Design Your Ship Round 1 [Alpha VS Beta]

hunterkiller64

#TeamAlpha

team alpha looks more tactical

jam3s1701

#TeamBeta

Tbh it's beta mainly down to the fact bar two ships the trek look is two engines and having four bothers me lol

tymersto

#TeamAlpha

While I like Beta's nacelle style, That's the only thing I liked.
I voted Alpha.

Now if the Beta nacelles could be reworked onto the Alpha, then it might be a better design...

Thank you for the time...

mayito2009

#TeamBeta

I like Beta I demand a recount!!!

gulberat

#TeamAlpha

smokeybacon90 wrote: »

Alpha, I like the nacelle arrangement.

Agreed, I'm a sucker for those "mean" lines on the nacelles. It even reminds me of a Polaris-class variant I used to fly (Reconnaissance Science Vessel).

mayito2009

#TeamBeta

People you need to remember you are voting for a CARRIER, must have room for stuff.

shermanttank

#TeamBeta

Beta is the way to go, solid nacelle and pylon arrangement, and the body looks like it's ment to haul fighters.
Alpha just looks like a over large saucer with some nacelles strapped on.

rodneyp803

I just want a romulan science based carrier.

mayito2009

#TeamBeta

Now that is a ship!!!! ^

nrobbiec

#TeamBeta

Beta, I like the unique saucer and the way it looks almost like a cruiser version of the Luna class, like the way the Battlecruiser is a big Prommie.

goodscotch

#TeamAlpha

I think a quad nacelle set up would be in order for a large carrier vessel.

mrspidey2

#TeamBeta

After all those delta shapes lately, it's time for an actual saucer again.
So, Beta it is.

jonathanlonehawk

#TeamBeta

Beta in this round, I'm not a fan of more than 2 nacelle ships.

warpangel

#TeamAlpha

Beta has a nice side-view but that saucer makes it look fat on the top-view. Alpha wins.

gulberat

#TeamAlpha

goodscotch wrote: »

I think a quad nacelle set up would be in order for a large carrier vessel.

This is kind of what I was thinking: this ship might well need the extra power to avoid being a total sitting duck on the battlefield. If this design were chosen, or another powerful-looking four-nacelle design, I would insist on increased turn rate compared to (for example) the Obelisk.

markhawkman

#TeamBeta

Yeah, of those two, Beta. I like the wide shape.

terranux

#TeamBeta

Time to try something new, Beta is best!

bawdytiefling

#TeamBeta

This was difficult. I like the axial view of Alpha better, but the Saggital profile for Beta is better. I think the Saggital profile has more of a visual impact, so I'm voting Beta.

tinkerstorm

#TeamBeta

Beta obviously, because the new Federation carrier should look as hideous as the Federation command cruisers.

ussboleyn

#TeamBeta

Think Beta looks a little better

superfort29

#TeamBeta

The Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical Manual (pages 63, 65, and 66) states that the experiments with single and more than two nacelle designs, conducted in 2269, proved that having two nacelles was the optimal configuration for vessel control and power generation.

Gonna have to go with the Beta.

astrorobla

#TeamBeta

All for the classically adapted saucer of Beta, plus the double-armed pod mount connecting to the nacelles is cool

salacnar070890

#TeamAlpha

TeamAlpha hands down​​

geekyguide

#TeamBeta

I'm still more for Beta - I feel like we have too many ships that share Alpha's profile as it stands.

xenosisuk

#TeamAlpha

#TeamAlpha
I like the 4 nacelle and Delta shaped saucer.

bensacatlover

#TeamBeta

#teambeta

guljarol

#TeamAlpha

Alpha, without hesitation!​​

groomofweird

#TeamBeta

Love the wide saucer on the Beta, nice to bring something a tad more traditional than more recent pointy stuff.

magneticmoose

#TeamBeta

I voted Beta, but personally I really don't care for that Saucer Section. Everything else (ie nacelles, apparent hull layout, and what appears to be a roll-bar) looks great for a carrier.