test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Tier 6 Resolute Adv. Heavy Cruiser

135

Comments

  • nominative99nominative99 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    I can't see anything that strikes me as appealing. It looks like another Command Ship Variant. At least we can change it to the Original/Retrofit configuration.

    I wonder if Cryptic will touch up the old Excelsior models to include the fins that were near the rear of the saucer.
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    Too much of the command cruiser vibe. Okay, I'm about through with 2410 designs Cryptic

    Bring on 2411.
  • eradicator84eradicator84 Member Posts: 1,116 Arc User
    I'm glad I gave up on Fed stuff a while ago. Fed cruiser designs have effectively stalled.

    Emissary and Nomad class Star Cruiser hulls need to have a T6 facelift, those were sleek and sexy.
    eqqus wrote: »
    Is it just me or are the new traits limited to 3 Km .... I mean come on guys
    ...
    at what point will you really be within 3 Km of a enemy
    Read it carefully, it's 3km of your TARGET, not 3km from yourself. In other words it's like Kemocite laced weapons skill in that it has a small AoE from target.
    AFMJGUR.jpg
  • f9thretxcf9thretxc Member Posts: 505 Arc User
    I wish you could see her from additional angles. There is no denying she's an Excelsior when you see her nose-on.

    I'll be the first to say, I'm looking forward to this one big time. Just grabbed the new Avenger, and love it, but the Excelsior has always been my favorite ship. Next to the Connie of course.

    I'll wait to see how it looks in game of course, as I tend to mix and match parts anyways.

    ​​
    My mother always told me to walk away from a fight, The Marines taught me how.
  • oldkhemaraaoldkhemaraa Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    Yep, I happen to think she's a beauty. If her stats are what I think they're going to be like she going to be every bit as rock solid in a fight as her predecessors. THAT looks like a federation battlecruiser.
    "I aim to misbehave" - Malcolm Reynolds
  • admiralbarrettadmiralbarrett Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    What difference does a new cruiser make when the end-game FRIGATES can tank better than a player's cruiser? One Vaadwaur shield-rip and it is frag-bait like everything else. :/

    How about re-balancing space combat?
  • psiameesepsiameese Member Posts: 1,650 Arc User
    This may be something that benefits from customization. Resolute with Excelsior saucer for those who dislike the 25th century arrowhead hulls?
    (/\) Exploring Star Trek Online Since July 2008 (/\)
  • khamseenairkhamseenair Member Posts: 2,640 Bug Hunter
    genhauk wrote: »
    genhauk wrote: »
    Here's the second view they posted on twitter.



    Does look more like an Excelsior from that angle right enough. Though I don't get why all the saucer sections have to be elongated of late, what's wrong with a classic round shape? My friend will love this though, solely so he can use his standard Excelsior skin on a T6 ship lol.

    Regarding the saucer, I'm gonna wait til it comes out. I can always put the original saucer on it and kitbash a "refit" for myself. :)


    Yeah I'd be curious to see how that would look. The nacelles and the primary hull on this new one look pretty good, I'm just feeling nostalgic for the more circular saucer.
    ​​
    Join date is wrong, I've actually been around since STO Beta.
    True alters don't have a "main". Account wide unlocks for all unique event rewards!!
  • bunansabunansa Member Posts: 928 Arc User
    Who the hell was asking for this? How much you want to bet this makes a 125-year-old frakking museum piece a better ship than the GCS again?

    Oh, and it's ugly as sin. I'm not touching it with a ten-parsec pole.

    I am sure people asked for it somewhere...
    And its not making a 125 year old ship better, its an updated version of that 125 year old ship...you know like how dodge came out with a new challenger.... its not the same one, its just a newer one...

    Also don't forget the blog clearly states, we can use any other heavy cruiser skin variant on it...doesn't have to be the t6 one...

    There is a few other ships I was betting on seeing before this one...surprisingly...the old joke isn't happening anymore with this girl....

    Tuesday passed and were getting 10.5 Thursday instead....
    tumblr_ndmkqm59J31r5ynioo2_r2_500.gif

  • kittyflofykittyflofy Member Posts: 1,004 Arc User
    I will do what i always do. I will wait until i start seeing dozens of em in system space. Then, you will know.
  • kylelockekylelocke Member Posts: 182 Arc User
    I thought that the Command Cruiser was the attempt to make a T6 Excelsior, guess I was wrong. Can we get some Fore, Side and Top view images? Because from what I can see, it looks more like an attempt to make a T6 Constituition by looking at the pylons and what I can see of the primary hull, even the nacelles look more like they were styled after those used on the Constituition refit.
    "I will make the Orion Syndicate face the light of justice or burn them with it." - Captainl Kyle Nathaniel Locke, U.S.S. Excalibur NCC-98105-C
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    I will wait until I see more of this ship. Hope it looks better than the last batch. They all was really horrible.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • skyecolyoskyecolyo Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    IM NOT SEEING A BIRD OF PREY >:(
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    Will You PLEASE stop with the damn Triangle Primary Hulls!!!!!
    GO back to using the more rounded ones, these look absolutely horrible in my opinion.
    Why the hell do Ya have to mess with a classic shape that has always worked just fine???
    :/
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • highlord83highlord83 Member Posts: 229 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    I have to say that I'm extremely underwhelmed. So many different direction they could have gone with "25th century Excelsior" and they settle for a kitbash of existing components. It's ugly, and not in a good way. On top of that, it's uninspired and has no equivalents in the Klingon or Rihan fleets.

    In all honestly, I'd like to see some more Federation vessels in the compact blocky vein like the Avenger. Ships that simply have the look of tough, frontline vessels designed during a time of war. Maybe some Rihan designs that have them trying out some Fdderation design features for greater efficiency with the Feds creating a sleek and no-nonsense multirole ship like higher-end warbirds while the Klingons roll out some awe-inspiring warship to remind us all why the Empire is a force worthy of both respect and fear.

    Mix up the design features. The alliance of powers brings an unprecedented level of cooperation and brainstorming between the three main powers. Lets see that reflected.
    "So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again."
    -Dedication plaque of the Federation Starship U.S.S. Merkava
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    daveyny wrote: »
    Will You PLEASE stop with the damn Triangle Primary Hulls!!!!!
    GO back to using the more rounded ones, these look absolutely horrible in my opinion.
    Why the hell do Ya have to mess with a classic shape that has always worked just fine???
    :/

    It's 2410 damnit! Triangle hulls are IN!

    I wouldn't be surprised if the T6 Prometheus had a circular hull. :D

  • captaincelestialcaptaincelestial Member Posts: 1,925 Arc User
    I am most pleased that the Excelsior is getting a 2410 update. I am hoping that the Advanced Science Vessel will get some loving too.

    When it comes to kit-bashing, ASV's a Galaxy-Class kit-bash in itself. Would be nice to be able to use the different skins/pieces used for the Galaxy variants to use on a T6 (and hopefully earlier versions) of the Adv. Sci. Vessel. Also, for T6 ASV, it would be very nice to allow it to use the Saucer Separation console.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    hypl wrote: »
    daveyny wrote: »
    Will You PLEASE stop with the damn Triangle Primary Hulls!!!!!
    GO back to using the more rounded ones, these look absolutely horrible in my opinion.
    Why the hell do Ya have to mess with a classic shape that has always worked just fine???
    :/

    It's 2410 damnit! Triangle hulls are IN!

    I wouldn't be surprised if the T6 Prometheus had a circular hull. :D
    There is already an Excelsior with a round saucer. Time for something different.

    Kitbashers can rejoice, and Excelsior lovers will surely be happy with the old design.




    Can we get the nacelles for the Command Cruiser? ;)​​
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • kaggert27kaggert27 Member Posts: 138 Arc User
    genhauk wrote: »
    Here's the second view they posted on twitter.


    I can see a portion of it being Excelsior, but I also see too much Command Cruiser/Regent/Odyssey ships:

    The main issue is the saucer, the problem is the dome under is circular, and the command deck is rounded off so we have two parts that flat out clash visually with the overall shape of the saucer. Expected if they did the Arrowhead shape they would have went more Guardian cruiser rounded off shape over the sharper one they show here. The location of the impulse engines...oh dear...almost all cruisers seem to have them out where they are placed (except the Command ships now...) Would have preferred them more in the center, and wider...stylized thin I guess?

    The Nacelles I can see show some of the actual wrap around of the blue warp coil grill like the Excelsior, but the problem is the gigantic Bussard collectors= Command Cruiser. To the point they kind of break the style of what is behind them. I like the Nacelles overall shape, but I would have liked it to look sort of like the Avenger class (T5) front Nacelle style - only instead of one Bussard collector opening there would be two smaller/thinner ones to match the size of the warp coil line (OR match the T6 Explorer Andromeda Class Bussards) Also their size, they seem shorter than one would think. And they connect in the middle section like...the Connie/some other ships do with the pylons so it kind of looks odd (though the pylons do look good!). I will miss the fins/thruster assemblies...

    The Neck appears to be fine. Though it looks like it slopes down the back like some other ships, this is okay! The secondary hull just looks like it's thicker in the back, this is okay, only thing I'm wondering about is the bulge at the bottom missing that dark/field thingy that most Fed Cruisers have.

    If you are keeping the nacelles and saucer way they are, I request "B" version parts in the future if you will... like the current Advanced Heavy Cruiser line has:

    The secondary Hull gets the Ent-B type thingy on it too, The Engines like I described earlier visually, The saucer though, I would not mind a change: instead of a circle, or arrowhead, go the route of the Exploration/Galaxy/Andromeda variants....only, more extreme to a actual oval if you need the pointy fix, or maybe a Stadium shape? ( dimensional geometric shape constructed of a rectangle with semicircles at a pair of opposite sides.)

    That is all. I'm tired, forgive spelling/grammar at this hour, please.
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    Yep, I happen to think she's a beauty. If her stats are what I think they're going to be like she going to be every bit as rock solid in a fight as her predecessors. THAT looks like a federation battlecruiser.

    They leaked on Tribble:

    Lt Cmdr Tac.
    Cmdr Eng.
    Lt Cmdr Eng.
    Ensign Eng.
    Lt Sci.



    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • dongemaharudongemaharu Member Posts: 544 Arc User
    So a T6, but I can use the the old skin. You've got yourself a deal.

    I don't see a single line in that picture that lends itself to the Excelsior. Bulging nacelles? Yet another arrow-shaped saucer? I'm not seeing any elegance. But hey, smart move letting us choose old skins!
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,468 Arc User
    One of the original selling features was the transwarp drive, is that going to be included in some way?​​
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • albertwesker45albertwesker45 Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    to me this advanced heavy cruiser has been heavily retrofitted to include the latest in state-of-the-art technologies in the sto universe
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    I wish you could see her from additional angles. There is no denying she's an Excelsior when you see her nose-on.​​

    Same thing was said about the bortasqu' :D

    Then again it might be called an excelsior if it looks like voyager and has a tugboat attached to the bottom of it.
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,468 Arc User
    wardcalis wrote: »
    So Romulans get nothing, but feds get anther ship? KDF get screwed too?

    I was wondering how long it would take for someone to complain about romulan and kdf content.. thank you for answering that question.

    Normally i would tell you to google T6 T=varo or T6 Gurumba, but our preview source has removed its content after too many people linked to their site on this forum.​​
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • robertdamonrobertdamon Member Posts: 62 Arc User
    I've been waiting for a 25th century skin and update for the Excelsior for years (and have had 3000 zen stashed away for several months now anticipating a Tier 6 version). Thank you Cryptic, this is much appreciated! :-) (...and to back up Borticus there's another pic of the Resolute on Reddit at the mo, from below, that looks much more Excelsior-like).
  • kylelockekylelocke Member Posts: 182 Arc User
    kaggert27 wrote: »
    genhauk wrote: »
    Here's the second view they posted on twitter.


    I can see a portion of it being Excelsior, but I also see too much Command Cruiser/Regent/Odyssey ships:

    The main issue is the saucer, the problem is the dome under is circular, and the command deck is rounded off so we have two parts that flat out clash visually with the overall shape of the saucer. Expected if they did the Arrowhead shape they would have went more Guardian cruiser rounded off shape over the sharper one they show here. The location of the impulse engines...oh dear...almost all cruisers seem to have them out where they are placed (except the Command ships now...) Would have preferred them more in the center, and wider...stylized thin I guess?

    The Nacelles I can see show some of the actual wrap around of the blue warp coil grill like the Excelsior, but the problem is the gigantic Bussard collectors= Command Cruiser. To the point they kind of break the style of what is behind them. I like the Nacelles overall shape, but I would have liked it to look sort of like the Avenger class (T5) front Nacelle style - only instead of one Bussard collector opening there would be two smaller/thinner ones to match the size of the warp coil line (OR match the T6 Explorer Andromeda Class Bussards) Also their size, they seem shorter than one would think. And they connect in the middle section like...the Connie/some other ships do with the pylons so it kind of looks odd (though the pylons do look good!). I will miss the fins/thruster assemblies...

    The Neck appears to be fine. Though it looks like it slopes down the back like some other ships, this is okay! The secondary hull just looks like it's thicker in the back, this is okay, only thing I'm wondering about is the bulge at the bottom missing that dark/field thingy that most Fed Cruisers have.

    If you are keeping the nacelles and saucer way they are, I request "B" version parts in the future if you will... like the current Advanced Heavy Cruiser line has:

    The secondary Hull gets the Ent-B type thingy on it too, The Engines like I described earlier visually, The saucer though, I would not mind a change: instead of a circle, or arrowhead, go the route of the Exploration/Galaxy/Andromeda variants....only, more extreme to a actual oval if you need the pointy fix, or maybe a Stadium shape? ( dimensional geometric shape constructed of a rectangle with semicircles at a pair of opposite sides.)

    That is all. I'm tired, forgive spelling/grammar at this hour, please.

    The design of the Command Cruisers are more-or-less inspired by the Excelsior-class if you take a closer look at them and the nacelles look like they came from the Constitution refit in terms of design too. I believe that th saucer section should be rounded off, the nacelles from the Odyssey or Sovereign would look better and maybe sweep the pylons backwards
    "I will make the Orion Syndicate face the light of justice or burn them with it." - Captainl Kyle Nathaniel Locke, U.S.S. Excalibur NCC-98105-C
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    So just seen the stats and er pass. . . Ltcmdr tac and 3 eng and 1sci along with command makes this ship for me at least a no buy. .

    boo I was looking forward to getting it too but the stats just not worth my time. . .

    sad panda lol
    JtaDmwW.png
  • horizons2052horizons2052 Member Posts: 184 Arc User
    I am guessing that the quality of the ship is equal to the quality of the advertisement of the ship? As in low quality, like the advertisement of the ship is lacking all the information that is important, so the ship must also be lacking everything that is important? Is that how this works now? Or is the staff just getting lazy? Either way, not good, not good.
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    Cruisers online
    747620.jpg

    Oh please. This game was calls "Escorts Online" last year. A T6 Escort was just released. Seriously?
Sign In or Register to comment.