vessel. Alpha looks too much like some sort of escort.
  • wakeoflovewakeoflove Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    gulberat wrote: »
    goodscotch wrote: »
    I think a quad nacelle set up would be in order for a large carrier vessel.

    This is kind of what I was thinking: this ship might well need the extra power to avoid being a total sitting duck on the battlefield. If this design were chosen, or another powerful-looking four-nacelle design, I would insist on increased turn rate compared to (for example) the Obelisk.

    You do realize that the warp nacelles are just dead weight at sublight speeds, right? So four nacelles are more likely to hamper sublight, i.e. combat/turn speeds and they do not provide power, just warp propulsion, power is generated by the warp core, so having two more nacelles strapped on just gives redundancy for warp drive, which isn't really a consideration in this game as it's not a simulation.
    NebulaOdyssey1_zpsqjc6anjg.jpg
    The Nebula-configured Odyssey needs to be a thing.
  • hiphahipha Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    #TeamBeta
    I like Beta it leaves room for a bay to be added . a nice battle cruiser with a bay. it be something def-rent
  • captainchaos66captainchaos66 Member Posts: 409 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    I love most 4 nacelle ships,, but the saucer on Alpha is a killer for me. I would like the next ship to have a more rounded saucer like the Galaxy. The Chevron saucer just doesn't do it for me anymore.
    ***************************
    Fleet Admiral In charge of Bacon
    Fighting 5th Attack Squadron
    The Devils Henchman
  • ascaladarascaladar Member Posts: 186 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    I was hoping we would be able to vote on a little more then just a few selections Saucers/Hulls/Nacelles.

    Bridge Officer layouts, console slots are just as important. I fear the same guy who recently gimped Alita, Resolute and Hestia will also work on the slots of this ship and make it useless.
  • highlandrisehighlandrise Member Posts: 354 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    ascaladar wrote: »
    I was hoping we would be able to vote on a little more then just a few selections Saucers/Hulls/Nacelles.

    Bridge Officer layouts, console slots are just as important. I fear the same guy who recently gimped Alita, Resolute and Hestia will also work on the slots of this ship and make it useless.

    If that should happen.....than they can keep that carrier, Hestia and Resolute are very Sad examples of how to RUIN Ships BADLY.
  • winteranestiwinteranesti Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    I like beta
  • aliensamongusaliensamongus Member Posts: 285 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    Going for Beta, it looks different than the rest, so it'll stand out. I also like it because it's bulky, and carriers should look hefty.
    giphy.gif
  • wakeoflovewakeoflove Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    maxvitor wrote: »
    It's with dismay that I note that it's looking more and more like Cryptic is going to do yet another end run around fixing the damn Galaxy X. I chose the Beta, I like it's lines and is a welcome departure from the lately overdone arrowhead shape. Some the others look more like Prometheus variants and those with vastly different sized warp engines just look odd to me.

    I have heard tale that a t6 galaxy-x is inbound, I think it might serve as mirror leeta's flagship in the upcoming stf or something, not sure, but I bet when it arrives the proper, "remastered" gal-x skin will make an appearance as well.
    NebulaOdyssey1_zpsqjc6anjg.jpg
    The Nebula-configured Odyssey needs to be a thing.
  • uthergreenshirtuthergreenshirt Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    #TeamBeta
    DELTADELTADELTA! B) its got to be ROUND!
This discussion has been closed.